Patient- vs Physician-Initiated Response to Symptom Monitoring and Health-Related Quality of Life: The SYMPRO-Lung Cluster Randomized Trial.

Importance: Online symptom monitoring through patient-reported outcomes can enhance health-related quality of life and survival. However, widespread adoption in clinical care remains limited due to various barriers including the need to reduce health care practitioners' workload. Objective: To report the effects of patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom monitoring on HRQOL and survival up to 1 year after initiation of any treatment in patients with lung cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: SYMPRO-Lung is a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial including patients with stage I to IV lung cancer. The inclusion period was from October 24, 2019, until September 16, 2021, and data collection ended October 8, 2022. Data analysis was conducted from November 9, 2023, until March 18, 2024. Intervention: Patients in the intervention group reported PRO symptoms weekly using the Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events lung cancer subset. If symptoms exceeded a validated threshold, an alert was sent to the health care practitioner (active intervention subgroup) or to the patient (reactive intervention subgroup). Patients in the control group received standard care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Health-related quality of life was measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire at baseline, 15 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2), and 1 year (T3), with the summary score (SS) and physical functioning (PF) as primary end points. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess mean differences over time. Effect size (ES) of 0.40 or greater was considered clinically relevant. Cox proportional hazards regression survival analyses were performed to estimate the effect of the intervention on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: A total of 515 patients (266 [51.7%] men; mean [SD] age, 65.4 [9.4] years) were included in the study (266 in the control group; 249 in the pooled intervention group). Most baseline characteristics were balanced between groups; however, the most notable exception was the distribution in cancer staging: the intervention group had a higher proportion of patients with stage IV cancer compared with the control group (139 [56%] vs 118 [44%]). The pooled intervention group had a significantly better SS (mean difference T1, 5.22; 95% CI, 2.72-7.73; P < .001; ES = 0.33; mean difference T2, 6.28; 95% CI, 3.65-8.92; P < .001; ES = 0.40; mean difference T3, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.15-6.80; P = .006; ES = 0.25) compared with the control group. Group differences improved more in PF but did not meet the ES greater than or equal to 0.40 threshold (mean difference T1, 7.00; 95% CI, 3.65-10.35; P < .001; ES = 0.27; mean difference T2, 6.79; 95% CI, 3.26-10.31; P < .001; ES = 0.26; mean difference T3, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.23-8.79; P = .009; ES = 0.19). No significant differences in HRQOL were observed between the reactive (n = 89) and active (n = 160) intervention groups. The HR for progression-free survival for the active intervention group compared with the control group was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58-1.04); the finding was not statistically significant. The HR for overall survival for both interventions groups compared with the control group were not statistically significant.(active: HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55-1.15; reactive: HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.42-1.15). Conclusions and Relevance: In this 1-year follow-up of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, PRO symptom monitoring yielded improvements in long-term HRQOL in patients with lung cancer. The reactive approach proved equally effective as the active approach. A nonsignificant potential survival benefit was observed for the intervention group. These positive results provide further evidence for the usefulness of routine PRO symptom monitoring in lung cancer care. Trial Registration: The Netherlands trial register Identifier: NL7897.

Real-World Acute Toxicity and 90-Day Mortality in Patients With Stage I NSCLC Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has firmly established its role in stage I NSCLC. Clinical trial results may not fully apply to real-world scenarios. This study aimed to uncover the real-world incidence of acute toxicity and 90-day mortality in patients with SBRT-treated stage I NSCLC and develop prediction models for these outcomes. METHODS: Prospective data from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Radiotherapy (DLCA-R) were collected nationally. Patients with stage I NSCLC (cT1-2aN0M0) treated with SBRT in 2017 to 2021 were included. Acute toxicity was assessed, defined as grade greater than or equal to 2 radiation pneumonitis or grade greater than or equal to 3 non-hematologic toxicity less than or equal to 90 days after SBRT. Prediction models for acute toxicity and 90-day mortality were developed and internally validated. RESULTS: Among 7279 patients, the mean age was 72.5 years, with 21.6% being above 80 years. Most were male (50.7%), had WHO scores 0 to 1 (73.3%), and had cT1a-b tumors (64.6%), predominantly in the upper lobes (65.2%). Acute toxicity was observed in 280 (3.8%) of patients and 90-day mortality in 122 (1.7%). Predictors for acute toxicity included WHO greater than or equal to 2, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, no pathology confirmation, middle or lower lobe tumor location, cT1c-cT2a stage, and higher mean lung dose (c-statistic 0.68). Male sex, WHO greater than or equal to 2, and acute toxicity predicted higher 90-day mortality (c-statistic 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study revealed a low rate of acute toxicity and an acceptable 90-day mortality rate in patients with SBRT-treated stage I NSCLC. Notably, advanced age did not increase acute toxicity or mortality risk. Our predictive models, with satisfactory performance, offer valuable tools for identifying high-risk patients.

