Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare hysteroscopic morcellation with loop resection for the removal of placental remnants in terms of procedure time, adverse events, tissue availability, histology results, short-term effectiveness, and postoperative adhesions. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: A teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Women with placental remnants. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic morcellation with the TRUCLEAR 8.0 Tissue Removal System (Smith & Nephew, Inc, Andover, MA) or loop resection with a rigid 8.5-mm bipolar resectoscope (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-six and 40 women were included in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. The median operating time was significantly shorter for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection (6.2 minutes [interquartile range, 4.0-11.2 minutes] vs 10.0 minutes [5.8-16.4 minutes], p = .023). Both operating time and total procedure time, corrected for the diameter of the placental remnants, were significantly reduced for hysteroscopic morcellation compared with loop resection, by 40% (95% confidence interval, 15%-58%; p = .005) and 22% (95% CI, 5%-37%; p = .014), respectively. No adverse events occurred during hysteroscopic removal. Perforation at dilation in 8 cases of the hysteroscopic morcellation group resulted in 2 procedure discontinuations and 1 incomplete procedure. Incomplete removal was found in 1 uncomplicated hysteroscopic morcellation procedure and 2 resection procedures. Pathology results confirmed the presence of placental remnants in 27 of 40 (67.5%) and 26 of 37 (70%) patients in the hysteroscopic morcellation and resection groups, respectively. Second-look hysteroscopy showed de novo intrauterine adhesions in 1 of 35 patients (3%) in the hysteroscopic morcellation group and 1 of 30 (3%) patients in the resection group. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic morcellation is a faster alternative than loop resection. Both techniques are safe and show high rates of complete removal and tissue availability and low rates of de novo intrauterine adhesions.

The role of androgen receptor expression in the curative treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: a pilot study.

The androgen receptor (AR) and its signaling pathway play an important role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). In the setting of primary treatment of PCa with radiotherapy (RT), where the AR can be expected to be of more importance, studies evaluating the AR expression are lacking. The goal of this research is to evaluate AR protein expression in hormone-naive PCa patients treated by RT and investigate its possible prognostic role. Primary biopsy samples of 18 patients treated with primary RT were analyzed including the corresponding clinical information. AR protein expression of the tumor epithelium (with highest Gleason pattern) and the surrounding stroma was quantified using the Quick score for steroid receptors. The differential expression between epithelium and stroma, respectively, between tumor and normal tissue (ΔTumor - ΔBenign >2 versus ≤ 2), was predictive for clinical progression-free survival in the biopsy samples (P = 0.014). Preliminary results of this research show already a promising role of differential AR expression in predicting clinical relapse after PCa treatment with primary EBRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings. Hopefully this can lead to a better understanding of PCa evolution and eventually lead to better therapy strategies.

Postoperative intensity-modulated arc therapy for cervical and endometrial cancer: a prospective report on toxicity.

PURPOSE: To report on toxicity after postoperative intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for cervical (CC) and endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four CC and 41 EC patients were treated with postoperative IMAT. If indicated, para-aortic lymph node irradiation (preventive or when affected, PALN) and/or concomitant cisplatin (40 mg/m(2), weekly) was administered. The prescribed dose for IMAT was 45 Gy (CC, 25 fractions) and 46 Gy (EC, 23 fractions), followed by a brachytherapeutic boost if possible. Radiation-related toxicity was assessed prospectively. The effect of concomitant cisplatin and PALN irradiation was evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding acute toxicity (n = 65), Grade 3 and 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in zero and 63% of patients (79% CC, 54% EC), respectively. Grade 3 and 2 acute genitourinary toxicity was observed in 1% and 18% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 (21%) and 3 (12%) hematologic toxicity (n = 41) occurred only in CC patients. Seventeen percent of CC patients and 2% of EC patients experienced Grade 2 fatigue and skin toxicity, respectively. Adding cisplatin led to an increase in Grade >2 nausea (57% vs. 9%; p = 0.01), Grade 2 nocturia (24% vs. 4%; p = 0.03), Grade ≥ 2 hematologic toxicity (38% vs. nil, p = 0.003), Grade ≥ 2 leukopenia (33% vs. nil, p = 0.009), and a strong trend toward more fatigue (14% vs. 2%; p = 0.05). Para-aortic lymph node irradiation led to an increase of Grade 2 nocturia (31% vs. 4%, p = 0.008) and a strong trend toward more Grade >2 nausea (44% vs. 18%; p = 0.052). Regarding late toxicity (n = 45), no Grade 3 or 4 late toxicity occurred. Grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, genitourinary toxicity, and fatigue occurred in 4%, 9%, and 1% of patients. Neither concomitant cisplatin nor PALN irradiation increased late toxicity rates. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative IMAT for EC or CC is associated with low acute and late toxicity. Concomitant chemotherapy and PALN irradiation influences acute but not late toxicity.