Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 72
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 41(36): 5296-5303, 2023 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37451878

RESUMEN

The immune response to COVID-19 booster vaccinations during pregnancy for mothers and their newborns and the functional response of vaccine-induced antibodies against Omicron variants are not well characterized. We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study of participants vaccinated during pregnancy with primary or booster mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from July 2021 to January 2022 at 9 academic sites. We determined SARS-CoV-2 binding and live virus and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers pre- and post-vaccination, and at delivery for both maternal and infant participants. Immune responses to ancestral and Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 strains were compared between primary and booster vaccine recipients in maternal sera at delivery and in cord blood, after adjusting for days since last vaccination. A total of 240 participants received either Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccine during pregnancy (primary 2-dose series: 167; booster dose: 73). Booster vaccination resulted in significantly higher binding and nAb titers, including to the Omicron BA.1 variant, in maternal serum at delivery and in cord blood compared to a primary 2-dose series (range 0.44-0.88 log10 higher, p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Live virus nAb to Omicron BA.1 were present at delivery in 9 % (GMT ID50 12.7) of Pfizer and 22 % (GMT ID50 14.7) of Moderna primary series recipients, and in 73 % (GMT ID50 60.2) of mRNA boosted participants (p < 0.0001), although titers were significantly lower than to the D614G strain. Transplacental antibody transfer was efficient for all regimens with median transfer ratio range: 1.55-1.77 for IgG, 1.00-1.78 for live virus nAb and 1.79-2.36 for pseudovirus nAb. COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during pregnancy elicited robust immune responses in mothers and efficient transplacental antibody transfer to the newborn. A booster dose during pregnancy significantly increased maternal and cord blood binding and neutralizing antibody levels, including against Omicron BA.1. Findings support the use of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Bloqueadores , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 402, 2022 May 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from investigational trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Limited data are available to inform pregnant and postpartum women on their decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: The goal of this observational, prospective cohort study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of various Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) or licensed COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant or lactating women and describe the transplacental antibody transfer and kinetics of antibodies in mothers and infants. The study is adaptive, allowing additional groups to be added as new vaccines or vaccine regimens are authorized. Up to 20 clinical research institutions in the United States (U.S.) will be included. Approximately 200 pregnant women and 65 postpartum women will be enrolled per EUA or licensed COVID-19 vaccine formulation in the U.S. This study will include pregnant and postpartum women of all ages with and without chronic medical conditions. Their infants will be enrolled and followed beginning at birth in the pregnant cohort and beginning at the earliest possible time point in the postpartum cohort. Blood samples will be collected for immunogenicity outcomes and pregnancy and birth outcomes assessed among women and infants. Primary analyses will be descriptive and done by vaccine type and/or platform. DISCUSSION: Given the long-standing and legitimate challenges of enrolling pregnant individuals into clinical trials early in the vaccine development pipeline, this study protocol describes our current study and provides a template to inform the collection of data for pregnant individuals receiving COVID-19 or other vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05031468 .


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Lactancia , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e630-e644, 2022 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We studied humoral responses after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination across varying causes of immunodeficiency. METHODS: Prospective study of fully vaccinated immunocompromised adults (solid organ transplant [SOT], hematologic malignancy, solid cancers, autoimmune conditions, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]) versus nonimmunocompromised healthcare workers (HCWs). The primary outcome was the proportion with a reactive test (seropositive) for immunoglobulin G to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain. Secondary outcomes were comparisons of antibody levels and their correlation with pseudovirus neutralization titers. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: A total of 1271 participants enrolled: 1099 immunocompromised and 172 HCW. Compared with HCW (92.4% seropositive), seropositivity was lower among participants with SOT (30.7%), hematological malignancies (50.0%), autoimmune conditions (79.1%), solid tumors (78.7%), and HIV (79.8%) (P < .01). Factors associated with poor seropositivity included age, greater immunosuppression, time since vaccination, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or adenovirus vector vaccines versus messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 (Moderna). mRNA-1273 was associated with higher antibody levels than BNT162b2 or adenovirus vector vaccines after adjusting for time since vaccination, age, and underlying condition. Antibody levels were strongly correlated with pseudovirus neutralization titers (Spearman r = 0.89, P < .0001), but in seropositive participants with intermediate antibody levels, neutralization titers were significantly lower in immunocompromised individuals versus HCW. CONCLUSIONS: Antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines were lowest among SOT and anti-CD20 monoclonal recipients, and recipients of vaccines other than mRNA-1273. Among those with intermediate antibody levels, pseudovirus neutralization titers were lower in immunocompromised patients than HCWs. Additional SARS-CoV-2 preventive approaches are needed for immunocompromised persons, which may need to be tailored to the cause of immunodeficiency.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(10): 3761-3770, 2021 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236947

