Use of Simethicone After Capsule Ingestion and Its Impact on the Quality of Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Pilot Study.

Background Small bowel capsule endoscopy is a tool to visualize the small bowel (SB) for conditions such as obscure bleeding. Various studies have been performed to compare various bowel preparation regimens in terms of small bowel transit time (SBTT), small bowel visualization quality (SBVQ), and diagnostic yield (DY). Literature suggests that using polyethylene glycol (PEG) prep is significantly better compared to clear liquid and overnight fast in terms of SBVQ and DY. Other investigators have tried to assess the efficacy of adding simethicone to the bowel preparation regimen which seems to improve SBVQ. However, no studies have been done to assess the results of simethicone ingestion after capsule swallowing. We intend to give patients simethicone one hour after capsule ingestion for two consecutive hours and compare results for SBVQ pre-and post-ingestion groups. The objective of this study is to compare the effect of simethicone on SBVQ in pre- and post-capsule ingestion groups. Methodology This prospective, randomized controlled trial included patients who were scheduled for outpatient capsule endoscopy at Albany Medical Center (AMC) Endoscopy Suite. Patients were divided into the control group, group 1, and the treatment group (group 2). The control group followed the standard AMC pre-capsule protocol that included PEG 238 g the evening prior. Group 1 included patients who received 3 mL of simethicone (20 mg/0.3 mL) 20 minutes prior to ingesting the capsule. The treatment group (group 2) included patients who ingested simethicone 3 mL 20 minutes prior to capsule swallowing, 3 mL after one hour, and 1.5 mL after another hour, totaling 7.5 mL of simethicone. Data regarding SBVQ for every patient were evaluated as an individual zone score from 1-3 points, each in proximal, middle, and distal SB based on the SBTT. A cumulative score of 3-9 was given after adding the three zones. These scores were derived using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel software. Results There were six patients in the control group, eight in group 1, and eight in the treatment group (group 2). Proximal, middle, and distal SB did not show any significant difference between their SBVQ scores. Moreover, the total combined score also showed no statistical difference in the SBVQ score. Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences in the SBVQ neither while looking at the cumulative score nor individual segmental score of the entire SB. However, this is only a pilot project with a small number of subjects and results may differ in future studies with increased power.

A Comparison of the Effects of COVID-19 on Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients While Working at Home and in the Office: A Retrospective Study.

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a strong relationship with psychological stress. Studies have shown increased stress levels in patients with IBS and IBD during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. The current literature on the impact of work environment on IBD and IBS symptoms is limited, particularly during the current pandemic. Objective This study aims to analyze how the pandemic impacted patients with IBS and IBD in the setting of staying home versus working outside the home. Methods After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, a retrospective review of 245 patients with IBS and IBD who followed with our gastroenterology clinic in the past year was performed. Patients were asked about symptoms including, but not limited to, worsening diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain. Pearson's chi-squared test was used for analysis. Results Of the 245 patients in our study, 67 had IBS, 166 had IBD, and 12 had both. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.4. A total of 136 (55.5%) patients worked from home during the pandemic, while 109 (44.5%) patients worked outside. Eighty-three patients working from home reported no change in symptoms, 35 reported worsening symptoms, and 18 reported an improvement in symptoms. Sixty-eight patients working outside the home reported no change in symptoms, 26 reported worsening symptoms, and 15 reported improvements. Working outside the home had a statistically significant relationship with COVID-19 infection. Thirty patients were infected, of which 22 (73.3%) worked outside the home (p=0.01). Overall, 203 (82.8%) patients received the vaccine, and only 14 of these patients reported worsening gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms one week after receiving the vaccine. Comparable results were seen after dividing the data into cohorts of IBS and IBD patients. Of the patients with IBD staying at home, 15.9% had depression (p=0.01). Conclusion Most patients had symptoms at baseline. There was no statistically significant correlation between change in symptoms and work settings. Patients were less likely to be infected with COVID-19 while staying home. Our patient population showed a high vaccination rate of 82.9% as compared to the national average of 59.2% (source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)). Only 5.7% of the patients reported new or worsening gastrointestinal symptoms in the week following vaccination. The limitations of the study included its retrospective design and poor correlation in general between symptoms and disease activity in IBD patients.

Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Who Have Gastrointestinal Bleeds Requiring Intervention: A Case-Control Study.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is widely recognized as a disease that affects the respiratory system, although it can also present with significant extrapulmonary symptoms. Very few studies have suggested an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. This study aimed to elucidate the incidence, etiology, risk factors, and outcomes of clinically significant GI bleeding requiring endoscopic intervention in patients with COVID-19. Methods This is a case-control (1:2) retrospective analysis of all hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 infection admitted between March 1, 2020, and January 5, 2021, in which we compared patients with upper and lower GI bleeds to those without. Cases are defined as patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who had a GI bleed requiring intervention while controls are defined as patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who did not have a GI bleed. Of 1002 patients admitted to the Albany Medical Center with COVID-19 infection, there were 76 confirmed cases of GI bleeding. These patients were compared to a control group composed of randomly selected patients with COVID-19 infection who were admitted to Albany Medical Center over the same time period. We assessed patients for in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days on day 28, ICU-free days on day 28, and hospital-free days on day 28. Additional information collected included demographic information, comorbid conditions, COVID-19 treatments received, endoscopy findings, endoscopic treatment received, and if the patients required a packed red blood cell transfusion. Results Out of 1007 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 76 (8%) had a GI bleed requiring endoscopic intervention. Peptic ulcer disease in the stomach or duodenum was the most common finding. The use of steroids, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulation was not associated with an increased risk of GI bleed in COVID-19 patients. The GI bleed group required ICU care in 37% (28/76) compared with 21% (32/152) in the control group, which was statistically significant (p=0.012; chi-square test). Length of hospital stay was longer in the GI bleed group (median 16 days IQR: 8 to 29 versus 7 days, IQR:4 to 16; p<0.001, Mann Whitney test). Conclusion Length of hospital stay and ICU level of care was higher in the GI bleed group of patients with COVID-19. ICU level of care was noted to be associated with an increased risk of GI bleeding. A GI bleed in COVID-19 patients could be from the virus's direct effect on the gut mucosa or stress-induced bleeding like any other severely sick ICU patient; however, this needs to be explored in future studies.

Acute portal venous thrombosis as an extrahepatic manifestation of acute hepatitis A infection.

Among the many potential causes and risk factors for acute portal venous thrombosis, viral hepatitis has been regarded as a rare associated condition. We present the first case in the literature of a 30-year-old previously healthy male who presented with acute portal venous thrombosis associated with acute hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, describing the probable pathophysiology mechanism, work-up and treatment pursued. We encourage that hepatitis A serological markers should be routinely included in the investigation for acute portal venous thrombosis of unknown aetiology, in unvaccinated patients with risk factors of a recent HAV exposure.

Clinical predictors of symptom improvement failure in gastroparesis.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine clinical predictors of gastroparesis outcomes. Methods: Between September 30, 2009 and January 31, 2020, we identified patients with gastroparesis diagnosed based on a 99mTc sulfur-labeled gastric emptying test. The patients who had no symptom improvement at 4 and 12 weeks were considered to have failed to show clinical improvement. Logistic regression was used to compute the association between different factors and clinical outcomes. Results: We identified 320 patients (mean age 47.5±5.3 years, 70.3% female, 71.3% Whites). Failure of clinical improvement was seen in 34.7% patients at 4 weeks and 27.5% at 12 weeks after the gastroparesis diagnosis. At 4 weeks, chronic kidney disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-5.26; P=0.007) and body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 (aOR 9.90, 95%CI 2.98-32.93; P<0.001) were associated with a lack of improvement, whereas type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was associated with better clinical outcomes (aOR 0.50, 95%CI 0.25-0.99; P=0.047). At 12 weeks, subjects who had undergone post-bariatric surgery had no improvement of their gastroparesis symptoms (aOR 2.43, 95%CI 1.01-5.82; P=0.047), whereas T2DM was associated with clinical improvement (aOR 0.46, 95%CI 0.22-0.95; P=0.035). The subgroup analysis showed that BMI <18.5 kg/m2 in non-diabetics and peripheral neuropathy in diabetics were associated with persistent symptoms. Conclusions: Gastroparesis patients with T2DM had significant symptom improvement. A history of bariatric surgery and renal failure were associated with worse clinical improvement. Peripheral neuropathy in diabetics was associated with persistent symptoms.

High-Resolution Esophageal Manometric Features in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The aims of our study included (1) to assess esophageal motility patterns of EoE by topographic analysis of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and (2) to establish a relationship between symptoms of EoE and motility abnormalities seen on HRM. Methods: A retrospective study in which all adult patients over 18 years of age with EoE diagnosed by endoscopy and histology and who underwent HRM were included in the study during the study period. Motility patterns in patients with EoE under HRM were analyzed. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages with inference by Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Results: Seven hundred patients diagnosed with EoE were noted, and of these, 38 patients had undergone esophageal HRM. Fifty-eight percent of these patients were noted to have an esophageal motility abnormality on HRM. Thirty-seven percent of the patients showed absent peristalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization but normal integrate relaxation pressure; 21% of the patients showed peristaltic dysfunction; and 42% of the patients had a normal HRM. Seventy-one percent of the patients with pan-esophageal pressurization presented with food impaction requiring endoscopy for disimpaction and esophageal dilation (P = .015). Conclusion: The most common abnormality noted was aperistalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization. This abnormality correlated with the clinical presentation of bolus impaction requiring an endoscopic intervention (P = .015).

Obliterative Portal Venopathy Caused by Oral Contraceptive Pills: A Case Report.

Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) have a known prothrombotic effect. Obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) can be seen in patients with underlying hypercoagulability. We present a case of a 19-year-old female patient taking OCPs who presented with obstructive jaundice. Her main concern was pruritis. An extensive workup was done to reach a diagnosis but it came back negative. A liver biopsy showed OPV. This was thought secondary to her OCP use. Her OCPs were discontinued which resulted in a complete resolution of her symptoms and laboratory abnormalities. Cases with a direct relationship between OPV and OCP use are extremely rare. More studies are required to establish a correlation between OPV and OCPs. OPV should be considered in the differential diagnosis among patients with obstructive jaundice without an obvious cause, especially in patients taking OCPs. Treatment is stopping the OCPs with close follow-up to confirm disease resolution.

An Unusual Case of Gastric Outlet Obstruction After Embolization of Gastroduodenal Artery Pseudoaneurysm.

Gastric outlet obstruction can occur secondary to intrinsic or extrinsic pathology. Historically peptic ulcer disease was the most common cause of gastric outlet obstruction but now malignancy-associated disease process is more common. Gastric outlet obstruction from mucosal ischemia caused by embolization of gastroduodenal artery is unheard of. This is due to the extensive blood supply of the stomach. We present an unusual presentation of gastric outlet obstruction in a patient with recent embolization of pancreatitis-induced pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery. The diagnosis was confirmed with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, computed tomography, and upper gastrointestinal series. The case was managed conservatively with a clear liquid diet and proton pump inhibitors. Repeat upper endoscopies at 1 and 6 months after presentation confirmed disease resolution. No guidelines exist on the management of such cases due to the rarity of the disease.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Four-Year Single-Center Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of hospital and community-acquired diarrhea with an annual incidence of 453,000 cases in the USA. The white race, female gender, and age over 65 years are known risk factors. Recurrence of CDI is a major problem in patients taking antibiotics for prolonged periods. These patients are observed to have reduced diversity of the intestinal microbiome. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can restore the healthy flora in the gut, thus breaking the cycle of recurrent infection. Our study aimed to analyze the efficacy of FMT and the recurrence of CDI after FMT. We also aimed to investigate the effects of comorbidities on the outcome of FMT. METHODS: After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, we included 64 patients who had received FMT at our institution from October 2015 to November 2019. All the patients over 16 years of age in both inpatient and outpatient settings were included. Patients under 16 years of age and patients treated without FMT were excluded. Frozen stool from a standardized stool bank (OpenBiome) was used. The thawed specimen was instilled into the terminal ileum or the cecum. Patients were followed up for the next 1 year for analysis of improvement in symptoms, recurrence, and repeat FMT. RESULTS: On the 2-months follow-up, 75% of patients reported symptomatic improvement, 15.6% reported no improvement while 9.4% did not follow up. Twenty-six (40.6%) patients had CDI recurrence in the following year; and 69.2% of patients with recurrence underwent a repeat FMT. There was no statistically significant correlation between CDI recurrence and the age (P value = 0.68), gender (P value = 0.61), previous use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs, P value = 0.11) or antibiotics (P value = 0.45). There was a statistically significant correlation noted with the use of immunosuppressants and recurrence (P value = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: FMT is a successful treatment modality for refractory and recurrent CDI. Repeat treatments can be beneficial if there is a lack of initial response. Being immunosuppressed with medications is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Possible Risk Factors for Candida Esophagitis in Immunocompetent Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Candida esophagitis (CE) is a condition typically diagnosed in patients who are immunocompromised. Risk factors leading to the development of CE in immunocompetent patients have not been entirely elucidated. This study set out to identify risk factors associated with the development of CE in immunocompetent patients. METHODS: This study was a single-center retrospective chart review. Patients diagnosed with CE confirmed by endoscopic biopsy or brushings at our hospital between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. The medical histories, endoscopy reports and pathology results were noted. Abdominal pain, heartburn, dysphagia and odynophagia were the common indications for endoscopy. A total of 241 patients were identified as having been diagnosed with CE by endoscopic brushing or biopsy. Of these patients, 161 were excluded due to the presence of immunocompromising and 80 patients were included who had no underlying immunocompromising conditions. RESULTS: Eighty patients with CE satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 39.8 years old (95% CI: 34.9 - 44.7). The incidences in men and women were similar in this study (49% women and 51% men). Of these patients, 56 (70%) (95% CI: 59-80%; P < 0.005) were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Fifteen patients (19%) had a previous upper endoscopy with evidence of reflux esophagitis, and they were all treated with PPIs and subsequently found to have CE on repeat upper endoscopy with a mean of 21.6 months of PPI treatment. There were 16 (20%) patients without any attributable risk factor and were completely healthy. CONCLUSIONS: CE is an opportunistic infection typically seen in immunocompromised. We report incidence of CE in immunocompetent patients. In our cohort of immunocompetent patients, PPI use was the most common risk factor associated with the development of CE. This could be related to hypochlorhydria resulting from PPI use. However, the cause remains unclear in some patients.