One-Year Landmark Analysis of the Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Background Although beta-blockers are recommended following myocardial infarction (MI), the benefits of long-term treatment have not been established. The study's aim was to evaluate beta-blocker efficacy by dose in 1-year post-MI survivors. Methods and Results The OBTAIN (Outcomes of Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction) registry included 7057 patients with acute MI, with 6077 one-year survivors. For this landmark analysis, beta-blocker dose status was available in 3004 patients and analyzed by use (binary) and dose at 1 year after MI. Doses were classified as no beta-blocker and >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, >25% to 50%, and >50% of target doses used in randomized clinical trials. Age was 63 to 64 years, and approximately two thirds were men. Median follow-up duration was 1.05 years (interquartile range, 0.98-1.22). When analyzed dichotomously, beta-blocker therapy was not associated with improved survival. When analyzed by dose, propensity score analysis showed significantly increased mortality in the no-beta-blocker group (hazard ratio,1.997; 95% CI, 1.118-3.568; P<0.02), the >0% to 12.5% group (hazard ratio, 1.817; 95% CI, 1.094-3.016; P<0.02), and the >25% to 50% group (hazard ratio, 1.764; 95% CI, 1.105-2.815; P<0.02), compared with the >12.5% to 25% dose group. The mortality in the full-dose group was not significantly higher (hazard ratio, 1.196; 95% CI, 0.687-2.083). In subgroup analyses, only history of congestive heart failure demonstrated significant interaction with beta-blocker effects on survival. Conclusions This analysis suggests that patients treated with >12.5% to 25% of the target dose used in prior randomized clinical trials beyond 1 year after MI may have enhanced survival compared with no beta-blocker and other beta-blocker doses. A new paradigm for post-MI beta-blocker therapy is needed that addresses which patients should be treated, for how long, and at what dose.

Performance of an ICD algorithm to detect lead noise and reduce inappropriate shocks.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) provide treatment for life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Failure of the pace/sense conductor of an ICD lead can cause noise on the sensing electrogram (EGM) that may be misinterpreted as ventricular activity, triggering inappropriate therapy. An algorithm based upon the confirmation of ventricular activity from a far-field EGM has been developed to reduce inappropriate therapies resulting from this type of lead failure, while ensuring that appropriate therapy is delivered. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the algorithm's ability to discriminate lead noise from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) and to determine whether it inhibits inappropriate shocks without delaying appropriate shocks. METHODS: The algorithm was prospectively tested using near- and far-field EGM recordings from patients in three conditions: normal sinus rhythm with sustained and non-sustained lead noise via manipulation of the ICD pocket or lead system, and VT/VF induced during defibrillation threshold testing. The recordings were played through a bench-top device running the algorithm with the diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and inhibition of therapy documented. RESULTS: The algorithm detected noise and withheld inappropriate therapy in 231 of 238 recordings of sustained lead noise that would otherwise have been diagnosed as VT/VF (97.1%). Non-sustained lead noise was correctly diagnosed in 47 of the 52 recordings (90.4%). The device appropriately identified all 853 recordings of VT/VF (100%), without an increase in the time to detection (0.01 ± 0.14 s). CONCLUSIONS: The SecureSense(TM) algorithm correctly diagnosed sustained and non-sustained lead noise recordings without compromising detection of VT/VF. Use of the algorithm may reduce inappropriate shocks and alert clinicians to lead noise indicative of lead failure.

Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Following a class I recall of St. Jude Medical Riata/Riata ST silicone implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads, we report on the phase I results of the Riata Lead Evaluation Study, a prospective, multicenter investigation to assess the prevalence of externalized conductors (ECs) and the electrical dysfunction in these leads. METHODS: We enrolled patients previously implanted with Riata/Riata ST leads and performed cinefluoroscopy using multiple views. A physician panel adjudicated the images for the presence of EC. The prevalence of EC was stratified and compared by lead model and patient characteristics. Upon occurrence of a lead revision, another physician panel determined whether electrical dysfunction had occurred based on predefined criteria. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy six patients with Riata/Riata ST silicone leads (8Fr/7Fr = 66.6%/33.4%; single-/dual-coil = 12.9%/87.1%) across 23 centers were analyzed. Implant duration was 4.8 ± 0.9 years for 7Fr and 6.5 ± 1.6 years for 8Fr leads (P <.001). The prevalence of EC was significantly lower in 7Fr compared with 8Fr leads for the entire study population (9.3% vs 24.2%, P < .001) and for leads implanted ≤6 years (9.4% vs 18.8%, P = .006). Other than lead size, there were no significant differences in lead, patient, or electrical characteristics between leads with and without EC. Over a period of 9.8 ± 2.0 months, the overall prevalence of electrical dysfunction was 1.3% (confidence interval 0.49%-2.1%), with only 3 of 10 cases occurring in leads with EC. CONCLUSION: Larger-diameter Riata leads were more prone to EC than smaller-diameter Riata ST leads. The prevalence of electrical dysfunction was not associated with EC.

Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.

INTRODUCTION: The Quartet(®) left ventricular (LV) lead is the first with 4 pacing electrodes (tip and 3 rings) that enables pacing from 10 different pacing vectors. Postoperative performance of this lead was evaluated in a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter IDE study. METHODS: Patients with standard indications for CRT-D were enrolled. Electrical performance and presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) were assessed during pacing from each of 10 vectors at predischarge (within 7 days), 1 month, and 3 months postimplant. RESULTS: The Quartet LV lead was implanted successfully in 170 patients (95.5% implant success rate, 68 ± 11 years, 68.5% male, LVEF: 25 ± 7%, NYHA class III: 98.3% and class IV: 1.7%). Mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 1.9 months. Capture threshold and impedance for each of the 10 LV lead pacing vectors remained stable during follow-up. LV lead dislodgement occurred in 6 (3.5%) patients and PNS was observed in 23 (13.5%) patients. PNS was resolved noninvasively in all 23 (100%) patients, either by reprogramming to pace from the additional LV lead pacing vectors alone (13 pts, 56.5%), reprogramming to pace from the additional LV lead pacing vectors and reprogramming pacing output (4 pts, 17.4%), or by reprogramming pacing output alone (6 pts, 26.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The Quartet LV lead electrical performance was stable and was associated with a high implant success and low dislodgement rate during 3-month follow-up. In all patients with PNS, the 10 pacing vectors combined with reduced output programming enabled the elimination of PNS noninvasively.

Feasibility of using multivector impedance to monitor pulmonary congestion in heart failure patients.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary edema (PE) is associated with fluid accumulation in the lungs. Device-based impedance measurements have been used to detect fluid overload prior to hospitalization. However, studies have reported a high false positive rate (FPR). The objective of this study was to develop and test a new multivector impedance-based algorithm that reliably tracks PE clinical events. METHODS: We enrolled patients with implanted CRT-Ds in 23 US centers within 2 weeks of device implant. Six-vector impedance data was collected automatically by the CRT-Ds every 30 min during emergency department visits/hospitalizations and every 2 h at all other times. Detection algorithms for cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) devices were developed using those impedance vectors that would be available in corresponding devices and retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: There were 75 patients (69 % male), mean age 66 ± 12 years, with a LVEF of 23 ± 6 % and QRS of 149 ± 25 ms. Twenty-one major clinical events occurred over 8.2 ± 2.6 months of follow-up time. CRT-D vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 71.4 % (95 % confidence interval 47.8-88.7) and a FPR of 0.56 (0.30-0.94) false positives per patient-year (FPs/pt-yr); ICD vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 61.9 % (38.4-81.9) and a FPR of 0.63 (0.36-0.90) FPs/pt-yr. In comparison, the single-vector RVCoil-Can implementation of this algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 57.1 % (34.0-78.2) and a FPR of 0.74 (0.44-1.12) FPs/pt-yr. CONCLUSIONS: This multivector impedance algorithm was effective in tracking PE clinical events in this patient population. Additional studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the performance of this algorithm in a larger population.

Clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical Riata defibrillation lead in a large patient population.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this large multicenter study was to evaluate the long-term reliability of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead to determine the incidence of adverse events (AEs). BACKGROUND: A recent concern has been the performance of cardiac defibrillator leads. There have been conflicting reports regarding the rate of lead perforation and other AEs. METHODS: Medical records from patients implanted from 6-1-2001 to 11-27-2007 with the St. Jude Medical Riata family of RV leads at 23 US (N = 12,969) and 5 German (N = 2,418) centers were reviewed for chronic lead-related AEs. These included perforation, dislodgment, conductor fracture and insulation damage. The mean follow-up period was 18.0 months. AEs were defined as those that required Riata lead revision, extraction, or replacement. RESULTS: The incidence of lead AEs was <1% for each AE type. Perforation occurred in 0.38%, dislodgement in 0.93%, conductor fracture in 0.18%, and insulation damage in 0.21% of patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: During the follow-up of the 15,387 patients with Riata leads, the incidence of AEs which included perforation, dislodgement, conductor fraction and insulation damage was low and within the range of what is considered clinically acceptable.

Performance of the St. Jude Medical Riata leads.

BACKGROUND: Recent attention has been focused on the performance of high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads. Lead-related adverse events can be caused by several factors, including patient characteristics, concomitant therapies, implantation technique, access site, and lead design. Few studies have included the number of patients and the follow-up duration necessary to characterize accurately the lead performance and the incidence of lead-related adverse events. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to define the incidence of lead-related adverse events including conductor fracture, insulation damage, perforation, and dislodgement of St. Jude Medical Riata ICD leads. METHODS: Data from the Advancements in ICD Therapy, OPTIM Lead InsUlation Material (OPTIMUM), Resynchronization HemodYnamic Treatment for Heart Failure Management (RHYTHM), and Post Approval Study (PAS) registries provided data from 7,497 patients with Riata leads. Patients were followed up for a median of 22 months. Adverse events, defined as those that required lead revision, extraction, or replacement, were recorded. RESULTS: Conductor fracture occurred in 0.09%, insulation damage in 0.13%, dislodgement in 0.88%, and perforation in 0.31% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: During more than 22 months of follow-up of over 7,000 Riata leads in 4 prospective registries and clinical trials, the incidence of lead-related adverse events including conductor fracture, insulation damage, dislodgement, and perforation necessitating lead revision, extraction, or replacement is rare.

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes.

BACKGROUND: Indications for cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure include a prolonged QRS interval (> or =120 msec), in addition to other functional criteria. Some patients with narrow QRS complexes have echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and may also benefit from CRT. METHODS: We enrolled 172 patients who had a standard indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients received the CRT device and were randomly assigned to the CRT group or to a control group (no CRT) for 6 months. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with an increase in peak oxygen consumption of at least 1.0 ml per kilogram of body weight per minute during cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the CRT group and the control group did not differ significantly in the proportion of patients with the primary end point (46% and 41%, respectively). In a prespecified subgroup with a QRS interval of 120 msec or more, the peak oxygen consumption increased in the CRT group (P=0.02), but it was unchanged in a subgroup with a QRS interval of less than 120 msec (P=0.45). There were 24 heart-failure events requiring intravenous therapy in 14 patients in the CRT group (16.1%) and 41 events in 19 patients in the control group (22.3%), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: CRT did not improve peak oxygen consumption in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure, providing evidence that patients with heart failure and narrow QRS intervals may not benefit from CRT. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00132977 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Atrial overdrive pacing and incidence of heart failure-related adverse events in permanently paced patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial overdrive pacing algorithms may be effective in preventing or suppressing atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the maintenance of a heart rate incessantly faster than spontaneous could induce left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and promote heart failure (HF) on the long term. OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis examined the effects of a new overdrive algorithm on the incidence of HF-related adverse events in 411 patients enrolled in the ADOPT-A trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The AF Suppression algorithm was randomly programmed ON in 209 patients (treatment group) versus OFF in 202 patients (control group). The incidence of HF-related adverse events and HF-related deaths over a 6-month follow-up was compared between the two groups. Patients with versus without HF-related clinical events were also compared to each other within each group. RESULTS: There were eight HF-related adverse clinical events (3.8%) in the treatment group and 11 (5.4%) in the control group, including four HF-related deaths (1.9 vs. 2.0%) in each group during follow-up. Baseline NYHA functional class in patients with versus without HF-related adverse events was 1.4 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.7 in the control, and 1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 1.5 +/- 0.6 in the treatment group. LV ejection fraction (EF) was 49 +/- 7% in patients with, versus 57 +/- 12% in patients without HF-related adverse events, in the control group, and 43 +/- 14% in patients with, versus 56 +/- 13% in patients without HF-related adverse events, in the treatment group. LVEF was lowest and similar in both groups among patients who died from HF (35 +/- 10% in the control and 38 +/- 27% in the treatment group). CONCLUSIONS: In ADOPT-A, HF-related clinical events and deaths were related to LV dysfunction and not to atrial pacing overdriven by the AF suppression algorithm.