RESUMEN

Despite ample evidence of the safety and efficacy of the influenza vaccine and the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, two-thirds of pregnant women do not receive these vaccines. Providers have a significant role in increasing prenatal vaccine uptake. It is important to understand how different sources of vaccine prescribing information, such as Food and Drug Administration package inserts, influence provider recommendations. We aimed to examine the role of vaccine package inserts in provider recommendations and perceptions of safety and effectiveness of vaccines during pregnancy. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to a random, weighted sample of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows living in the United States in March 2019. Providers were asked about their attitudes toward package inserts, and to evaluate sample package insert statements following two different labeling rules. Their evaluations of each rule were then compared. Of the 321 respondents, the majority (90%, 288/321) recommended and/or administered maternal vaccinations. Few respondents (7.8%, 25/321) read package inserts for information regarding vaccination. Respondents were less likely to recommend sample vaccines with Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule-complying inserts (46.1%, 148/321) than vaccines with Pregnancy Category inserts (87.5%, 282/321). Although most providers did not actively utilize vaccine package inserts to inform recommendations, the previous Pregnancy Categories rule was preferred compared to the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule. Collaborative efforts to update inserts with current clinical practices for pregnancy would be valuable in reducing apprehensiveness around package inserts to generate safer and more cogent recommendations for pregnant women.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Tos Ferina , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hábitos , Humanos , Embarazo , Etiquetado de Productos , Estados Unidos , Vacunación
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(6): ofab138, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34189160

RESUMEN

Seasonal influenza epidemics result in substantial health care burden annually. Early initiation of antiviral treatment of influenza has been shown to reduce the risk of complications and duration of illness. Pregnant and postpartum women may be at increased risk for influenza-associated complications; however, pregnant women have been generally excluded from clinical trials of antiviral treatment of influenza. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on the clinical effectiveness and safety of antiviral treatment of pregnant women with influenza. Observational data show a reduction of severe outcomes when pregnant and postpartum women are treated with oseltamivir and other neuraminidase inhibitors without increased risk of adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal outcomes. Due to lack of safety and efficacy data for baloxavir treatment of pregnant and postpartum women, baloxavir is currently not recommended for use in these populations.

8.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ; 48(1): 53-74, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573790

RESUMEN

Viral infections are common complications of pregnancy. Although some infections have maternal sequelae, many viral infections can be perinatally transmitted to cause congenital or chronic infection in fetuses or infants. Treatments of such infections are geared toward reducing maternal symptoms and complications and toward preventing maternal-to-child transmission of viruses. The authors review updates in the treatment of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B and C viruses, human immunodeficiency virus, and COVID-19 during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Virosis/terapia , Virosis/transmisión , Adulto , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/transmisión , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/terapia , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/transmisión , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Hepatitis B/terapia , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Hepatitis C/terapia , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Herpes Simple/terapia , Herpes Simple/transmisión , Humanos , Lactante , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Vaccine ; 39(1): 85-120, 2021 01 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31060949

RESUMEN

Zika virus, influenza, and Ebola have called attention to the ways in which infectious disease outbreaks can severely - and at times uniquely - affect the health interests of pregnant women and their offspring. These examples also highlight the critical need to proactively consider pregnant women and their offspring in vaccine research and response efforts to combat emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Historically, pregnant women and their offspring have been largely excluded from research agendas and investment strategies for vaccines against epidemic threats, which in turn can lead to exclusion from future vaccine campaigns amidst outbreaks. This state of affairs is profoundly unjust to pregnant women and their offspring, and deeply problematic from the standpoint of public health. To ensure that the needs of pregnant women and their offspring are fairly addressed, new approaches to public health preparedness, vaccine research and development, and vaccine delivery are required. This Guidance offers 22 concrete recommendations that provide a roadmap for the ethically responsible, socially just, and respectful inclusion of the interests of pregnant women in the development and deployment of vaccines against emerging pathogens. The Guidance was developed by the Pregnancy Research Ethics for Vaccines, Epidemics, and New Technologies (PREVENT) Working Group - a multidisciplinary, international team of 17 experts specializing in bioethics, maternal immunization, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, pediatrics, philosophy, public health, and vaccine research and policy - in consultation with a variety of external experts and stakeholders.


Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunas , Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Vacunación , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(12): e2030815, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351087

RESUMEN

Importance: Maternal morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States, most of which occur post partum, with significant racial disparities, particularly associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Blood pressure trajectory after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy has not been previously described. Objectives: To describe the blood pressure trajectory in the first 6 weeks post partum after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and to evaluate whether blood pressure trajectories differ by self-reported race. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included deliveries between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Women with a clinical diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy were enrolled in a postpartum remote blood pressure monitoring program at the time of delivery and were followed up for 6 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed from April 6 to 17, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mixed-effects regression models were used to display blood pressure trajectories in the first 6 weeks post partum. Results: A total of 1077 women were included (mean [SD] age, 30.2 [5.6] years; 804 of 1017 White [79.1%] and 213 of 1017 Black [20.9%]). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were found to decrease rapidly in the first 3 weeks post partum, with subsequent stabilization (at 6 days post partum: mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure, 146 [13] mm Hg; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure, 95 [10] mm Hg; and at 3 weeks post partum: mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure, 130 [12] mm Hg; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure, 85 [9] mm Hg). A significant difference was seen in blood pressure trajectory by race, with both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreasing more slowly among Black women compared with White women (mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure at 1 week post partum: White women, 143 [14] mm Hg vs Black women, 146 [13] mm Hg; P = .01; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure at 1 week post partum: White women, 92 [9] mm Hg vs Black women, 94 [9] mm Hg; P = .02; and mean [SD] peak systolic blood pressure at 3 weeks post partum: White women, 129 [11] mm Hg vs Black women, 136 [15] mm Hg; P < .001; mean [SD] peak diastolic blood pressure at 3 weeks post partum: White women, 84 [8] mm Hg vs Black women, 91 [13] mm Hg; P < .001). At the conclusion of the program, 126 of 185 Black women (68.1%) compared with 393 of 764 White women (51.4%) met the criteria for stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that, in the postpartum period, blood pressure decreased rapidly in the first 3 weeks and subsequently stabilized. The study also found that, compared with White women, Black women had a less rapid decrease in blood pressure, resulting in higher blood pressure by the end of a 6-week program. Given the number of women with persistent hypertension at the conclusion of the program, these findings also appear to support the importance of ongoing postpartum care beyond the first 6 weeks after delivery.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Periodo Posparto/fisiología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/etnología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Vaccine ; 38(44): 6930-6940, 2020 10 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32883555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational trivalent group B streptococcus (GBS) vaccine in US pregnant women, transplacental serotype-specific antibody transfer and persistence in infants, and serotype-specific antibodies in breast milk. METHODS: This randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial administered one dose of trivalent GBS vaccine (n = 49) or placebo (n = 26) to healthy pregnant 18-40-year-old women at 240/7-346/7 weeks' gestation. Women were enrolled from March 2014 to August 2015. Safety follow-up continued through postpartum day 180. Primary immunogenicity objectives were to evaluate serotype Ia/Ib/III-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in sera from women on day 1 (pre-vaccination), day 31, delivery and postpartum days 42 and 90, and from infants at birth (cord blood), days 42 and 90. Antibody transfer ratios (cord blood/maternal sera at delivery) and serotype-specific secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) and IgG in breast milk after delivery and on postpartum days 42 and 90 were evaluated. The planned sample size was not based on statistical assumptions for this descriptive study. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Serious adverse events were reported for 16% of GBS-vaccinated women and 15% of their infants, and 15% of placebo recipients and 12% of their infants; none were fatal or deemed vaccine-related. Serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were 13-23-fold higher in vaccine vs placebo recipients on day 31 and persisted until postpartum day 90. Median antibody concentrations were substantially higher in women with detectable pre-vaccination antibody concentrations. Antibody transfer ratios in the vaccine group were 0.62-0.82. Infant IgG GMCs and breast milk sIgA GMCs were higher in the vaccine vs the placebo group at all timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal immunization with the trivalent GBS vaccine in US women had a favorable safety profile, elicited antibodies that were transplacentally transferred and persisted in infants for a minimum of 3 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02046148.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Vacunas Estreptocócicas , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Lactante , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus agalactiae , Adulto Joven
13.
Sex Transm Infect ; 96(6): 436-438, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31719170

