Seasonal Impact on Grade ≥2 Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Supplementary Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated grade ≥2 dermatitis in patients irradiated for breast cancer. This study evaluated associations between dermatitis and the season during which radiotherapy took place. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Associations between the season and grade ≥2 dermatitis were retrospectively evaluated in 327 breast cancer patients. Seasons were March to May (spring), June to August (summer), September to November (autumn), and December to February (winter). Subgroup analyses were performed considering fractionation, radiation technique, treatment volume, radiation boost, and deep-inspiration breath-hold technique. Furthermore, warmer and cooler months were compared. RESULTS: The season had no significant impact on the rate of grade ≥2 dermatitis in the entire cohort (p=0.63) nor in the subgroup analyses (p-values between 0.17 and 0.82). No significant difference in rate was found between warm and cool months. CONCLUSION: Grade ≥2 dermatitis was not associated with the season during which radiotherapy was performed. This factor may not be important for stratification in prospective trials.

Associations Between Mean Lung Dose and Prevalence of Radiation Pneumonitis in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pneumonitis is a serious radiotherapy complication. This study, which is a prerequisite for a prospective trial, aimed to identify the prevalence of pneumonitis and risk factors in elderly patients with lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight lung cancer patients aged ≥65 years were included. Seventeen factors were investigated regarding grade ≥2 pneumonitis at 24 weeks following radiotherapy. RESULTS: The prevalence of grade ≥2 pneumonitis at 24 weeks was 27.3%. On univariate analysis, a significant association was observed for mean (ipsilateral) lung dose (MLD; ≤13.0 vs. 13.1-20.0 vs. >20.0 Gy; 0% vs. 24.9% vs. 48.7%). Results were significant also for ≤13.0 vs. >13.0 Gy (0% vs. 37.1%) or ≤20.0 vs. >20.0 Gy (13.4% vs. 48.7%). MLD achieved significance on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients receiving MLDs >13.0 Gy, particularly >20.0 Gy, have a high risk of grade ≥2 pneumonitis. These results are important for designing a prospective trial.

Clinically Significant Dermatitis During Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy may experience grade ≥2 dermatitis. In the Interreg-project HeAT, a mobile application (app) reminding patients to perform skin care will be prospectively tested with the goal of decreasing clinically significant radiation dermatitis. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and risk factors, required for designing the prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of 327 patients with breast cancer irradiated during 2022-2023, the prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and 23 potential risk factors were investigated. RESULTS: The prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis was 31.2%. On multivariate analysis, it was significantly associated with chronic inflammatory disease (p=0.001), significant cardiovascular disease (p<0.001), smoking history >10 pack years (p<0.001), advanced T-stage (p=0.017), normo-fractionation (p<0.001), and radiation boost (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of grade ≥2 dermatitis and independent risk factors during adjuvant radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer were identified that contribute to improved patient care and the design of a prospective trial.

Emotional Distress Prior to Chemoradiation for Rectal or Anal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anticipation of chemoradiation has been reported to cause psychosocial distress in patients with rectal cancer. This study provides additional data regarding prevalence and risk factors of emotional distress in patients who received chemoradiation for rectal or anal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients were analyzed for emotional distress utilizing 12 factors. When applying the Bonferroni correction, p-values <0.0042 were considered significant. RESULTS: Worry, fears, sadness, depression, nervousness, and loss of interest in usual activities were reported by 31%, 47%, 33%, 11%, 47%, and 19% of patients, respectively. More physical problems were associated with fears (p=0.0030) and loss of interest (p=0.0021). Strong trends were observed for associations between female sex and sadness (p=0.0098) and between lower performance score and worry (p=0.0068) or fears (p=0.0064). CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of patients reported emotional distress prior to chemoradiation for rectal or anal cancer. High-risk patients may benefit from early psycho-oncological support.

A randomized phase 2 trial of nintedanib and low-dose cytarabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

We investigated the safety and efficacy of nintedanib added to low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in a phase 1/2 study in patients 60 years or older with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The results of the dose-finding phase 1 part have been previously published. Patients were randomized 1:1 to LDAC plus nintedanib or LDAC plus placebo stratified by AML status (newly diagnosed vs r/r). LDAC was applied subcutaneously at 20 mg twice daily on days 1 to 10. Nintedanib/placebo was orally administered twice daily on days 1 to 28 in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Between 05/2017 and 09/2019, 31 patients were randomized and 30 were treated, before the study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment. Median (range) age of patients was 76 (60-84) years. Twenty-two patients (73%) had r/r AML. Median OS in patients treated with LDAC and nintedanib was 3.4 months, compared with 3.6 months in those treated in the placebo arm, with a HR adjusted for AML status of 1.19 (corresponding confirmatory adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-2.56; univariate log-rank P = 0.96). In the 22 patients with r/r AML, median OS was 3.0 months in the nintedanib and 3.6 months in the placebo arm (P = 0.36). One patient in the nintedanib and two patients in the placebo arm achieved a CR and entered maintenance treatment. Nintedanib showed no superior therapeutic activity over placebo when added to LDAC in elderly AML patients considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01488344.