Acute evaluation of programmer-guided AV/PV and VV delay optimization comparing an IEGM method and echocardiogram for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients and dual-chamber ICD implants.

INTRODUCTION: Intracardiac delay optimization of biventricular and dual-chamber pacing devices currently relies on time-consuming echocardiographic measurements. A novel intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method for atrioventricular (AV/PV) and interventricular (VV) delay optimization was developed, which can be performed during routine device follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective, nonrandomized, multi-center trial, patients previously implanted with St. Jude Medical cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) devices or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) underwent standard AV/PV and/or VV delay optimization guided by Doppler echocardiogram measurements of the maximum aortic velocity time integral (aortic VTI). Aortic VTI measurements applying the IEGM method recommended delays were then obtained in all patients. Fifty-eight patients (age: 68 +/- 11 years; 81% male; 74% ischemic) and 57 patients (age: 71 +/- 10 years; 74% male; 71% ischemic) were enrolled for AV/PV and VV delay evaluation, respectively. An independent core lab determined the maximum aortic VTIs. Data analysis of the AV, PV, and VV delays demonstrated the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between the standard method aortic VTI values and the IEGM method aortic VTI values was 97.5%, 96.1%, and 96.6%, respectively. All analyses demonstrated that the CCC > 90% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The automated programmer-based IEGM method provides a reliable and simpler alternative to standard techniques for the optimization of AV/PV and VV delay settings in patients with CRT-D devices and dual-chamber ICDs.

A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT).

OBJECTIVES: The Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT) was a single blind, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the atrial fibrillation (AF) Suppression Algorithm (St. Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, Sylmar, California) in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. BACKGROUND: This algorithm increases the pacing rate when the native rhythm emerges and periodically reduces the rate to search for intrinsic atrial activity. METHODS: Symptomatic AF burden (percentage of days during which symptomatic AF occurred) was the primary end point. Patients underwent pacemaker implantation, were randomized to DDDR with the algorithm on (treatment) or off (control), and were followed for six months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and antiarrhythmic drugs used were similar in both groups. The percentage of atrial pacing was higher in the treatment group (92.9% vs. 67.9%, p < 0.0001). The AF Suppression Algorithm reduced symptomatic AF burden by 25% (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment). Atrial fibrillation burden decreased progressively in both groups but was lower in the treatment group at each follow-up visit (one, three, and six months) (p = 0.005). Quality of life scores improved in both groups. The mean number of AF episodes (4.3 +/- 11.5 control vs. 3.2 +/- 8.6 treatment); total hospitalizations (17 control vs. 15 treatment); and incidence of complications, adverse events, and deaths were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The ADOPT demonstrated that overdrive atrial pacing with the AF Suppression Algorithm decreased symptomatic AF burden significantly in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. The decrease in relative AF burden was substantial (25%), although the absolute difference was small (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment).

Amiodarone versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator:randomized trial in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia--AMIOVIRT.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this multicenter randomized trial was to compare total mortality during therapy with amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). BACKGROUND: Whether an ICD reduces mortality more than amiodarone in patients with NIDCM and NSVT is unknown. METHODS: One hundred three patients with NIDCM, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =0.35, and asymptomatic NSVT were randomized to receive either amiodarone or an ICD. The primary end point was total mortality. Secondary end points included arrhythmia-free survival, quality of life, and costs. RESULTS: The study was stopped when the prospective stopping rule for futility was reached. The percent of patients surviving at one year (90% vs. 96%) and three years (88% vs. 87%) in the amiodarone and ICD groups, respectively, were not statistically different (p = 0.8). Quality of life was also similar with each therapy (p = NS). There was a trend with amiodarone, as compared to the ICD, towards improved arrhythmia-free survival (p = 0.1) and lower costs during the first year of therapy ($8,879 US dollars vs. $22,039 US dollars, p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and quality of life in patients with NIDCM and NSVT treated with amiodarone or an ICD are not statistically different. There is a trend towards a more beneficial cost profile and improved arrhythmia-free survival with amiodarone therapy.