Patient-reported outcomes after personalised dose-escalation for stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer patients: Results from the randomised ARTFORCE PET-Boost trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ultimate challenge in dose-escalation trials lies in finding the balance between benefit and toxicity. We examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The international, randomised, phase 2 ARTFORCE PET-Boost study (NCT01024829) aimed to improve 1-year freedom from local failure rates in patients with stage II-III NSCLC, with a ≥ 4 cm primary tumour. Treatment consisted of an individualised, escalated fraction dose, either to the primary tumour as a whole or to its most FDG-avid subvolume (24 x 3.0-5.4 Gy). Patients received sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or radiotherapy only. Patients were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13, and the EuroQol-5D at eight timepoints. We assessed the effect of dose-escalation on C30 sum score through mixed-modelling and evaluated clinically meaningful changes for all outcomes. RESULTS: Between Apr-2010 and Sep-2017, 107 patients were randomised; 102 were included in the current analysis. Compliance rates: baseline 86.3%, 3-months 85.3%, 12-months 80.3%; lowest during radiation treatment 35.0%. A linear mixed-effect (LME) model revealed no significant change in overall HRQoL over time, and no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Physical functioning showed a gradual decline in both groups during treatment and at 18-months follow-up, while clinically meaningful worsening of dyspnoea was seen mainly at 3- and 6-months. CONCLUSION: In patients with LA-NSCLC treated with two dose-escalation strategies, the average patient-reported HRQoL remained stable in both groups, despite frequent patient-reported symptoms, including dyspnoea, dysphagia, and fatigue.

Baseline shift corrections towards the heart: External validation of the impact on survival in early-stage NSCLC patients.

PURPOSE: To externally validate Johnson-Hart et al. findings: the association of tumor baseline shifts towards the heart with overall survival (OS) in SBRT for NSCLC. Further analysis included investigating the presence of interfractional heart baseline shifts and the association of OS with heart dose change during treatment. METHODS: Data from 416 SBRT early-stage NSCLC patients was collected. Pearson's correlations (PCCs) between clinical variables and treatment-averaged tumor shifts towards/away from the heart were explored. Validation of published multivariable Cox model was performed. PCCs between heart and tumor baseline shifts were analyzed. Dose accumulation was performed following daily CBCT-to-pCT deformable registration. Maximum heart dose (D0) was computed for planned and accumulated doses. Differences in OS according to shifts towards/away from the heart or D0 increase/decrease were analyzed. Significant D0 differences between patients with D0 increase/decrease and different tumor locations were explored. RESULTS: Tumor shifts towards/away from the heart showed no significant association with OS (p = 0.91). Distance between PTV and heart correlated significantly (PCC = 0.18) with shifts to the heart. Cox model did not validate in our cohort. Heart presented baseline shifts positively correlated with tumor baseline shifts in all three directions (PCC ≥ 0.38; p < 0.001). Counterintuitively, patients experiencing increased D0 during treatment showed significantly better OS (p = 0.0077). Upper-lobe tumor patients with increased D0 had lower D0 than those with decreased D0 (right-upper-lobe p ≤ 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In our SBRT cohort, the shifts towards the heart were not associated with worse OS. Moderate correlations were found between tumor and heart baseline shifts in each direction. Moreover, the distance between the PTV and the heart showed a significant correlation with shifts to the heart.

Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: external validation of two prediction models.

Background: Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with decreased immunotherapy efficacy and survival. At The Christie and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), prediction models for lymphopenia were developed in lung and esophageal cancer patients, respectively. The aim of this study was to externally validate both models in patients with stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients who underwent concurrent CRT for stage III NSCLC in 2019-2021 were studied. Outcomes were grade ≥3 and grade 4 lymphopenia during CRT. The Christie model predictors for grade ≥3 lymphopenia included age, baseline lymphocyte count, radiotherapy duration, chemotherapy, mean heart and lung doses, and thoracic vertebrae V20Gy. MDACC predictors for grade 4 lymphopenia were age, baseline lymphocyte count, planning target volume (PTV), and BMI. The external performance of both models was assessed. Results: Among 100 patients, 78 patients (78%) developed grade ≥3 lymphopenia, with grade 4 lymphopenia in 17 (17%). For predicting grade ≥3 lymphopenia, the Christie and MDACC models yielded c-statistics of 0.77 and 0.79, respectively. For predicting grade 4 lymphopenia, c-statistics were 0.69 and 0.80, respectively. Calibration for the Christie and MDACC models demonstrated moderate and good agreement, respectively. Conclusion: The PTV-based MDACC prediction model for severe RIL demonstrated superior external performance in NSCLC patients compared to the dosimetry-based Christie model. As such, the MDACC model can aid in identifying patients at high risk for severe lymphopenia. However, to optimize radiotherapy planning, further improvement and external validation of dosimetry-based models is desired.

Quality of life after patient-initiated vs physician-initiated response to symptom monitoring: the SYMPRO-Lung trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies using patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) to monitor symptoms during and after (lung) cancer treatment used alerts that were sent to the health-care provider, although an approach in which patients receive alerts could be more clinically feasible. The primary aim of this study was to compare the effect of weekly PROM symptom monitoring via a reactive approach (patient receives alert) or active approach (health-care provider receives alert) with care as usual on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 15 weeks after start of treatment in lung cancer patients. METHODS: The SYMPRO-Lung trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial using a stepped wedge design. Stage I-IV lung cancer patients in the reactive and active groups reported PROM symptoms weekly, which were linked to a common alerting algorithm. HRQOL was measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and after 15 weeks. Linear regression analyses and effect size estimates were used to assess mean QOL-C30 change scores between groups, accounting for confounding. RESULTS: A total of 515 patients were included (160 active group, 89 reactive group, 266 control group). No differences in HRQOL were observed between the reactive and active group (summary score: unstandardized beta [B] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.22 to 4.24, Cohen d effect size [ES] = 0.06; physical functioning: B = 0.25, 95% CI = -5.15 to 4.64, ES = 0.02). The combined intervention groups had statistically and clinically significantly better mean change scores on the summary score (B = 4.85, 95% CI = 1.96 to 7.73, ES = 0.57) and physical functioning (B = 7.00, 95% CI = 2.90 to 11.09, ES = 0.71) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly PRO symptom monitoring statistically and clinically significantly improves HRQOL in lung cancer patients. The logistically less intensive, reactive approach may be a better fit for implementation.

Self-Reported Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Patients With SCLC in the Hippocampal Avoidance Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Versus Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Randomized Phase 3 Trial (NCT01780675).

Introduction: In the randomized controlled trial in patients with SCLC comparing standard prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) with hippocampal avoidance PCI (HA-PCI), we did not observe beneficial effects of HA-PCI on tested cognition. Here, we report findings on self-reported cognitive functioning (SRCF) and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Patients with SCLC were randomized to receive PCI with or without HA (NCT01780675) and assessed at baseline (82 HA-PCI and 79 PCI patients) and at 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up, using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ-brain cancer module (BN20). SRCF was assessed with the cognitive functioning scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire. A change of 10 points was used for minimal clinically important differences. Percentages of patients classified with having improved, stable, or deteriorated SRCF were compared between groups using chi-square tests. Changes in mean scores were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results: There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with deteriorated, stable, or improved SRCF between the treatment arms. Depending on the evaluated time point, 31% to 46% and 29% to 43% of patients in the HA-PCI and PCI arm, respectively, reported a deteriorated SRCF on the basis of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Medical Outcomes Study. QoL outcomes were not significantly different between the study arms, except for physical functioning at 12 months (p = 0.019) and motor dysfunction at 24 months (p = 0.020). Conclusions: Our trial did not find beneficial effects of HA-PCI over PCI on SRCF and QoL. The cognitive benefit of sparing the hippocampus in the context of PCI is still a subject of debate.

