RESUMEN
Background: Intrauterine transfusion (IUT) of the donor and partial exchange (pET) of the recipient is a temporizing treatment for pregnancies with Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence (TAPS). We aimed to provide a detailed description of the procedural approach and outcomes for sequential donor IUT and recipient pET in TAPS. Methods: Retrospective study of spontaneous TAPS referred to the Johns Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy treated with donor IUT followed by recipient pET utilizing a double-syringe setup. Procedural characteristics and outcomes as well as the accuracy of existing transfusion formulas were analyzed and compared with the literature. Results: 5 of 78 patients with spontaneous TAPS underwent a total of 19 combined IUT/pET procedures (median first procedure to delivery interval 5.6 weeks [interquartile range IQR 1.9-6.0]). One pET was stopped due to fetal deceleration. The patients were delivered at 33.0 weeks [IQR 31.9-33.3] with two survivors and no neonatal transfusion requirements. The IUT volume was 48 mL [IQR 39-63 mL] and the pET volume was 32 mL [IQR 20-50], utilizing aliquots of 5-20 mL for the latter (p = 0.021). For the IUTs, the assumption of a fetal blood volume below 150 mL/kg underestimated the required transfusion volume. For the pETs, all formulas required adjustment of the dilution volume based on bedside testing (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Donor transfusion followed by partial exchange in the recipient can prolong pregnancy in spontaneous TAPS and obviate the need for neonatal transfusion. A double-syringe setup facilitates efficient saline exchange. Because the accuracy of volume formulas is limited, bedside testing is recommended to achieve the target hemoglobin.
RESUMEN
Background: Fetal growth restriction is associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality. Early identification of women having at-risk fetuses can reduce perinatal adverse outcomes. Objectives: To assess the predictive performance of existing models predicting fetal growth restriction and birthweight, and if needed, to develop and validate new multivariable models using individual participant data. Design: Individual participant data meta-analyses of cohorts in International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications network, decision curve analysis and health economics analysis. Participants: Pregnant women at booking. External validation of existing models (9 cohorts, 441,415 pregnancies); International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications model development and validation (4 cohorts, 237,228 pregnancies). Predictors: Maternal clinical characteristics, biochemical and ultrasound markers. Primary outcomes: fetal growth restriction defined as birthweight <10th centile adjusted for gestational age and with stillbirth, neonatal death or delivery before 32 weeks' gestation birthweight. Analysis: First, we externally validated existing models using individual participant data meta-analysis. If needed, we developed and validated new International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications models using random-intercept regression models with backward elimination for variable selection and undertook internal-external cross-validation. We estimated the study-specific performance (c-statistic, calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large) for each model and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was quantified using τ2 and 95% prediction intervals. We assessed the clinical utility of the fetal growth restriction model using decision curve analysis, and health economics analysis based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2008 model. Results: Of the 119 published models, one birthweight model (Poon) could be validated. None reported fetal growth restriction using our definition. Across all cohorts, the Poon model had good summary calibration slope of 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.96) with slight overfitting, and underpredicted birthweight by 90.4 g on average (95% confidence interval 37.9 g to 142.9 g). The newly developed International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction model included maternal age, height, parity, smoking status, ethnicity, and any history of hypertension, pre-eclampsia, previous stillbirth or small for gestational age baby and gestational age at delivery. This allowed predictions conditional on a range of assumed gestational ages at delivery. The pooled apparent c-statistic and calibration were 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.0), and 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.23), respectively. The model showed positive net benefit for predicted probability thresholds between 1% and 90%. In addition to the predictors in the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction model, the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-birthweight model included maternal weight, history of diabetes and mode of conception. Average calibration slope across cohorts in the internal-external cross-validation was 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.23) with no evidence of overfitting. Birthweight was underestimated by 9.7 g on average (95% confidence interval -154.3 g to 173.8 g). Limitations: We could not externally validate most of the published models due to variations in the definitions of outcomes. Internal-external cross-validation of our International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction model was limited by the paucity of events in the included cohorts. The economic evaluation using the published National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2008 model may not reflect current practice, and full economic evaluation was not possible due to paucity of data. Future work: International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications models' performance needs to be assessed in routine practice, and their impact on decision-making and clinical outcomes needs evaluation. Conclusion: The International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction and International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-birthweight models accurately predict fetal growth restriction and birthweight for various assumed gestational ages at delivery. These can be used to stratify the risk status at booking, plan monitoring and management. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019135045. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/148/07) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 14. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
