RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Practice guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics recommend evidence-based behavioral therapy (BT) as first-line treatment for preschool-age children with ADHD, prior to medication initiation. Thus, this study's objective is to present the frequency of physician-documented receipt of BT in preschool-age children with ADHD prior to medication initiation and to determine factors associated with receipt BT receipt. METHODS: This retrospective medical record review was conducted across 7 Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) sites. Data were abstracted for children <72 months old seen by a DBP clinician and initiated on ADHD medication between 1/1/2013-7/1/2017. From narrative text of the medical records, BT receipt was coded as: parent training in behavior management (PTBM), Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), other, or did not receive. RESULTS: Of the 497 children in this study; 225 children (45%) had reported receipt of any BT prior to ADHD medication initiation, with 15.9% (n = 79) receiving PTBM. Children with co-existing diagnoses of ASD or disruptive behavior disorder were more likely to receive BT than children without co-existing conditions (59.3% vs 69.0% vs 30.6%). There was significant site variability in reported receipt of BT, ranging from 22.4% to 74.1%, and sex and insurance were not associated with BT rates. CONCLUSION: The percentage of children with documented receipt of any BT, and particularly PTBM, was low across all sites and co-existing conditions. These findings highlight the universal need to increase receipt of evidence-based BT for all young children with ADHD.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Estados Unidos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Consejo , Terapia Conductista , PediatrasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity or externalizing symptoms (EXT) or internalizing symptoms (INT) moderate response to stimulants (STIM) and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2As) in preschool ADHD. METHODS: Health records for children treated with medication for ADHD and with parent rating scale data available (N = 309; age <72 months) were reviewed at 7 Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Research Network sites. Severity of ADHD was defined as the number of ADHD symptoms occurring often or very often on DSM-IV-based parent rating scales. EXT or INT from standardized rating scales were categorized as T score <60, 60 to <70, or ≥70. Ordinal logistic regression models predicting response to medication were calculated. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age at ADHD diagnosis was 59 (54-65) months. One hundred eighty-three participants had ADHD symptom severity, and 195 had EXT or INT data. ADHD severity was not associated with medication response. Both EXT and INT were associated with medication response but with significant medication class by EXT/INT interactions. Children with higher EXT were less likely to respond to STIM, with percentage of nonresponders for T-score categories <60, 60 to <70, and ≥70 being 3.6%, 25.7%, and 33.3% (p = 0.016) and, for A2As, being 60%, 50%, and 33.3% (p = 0.55), respectively. A similar pattern was observed for INT categories: STIM 19.4%, 22.5%, and 50.0% (p = 0.002) and A2As 42.3%, 30%, and 42.3% (p = 0.48), respectively. CONCLUSION: For preschool ADHD, low ratings of EXT or INT are associated with a high likelihood of response to STIM. By contrast, response rates to STIM and A2As are more similar for children with high levels of EXT or INT.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Escolaridad , Instituciones Académicas , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , PadresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare the type and frequency of a range of common and uncommon adverse effects (AEs) associated with α-2 adrenergic agonist (A2A) and stimulant treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at preschool-age as well as to evaluate the impact of age on common AEs. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective electronic medical record review of children <72 months of age (n = 497) evaluated at outpatient developmental-behavioral pediatric practices at 7 US academic medical centers within the Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network. Data on AEs were abstracted for children who had treatment initiated by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician with an A2A or stimulant medication between January 2013 and July 2017; follow-up was complete by February 2019. RESULTS: A2A and stimulants had distinctive AE profiles. A2A compared with stimulants had a greater proportion with daytime sleepiness and headaches; stimulants had significantly greater proportions for most other AE, including moodiness/irritability, difficulty with sleep, appetite suppression, stomachaches, skin picking/repetitive behaviors, withdrawn behavior, and weight loss. Younger age was associated with disruptive behavior and difficulty with sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulants had a greater rate of most AEs compared with A2A. AE profiles, together with efficacy, should inform clinical decision-making. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to fully compare efficacy and AE profiles of A2A and stimulants.