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis and investigate associations between trichomoniasis, endometritis and sequelae among women with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of trichomoniasis identified via wet mount and its association with histologically confirmed endometritis, infertility and recurrent PID among 647 women in the PID Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) study. Participants were treated for clinically suspected PID and followed for a mean of 84 months for incident sequelae. Analyses were adjusted for age, race, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium and bacterial vaginosis. Additional adjustments were incorporated for history of infertility (models of pregnancy and infertility), history of PID (recurrent PID), and self-reported partner treatment and intercourse between baseline and 30-day follow-up (persistent endometritis). RESULTS: T. vaginalis was present in the vagina of 12.8% of women. The odds of having endometritis at baseline were twice as high among women with trichomoniasis as compared with those without (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3). Persistent endometritis was highly prevalent at 30 days (52.1%) and more common among women with baseline trichomoniasis (AOR: 2.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 10.1), although non-significantly. Infertility and recurrent PID were more common among women with trichomoniasis, while rates of pregnancy and live birth were lower. CONCLUSIONS: T. vaginalis was frequently isolated from the vagina of women with PID in the PEACH cohort. Wet mount microscopy for the identification of motile trichomonads was standard practice at the time of the PEACH study, but likely resulted in an underestimation of true T. vaginalis prevalence. Our findings of modest, although non-significant, prospective associations between trichomoniasis and sequelae are novel and underscore the need for additional investigation into whether T. vaginalis may play an aetiological role in adverse reproductive and gynaecological outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Endometritis/epidemiología , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/epidemiología , Índice de Embarazo , Vaginitis por Trichomonas/epidemiología , Adulto , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis , Femenino , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Mycoplasma genitalium , Enfermedad Inflamatoria Pélvica/tratamiento farmacológico , Embarazo , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Trichomonas vaginalis , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vaginosis Bacteriana/epidemiología
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(4): 685-691, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503166

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and compliance of a remote blood pressure monitoring protocol implemented as a quality improvement measure at the hospital level for management of hypertension in postpartum women after hospital discharge. METHODS: This is an ongoing quality improvement project that included women admitted to the postpartum unit of a single tertiary care hospital. We designed nursing call center-driven blood pressure management and treatment algorithms, which were initiated after hospital discharge until 6 weeks postpartum. Women are eligible to participate if they have a diagnosis of chronic hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or postpartum hypertension and have access to a text messaging-enabled smartphone device. After identification by an obstetric care provider, women are enrolled into the program, which is automatically indicated in the electronic medical record. Maternal, obstetric, and sociodemographic data were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and January 2019, we enrolled 499 patients. Here we report on the first 409 enrolled patients. Participants include 168 (41%) with gestational hypertension, 179 (44%) with preeclampsia with no history of chronic hypertension, 49 (12%) with chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and 13 (3%) with postpartum preeclampsia. One hundred seventy-one (42%) participants had antihypertensives initiated or titrated through the program. Three hundred forty women (83%) continued the program beyond 3 weeks postpartum, and 360 (88%) attended an in-person 6-week postpartum visit. Two hundred thirty-five out of 250 women who completed a postprogram survey (94%) reported satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSION: In this study, we detail results from an ongoing remote blood pressure monitoring program. We demonstrate high compliance, retention, and patient satisfaction with the program. This is a feasible, scalable remote monitoring program connected to the electronic medical record.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Hipertensión/terapia , Atención Posnatal/normas , Telemedicina/normas , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/terapia , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Telemedicina/métodos
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 221(5): 505.e1-505.e7, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055032