One in ten babies is born small for their age. A third of such small babies are considered to be 'growth-restricted' as they have complications such as dying in the womb (stillbirth) or after birth (newborn death), cerebral palsy, or needing long stays in hospital. When growth restriction is suspected in fetuses, they are closely monitored and often delivered early to avoid complications. Hence, it is important that we identify growth-restricted babies early to plan care. Our goal was to provide personalised and accurate estimates of the mother's chances of having a growth-restricted baby and predict the baby's weight if delivered at various time points in pregnancy. To do so, first we tested how accurate existing risk calculators ('prediction models') were in predicting growth restriction and birthweight. We then developed new risk-calculators and studied their clinical and economic benefits. We did so by accessing the data from individual pregnant women and their babies in our large database library (International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications). Published risk-calculators had various definitions of growth restriction and none predicted the chances of having a growth-restricted baby using our definition. One predicted baby's birthweight. This risk-calculator performed well, but underpredicted the birthweight by up to 143 g. We developed two new risk-calculators to predict growth-restricted babies (International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction) and birthweight (International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-birthweight). Both calculators accurately predicted the chances of the baby being born with growth restriction, and its birthweight. The birthweight was underpredicted by <9.7 g. The calculators performed well in both mothers predicted to be low and high risk. Further research is needed to determine the impact of using these calculators in practice, and challenges to implementing them in practice. Both International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-fetal growth restriction and International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications-birthweight risk calculators will inform healthcare professionals and empower parents make informed decisions on monitoring and timing of delivery.
Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Mortinato , Edad Gestacional , Adulto , Complicaciones del EmbarazoRESUMEN
Objective: To predict birth weight at various potential gestational ages of delivery based on data routinely available at the first antenatal visit. Design: Individual participant data meta-analysis. Data sources: Individual participant data of four cohorts (237 228 pregnancies) from the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complications (IPPIC) network dataset. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies in the IPPIC network were identified by searching major databases for studies reporting risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth, from database inception to August 2019. Data of four IPPIC cohorts (237 228 pregnancies) from the US (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2018; 233 483 pregnancies), UK (Allen et al, 2017; 1045 pregnancies), Norway (STORK Groruddalen research programme, 2010; 823 pregnancies), and Australia (Rumbold et al, 2006; 1877 pregnancies) were included in the development of the model. Results: The IPPIC birth weight model was developed with random intercept regression models with backward elimination for variable selection. Internal-external cross validation was performed to assess the study specific and pooled performance of the model, reported as calibration slope, calibration-in-the-large, and observed versus expected average birth weight ratio. Meta-analysis showed that the apparent performance of the model had good calibration (calibration slope 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.10; calibration-in-the-large 44.5 g, -18.4 to 107.3) with an observed versus expected average birth weight ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.07). The proportion of variation in birth weight explained by the model (R2) was 46.9% (range 32.7-56.1% in each cohort). On internal-external cross validation, the model showed good calibration and predictive performance when validated in three cohorts with a calibration slope of 0.90 (Allen cohort), 1.04 (STORK Groruddalen cohort), and 1.07 (Rumbold cohort), calibration-in-the-large of -22.3 g (Allen cohort), -33.42 (Rumbold cohort), and 86.4 g (STORK Groruddalen cohort), and observed versus expected ratio of 0.99 (Rumbold cohort), 1.00 (Allen cohort), and 1.03 (STORK Groruddalen cohort); respective pooled estimates were 1.00 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.23; calibration slope), 9.7 g (-154.3 to 173.8; calibration-in-the-large), and 1.00 (0.94 to 1.07; observed v expected ratio). The model predictions were more accurate (smaller mean square error) in the lower end of predicted birth weight, which is important in informing clinical decision making. Conclusions: The IPPIC birth weight model allowed birth weight predictions for a range of possible gestational ages. The model explained about 50% of individual variation in birth weights, was well calibrated (especially in babies at high risk of fetal growth restriction and its complications), and showed promising performance in four different populations included in the individual participant data meta-analysis. Further research to examine the generalisability of performance in other countries, settings, and subgroups is required. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42019135045.
