Receptor-mediated uptake of Legionella pneumophila by Acanthamoeba castellanii and Naegleria lovaniensis.

AIMS: Investigation of the attachment and uptake of Legionella pneumophila by Acanthamoeba castellanii and Naegleria lovaniensis, as these are two critical steps in the subsequent bacterial survival in both amoeba hosts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Initially, the mode of Legionella uptake was examined using inhibitors of microfilament-dependent and receptor-mediated uptake phagocytosis. Secondly, the minimum saccharide structure to interfere with L. pneumophila uptake was determined by means of selected saccharides. Bacterial attachment and uptake by each of the amoeba species occurred through a receptor-mediated endocytosis, which required de novo synthesis of host proteins. Legionella pneumophila showed a high affinity to the alpha1-3D-mannobiose domain of the mannose-binding receptor located on A. castellanii. In contrast, L. pneumophila bacteria had a high affinity for the GalNAcbeta1-4Gal domain of the N-acetyl-D-galactosamine receptor of N. lovaniensis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data pointed to a remarkable adaptation of L. pneumophila to invade different amoeba hosts, as the uptake by both amoeba species is mediated by two different receptor families. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The fact that L. pneumophila is taken up by two different amoeba species using different receptor families adds further complexity to the host-parasite interaction process, as 14 amoeba species are known to be appropriate Legionella hosts.

Impact of non-Legionella bacteria on the uptake and intracellular replication of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii and Naegleria lovaniensis.

In aquatic environments, Legionella pneumophila survives, in association with other bacteria, within biofilms by multiplying in free-living amoebae. The precise mechanisms underlying several aspects of the uptake and intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in amoebae, especially in the presence of other bacteria, remain unknown. In the present study, we examined the competitive effect of selected non-Legionella bacteria (Escherichia coli, Aeromonas hydrophila, Flavobacterium breve, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on the uptake of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 by the amoebae Acanthamoeba castellanii and Naegleria lovaniensis. We also investigated their possible influence on the intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in both amoeba species. Our results showed that the non-Legionella bacteria did not compete with L. pneumophila for uptake, suggesting that the amoeba hosts took in L. pneumophila through a specific and presumably highly efficient uptake mechanism. Living and heat-inactivated P. aeruginosa best supported the replication of L. pneumophila in N. lovaniensis and A. castellanii, respectively, whereas for both amoeba species, E. coli yielded the lowest number of replicated L. pneumophila. Furthermore, microscopic examination showed that 100% of the A. castellanii and only 2% of the N. lovaniensis population were infected with L. pneumophila at the end of the experiment. This study clearly shows the influence of some non-Legionella bacteria on the intracellular replication of L. pneumophila in A. castellanii and N. lovaniensis. It also demonstrates the different abilities of the two tested amoeba species to serve as a proper host for the replication and distribution of the human pathogen in man-made aquatic environments such as cooling towers, shower heads, and air conditioning systems with potential serious consequences for human health.

Detection of Naegleria spp. and Naegleria fowleri: a comparison of flagellation tests, ELISA and PCR.

To detect Naegleria spp, in particular Naegleria fowleri, the causative agent of human primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, a flagellation test (FT) is routinely used followed by a specific ELISA. A positive FT indicates the presence of Naegleria spp although some false negatives are likely to occur since parameters for enflagellation vary greatly. As negative FTs are not routinely screened any further for the presence of N. fowleri, this could result in an underestimation of the presence of this pathogen. Therefore, amoebae were further analysed using ELISA and standard PCR not only after a positive but also after a negative FT. In this study 39 cultures containing amoebae were tested with FT, ELISA and the two PCR assays with 11 positive for FT. These were submitted to ELISA and four confirmed as N. fowleri. PCR with the common primer-set on these 11 positive FTs revealed all as Naegleria spp. The specific PCR used on these cultures detected four positive for N. fowleri, corresponding totally with the ELISA results. The 28 negative flagellation tests were also submitted to ELISA and PCR. Of these, 11 were identified as Naegleria spp with common PCR and six as N. fowleri as well as with ELISA and the specific PCR. When the detection of Naegleria spp is based on intermediary processes, such as flagellation tests, false negatives are likely to occur leading to severe underestimations. This study has shown that amoebae taken from negative FTs can be identified as Naegleria spp and N. fowleri when using PCR and ELISA. The application of at least one of the specific N. fowleri tests is recommended for routine screening. The heterogeneous distribution of the false negative results between the different power plants suggested the presence of different genotypes.