Evaluation of Sleep Disturbances in Patients With Bladder Cancer Scheduled for Local or Loco-regional Radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Organ-sparing treatment is increasingly used for bladder cancer, particularly for patients with significant comorbidities or advanced age. The upcoming treatment can cause distress and sleep disturbances. This study investigated pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with bladder cancer scheduled for local or loco-regional radiotherapy were retrospectively evaluated. Sixteen characteristics were analyzed for sleep disturbances including age, sex, performance score, comorbidities, previous malignancy, distress score, emotional problems, physical problems, treatment situation, treatment intent, current primary tumor and nodal stage, distant metastasis, treatment volume, concurrent chemotherapy, and Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. RESULTS: Eleven patients (50.0%) reported sleep disturbances that were significantly associated with distress scores ≥5 (p=0.035). Trends were found for age ≤75 years (p=0.183), ≥2 emotional problems (p=0.183), ≥5 physical problems (p=0.064), and distant metastasis (p=0.090). CONCLUSION: Half of the patients reported pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances. Risk factors facilitate identification of patients requiring psychological support.

Sleep Problems Prior to Radio-chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or the Esophagogastric Junction.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with locally advanced cancer of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction receive definitive or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patient anticipation of this treatment can cause or aggravate distress and sleep disorders. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of sleep disorders and risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients assigned to radio-chemotherapy were retrospectively evaluated for pre-treatment sleep disorders. Investigated characteristics included age; sex; performance score; comorbidity index; previous malignancies; family history; distress score; emotional, physical or practical problems; tumor site; histology and grading; tumor stage; planned treatment; and relation to 2019 Coronavirus pandemic. RESULTS: Sleep problems were reported by 15 patients (39.5%). Significant associations were found for higher distress scores (p=0.016) and greater numbers of emotional problems (p<0.0001). A trend was observed for greater numbers of physical problems (p=0.176). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sleep problems was high. Risk factors were found that can help identify patients requiring psychological support already prior to radio-chemotherapy.

Risk Factors for Sleep Problems Prior to Radiochemotherapy for Malignant Gliomas.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with malignant gliomas are scheduled for radiochemotherapy, which may cause emotional distress associated with sleep problems. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of such sleep problems in these patients and identify risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients scheduled for radiochemotherapy for grade II-IV gliomas were retrospectively investigated for pre-treatment sleep problems. Fifteen characteristics were evaluated including temporal relation to COVID-19 pandemic, age, gender, performance status, comorbidity, (family) history of malignancies, distress score, emotional problems, physical problems, practical problems, involved sites, glioma grade, upfront surgery, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Nineteen patients stated pre-treatment sleep problems (prevalence=66.7%). Significant associations with sleep problems were found for female gender (p=0.023), presence of emotional problems (p=0.006), and ≥4 physical problems (p<0.001). A trend was found for distress scores ≥5 (p=0.077). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sleep problems was high. Risk factors were determined that can be used to identify patients who likely benefit from psychological support.

Sleep Disturbances in Lung Cancer Patients Assigned to Definitive or Adjuvant Irradiation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A considerable number of patients with lung cancer are scheduled for definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy. Prevalence and potential risk factors of pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen factors were retrospectively investigated for associations with pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances in 77 lung cancer patients. Factors included COVID-19 pandemic; age; gender; performance score; comorbidity index; history of another malignancy; distress score; number of emotional, physical or practical problems; patient's request for psychological support; histology; tumor stage; upfront surgery; chemotherapy; and type of radiotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (40.3%) reported sleep disturbances that were significantly associated with distress score 6-10 (p=0.019), ≥2 emotional problems (p=0.001), ≥5 physical problems (p<0.001), and request for psychological support (p=0.006). Trends were found for female gender (p=0.064) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (p=0.057). CONCLUSION: Many lung cancer patients assigned to radiotherapy reported sleep disturbances. Risk factors can be used to identify patients in need of psychological support already before treatment.

Risk Factors for Sleep Disturbances in Patients Scheduled for Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with head-and-neck cancer are scheduled for irradiation. This study was performed to determine the frequency of and risk factors for pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients with head-and-neck cancer scheduled for radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Eighteen characteristics were evaluated including timing of start of radiotherapy relative to COVID-19 pandemic; age; gender; Karnofsky performance score; Charlson comorbidity index; history of another malignancy; family history of malignancy; distress score; number of emotional, physical or practical problems; request for psychological support; tumor site and stage; upfront surgery; planned chemotherapy; and brachytherapy boost. RESULTS: The frequency of pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances was 42.7%. This was significantly associated with age ≤63 years (p=0.049), Karnofsky performance score ≤80 (p=0.002), Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (p=0.005), history of another malignancy (p=0.012), emotional (p=0.001) or physical (p<0.001) problems, and request for psychological support (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbances were frequent in patients assigned to radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer. Recognizing risk factors for sleep disturbance helps identify patients requiring psychological support.

