Administration of fibrinogen concentrate for refractory bleeding in massively transfused, non-trauma patients with coagulopathy: a retrospective study with comparator group.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, single centre study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate (FBNc) in decreasing blood requirements and reaching optimal fibrinogen level, in non-trauma, massively transfused, bleeding patients with coagulopathy. METHODS: Over a 3-years period, all patients for whom a massive transfusion protocol was activated and had received ≥ 4 units of allogeneic blood components within a ≤ 4 h period, were included. Patients were classified according to whether they received FBNc or achieved an optimal fibrinogen level of ≥ 2 g/L within 24 h after FBNc administration. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients received 2 [2,4] g of FBNc (FBNc group) and 72 did not (comparator group). FBNc was administered after transfusing 5 [5,9] blood component units, 3 [2,6] hours after massive transfusion protocol activation. Linear regression analysis showed that SOFA (AOR 0.75 [95% CI:0.08-1.43]) and admission fibrinogen level (AOR -2.7 [95% CI:-4.68 - -0.78]), but not FBNc administration, were independently associated with total transfused units. There was a significant inverse relation between both admission and target fibrinogen levels, and total transfused components. Logistic regression showed a direct relationship between admission fibrinogen level and achieving a target level ≥ 2 g/L (AOR 3.29 [95% CI;1.95-5.56]). No thromboembolic events associated with FBNc were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In massively transfused, non-trauma patients with coagulopathy and refractory bleeding, late administration of low FBNc dosage was not associated with decreased blood transfusion or increased post-infusion fibrinogen level. Given that both fibrinogen upon admission and target fibrinogen levels were associated with decreased blood transfusion, earlier administration and higher doses of FBNc could be needed.

Clinical efficacy and safety of the combination of colistin plus vancomycin for the treatment of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

A potent synergy of a glycopeptide-colistin combination against Acinetobacter baumannii has recently been described. We set out to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a retrospective study including episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia or bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. We compared 29 patients (group I) treated with colistin plus vancomycin with 28 patients treated with colistin alone (group II). Group I received vancomycin (for empirical or targeted therapy) at the onset of colistin administration and both antimicrobials coincided for at least 5 days. Baseline characteristics, clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and mortality were similar in both groups but the rate of acute kidney injury was higher in group I (55.2 vs. 28%; p = 0.04). In critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infections, clinical outcomes do not differ in patients treated with colistin plus vancomycin from those receiving colistin without vancomycin. This combination significantly increases the risk of renal failure.

Efficacy of the prothrombin complex concentrate prothromplex in patients requiring urgent reversal of vitamin K antagonists or presenting with uncontrolled bleeding: a retrospective, single center study.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Prothromplex, PTX) in shortening prolonged international normalized ratio or controlling life-threatening bleeding. The study was a retrospective single-centre study that included 142 patients treated with PTX and allocated in three groups: patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (acenocumarol) and undergoing invasive procedure or presenting with severe bleeding (n = 76), patients treated with VKA presenting with intracranial haemorrhage (n = 22), and patients not on VKA and presenting with uncontrolled bleeding (n = 44). The primary outcome variable was international normalized ratio (INR) return to the norm after PTX infusion. Secondary outcome variables included bleeding control and reduction of transfusion rate. Overall, patients received a median of 1200 IU (≈15 IU/kg) of PTX, and INR decreased from 4 ±â€Š3 to 1.7 ±â€Š1.2 (P < 0.01) in all groups, although it remained at least 1.4 in 38% of patients (29.3% among patients receiving 25 IU/kg vs. 42.6% among those receiving 15 IU/kg; P < 0.05). Patients with initial INR at least 4 benefited the most from treatment. After PTX administration, there was a significant reduction in both transfused blood components units (P < 0.01) and estimated blood loss volume (from 1500 ±â€Š1500 to 200 ±â€Š100 ml; P < 0.01), and only one episode of deep venous thrombosis was observed. Administration of fixed doses of PTX shortened prolonged international normalized ratio and improved life-threatening bleeding in patients with or without VKA therapy. Higher dose attained a more adequate post-infusion INR.

Use of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer in the Andalusian public health system.

BACKGROUND: The place of monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer has not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the treatment pattern of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer patients in the Andalusian Public Healthcare System. METHOD: Data were collected from all patients treated with these drugs from July 2009 to December 2010 from pharmacy programs and medical records. RESULTS: Three hundred patients were included, of whom 227 received the antibody at the forefront. The proportion of patients who received bevacizumab in the first line is greater than that of cetuximab (62.1 vs. 37.5 % respectively) and similar in the second line and subsequent (47.8 vs. 53.8 % and 48.5 vs. 46.2 % respectively). XELOXbevacizumab was the most frequently prescribed scheme (35.3 %) followed by FOLFOX-monoclonal antibody schemes, regardless that this was bevacizumab or cetuximab (22.5 %). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.7 months for patients receiving cetuximab, 9.6 months for patients receiving bevacizumab and 8.2 months for those who received no monoclonal antibody in the first line. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was the antibody of choice in first line, showing utilization rates similar to cetuximab in second line and subsequent. The median PFS in our study is related to the PFS of the major clinical trials.