RESUMEN
This review describes an in-depth analysis of the neurotoxicity associated with the anesthetic agents used during fetal surgery, intending to highlight the importance of understanding the effects of general anesthetics on the developing brain, particularly in the context of open fetal surgery, where high doses are applied to facilitate surgical access and augment uterine relaxation. We examined evidence from preclinical studies in rodents and primates, along with studies in human subjects, with the results collectively suggesting that general anesthetics can disrupt brain development and lead to long-lasting neurological deficits. Our review underscores the clinical implications of these findings, indicating an association between extensive anesthetic exposure in early life and subsequent cognitive deficits. The current standard of anesthetic care for fetal surgical procedures was scrutinized, and recommendations have been proposed to mitigate the risk of anesthetic neurotoxicity. These recommendations emphasize the need for careful selection of anesthetic techniques to minimize fetal exposure to potentially harmful agents. In conclusion, while the benefits of fetal surgery in addressing immediate risks often outweigh the potential neurotoxic effects of anesthesia, the long-term developmental impacts nevertheless warrant consideration. Our analysis suggests that the use of general anesthetics in fetal surgery, especially at high doses, poses a significant risk of developmental neurotoxicity. As such, it is imperative to explore safer alternatives, such as employing different methods of uterine relaxation and minimizing the use of general anesthetics, to achieve the necessary surgical conditions. Further research, particularly in clinical settings, is essential to fully understand the risks and benefits of anesthetic techniques in fetal surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify current practices in the management of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: International. POPULATION: Clinicians involved in the management of MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR. METHODS: A structured, self-administered survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical practices and attitudes to diagnostic criteria and management strategies. RESULTS: Overall, 62.8% (113/180) of clinicians completed the survey; of which, 66.4% (75/113) of the respondents reported that they would use an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of <10th centile for the smaller twin and an inter-twin EFW discordance of >25% for the diagnosis of sFGR. For early-onset type I sFGR, 79.8% (75/94) of respondents expressed that expectant management would be their routine practice. On the other hand, for early-onset type II and type III sFGR, 19.3% (17/88) and 35.7% (30/84) of respondents would manage these pregnancies expectantly, whereas 71.6% (63/88) and 57.1% (48/84) would refer these pregnancies to a fetal intervention centre or would offer fetal intervention for type II and type III cases, respectively. Moreover, 39.0% (16/41) of the respondents would consider fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for early-onset type I sFGR, whereas 41.5% (17/41) would offer either FLS or selective feticide, and 12.2% (5/41) would exclusively offer selective feticide. For early-onset type II and type III sFGR cases, 25.9% (21/81) and 31.4% (22/70) would exclusively offer FLS, respectively, whereas 33.3% (27/81) and 32.9% (23/70) would exclusively offer selective feticide. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in clinician practices and attitudes towards the management of early-onset sFGR in MCDA twin pregnancies, especially for type II and type III cases, highlighting the need for high-level evidence to guide management.
Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Embarazo Gemelar , Gemelos Monocigóticos , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Peso Fetal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Fetoscopía/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The optimal protocol for serial amnioinfusions to maintain amniotic fluid in pregnancies with early-onset fetal renal anhydramnios before 22 weeks is not known. We compared the performance of two different approaches. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of serial amnioinfusions performed by a single center during the external pilot and feasibility phases of the Renal Anhydramnios Fetal Therapy (RAFT) trial. During the external pilot, higher amnioinfusion volumes were given less frequently; in the feasibility study, smaller volume amnioinfusions were administered more frequently. Procedural details, complications, and obstetric outcomes were compared between the two groups using Pearson's χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Student's t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables. The adjusted association between procedural details and chorioamniotic separation was obtained through a multivariate repeated measure logistic regression model. RESULTS: Eleven participants underwent 159 amnioinfusions (external pilot: 3 patients, 21 amnioinfusions; feasibility: 8 patients, 138 amnioinfusions). External pilot participants had fewer amnioinfusions (7 vs. 19.5 in the feasibility group, p = 0.04), larger amnioinfusion volume (750 vs. 500 mL, p < 0.01), and longer interval between amnioinfusions (6 [4-7] vs. 4 [3-5] days, p < 0.01). In the external pilot, chorioamniotic separation was more common (28.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.01), preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurred sooner after amnioinfusion initiation (28 ± 21.5 vs. 75.6 ± 24.1 days, p = 0.03), and duration of maintained amniotic fluid between first and last amnioinfusion was shorter (38 ± 17.3 vs. 71 ± 19 days, p = 0.03), compared to the feasibility group. While delivery gestational age was similar (35.1 ± 1.7 vs. 33.8 ± 1.5 weeks, p = 0.21), feasibility participants maintained amniotic fluid longer. CONCLUSION: Small volume serial amnioinfusions performed more frequently maintain normal amniotic fluid volume longer because of delayed occurrence of PPROM.