Frequency and Risk Factors of Sleep Disturbances in Patients With Prostate Cancer Assigned to Local or Loco-regional Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with prostate cancer receive definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aimed to identify the frequency of sleep disturbances and corresponding risk factors prior to radiation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 48 patients assigned to local or loco-regional irradiation for prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed for pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances. Fifteen characteristics were analyzed including age, performance status, comorbidity, history of previous malignancy, distress score, (emotional, physical or practical) problems, prostate-specific antigen, primary tumor stage, Gleason-score, upfront androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), treatment volume, brachytherapy, and COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances were reported by 20.8% of patients and significantly associated with distress scores ≥4 (p<0.0001) and ≥3 physical problems (p=0.0001). Trends were found for Karnofsky performance score ≤80 (p=0.095), Gleason score 7b-9 (p=0.079), and ADT (p=0.067). CONCLUSION: Pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances were less common in prostate cancer patients than in other cancer patients. Risk factors were identified that can help identify patients requiring psychological support prior to radiotherapy.

Sleep Disorders Prior to Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Gynecological Malignancies.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with gynecological malignancies receive postoperative radiotherapy, which can lead to fear and sleep disorders. We aimed to identify the prevalence of and risk factors for sleep disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients assigned to radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies were retrospectively evaluated. Seventeen characteristics were analyzed for associations with pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders including age, Karnofsky performance score, Charlson comorbidity index, history of additional malignancy, family history of gynecological cancer, distress score, emotional, physical or practical problems, tumor site/stage; chemotherapy, treatment volume, brachytherapy, and the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The prevalence of pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders was 46.8%. Sleep disorders were significantly associated with Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (p=0.012), greater number of physical problems (p<0.0001), and advanced primary tumor stage (p=0.005). A trend was found for greater number of emotional problems (p=0.075). CONCLUSION: Pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders are common in patients with gynecological malignancies, particularly in those with specific risk factors. Patients should be offered early psychological support.

Evaluation of Pre-radiotherapy Sleep Disorders in Patients With Rectal or Anal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy are common treatments for rectal and anal cancer. Anticipation of treatment may cause distress and sleep disorders. This study aimed to identify risk factors for sleep disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 42 patients with rectal or anal cancer scheduled for radiotherapy, 16 characteristics were analyzed for associations with pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders including age, gender, performance score, comorbidity, patient's or family history of additional cancer/melanoma, distress score, emotional/physical/practical problems, tumor site and stage, surgery and relation to COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of pre-radiotherapy sleep disorders was 42.9%. Sleep disorders were significantly associated with Karnofsky performance score 60-80 (p=0.044), Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (p=0.0012), distress score 6-10 (p=0.00012), and more emotional (p=0.0012), physical (p=0.0004) or practical (p=0.033) problems. A trend was found for female gender (p=0.061). CONCLUSION: Sleep disorders were common in patients with rectal or anal cancer scheduled for radiotherapy. Risk factors can help identify patients requiring psychooncological support already prior to the start of radiotherapy.

Emotional Problems Prior to Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Being scheduled for radiotherapy can cause emotional distress. This study aimed to identify risk factors in 338 patients assigned to radiotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen potential risk factors including the COVID-19 pandemic were investigated for associations with the six emotional problems included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer. RESULTS: Worry and fears were significantly associated with age ≤60 years; sadness with age and Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <90; depression with KPS and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3; loss of interest with KPS. Trends were found for associations between sadness and additional breast cancer/DCIS, Charlson Index and chemotherapy; between depression and additional breast cancer/DCIS, treatment volume and nodal stage N1-3; between nervousness and additional breast cancer/DCIS, mastectomy and triple-negativity; between loss of interest and Charlson Index, family history of breast cancer/DCIS, invasive cancer, chemotherapy, and treatment volume. The COVID-19 pandemic did not increase emotional problems. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for emotional problems were identified. Patients with such factors should receive psychological support well before radiotherapy.