Risk factors for cognitive impairment in radically treated stage III NSCLC: Secondary findings of the NVALT-11 study.

AIM: To identify risk factors for self-reported cognitive impairment in radically treated stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Cognitive functioning was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 at seven pre-specified time points in the phase III NVALT-11 trial (observation versus prophylactic cranial irradiation [PCI] in stage III NSCLC treated with chemo-radiotherapy ± surgery). Cognition was analyzed as binary (impairment or not) and continuous outcome, respectively, using generalized estimating equation (GEE) before and after multiple imputation. A score < 75 was defined as cognitive impairment. A mean difference by < 10, 10-<20, ≥ 20 points was regarded as of no, moderate, and large clinical effect, respectively. We categorized the cognitive impairment into four types based on changes over time: sustained, reversible, recurring, and alternating. RESULTS: In the no-PCI arm, 43/84 [51.2%] reported cognitive impairment at least once, of which 31.4% were sustained, 25.7% reversible, 28.6% recurring, and 14.3% alternating. Results were similar in the PCI arm. Cognitive functioning at baseline was comparable in two arms and a score < 75 was a significant risk factor with large effect for subsequent cognitive impairment (no-PCI: ß = -23.30, p < 0.001; PCI arm: ß = -22.34, p < 0.001; All: ß = -23.47, p < 0.001). Younger age (≤60y), squamous histology, and PCI were risk factors without clinical relevance (ß > -10, p < 0.05). Cognitive functioning declined over time (ß = -0.26, p = 0.001) except for patients with cognitive impairment at baseline (ß = 0.141, p = 0.33). CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairment is dynamic over time with four types. Baseline cognitive impairment (score < 75) is the most important risk factor for subsequent cognitive impairment in stage III NSCLC. Note: This work has been partly reported as an oral presentation at the ESTRO 2021 meeting (OC-0176).

18F-FDG-PET guided vs whole tumour radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (PET-Boost): Results from a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to assess if radiation dose escalation to either the whole primary tumour, or to an 18F-FDG-PET defined subvolume within the primary tumour known to be at high risk of local relapse, could improve local control in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable, stage II-III NSCLC were randomised (1:1) to receive dose-escalated radiotherapy to the whole primary tumour or a PET-defined subvolume, in 24 fractions. The primary endpoint was freedom from local failure (FFLF), assessed by central review of CT-imaging. A phase II 'pick-the-winner' design (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.80) was applied to detect a 15 % increase in FFLF at 1-year. CLINICALTRIALS: gov:NCT01024829. RESULTS: 150 patients were enrolled. 54 patients were randomised to the whole tumour group and 53 to the PET-subvolume group. The trial was closed early due to slow accrual. Median dose/fraction to the boosted volume was 3.30 Gy in the whole tumour group, and 3.50 Gy in the PET-subvolume group. The 1-year FFLF rate was 97 % (95 %CI 91-100) in whole tumour group, and 91 % (95 %CI 82-100) in the PET-subvolume group. Acute grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 23 (43 %) and 20 (38 %) patients, and late grade ≥ 3 in 12 (22 %) and 17 (32 %), respectively. Grade 5 events occurred in 19 (18 %) patients in total, of which before disease progression in 4 (7 %) in the whole tumour group, and 5 (9 %) in the PET-subvolume group. CONCLUSION: Both strategies met the primary objective to improve local control with 1-year rates. However, both strategies led to unexpected high rates of grade 5 toxicity. Dose differentiation, improved patient selection and better sparing of central structures are proposed to improve dose-escalation strategies.

Hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) for small cell lung cancer reduces hippocampal atrophy compared to conventional PCI.