RESUMEN
In congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), abdominal organs are displaced into the chest, compress the lungs, and cause mediastinal shift. This contributes to development of pulmonary hypoplasia and hypertension, which is the primary determinant of morbidity and mortality for affected newborns. The severity is determined using prenatal imaging as early as the first trimester and is related to the laterality of the defect, extent of lung compression, and degree of liver herniation. Comprehensive evaluation of fetal CDH includes imaging-based severity assessment, severity assessment, and evaluation for structural or genetic abnormalities to differentiate isolated from complex cases. Prenatal management involves multispecialty counseling, consideration for fetal therapy with fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe cases, monitoring and intervention for associated polyhydramnios or signs of preterm labor if indicated, administration of antenatal corticosteroids in the appropriate setting, and planned delivery to optimize the fetal condition at birth. Integrated programs that provide a smooth transition from prenatal to postnatal care produce better outcomes. Neonatal care involves gentle ventilation to avoid hyperinflation and must account for transitional physiology to avoid exacerbating cardiac dysfunction and decompensation. Infants who have undergone and responded to FETO have greater pulmonary capacity than expected, but cardiac dysfunction seems unaffected. In about 25-30% of CDH neonates extracorporeal life support is utilized, and this provides a survival benefit for patients with the highest predicted mortality, including those who underwent FETO. Surgical repair after initial medical management for the first 24-48 hours of life is preferred since later repair is associated with delayed oral feeding, increased need for tube feeds, and increased post-repair ventilation requirement and supplemental oxygen at discharge. With overall survival rates >70%, contemporary care involves management of chronic morbidities in the context of a multidisciplinary clinic setting.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Mirror syndrome (MS) is a condition characterized by the presence of maternal, fetal, and placental edema and is reversible through delivery or pregnancy termination. As fetal hydrops itself may be amenable to treatment, we sought to determine outcomes for MS primarily managed by fetal therapy through a narrative review of the literature and cases managed at our fetal center. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched through January 2024 using key words: mirror syndrome, Ballantyne's syndrome, fetal hydrops, maternal hydrops, pseudotoxemia, triple edema, maternal recovery, fetal therapy, and resolution. Manuscripts describing primary management by fetal therapy that included maternal and fetal outcomes were identified. Clinical details of MS patients managed with fetal therapy at our center were also included for descriptive analysis. RESULTS: 16 of 517 manuscripts (3.1%) described fetal therapy as the primary intended treatment in 17 patients. 3 patients managed at our center were included in the analysis. Among 20 patients undergoing primary fetal therapy for management of mirror syndrome, median gestational age of presentation was 24 weeks and 5 days gestation; predominant clinical findings were maternal edema (15/20), proteinuria (10/20), pulmonary edema (8/20), and hypertension (8/20); the primary laboratory abnormalities were anemia (8/20) and elevated creatinine or transaminases (5/20). Condition-specific fetal therapies led to resolution of hydrops in 17 (85%) cases and MS in 19 (95%) cases. The median time to hydrops resolution was 7.5 days and to resolution of mirror syndrome was 10 days. Fetal therapy prolonged pregnancy by a median of 10 weeks with a median gestational age of 35 weeks and 5 days at delivery. All women delivered for indications other than mirror syndrome and 19/20 fetuses survived. CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected cases, MS often resolves after fetal therapy of hydrops allowing for safe pregnancy prolongation with good maternal and infant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Fetales , Hidropesía Fetal , Humanos , Embarazo , Hidropesía Fetal/terapia , Hidropesía Fetal/diagnóstico , Femenino , Terapias Fetales/métodos , Edema/terapia , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared early neurodevelopmental morbidity in young children with severe CDH who underwent FETO to those without fetal therapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of severe CDH patients undergoing FETO (n = 18) at a single North American center from 2015 to 2021 (NCT02710968). Outpatient survivors (n = 12) were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and compared to expectantly managed CDH patients. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Capute Scales [Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scales (CLAMS) and Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT)], with a developmental quotient (DQ) < 85 indicative of at-risk for delay. RESULTS: At one year, 58% (n = 7) of FETO patients underwent evaluation, with notable concern for language delay (CLAMS median DQ, 80.1 [interquartile range, 67.6-86.7]). FETO scores improved by 24-months, whereas high severity/non-FETO scores declined [CLAMS median DQ (Difference in DQ), 92.3 (+12.2) vs. 77.1 (-13.4), respectively; p = 0.049]. On the initial CAT, FETO patients had concern for visual motor and problem-solving delays, with a median DQ of 81.3 (62.1-89.4). At 24-months, FETO patients had improving scores [Median CAT DQ, 90.8 (+9.5)], whereas high severity/non-FETO [87.5 (-3.0), p = 0.28] had declining scores. CONCLUSION: These initial data suggest that FETO is associated with favorable neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24-months compared to severe CDH under expectant management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Asunto(s)
Fetoscopía , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Humanos , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Fetoscopía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/epidemiología , Tráquea/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/etiología , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/epidemiología , EmbarazoRESUMEN
While microplastics have been recently detected in human blood and the placenta, their impact on human health is not well understood. Using a mouse model of environmental exposure during pregnancy, our group has previously reported that exposure to polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics throughout gestation results in fetal growth restriction. While polystyrene is environmentally relevant, polyethylene is the most widely produced plastic and amongst the most commonly detected microplastic in drinking water and human blood. In this study, we investigated the effect of maternal exposure to polyethylene micro- and nanoplastics on fetal growth and placental function. Healthy, pregnant CD-1 dams were divided into three groups: 106 ng/L of 740-4990 nm polyethylene with surfactant in drinking water (n = 12), surfactant alone in drinking water (n = 12) or regular filtered drinking water (n = 11). At embryonic day 17.5, high-frequency ultrasound was used to investigate the placental and fetal hemodynamic responses following exposure. While maternal exposure to polyethylene did not impact fetal growth, there was a significant effect on placental function with a 43% increase in umbilical artery blood flow in the polyethylene group compared to controls (p < 0.01). These results suggest polyethylene has the potential to cause adverse pregnancy outcomes through abnormal placental function.