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Pediatría , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Objectives: To determine whether conditions coexisting with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschool-age children are associated with choice of stimulants or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2As) and/or likelihood of improvement in ADHD symptoms. Methods: A retrospective electronic health record review of 497 children from 7 Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) sites. Children were <72 months when treated with medication for ADHD from January 1, 2013 to July 1, 2017. We abstracted coexisting conditions, initial medication prescribed, and whether the medication was associated with improvement in symptoms. Analysis of improvement was adjusted for clustering by clinician and site. Results: The median (interquartile range) child age at the time of initiation of ADHD medication was 62 (54-67) months. The most common coexisting conditions included language disorders (40%), sleep disorders (28%), disruptive behavior disorders (22.7%), autism spectrum disorder (ASD; 21.8%), and motor disorders (19.9%). No coexisting conditions were present in 17.1%; 1 in 36.8%, 2 in 26.8%, and ≥3 in 19.3%. Stimulants were initially prescribed for 322 (64.8%) and A2A for 175 (35.2%) children. Children prescribed stimulants were more likely to have no coexisting conditions than those prescribed A2A (22.3% vs. 7.4%; p < 0.001). Coexisting ASD and sleep disorder were associated with increased likelihood of starting A2As versus stimulants (p < 0.0005; p = 0.002). The association between medication treatment and improvement varied by number of coexisting conditions for 0, 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively (84.7%, 73.8%, 72.9%, 64.6%; p = 0.031). Children with ≥3 coexisting conditions were less likely to respond to stimulants than children with no coexisting conditions (67.4% vs. 79.9%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Among preschool-age children with ADHD, those with ≥3 coexisting conditions were less likely to respond to stimulants than those with no coexisting conditions. This was not found for A2A, but further research is needed as very few children with no coexisting conditions were treated with A2A.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/complicaciones , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/complicaciones , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Importance: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is diagnosed in approximately 2.4% of preschool-age children. Stimulants are recommended as first-line medication treatment. However, up to 25% of preschool-age children with ADHD are treated with α2-adrenergic agonist medications, despite minimal evidence about their efficacy or adverse effects in this age range. Objective: To determine the frequency of reported improvement in ADHD symptoms and adverse effects associated with α2-adrenergic agonists and stimulant medication for initial ADHD medication treatment in preschool-age children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective electronic health record review. Data were obtained from health records of children seen at 7 outpatient developmental-behavioral pediatric practices in the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network in the US. Data were abstracted for 497 consecutive children who were younger than 72 months when treatment with an α2-adrenergic agonist or stimulant medication was initiated by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician for ADHD and were treated between January 1, 2013, and July 1, 2017. Follow-up was complete on February 27, 2019. Exposures: α2-Adrenergic agonist vs stimulant medication as initial ADHD medication treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reported improvement in ADHD symptoms and adverse effects. Results: Data were abstracted from electronic health records of 497 preschool-age children with ADHD receiving α2-adrenergic agonists or stimulants. Median child age was 62 months at ADHD medication initiation, and 409 children (82%) were males. For initial ADHD medication treatment, α2-adrenergic agonists were prescribed to 175 children (35%; median length of α2-adrenergic agonist use, 136 days) and stimulants were prescribed to 322 children (65%; median length of stimulant use, 133 days). Improvement was reported in 66% (95% CI, 57.5%-73.9%) of children who initiated α2-adrenergic agonists and 78% (95% CI, 72.4%-83.4%) of children who initiated stimulants. Only daytime sleepiness was more common for those receiving α2-adrenergic agonists vs stimulants (38% vs 3%); several adverse effects were reported more commonly for those receiving stimulants vs α2-adrenergic agonists, including moodiness/irritability (50% vs 29%), appetite suppression (38% vs 7%), and difficulty sleeping (21% vs 11%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective review of health records of preschool-age children with ADHD treated in developmental-behavioral pediatric practices, improvement was noted in the majority of children who received α2-adrenergic agonists or stimulants, with differing adverse effect profiles between medication classes. Further research, including from randomized clinical trials, is needed to assess comparative effectiveness of α2-adrenergic agonists vs stimulants.
Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapéutico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Guanfacina/uso terapéutico , Metilfenidato/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/efectos adversos , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/inducido químicamente , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Guanfacina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Genio Irritable , Masculino , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand developmental-behavioral pediatricians' (DBPs') use of clinic versus telephone encounters for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication management. Understanding use of telephone encounters for pharmacologic management of ADHD in preschoolers may inform care for children with ADHD. METHODS: DBP investigators within Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network abstracted data from medical records of 503 children aged younger than 72 months treated for ADHD with medication by a DBP clinician between January 1, 2013, and July 1, 2017, across 7 sites. We abstracted data about medication treatment episodes (defined as start and end/change of a specific type, dose, and frequency of ADHD medication) and encounter type (clinic vs telephone). We present descriptive statistics related to encounter types and χ2 analyses to compare frequencies across reasons for the end of treatment episode and across sites. RESULTS: The study included 503 participants with a total of 1734 treatment episodes. The initial medication was started via a clinic encounter 85.9% of the time and via telephone encounters 14.1% of the time. When evaluating reasons for end of treatment episode, decreases in dose/frequency of medication were less common for clinic versus telephone encounters (27% vs 73%; p < 0.001) and adding an additional medication was more common at clinic versus telephone encounters (64% vs 36% p < 0.001). Sites varied significantly in frequency of telephone encounters, ranging from 16.9% to 68.9% (mean 45.7%). CONCLUSION: Telephone encounters were used for pharmacologic management of ADHD in preschoolers to varying degrees across 7 DBP sites. These findings suggest that telephone management serves an important role in ADHD care.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Escolaridad , Humanos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico , Instituciones Académicas , TeléfonoRESUMEN
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common behavioral condition and the second most common chronic illness in children. The observance of specific behaviors in multiple settings have remained the most successful method for diagnosing the condition, and although there are differences in specific areas of the brain, and a high heritability estimate (â¼76%), they are not diagnostically specific. Medications, and particularly stimulant medication, have undergone rigorous studies to document their efficacy dating back to the 1970s. Likewise, behavioral interventions in the form of parent training and classroom programs have demonstrated robust efficacy during the same time period. Both medication and behavioral interventions are symptomatic treatments. The availability of only symptomatic treatments places ADHD in the same category as other chronic conditions such as diabetes and asthma. Successful treatment of most individuals requires ongoing adherence to the therapy. Improved communication between patients and their families, primary and mental health providers, and school personnel is necessary for effective ADHD treatment. Further enhancement of electronic systems to facilitate family, school, and provider communication can improve monitoring of ADHD symptoms and functional performance. The American Academy of Pediatrics ADHD guidelines were initially developed to help primary care clinicians address the needs of their patients with ADHD and were further refined with the second revision in 2019.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Niño , Conducta Infantil , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Responsabilidad Parental , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Programas Informáticos , Transición a la Atención de AdultosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Residents receive little parenting education despite its potential to improve parenting behavior and decrease child maltreatment despite the inclusion of parenting content on board certification examinations. Teaching residents how to discuss parenting and foster positive parent-child relationships is essential to treating the whole person in osteopathic pediatric medicine. OBJECTIVE: To improve pediatric and internal medicine-pediatric residents' knowledge, confidence, and skills in providing parenting advice. METHODS: Four toddler parenting and discipline modules were developed. During continuity clinic, residents viewed and discussed modules with faculty. Residents completed a confidence and knowledge questionnaire before and after the curriculum, provided a self-report of use of skills learned, and completed a feasibility survey. Faculty also completed a feasibility survey. RESULTS: Forty-one of 61 residents (67%) participated in the study. Before participation, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) resident score for confidence in giving advice was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) (on a 10-point scale), increasing to 7.0 (6.0-8.0) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 8.0 (8.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules. Median (IQR) score on board-style questions was 8.0 (7.0-9.0) (on a 12-point scale) before participating in the modules and 8.5 (7.5-9.5) for those completing 1 to 3 modules and 9.0 (7.0-9.0) for those completing 4 modules after participation; the increase was not statistically significant. Nine faculty and 29 residents completed the modules and responded to the exit survey regarding feasibility and acceptability of the curriculum. On a 4-point scale (4 being excellent), sessions had an overall mean (SD) rating of 3.7 (0.5) by faculty and 3.5 (0.5) by residents. Most residents (27 [93.1%]) reported interest in more modules, and 28 residents (96.6%) reported using information learned from the modules during clinic visits. CONCLUSION: Confidence delivering parenting advice increased among residents who completed the curriculum modules. Faculty and residents reported high feasibility ratings, and residents endorsed application of skills during clinic visits and interest in more modules.