BACKGROUND: Reducing radiation dose to the hippocampus with hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) is proposed to prevent cognitive decline. It has, however, not been investigated whether hippocampal atrophy is actually mitigated by this approach. Here, we determined whether HA-PCI reduces hippocampal atrophy. Additionally, we evaluated neurotoxicity of (HA-)PCI to other brain regions. Finally, we evaluated associations of hippocampal atrophy and brain neurotoxicity with memory decline. METHODS: High-quality research MRI scans were acquired in the multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial NCT01780675. Hippocampal atrophy was evaluated for 4 months (57 HA-PCI patients and 46 PCI patients) and 12 months (28 HA-PCI patients and 27 PCI patients) after (HA-)PCI. We additionally studied multimodal indices of brain injury. Memory was assessed with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R). RESULTS: HA-PCI reduced hippocampal atrophy at 4 months (1.8% for HA-PCI and 3.0% for PCI) and at 12 months (3.0% for HA-PCI and 5.8% for PCI). Both HA-PCI and PCI were associated with considerable reductions in gray matter and normal-appearing white matter, increases in white matter hyperintensities, and brain aging. There were no significant associations between hippocampal atrophy and memory. CONCLUSIONS: HA-PCI reduces hippocampal atrophy at 4 and 12 months compared to regular PCI. Both types of radiotherapy are associated with considerable brain injury. We did not find evidence for excessive brain injury after HA-PCI relative to PCI. Hippocampal atrophy was not associated with memory decline in this population as measured with HVLT-R. The usefulness of HA-PCI is still subject to debate.

The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R): Real-World Data on Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Curative Chemoradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care in inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, favoring concurrent (cCRT) over sequential CRT (seqCRT), with adjuvant immunotherapy in responders. Elderly and frail NSCLC patients have generally been excluded from trials in the past. In elderly patients however, the higher treatment related morbidity of cCRT, may outweigh the possible lower tumor control of seqCRT. For elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC real-world data is essential to be able to balance treatment toxicity and treatment outcome. The aim of this study is to analyze acute toxicity and 3-month mortality of curative chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC and to analyze whether cCRT for elderly stage III NSCLC patients is safe. METHODS: The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Radiotherapy (DLCA-R) is a national lung cancer audit that started in 2013 for patients treated with curative intent radiotherapy. All Dutch patients treated for stage III NSCLC between 2015 and 2018 with seqCRT or cCRT for (primary or recurrent) stage III lung cancer are included in this population-based study. Information was collected on patient, tumor- and treatment characteristics and the incidence and severity of acute non-hematological toxicity (CTCAE-4 version 4.03) and mortality within 3 months after the end of radiotherapy. To evaluate the association between prognostic factors and outcome (acute toxicity and mortality within 3 months), an univariable and multivariable analysis was performed. The definition of cCRT was:radiotherapy started within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Out of all 20 Dutch departments of radiation oncology, 19 centers participated in the registry. A total of 2942 NSCLC stage III patients were treated with CRT. Of these 67.2% (n = 1977) were treated with cCRT (median age 66 years) and 32.8% (n = 965) were treated with seqCRT (median age 69 years). Good performance status (WHO 0-1) was scored in 88.6% for patients treated with cCRT and in 71.0% in the patients treated with seqCRT. Acute nonhematological 3-month toxicity (CTCAE grade ≥3 or radiation pneumonitis grade ≥2) was scored in 21.9% of the patients treated with cCRT and in 17.7% of the patients treated with seqCRT. The univariable analysis for acute toxicity showed significantly increased toxicity for cCRT (P = .008), WHO ≥2 (P = .006), and TNM IIIC (P = .031). The multivariable analysis for acute toxicity was significant for cCRT (P = .015), WHO ≥2 (P = .001) and TNM IIIC (P = .016). The univariable analysis for 3-month mortality showed significance for seqCRT (P = .025), WHO ≥2 (P < .001), higher cumulative radiotherapy dose (P < .001), higher gross tumor volume total (P = .020) and male patients (p < .001). None of these variables reached significance in the multivariable analysis for 3-month mortality. CONCLUSION: In this national lung cancer audit of inoperable NSCLC patients, 3-month toxicity was significantly higher in patients treated with cCRT (21.9% vs. 17.7% for seqCRT) higher TNM stage IIIC, and poor performance (WHO≥2) patients.The 3-months mortality was not significantly different for tested parameters. Age was not a risk factor for acute toxicity, nor 3 months mortality.