Asunto(s)
Agua Potable , Placenta , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Placenta/irrigación sanguínea , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Polietileno/toxicidad , Poliestirenos , Desarrollo Fetal , Resultado del Embarazo , Hemodinámica , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , TensoactivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Findings from randomized trials (RCTs) on cervical pessary treatment to prevent spontaneous preterm birth are inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: Our hypothesis suggests that adhering to the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and following the instructions for use are essential prerequisites for successful therapy. Conversely, the non-adherence to these guidelines will probably contribute to its failure. SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA: Based on validated criteria from integrity assessments we performed a systematic review identifying 14 RCTs evaluating the effect of cervical pessaries. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We analyzed the implications of 14 criteria each accounting for 0-2 points of a score reflecting the clinical evaluation plan (CEP) as proposed by the MDR to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of medical devices. MAIN RESULTS: Seven RCTs in each singleton and twin pregnancies (5193 "cases") were included, detecting a high heterogeneity within control groups (I2 = 85% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.01). The CEP score varied from 11 to 26 points for all studies. The most common reasons for low scores and potential data compromise were poor recruitment rates, no (completed) power analysis, and no pre-registration, but mainly non-adherence to technical, biological, and clinical equivalence to the instructions for use as required by the MDR. All trials with score values greater than 20 had applied audit procedures. Within this group we found significantly reduced rates of spontaneous preterm birth at less than 34 weeks within the pessary group in singleton (odds ratio 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.65) and twin pregnancies (odds ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.67). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in the composite poor neonatal outcome in singleton (odds ratio 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.61) and twin pregnancies (odds ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.82) after a pessary as compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Non-audited RCTs and meta-analyses mixing studies of different clinical quality as pre-defined by a CEP and the MDR pose the risk for erroneous conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Nacimiento Prematuro , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , Pesarios , Legislación de Dispositivos Médicos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cuello del Útero , Embarazo GemelarRESUMEN
Maternal exposure to microplastics and nanoplastics has been shown to result in fetal growth restriction in mice. In this study, we investigated the placental and fetal hemodynamic responses to plastics exposure in mice using high-frequency ultrasound. Healthy, pregnant CD-1 dams were given either 106 ng/L of 5 µm polystyrene microplastics or 106 ng/L of 50 nm polystyrene nanoplastics in drinking water throughout gestation and were compared with controls. Maternal exposure to both microplastics and nanoplastics resulted in evidence of placental dysfunction that was highly dependent on the particle size. The umbilical artery blood flow increased by 48% in the microplastic-exposed group and decreased by 25% in the nanoplastic-exposed group compared to controls (p < 0.05). The microplastic- and nanoplastic-exposed fetuses showed a significant decrease in the middle cerebral artery pulsatility index of 10% and 13%, respectively, compared to controls (p < 0.05), indicating vasodilation of the cerebral circulation, a fetal adaptation that is part of the brain sparing response to preserve oxygen delivery. Hemodynamic markers of placental dysfunction and fetal hypoxia were more pronounced in the group exposed to polystyrene nanoplastics, suggesting nanoplastic exposure during human pregnancy has the potential to disrupt fetal brain development, which in turn may cause suboptimal neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Microplásticos , Plásticos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Poliestirenos/toxicidad , Placenta/irrigación sanguínea , Desarrollo FetalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Risks and benefits of experimental fetal therapies can remain uncertain after initial clinical studies, especially long-term effects. Nevertheless, pregnant individuals may request them, hoping to benefit their future child. Guidance about offering experimental fetal therapies outside research (as "innovative therapy") is limited, despite their ethical complexity. We propose points for clinicians and reviewers to consider when deciding whether and how to offer experimental fetal therapies as innovative therapies after initial clinical studies. METHOD: We used conceptual analysis and a current case to develop points for consideration, grounded in broader debates on innovative therapy and the unique challenges associated with experimental fetal therapies. RESULTS: Clinicians should evaluate whether offering experimental fetal therapies as innovative therapy is appropriate for a pregnant individual and their fetus. The anticipated risk-benefit ratio for the fetus should be favorable. For the pregnant individual, risks may outweigh benefits, within reasonable limits. Medical resources should be sufficient to ensure appropriate care. Clinicians should support pregnant individuals in making informed choices. Clinicians offering innovative therapies with more than minimal risk should collect and report data on outcomes. Independent review should take place. CONCLUSION: Considering these points may advance the interests of fetuses, future children, and their families.