RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are rare, benign, aggressive, recurrent tumors that are most often found at the ends of long bones. They account for 5% of all primary bone tumors and 20% of all benign bone tumors. The clinical features of GCTB include local swelling, pain, and limitations in joint movement. Approximately half of GCTB arise around the knee joint, affecting either the distal femur or proximal tibia. Tissue biopsy reveals an excess of multinucleated giant cells on a stromal cell background, indicating a diagnosis. Intralesional curettage is used to treat GCTB and is associated with minimal disability; however, local recurrence may occur in many patients. Resection and endoprosthetic repair or bone graft reconstruction are often used to treat GCTB near the joint. To our knowledge, there are currently no studies on this topic in the city of Jeddah, where we conducted our study. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of surgical resection accompanied by denosumab injection compared to that of surgery alone in treating GCTB. METHODS: All cases of GCTB at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, between January 2008 and December 2018, that fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. All cases of GCTB in the pre-specified period were classified as surgical resection with denosumab injection or surgical resection alone. The outcomes of the two modalities were compared. Recurrence was investigated in patients belonging to both the groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study and the data were analyzed. The subjects were divided into two groups: denosumab and surgery (n = 7) and surgery alone (n = 19). Patients treated with denosumab and surgery had a higher recurrence rate (57%); however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.407). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that when comparing local recurrence after curettage in patients treated with denosumab and patients who did not receive it, preoperative denosumab therapy was associated with an increased incidence of local recurrence. We recommend a systematic review that can include more studies in this field to acquire more definitive results regarding this topic.
RESUMEN
The monitoring of the tumor marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is commonly used as a part of epithelial ovarian cancer monitoring for recurrence. This study seeks to calculate the average time between CA-125 elevation above 35 IU/mL and evidence of recurrence through any currently accepted modality (positive clinical findings, biopsy, imaging, or PET [positron emission tomography] findings) in a patient population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We studied patients who were diagnosed between January 2006 and December 2016, underwent successful primary therapy, and were then followed up at Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We adopted a cross-sectional chart review study design. We used inclusive (consecutive) sampling. A total of 13 patients were included, of whom 76.9% (10 patients) developed CA-125 elevations above 35 IU/mL prior to the confirmation of recurrence. If all 13 patients are included in the mean average calculation, the mean average time elapsed between CA-125 elevation and confirmation of recurrence was 161.5 days (standard deviation ± 230.6). If only the 10 patients who did exhibit a CA-125 elevation above 35 IU/mL were included, the mean average was 210 days (standard deviation ± 244.2).