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Empiric therapy for urinary tract infection is difficult in postmenopausal women because of the higher rates of confounding lower urinary tract symptoms and differential resistance profiles of uropathogens in this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the least costly strategy for treatment of postmenopausal women with the primary complaint of dysuria. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cost minimization analysis modeling the following clinical options: (1) empiric antibiotic therapy followed by urine culture, (2) urinalysis with empiric antibiotic therapy only if positive nitrites and leukocyte esterase, or (3) waiting for culture prior to initiating antibiotics. For all strategies we included nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin, or cephalexin. Pathogens included Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumonaie, or Proteus mirabalis. Pathogens, resistance, treatment success, and medication side effects were specific to postmenopausal women. RESULTS: Cost minimization modeling with TreeAge Pro assumed 73.4% of urinary tract infections were caused by Escherichia coli with 24.4% resistance to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. With our assumptions, empiric antibiotics with nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the least costly approach ($89.64/patient), followed by waiting for urine culture ($97.04/patient). Except for empiric antibiotics with fosfomcyin, empiric antibiotics was always less costly than using urinalysis to discriminate antibiotic use. This is due to the cost of urinalysis ($38.23), high rate of both urinary tract infection (91%), and positive urinalysis (69.3%) with dysuria in postmenopausal women and resultant high rate of antibiotic use with or without urinalysis. Options with fosfomycin were the most expensive because of the highest drug costs ($98/dose), and tornado analyses showed fosfomycin cost was the most impactful variable for model outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed empiric fosfomycin became the least costly option if drug costs were $25.80, a price still more costly than almost all modeled baseline drug costs. This outcome was largely predicated on low resistance to fosfomycin. Conversely, ciprofloxacin was never the least costly option because of higher resistance and side effect cost, even if the drug cost was $0. We modeled 91% positive urine culture rate in postmenopausal women with dysuria; waiting for the urine culture prior to treatment would be the least costly strategy in a population with a predicted positive culture rate of <65%. CONCLUSION: The least costly strategy was empiric antibiotics with nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, followed by waiting on culture results. Local resistance patterns will have an impact on cost minimization strategies. Empiric fosfomycin would be least costly with reduced drug costs, even at a level at which drug costs were higher than almost all other antibiotics. In a population with high posttest probability of positive urine culture, urinalysis adds unnecessary cost. Antibiotic stewardship programs should continue efforts to decrease fluoroquinolone use because of high resistance, side effects, and increased cost.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Disuria/economía , Posmenopausia , Urinálisis/economía , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Árboles de Decisión , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fosfomicina/economía , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nitrofurantoína/economía , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapéutico , Sulfametizol/economía , Sulfametizol/uso terapéutico , Trimetoprim/economía , Trimetoprim/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
16.
Clin Perinatol ; 46(2): 235-256, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010558

RESUMEN

Viral infections are common complications of pregnancy. Although some infections have maternal sequelae, many viral infections can be perinatally transmitted to cause congenital or chronic infection in fetuses or infants. Treatments of such infections are geared toward reducing maternal symptoms and complications and toward preventing maternal-to-child transmission of viruses. This article reviews the treatment of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B and C viruses, and human immunodeficiency virus during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Herpes Simple/tratamiento farmacológico , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Intercambio Materno-Fetal , Embarazo
17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30602513

RESUMEN

Breastfeeding (BF) women are an important population for biomedical HIV prevention strategies, but they are rarely included in trials. The 25-mg dapivirine vaginal ring (VR) reduced women's risk of sexually transmitted HIV infection in two phase 3 trials conducted in Africa. We conducted a phase 1, open-label study (MTN-029/IPM 039) of dapivirine VR use among lactating women in Pittsburgh, PA, and Birmingham, AL, USA. MTN-029/IPM 039 enrolled 16 healthy adult women who had already weaned their infants but were still able to express breast milk. Women were instructed to use the VR continuously for 14 days and provided milk, plasma, and cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) samples for pharmacological analysis. No infants were exposed to the drug, but infant dosage was estimated according to FDA guidance. Adverse events (AEs) were collected at all contacts. The study was completed with 100% participant retention. Median dapivirine concentrations were 676 pg/ml in breast milk, 327 pg/ml in plasma (milk/plasma ratio ∼2.0), and 36.25 ng/mg in CVF. Six participants experienced 10 total AEs, none of which required VR discontinuation. The estimated mean daily infant dosage was 74.3 ng/kg/day. In this first study of dapivirine exposure during lactation, dapivirine VR use was associated with lower concentrations of detectable dapivirine in milk and plasma than in CVF samples and a favorable safety profile. Estimated daily levels of infant dapivirine exposure were also low. Additional studies are needed to evaluate longer periods of dapivirine VR use among BF mother-infant pairs living in regions with higher incidence of sexually transmitted HIV infection. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02808949.).


