Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425221

RESUMEN

One fundamental strategy to address the public health threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is improved awareness among the public, prescribers, and policy makers with the aim of engaging these groups to act. World Antimicrobial Awareness Week is an opportunity for concerted and consistent communication regarding practical strategies to prevent and mitigate AMR. We highlight 10 ways for antimicrobial stewards to make the most of World Antimicrobial Awareness Week.

6.
Patient Saf Surg ; 15(1): 36, 2021 Oct 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is a core strategy for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Despite best practice guidelines and known efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing SSI risk, there is often wide variation in its use. This study was designed to determine the individual perspectives of perioperative providers at an academic tertiary referral center regarding their knowledge of preoperative antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing. METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted amongst surgical and anesthesia team members involved in preoperative antibiotic decision making. The survey addressed ten key principles relating to preoperative antibiotic use, including antibiotic choice, timing and rate of infusion, and dosing. The survey was distributed among orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and anesthesia providers at their respective monthly service line meetings between August 2017 to June 2019. The data was stored and analyzed in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. RESULTS: A total of 73 providers completed the survey. Twenty-two (30 %) of the providers agreed and 47 (64 %) disagreed that both vancomycin and cefazolin are equally effective for antibiotic prophylaxis. As for antibiotic choice in patients with penicillin allergies, 37 (51 %) agreed with vancomycin, 21 (29 %) agreed with clindamycin, and 15 (21 %) disagreed with both alternatives. When providers were surveyed regarding the appropriateness of standard versus weight adjusted dosing, 67 (92 %) agreed that vancomycin should be weight adjusted and 63 (86 %) agreed that cefazolin should be weight adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear consensus amongst providers for which antibiotic to administer for antibiotic prophylaxis despite existing guidelines. Discrepancy also exists between orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia providers in regards to appropriate antibiotic choice for patients with reported penicillin allergies. Institutions should implement evidence-based protocols for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and continue to prospectively monitor compliance in order to identify any inconsistencies that could result in inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients.

7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168508

RESUMEN

Challenges for infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship programs have arisen with the fourth wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, fueled by the delta variant. These challenges include breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals, decisions to re-escalate infection prevention measures, critical medication shortages, and provider burnout. Various strategies are needed to meet these challenges.

11.
Crit Care ; 19: 286, 2015 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26316210

RESUMEN

Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes of mortality in the intensive care unit. Over a decade ago, early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) emerged as a novel approach for reducing sepsis mortality and was incorporated into guidelines published by the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign. In addition to requiring early detection of sepsis and prompt initiation of antibiotics, the EGDT protocol requires invasive patient monitoring to guide resuscitation with intravenous fluids, vasopressors, red cell transfusions, and inotropes. The effect of these measures on patient outcomes, however, remains controversial. Recently, three large randomized trials were undertaken to re-examine the effect of EGDT on morbidity and mortality: the ProCESS trial in the United States, the ARISE trial in Australia and New Zealand, and the ProMISe trial in England. These trials showed that EGDT did not significantly decrease mortality in patients with septic shock compared with usual care. In particular, whereas early administration of antibiotics appeared to increase survival, tailoring resuscitation to static measurements of central venous pressure and central venous oxygen saturation did not confer survival benefit to most patients. In the following review, we examine these findings as well as other evidence from recent randomized trials of goal-directed resuscitation. We also discuss future areas of research and emerging paradigms in sepsis trials.


Asunto(s)
Resucitación/métodos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Presión Sanguínea , Protocolos Clínicos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Oxígeno/sangre , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Resucitación/normas , Choque Séptico/fisiopatología
12.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 13(9): 1047-50, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26175335

RESUMEN

Infection transmission in healthcare facilities is a growing concern. Visitation to healthcare facilities is very common, though the potential role of visitors in the transmission of infection is unknown. Although transmission-based precautions are generally used to prevent the spread of organisms in healthcare settings by healthcare staff, the applicability of these precautions to visitors is unclear. Decisions regarding whether to implement transmission-based precautions among visitors should take into account the organism of concern and means of transmission as well as factors pertaining to the visitor and the healthcare setting. The role of visitors as vectors for organism transmission in the healthcare setting and the potential benefits and adverse consequences of visitor adherence with transmission-based precautions are important areas for additional research.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Visitas a Pacientes , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Visitas a Pacientes/educación
13.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 16(12): 447, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25388018

RESUMEN

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been suggested for the treatment of many ailments due to its ability to modulate the immune system and to provide passive immunity to commonly circulating pathogens. Its use as primary and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of conditions affecting critically ill patients is an attractive option, especially when alternative therapy does not exist. The body of literature on the use of IVIG for the treatment of several serious conditions, including sepsis, toxic shock syndrome, acute myocarditis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and H1N1 influenza, were reviewed. Despite advances in treatment of these conditions since they were first described, there remains a paucity of well-designed studies on the use of IVIG for their treatment. Therefore, the use of IVIG for treatment of these conditions remains controversial.