Quality assurance and safety of hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation in the multicenter randomized phase III trial (NCT01780675).

Objective: NCT01780675, a multicenter randomized phase III trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus PCI with hippocampal sparing in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) investigated neurocognitive decline and safety. As part of quality assurance, we evaluated if hippocampal avoidance (HA)-PCI was performed according to the NCT01780675 trial protocol instructions, and performed a safety analysis to study the incidence and location of brain metastases for patients treated with HA-PCI. Methods: This retrospective analysis evaluated the quality of the irradiation given in the randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing SCLC patients receiving PCI with or without hippocampal avoidance, using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The dose distribution for each patient receiving HA-PCI was retrieved and analyzed to evaluate if the treatment dose constraints were met. A questionnaire was sent out to all participating sites, and data on radiotherapy technique, pre-treatment dummy runs, phantom measurements and treatment electronic portal imaging device (EPID) dosimetry were collected and analyzed. As part of the safety analysis, the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scans on which cranial disease progression was first diagnosed were collected and matched to the radiotherapy planning dose distribution. The matched scans were reviewed to analyze the location of the brain metastases in relation to the prescribed dose. Results: A total of 168 patients were randomized in the NCT01780675 trial in 10 centers in the Netherlands and Belgium from April 2013 until March 2018. Eighty two patients receiving HA-PCI without evidence of brain metastases were analyzed. All patients were treated with 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Dummy runs and phantom measurements were performed in all institutions prior to enrolling patients into the study. The radiotherapy (RT) plans showed a median mean bilateral hippocampal dose of 8.0 Gy, range 5.4-11.4 (constraint ≤ 8.5 Gy). In six patients (7.3%) there was a protocol violation of the mean dose in one or both hippocampi. In four of these six patients (4.9%) the mean dose to both hippocampi exceeded the constraint, in 1 patient (1.2%) only the left and in 1 patient (1.2%) only the right hippocampal mean dose was violated (average median dose left and right 8.9 Gy). All patients met the trial dose constraint of V 115% PTV ≤ 1%; however the D max PTV constraint of ≤ 28.75 Gy was violated in 22.0% of the patients. The safety analysis showed that 14 patients (17.1%) developed cranial progression. No solitary brain metastases in the underdosed region were found. Two out of 11 patients with multiple brain metastasis developed metastasis in the underdosed region(s). Conclusions: The radiotherapy quality within the HA-PCI trial is performed according to the protocol guidelines. The dose constraints to the hippocampi are met in the vast majority of cases. In all patients, the volume of the brain for which a higher dose was accepted, is according to the trial. However, within this volume there are small areas with higher doses than advised.

Detailed dosimetric evaluation of inter-fraction and respiratory motion in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy based on daily 4D cone beam CT images.

Objective. Periodic respiratory motion and inter-fraction variations are sources of geometric uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of pulmonary lesions. This study extensively evaluates and validates the separate and combined dosimetric effect of both factors using 4D-CT and daily 4D-cone beam CT (CBCT) dose accumulation scenarios.Approach. A first cohort of twenty early stage or metastatic disease lung cancer patients were retrospectively selected to evaluate each scenario. The planned-dose (3DRef) was optimized on a 3D mid-position CT. To estimate the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion (4DRef), inter-fractional variations (3DAcc) and the combined effect of both factors (4DAcc), three dose accumulation scenarios based on 4D-CT, daily mid-cone beam CT (CBCT) position and 4D-CBCT were implemented via CT-CT/CT-CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) techniques. Each scenario was compared to 3DRef.A separate cohort of ten lung SBRT patients was selected to validate DIR techniques. The distance discordance metric (DDM) was implemented per voxel and per patient for tumor and organs at risk (OARs), and the dosimetric impact for CT-CBCT DIR geometric errors was calculated.Main results.Median and interquartile range (IQR) of the dose difference per voxel were 0.05/2.69 Gy and -0.12/2.68 Gy for3DAcc-3DRefand4DAcc-3DRef.For4DRef-3DRefthe IQR was considerably smaller -0.15/0.78 Gy. These findings were confirmed by dose volume histogram parameters calculated in tumor and OARs. For CT-CT/CT-CBCT DIR validation, DDM (95th percentile) was highest for heart (6.26 mm)/spinal cord (8.00 mm), and below 3 mm for tumor and the rest of OARs. The dosimetric impact of CT-CBCT DIR errors was below 2 Gy for tumor and OARs.Significance. The dosimetric impact of inter-fraction variations were shown to dominate those of periodic respiration in SBRT for pulmonary lesions. Therefore, treatment evaluation and dose-effect studies would benefit more from dose accumulation focusing on day-to-day changes then those that focus on respiratory motion.