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Fetales , Atención Prenatal , Embarazo , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Feto , Medición de Riesgo , Terapias en InvestigaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in a multicenter North American cohort of patients with isolated, left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to compare neonatal mortality and morbidity in patients with severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with those expectantly managed. METHODS: We analyzed data from 10 centers in the NAFTNet (North American Fetal Therapy Network) FETO (Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion) Consortium registry, collected between November 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020. In addition to reporting procedure-related surgical outcomes of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion, we performed a comparative analysis of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion compared with contemporaneous expectantly managed patients. RESULTS: Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was successfully performed in 87 of 89 patients (97.8%). Six-month survival in patients with severe left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia did not differ significantly between patients who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and those managed expectantly (69.8% vs 58.1%, P =.30). Patients who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion had higher rates of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (54.0% vs 14.3%, P <.001), earlier gestational age at delivery (median 35.0 weeks vs 38.3 weeks, P <.001), and lower birth weights (mean 2,487 g vs 2,857 g, P =.001). On subanalysis, in patients for whom all recorded observed-to-expected lung/head ratio measurements were below 25%, patients with fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion required fewer days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (median 9.0 days vs 17.0 days, P =.014). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was successfully implemented across several North American fetal therapy centers. Although survival was similar among patients undergoing fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and those expectantly managed, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion in North American centers may reduce morbidity, as suggested by fewer days of ECMO in those patients with persistently reduced lung volumes (observed-to-expected lung/head ratio below 25%).
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas , Oclusión con Balón , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Fetoscopía/efectos adversos , Pulmón , Feto , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/etiología , América del Norte , Tráquea/cirugía , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: Early anhydramnios during pregnancy, resulting from fetal bilateral renal agenesis, causes lethal pulmonary hypoplasia in neonates. Restoring amniotic fluid via serial amnioinfusions may promote lung development, enabling survival. Objective: To assess neonatal outcomes of serial amnioinfusions initiated before 26 weeks' gestation to mitigate lethal pulmonary hypoplasia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial conducted at 9 US fetal therapy centers between December 2018 and July 2022. Outcomes are reported for 21 maternal-fetal pairs with confirmed anhydramnios due to isolated fetal bilateral renal agenesis without other identified congenital anomalies. Exposure: Enrolled participants initiated ultrasound-guided percutaneous amnioinfusions of isotonic fluid before 26 weeks' gestation, with frequency of infusions individualized to maintain normal amniotic fluid levels for gestational age. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was postnatal infant survival to 14 days of life or longer with dialysis access placement. Results: The trial was stopped early based on an interim analysis of 18 maternal-fetal pairs given concern about neonatal morbidity and mortality beyond the primary end point despite demonstration of the efficacy of the intervention. There were 17 live births (94%), with a median gestational age at delivery of 32 weeks, 4 days (IQR, 32-34 weeks). All participants delivered prior to 37 weeks' gestation. The primary outcome was achieved in 14 (82%) of 17 live-born infants (95% CI, 44%-99%). Factors associated with survival to the primary outcome included a higher number of amnioinfusions (P = .01), gestational age greater than 32 weeks (P = .005), and higher birth weight (P = .03). Only 6 (35%) of the 17 neonates born alive survived to hospital discharge while receiving peritoneal dialysis at a median age of 24 weeks of life (range, 12-32 weeks). Conclusions and Relevance: Serial amnioinfusions mitigated lethal pulmonary hypoplasia but were associated with preterm delivery. The lower rate of survival to discharge highlights the additional mortality burden independent of lung function. Additional long-term data are needed to fully characterize the outcomes in surviving neonates and assess the morbidity and mortality burden. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03101891.