14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24999384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surveillance blood cultures are often obtained in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients for detection of bloodstream infection. The major aims of this retrospective cohort study were to determine the utility of the practice of obtaining surveillance blood cultures from asymptomatic patients during the first 100 post-transplant days and to determine if obtaining more than one positive blood culture helps in the diagnosis of bloodstream infection. METHODS: We conducted a 17-month retrospective analysis of all blood cultures obtained for patients admitted to the hospital for HSCT from January 2010 to June 2011. Each patient's clinical course, vital signs, diagnostic testing, treatment, and response to treatment were reviewed. The association between number of positive blood cultures and the final diagnosis was analyzed. RESULTS: Blood culture results for 205 patients were reviewed. Cultures obtained when symptoms of infection were present (clinical cultures) accounted for 1,033 culture sets, whereas 2,474 culture sets were classified as surveillance cultures (no symptoms of infection were present). The total number of positive blood cultures was 185 sets (5.3% of cultures obtained) and accounted for 84 positive culture episodes. Incidence of infection in autologous, related allogeneic and unrelated allogeneic transplants was 8.3%, 20.0%, and 28.6% respectively. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common organisms isolated. Based on our application of predefined criteria there were 29 infections and 55 episodes of positive blood cultures that were not infections. None of the patients who developed infection were diagnosed by surveillance blood cultures. None of the uninfected patients with positive blood cultures showed any clinical changes after receiving antibiotics. There was a significant difference between the incidence of BSI in the first and second 50-day periods post-HSCT. There was no association between the number of positive blood cultures and the final diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Surveillance blood cultures in patients who have undergone HSCT do not identify bloodstream infections. The number of positive blood cultures was not helpful in determining which patients had infection. Patients are at higher risk of infection in the first 50 days post-transplant period.

15.
Int J Family Med ; 2012: 298472, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22778950

RESUMEN

Objective. The aim of this study is to describe and compare access and barriers to health services in three proximal yet topographically distinct communities in northern Honduras served by the nonprofit organization the Honduras Outreach Medical Brigada Relief Effort (HOMBRE). Methods. Study personnel employed a 25-item questionnaire in Spanish at the point of care during HOMBRE clinics in Coyoles, Lomitas, and La Hicaca (N = 220). We describe and compare the responses between sites, using Chi-squared and Fisher Exact tests. Results. Respondents in Lomitas demonstrated the greatest limitations in access and greatest barriers to care of all sites. Major limitations in access included "never" being able to obtain a blood test, obtain radiology services, and see a specialist. Major barriers were cost, distance, facility overcrowding, transportation, being too ill to go, inability to take time off work, and lack of alternate childcare. Conclusions. Despite being under the same local health authority, geographically remote Honduran communities experience greater burdens in healthcare access and barriers than neighboring communities of the same region.

16.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(3): 268-75, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22314064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of antimicrobial scrubs on healthcare worker (HCW) bacterial burden is unknown. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of antimicrobial scrubs on hand and apparel bacterial burden. DESIGN: Prospective, crossover trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty HCWs randomized to study versus control scrubs in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Weekly microbiology samples were obtained from scrub abdominal area, cargo pocket, and hands. Mean log colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were calculated. Compliance with hand hygiene practices was measured. Apparel and hand mean log CFU counts were compared. RESULTS: Adherence measures were 78% (910/1,173) for hand hygiene and 82% (223/273) for scrubs. Culture compliance was 67% (306/460). No differences were observed in bacterial hand burden or in HCWs with unique positive scrub cultures. No difference in vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and gram-negative rod (GNR) burden was observed. A difference in mean log methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CFU count was found between study and control scrubs for leg cargo pocket (mean log CFUs, 11.84 control scrub vs 6.71 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), abdominal area (mean log CFUs, 11.35 control scrub vs 7.54 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), leg cargo pocket at the beginning of shift (mean log CFUs, 11.96 control scrub vs 4.87 study scrub; [Formula: see text]), and abdominal area pocket at the end of shift (mean log CFUs, 12.14 control scrubs vs 8.22 study scrub; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: Study scrubs were associated with a 4-7 mean log reduction in MRSA burden but not VRE or GNRs. A prospective trial is needed to measure the impact of antimicrobial impregnated apparel on MRSA transmission rates.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Ropa de Protección/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Centros Médicos Académicos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Estudios Cruzados , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 14(2): 155-60, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22249425

RESUMEN

Oseltamivir and Zanamivir are the two main Neuraminidase inhibitors used for the treatment of Influenza. Oseltamivir resistance has been identified in non-pandemic influenza viruses, as well as H1N1 pandemic Influenza A viruses. Resistance is associated with increased morbidity, and poorer outcomes in severely immunocompromised hosts. Newer neuraminidase inhibitors, increased vaccination and combination therapy may be alternatives for the treatment of Influenza in this setting.