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacocinética , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Leche Humana/química , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Administración Intravaginal , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Lactancia/metabolismo , Pirimidinas/sangre , Adulto Joven
18.
Birth Defects Res ; 109(5): 387-390, 2017 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergence of Zika virus as a pathogen with important implications for perinatal outcomes highlights the need to identify safe and effective strategies for prevention and treatment of maternal infections. METHODS: While substantial progress has been made in this area in recent years, significant regulatory and health systems barriers must still be overcome to identify and deliver evidence-based drug therapies for pregnant women. RESULTS: We review progress and outstanding challenges associated with the identification and implementation of new treatment options for maternal infections. CONCLUSION: We describe several strategies in use to optimize the application of existing evidence.Birth Defects Research 109:387-390, 2017.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Adulto , Preescolar , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/tendencias , Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Malaria/prevención & control , Mosquitos Vectores , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Virus Zika/patogenicidad
19.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(5): 896-906, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28383378

RESUMEN

It has been recognized for centuries that pregnant women have unique susceptibilities to many infectious diseases that predispose them to untoward outcomes compared with the general adult population. It is thought a combination of adaptive alterations in immunity to allow for the fetal allograft combined with changes in anatomy and physiology accompanying pregnancy underlie these susceptibilities. Emerging infectious diseases are defined as those whose incidence in humans has increased in the past two decades or threaten to increase in the near future. The past decade alone has witnessed many such outbreaks, each with its own unique implications for pregnant women and their unborn fetuses as well as lessons for the health care community regarding response and mitigation. Examples of such outbreaks include, but are not limited to, severe acute respiratory syndrome, the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza, Ebola virus, and, most recently, the Zika virus. Although each emerging pathogen has unique features requiring specific considerations, there are many underlying principles that are shared in the recognition, communication, and mitigation of such infectious outbreaks. Some of these key principles include disease-specific delineation of transmission dynamics, understanding of pathogen-specific effects on both mothers and fetuses, and advance planning and contemporaneous management that prioritize communication among public health experts, clinicians, and patients. The productive and effective working collaboration among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine has been a key partnership in the successful communication and management of such outbreaks for women's health care providers and patients alike. Going forward, the knowledge gained over the past decade will undoubtedly continue to inform future responses and will serve to optimize the education and care given to pregnant women in the face of current and future emerging infectious disease outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/etiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Salud Global , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/etiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/etiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/etiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
20.
Vaccine ; 35(5): 842-848, 2017 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28062124

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if text message reminders increase the likelihood of receiving the influenza vaccine among pregnant women. METHODS: Pregnant women were randomized to either receive or not receive weekly text messages. Women were told the messages would be about health-related behavior in pregnancy. Those randomized to the intervention group received two messages weekly for four consecutive weeks reinforcing that the influenza vaccine is recommended for all pregnant women and safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Women were contacted six weeks postpartum to determine if they had received the vaccine. Sample size calculation determined that 108 women were required in both groups to see a 75% increase in vaccination rates over baseline in the text message group compared to the control group. RESULTS: Recruitment began November 4, 2013, and 317 women were randomized. The mean gestational age at recruitment was 22weeks. There were 40/129 (31%) women in the text message group and 41/152 (27%) women in the control group who received the vaccine (p=0.51). Significant predictors of vaccine acceptance were being married compared to single (95% vs. 67%, p<0.001), having higher household income (55% vs. 39%, p=0.03) and having received the vaccine before (77% vs. 36%, p<0.001). Among women receiving text messages, the majority were satisfied, with only 15/129 (12%) reporting that they did not like receiving the messages, and 24/129 (19%) stating that the information in the messages was not helpful. CONCLUSION: Weekly text messages reinforcing the recommendation for and safety of the influenza vaccine in pregnancy did not increase the likelihood of actually receiving the vaccine among pregnant women. Overall vaccination rates were low, highlighting the need for patient education and innovative techniques to improve vaccine acceptance. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT 02428738.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Sistemas Recordatorios , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/virología , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Estado Civil/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Vacunación/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...