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Internado y Residencia , Responsabilidad Parental , Pediatría/educación , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Osteopática , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Assessing race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) relationships with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis, treatment, and access to care has yielded inconsistent results often based only on parent-report. In contrast, this study used broader ADHD diagnostic determination including case-definition to examine these relationships in a multisite elementary-school-based sample. METHOD: Secondary analysis of children with and without ADHD per parent and teacher-reported Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria evaluated SES, race/ethnicity, and other variables through simple bivariate/multivariable models within and across: parent-reported diagnosis, medication treatment, and meeting ADHD study case-definition. RESULTS: The total sample included 51.9% male, 51.3% White, and 53.1% with private insurance; 10% had parent-reported ADHD diagnoses while 8.3% met ADHD study case-definition. In multivariable models, White children had higher odds of parent-reported diagnoses than Black, Hispanic, and Other Race/Ethnicity children (p < 0.05), but only Hispanic children had lower odds of being case-positive (<0.05); males and children in single-parent households had higher odds of parent-reported diagnoses and being case-positive (p < 0.05); and children who were White, male, and had health insurance had higher odds of taking medication (p < 0.05). Among children who were case-positive, those with Medicaid, White, and 2-parent statuses had higher odds of parent-reported diagnoses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Children with underlying ADHD appear more likely to have assessment/medication treatment access if they are White, male, have health insurance (particularly Medicaid), and live in 2-parent households. While boys and children raised by single parents may have higher rates of ADHD diagnoses, false-positive diagnostic risk also appeared higher, inviting further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/etnología , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/etnologíaRESUMEN
Background: Factors surrounding pediatricians' parenting advice and training on parenting during residency have not been well studied. The Resident Parenting Questionnaire (RPQ) was developed to assess (a) the relationship between pediatric residents' upbringing and their parenting advice style and (b) factors associated with confidence and resource use when delivering parenting advice. Methods: Three hundred and one pediatric residents from 15 United States residency programs completed the RPQ with upbringing and advice responses categorized using Baumrind's parenting model (authoritative, authoritarian, permissive). Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests, Bowker's test of symmetry, and regression analyses assessed associations between residents' upbringing, parenting advice style/content, and confidence in providing parenting advice. Results: Most participants indicated being raised authoritatively (68%) and giving authoritative parenting advice (83%), but advice differed based on how they perceived their upbringing (p < 0.001). Residents noting authoritative upbringing were more likely to give authoritative advice (85%) while others tended to give advice differing from upbringing (e.g., those perceiving authoritarian upbringing were more likely to give authoritative/permissive). Analyses suggest resident race, acculturation, future plans, and resident level are associated with parenting advice type. Confidence in giving parenting advice decreased significantly as patient age increased and increased with resident level advancement. Residents reported consulting attending physicians for parenting advice guidance more than any other evidence-based resources. Conclusion: Most pediatric residents appear to be aware of appropriate authoritative parenting advice regardless of upbringing, especially as they advance through residency. Residents may benefit from opportunities to reflect upon their upbringing, particularly if raised in authoritarian or permissive styles. Targeted training of residents on evidence-based parenting strategies, particularly for older pediatric patients, appears warranted.
RESUMEN
Child health and developmental outcomes are influenced by the health of the family and the context created. Research suggests symptoms of poor family health (e.g. suboptimal family interactions, parenting stress) yet there is limited understanding of the factors which contribute to robust family health which may unveil opportunities for targeted intervention and family health promotion. The present study examined families' experiences of family health and factors contributing to family health. We performed a qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory methods to guide our understanding of family health for families with typically developing children aged 5-18. Interviews were conducted in family homes and all members were invited to participate. Data from interviews were transcribed, coded, thematically analyzed, and verified with select families. Ten families, including 10 mothers, 8 fathers, and 15 children participated in the study. Participants described family health as a process of balance, living purposefully, and sharing experiences together in alignment with family identity. Mediating family health were processes of awareness and reflection, and adapting, adjusting, and changing in response to family life including external stress factors. Results highlight the possibility for healthcare practitioners to facilitate families' self-reflection and awareness about their health in order to mediate family health development.
Asunto(s)
Salud de la Familia , Familia/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Early identification of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) is important for providing services and preventing secondary disabilities. Recent studies indicate that many FASDs are undiagnosed, partly because there is a need to improve detection of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE). The aims of this review are to characterize existing practices for assessing PAE in pediatric care, identify the most efficient, promising methods of detecting PAE, and recognize the knowledge and practice gaps. This review indicates that maternal self-reports remain the most common method utilized in routine clinical practice and highlights promising methods of PAE identification, including a single binge drinking question. The review yields few studies describing existing strategies to assess PAE in pediatric practice and identifies knowledge gaps that need to be addressed for improving recognition of FASDs in pediatric practice.