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Fetales , Soluciones Isotónicas , Enfermedades Renales , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Oligohidramnios , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Terapias Fetales/métodos , Edad Gestacional , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/congénito , Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Infusiones Parenterales/métodos , Oligohidramnios/etiología , Oligohidramnios/mortalidad , Oligohidramnios/terapia , Enfermedades Fetales/etiología , Enfermedades Fetales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Fetales/terapia , Enfermedades Pulmonares/congénito , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares/terapia , Soluciones Isotónicas/administración & dosificación , Soluciones Isotónicas/uso terapéutico , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resultado del Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/mortalidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Plastics used in everyday materials accumulate as waste in the environment and degrade over time. The impacts of the resulting particulate micro- and nanoplastics on human health remain largely unknown. In pregnant mice, we recently demonstrated that exposure to nanoplastics throughout gestation and during lactation resulted in changes in brain structure detected on MRI. One possible explanation for this abnormal postnatal brain development is altered fetal brain metabolism. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of maternal exposure to nanoplastics on fetal brain metabolism. METHODS: Healthy pregnant CD-1 mice were exposed to 50 nm polystyrene nanoplastics at a concentration of 106 ng/L through drinking water during gestation. Fetal brain samples were collected at embryonic day 17.5 (n = 18-21 per group per sex) and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance was used to determine metabolite profiles and their relative concentrations in the fetal brain. RESULTS: The relative concentrations of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), creatine and glucose were found to decrease by 40%, 21% and 30% respectively following maternal nanoplastic exposure when compared to the controls (p < 0.05). The change in relative concentration of asparagine with nanoplastic exposure was dependent on fetal sex (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Maternal exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics caused abnormal fetal brain metabolism in mice. The present study demonstrates the potential impacts of nanoplastic exposure during fetal development and motivates further studies to evaluate the risk to human pregnancies.
Asunto(s)
Microplásticos , Poliestirenos , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Animales , Ratones , Exposición Materna/efectos adversos , Metabolómica , EncéfaloRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that the congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio is a useful prognosticator of neonatal outcome in prenatally diagnosed lung lesions. However, there remains a lack of consensus on which congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio values have the best predictive value because of operator dependence, inherent changes in lung lesion size throughout gestation, and the widespread use of maternal steroids. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the association between serial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements and neonatal outcomes among fetuses with lung malformations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of fetuses with a prenatally diagnosed lung malformation managed at 2 major fetal centers from January 2010 to December 2021. Prenatal variables, including prospectively measured congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements (initial, maximum, and final), were analyzed. The results were correlated with 3 outcome measures, namely surgical resection before 30 days of life, a need for supplemental O2 at birth, and endotracheal intubation at birth. Statistical analyses were performed using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, Welch 2 sample t tests, and multivariable logistic regressions (P<.05). RESULTS: There were 123 fetuses with isolated lung lesions identified. Eight (6.5%) had hydrops. The mean initial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 0.67±0.61 cm2 at 22.9±3.9 weeks' gestation. The mean maximum congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 1.08 ± 0.94 cm2 at 27.0 ± 4.0 weeks' gestation. The mean final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio was 0.58±0.60 cm2 at 33.2±4.1 weeks' gestation. At a mean gestational age at delivery of 38.3±2.6 weeks, 15 (12.2%) underwent neonatal lung resection for symptomatic disease. In a multivariable regression, all 3 congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio measurements showed a significant correlation with neonatal lung resection (P<.001). Optimal congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio cutoffs were established based on an initial congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥0.8 cm2, maximum congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥1.5 cm2, and a final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of ≥1.3 cm2 with associated areas under the curve of 0.89, 0.97, and 0.93, respectively. The final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio had the highest specificity for predicting surgical lung resection in the early postnatal period. CONCLUSION: Measuring congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratios throughout pregnancy in fetuses with pulmonary malformations has clinical value for prenatal counseling and planning care transition after delivery. Fetuses with a final congenital pulmonary airway malformation volume ratio of more than 1.3 cm2 are likely to require neonatal surgery and therefore should be delivered at tertiary care centers with a neonatal intensive care unit and pediatric surgical expertise.