Accelerated Fractionation Plus Chemotherapy Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiochemotherapy for Unresectable Head-and-Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Prognosis of patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck requires improvement. This retrospective study compared accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy to conventional radiochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received definitive treatment with accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (group A, n=10) or conventional cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy (group B, n=85). Groups were matched for several patient and tumor characteristics and compared for locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Additionally, accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy regimens in group B were compared for LRC and OS. RESULTS: Treatment type had no significant impact on LRC (p=0.98) and OS (p=0.57). In group A, toxicities occurred more often, including grade ≥3 mucositis (p=0.041), grade ≥2 lymphedema (p=0.007) and grade ≥3 leucopenia (p=0.007). Best 2-year LRC (p=0.39) and OS (p=0.015) was achieved with 20 mg/m2 cisplatin days 1-5 every 4 weeks; accelerated radiochemotherapy resulted in second-worst outcomes. CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of this study, accelerated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy provided no significant benefit but increased toxicity compared to conventional radiochemotherapy.

Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2).

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer. METHODS: This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2­year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2­year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesis = H0), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H0 was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable. RESULTS: Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55-87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36-71%); H0 was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (p = 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30-1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25-1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13-1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17-1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (p = 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (p = 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.

A Scoring Tool to Estimate the Survival of Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases from Esophageal Cancer Receiving Whole-brain Irradiation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Elderly patients with metastatic esophageal cancer may benefit from individualized therapies. A tool to predict the survival of such patients with brain metastases was created. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 11 elderly patients (≥65 years) receiving whole-brain irradiation (WBI) for brain metastases from esophageal cancer, age, gender, performance status, number of brain metastases, metastases outside the brain, time between cancer diagnosis and WBI, and WBI regimen were evaluated for survival. RESULTS: On univariate analyses, age ≥73 years (p=0.046) and time between diagnosis of esophageal cancer and WBI ≤6 months (p=0.046) were significantly associated with poorer survival. On multivariate analysis, both showed a trend. Based on these two factors, the following points were assigned: age ≤72 years=1 point, age ≥73 years=0 points; time between cancer diagnosis and WBI >6 months=1 point, and ≤6 months=0 points. Three prognostic groups were thus formed: 0, 1 and 2 points. Survival rates of these groups at 6 months were 0%, 0% and 40% (p=0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION: This new tool allows estimation of survival and treatment individualization in elderly patients irradiated for brain metastases from esophageal cancer.

Performance Status Is Associated With Survival in Elderly Patients Irradiated for Cerebral Metastases from Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment of elderly patients with cancer has increasing importance. Since many of these patients may not tolerate standard treatments, they might benefit from personalized approaches. This study was performed to identify characteristics that allow estimation of survival in elderly patients with prostate cancer with cerebral metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 21 elderly patients (≥65 years) receiving whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for cerebral metastases from prostate cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Six characteristics were investigated: WBRT program, age, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastases, and interval between diagnosis of prostate cancer and WBRT. RESULTS: On univariate analyses, KPS ≥80% resulted in better survival than KPS ≤70% (log-rank p=0.018). Three-month survival was 60% vs. 36%, and 6-month survival 50% vs. 0%, respectively. In the Cox model, KPS maintained significance (hazard ratio=3.18, p=0.031). CONCLUSION: KPS is a significant prognostic factor of survival in elderly patients with prostate cancer receiving WBRT for cerebral metastases.

Prevalence of metastases within the hypothalamic-pituitary area in patients with brain metastases.

AIM: To quantify the prevalence of brain metastases involving the hypothalamic-pituitary (HT-P) area. INTRODUCTION: Cognitive impairment and fatigue are common side effects of whole brain irradiation (WBI) comprising the quality of life (QoL) for survivors. While the former is related to radiation-induced hippocampal injury, the latter could be secondary to hormonal disbalance as a consequence of radiation of the HT-P area. Thus, sparing both regions from higher irradiation doses could reduce these sequelae. METHODS: T1 contrast medium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 865 patients with brain metastases (4,280 metastases) were reviewed. HT-P area was individually contoured with a margin of 5 mm in order to evaluate the prevalence of brain metastases in this region. RESULTS: Involvement of the hypothalamic region was found in 26 patients (involvement rate of 3% for patients and 1% for metastases), involvement of the pituitary gland in 9 patients (1% for patients and < 1% for metastases). Binary logistical regression analysis revealed the presence of > 10 brain metastases as the only factor associated with hypothalamic involvement while no distinct factor was associated with an involvement of the pituitary gland. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of metastases within the HT-P area in patients with brain metastases calls for further studies examining whether sparing of this region might improve patients QoL.

A randomized trial (RAREST-01) comparing Mepitel® Film and standard care for prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN).

Mepitel® Film (MEP) and standard care (STD) were compared for radiation dermatitis in SCCHN patients. This trial was stopped prematurely since13/28 patients did not tolerate MEP. Grade ≥2 dermatitis: 34.8% (MEP) vs. 35.7% (STD) at 50 Gy, 65.2% vs. 59.3% at 60 Gy. MEP was unsatisfactorily tolerated and appeared not superior (NCT03047174).