18.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 35(7): 1368-73, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21676005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) affect 1.7 million patients annually in the United States, and patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD) are at increased risk of developing HAI. HAI have been shown to substantially increase the hospital length of stay, mortality, and cost. In a cohort of patients with HAI, we sought to determine mortality, cost, and hospital length of stay attributable to AUD. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the year 2007, the largest all-payer database of hospitalized patients comprising approximately 1,000 hospitals, we performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who developed healthcare-associated pneumonia or sepsis. We excluded patients who were transferred from another healthcare facility, who were diagnosed with community-acquired infections, immunosuppression, or cancer. Logistic regression was computed to calculate attributable mortality. Linear regression analyses were computed to determine cost and hospital length of stay α = 10(-10) . RESULTS: A total of 149,892 patients developed HAI, and 8,830 (5.9%) had a co-diagnosis of AUD. Patients with AUD were younger, more likely to be men, less likely to be Asian, and more likely to be Hispanic. Patients with AUD were more likely to have tobacco dependence, less likely to be electively admitted to the hospital, and less likely to undergo surgery. They also had lower severity of illness, lower income, and were more likely to be in academic medical centers. Logistic regression revealed that AUD was an independent predictor of increased mortality: Odds ratio = 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.626; 1.799], p < 10(-10) . Linear regression demonstrated that AUD independently predicted increased hospital length of stay by 2 days: Patients with AUD had a length of stay of 13 days, 95% CI [12.4; 13.6] compared with 11 days, 95% CI [11.1; 11.4] for patients without AUD, p < 10(-10) . Linear regression also revealed that patients with AUD had a higher hospital cost: $34,826, 95% CI [32,415.71; 37,416.52] for patients with AUD compared with $27,167, 95% CI [25,703.18; 28,714.05] for patients without AUD, p < 10(-10) . CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AUD who experience HAI have worse outcomes compared with patients without AUD. Patients with AUD have higher mortality, longer hospital length of stay, and higher costs. Studies aimed at decreasing the morbidity and mortality of HAI in patients with AUD are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Anciano , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Alcohol/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov ; 5(2): 152-6, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20334616

RESUMEN

Three worldwide influenza pandemics were reported in the 20th century: in 1918, 1957 and 1968. All three pandemics were caused by different sub-types of Influenza A viruses: H1N1, H2N2 and H3N2 respectively. In early March 2009, the first cases of influenza -like illness (ILI) were reported from Mexico. This strain was identified as influenza A/ H1N1 strain. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza most commonly causes a self-limited illness, however, significant morbidity and mortality were reported in the young, the obese and in pregnant women. The drugs of choice for treatment and prophylaxis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza are the neuraminidase inhibitors, Oseltamivir and Zanamivir. While a few cases of Oseltamivir-resistance are reported, these isolates still retained their susceptibility to the inhaled Neuraminidase inhibitor, Zanamivir. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus is routinely resistant to the adamantanes: Amantadine and Rimantadine. These agents should not be used for the treatment or prophylaxis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza. The FDA recently approved the emergency use of Peramivir, an intravenous neuraminidase inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with severe influenza. We discuss the use of available antivirals, as well as the effectiveness of adjunctive therapies with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory agents, such as immunoglobulins and statins, for the treatment and management of patients with severe H1N1 influenza. This review summarizes the recent patents for the use of antivirals in treatment of severe influenza.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/efectos de los fármacos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Humanos
20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 14 Suppl 3: e18-24, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20116313

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We studied risk factors for nasal colonization with inducible dormant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ID-MRSA) and community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) in a cohort of predominantly university students. METHODS: Nasal surveillance cultures were performed in student health and ambulatory clinics. Molecular features were identified and risk factors for CA-MRSA and ID-MRSA colonization were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1000 participants, 89% (n = 890) were university students. Sixty-four percent were female, 59% Caucasian. The mean age was 23.5 years; 1.6% (n = 16) were CA-MRSA and 1.4% (n = 14) were ID-MRSA colonized. Fifteen (94%) of the CA-MRSA strains were PFGE type IV. pvl (Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene) positivity was 75% in CA-MRSA and 57% in ID-MRSA. ID-MRSA isolates were pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) type I, 7%; type II, 14%; type V, 7%; and type IV, 71%. CA-MRSA SCCmec classification was 94% type IV and 6% type V. Risk factors for carriage of CA-MRSA were older age (OR 1.046, p=0.040) and dog ownership (OR 1.450, p=0.019). Single family home (OR 0.040, p=0.007) was a protective factor. There were no significant variables of association found for ID-MRSA colonization. CONCLUSIONS: ID-MRSA/CA-MRSA colonization was low. Most isolates were PFGE types IV and II, pvl-positive and susceptible to several antibiotics. Older age and dog ownership were risk factors for CA-MRSA. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of ID-MRSA carriage.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Mascotas , Vigilancia de la Población , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Estudiantes , Universidades , Virginia/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...