Asunto(s)
Malformación Adenomatoide Quística Congénita del Pulmón , Enfermedades Fetales , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Malformación Adenomatoide Quística Congénita del Pulmón/diagnóstico , Malformación Adenomatoide Quística Congénita del Pulmón/epidemiología , Malformación Adenomatoide Quística Congénita del Pulmón/complicaciones , Feto , MorbilidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of secondary tethered spinal cord (TSC) between prenatal and postnatal closure in patients with MMC. The objectives was to understand the incidence of secondary TSC after prenatal surgery for MMC compared to postnatal surgery for MMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On May 4, 2023, a systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to gather relevant data. Primary studies focusing on repair type, lesion level, and TSC were included, while non-English or non-Dutch reports, case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, letters, comments, and animal studies were excluded. Two reviewers assessed the included studies for bias risk, following PRISMA guidelines. TSC frequency in MMC closure types was determined, and the relationship between TSC occurrence and closure technique was analyzed using relative risk and Fisher's exact test. Subgroup analysis revealed relative risk differences based on study designs and follow-up periods. A total of ten studies, involving 2,724 patients, were assessed. Among them, 2,293 patients underwent postnatal closure, while 431 received prenatal closure for the MMC defect. In the prenatal closure group, TSC occurred in 21.6% (n = 93), compared to 18.8% (n = 432) in the postnatal closure group. The relative risk (RR) of TSC in patients with prenatal MMC closure versus postnatal MMC closure was 1.145 (95%CI 0.939 to 1.398). Fisher's exact test indicated a statistically non-significant association (p = 0.106) between TSC and closure technique. When considering only RCT and controlled cohort studies, the overall RR for TSC was 1.308 (95%CI 1.007 to 1.698) with a non-significant association (p = .053). For studies focusing on children up until early puberty (maximum 12 years follow-up), the RR for tethering was 1.104 (95%CI 0.876 to 1.391), with a non-significant association (p = 0.409). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This review found no significant increase in relative risk of TSC between prenatal and postnatal closure in MMC patients, but a trend of increased TSC in the prenatal group. More long-term data on TSC after fetal closure is needed for better counseling and outcomes in MMC.
Asunto(s)
Meningomielocele , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Meningomielocele/cirugía , Feto , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Incidencia , Médula EspinalRESUMEN
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy continue to be significant contributors to adverse perinatal outcome and maternal mortality, as well as inducing life-long cardiovascular health impacts that are proportional to the severity and frequency of pregnancy complications. The placenta is the interface between the mother and fetus and its failure to undergo vascular maturation in tandem with maternal cardiovascular adaptation by the end of the first trimester predisposes to hypertensive disorders and fetal growth restriction. While primary failure of trophoblastic invasion with incomplete maternal spiral artery remodeling has been considered central to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, cardiovascular risk factors associated with abnormal first trimester maternal blood pressure and cardiovascular adaptation produce identical placental pathology leading to hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Outside pregnancy blood pressure treatment thresholds are identified with the goal to prevent immediate risks from severe hypertension >160/100 mm Hg and long-term health impacts that arise from elevated blood pressures as low as 120/80 mm Hg. Until recently, the trend for less aggressive blood pressure management during pregnancy was driven by fear of inducing placental malperfusion without a clear clinical benefit. However, placental perfusion is not dependent on maternal perfusion pressure during the first trimester and risk-appropriate blood pressure normalization may provide the opportunity to protect from the placental maldevelopment that predisposes to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Recent randomized trials set the stage for more aggressive risk-appropriate blood pressure management that may offer a greater potential for prevention for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. KEY POINTS: · Optimal management of maternal blood pressure to prevent preeclampsia and its risks is undefined.. · Early gestational rheological damage to the intervillous space predisposes to preeclampsia and FGR.. · First trimester blood pressure management may need to aim for normotension to prevent preeclampsia..
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop a realistic simulation model for laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic spina bifida aperta (SBa) surgery, to be used for training purposes and preoperative planning. METHODS: The predefined general requirement was a realistic model of an exteriorized uterus, allowing all neurosurgical steps of the intervention. The uterus was modelled using ultrasound and MRI images of a 25 weeks' gravid uterus, consisting of flexible polyurethane foam coated with pigmented silicone. The fetal model, contained an opening on the dorsal side for a customizable spinal insert with all the aspects of a SBa, including a cele, placode, and myofascial and skin layer. The model was assessed in a series of validation experiments. RESULTS: Production costs are low, uterus and fetus are reusable. Placental localization and the level and size of the spinal defect are adjustable, enabling case-specific adaptations. All aspects of the simulator were scored close to realistic or higher for both appearance and functional capacities. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative model provides an excellent training opportunity for centers that are starting a fetoscopic SBa repair program. It is the first simulation model with adjustable spinal defect and placental localisation. Further objective validation is required, but the potential for using this model in preoperative planning is promising.