Investigation of the added value of CT-based radiomics in predicting the development of brain metastases in patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC.

Introduction: Despite radical intent therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cumulative incidence of brain metastases (BM) reaches 30%. Current risk stratification methods fail to accurately identify these patients. As radiomics features have been shown to have predictive value, this study aims to develop a model combining clinical risk factors with radiomics features for BM development in patients with radically treated stage III NSCLC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of two prospective multicentre studies. Inclusion criteria: adequately staged [18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18-FDG-PET-CT), contrast-enhanced chest CT, contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging/CT] and radically treated stage III NSCLC, exclusion criteria: second primary within 2 years of NSCLC diagnosis and prior prophylactic cranial irradiation. Primary endpoint was BM development any time during follow-up (FU). CT-based radiomics features (N = 530) were extracted from the primary lung tumour on 18-FDG-PET-CT images, and a list of clinical features (N = 8) was collected. Univariate feature selection based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was performed to identify relevant features. Generalized linear models were trained using the selected features, and multivariate predictive performance was assessed through the AUC. Results: In total, 219 patients were eligible for analysis. Median FU was 59.4 months for the training cohort and 67.3 months for the validation cohort; 21 (15%) and 17 (22%) patients developed BM in the training and validation cohort, respectively. Two relevant clinical features (age and adenocarcinoma histology) and four relevant radiomics features were identified as predictive. The clinical model yielded the highest AUC value of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.84), better than radiomics or a combination of clinical parameters and radiomics (both an AUC of 0.62, 95% CIs of 0.47-076 and 0.48-0.76, respectively). Conclusion: CT-based radiomics features of primary NSCLC in the current setup could not improve on a model based on clinical predictors (age and adenocarcinoma histology) of BM development in radically treated stage III NSCLC patients.

Excessive esophageal toxicity in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy and 3-weekly platinum doublet chemotherapy.

Introduction: Concurrent chemoradiation followed by immunotherapy is the standard of care for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prior to the introduction of adjuvant immunotherapy, we treated patients with stage III NSCLC with concurrent platinum doublet chemotherapy and 66 Gy in 24 fractions. We determined the toxicity of this treatment. Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed in a cohort of patients with stage III NSCLC, <70 years old, and WHO performance score 0-1. Patients were treated with concurrent platinum doublet chemotherapy and 66 Gy in 24 fractions. All patients were staged with a PET-scan and brain MRI-scan. Toxicity was scored using the common criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v4.03). Results: Between 2012 and 2017, 41 patients were treated with mildly hypofractionated radiotherapy and platinum doublet chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. The median age was 57 and 58% of patients were male. The majority of patients had stage IIIB disease (68%). The median total Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) was 104 cc (range: 15-367 cc). The median lymph node GTV was 59 cc (10-341 cc). Five patients died: four due to an esophagus perforation or fistula, and one due to pulmonary bleeding. Grade ≥ 3 esophageal toxicity occurred in 16 patients. Five patients had late grade ≥ 3 esophageal toxicity (12%). The median overall survival was 19 months. Conclusion: Toxicity was unexpectedly high in patients with stage III NSCLC (WHO 0-1) after concurrent platinum doublet chemotherapy and 66 Gy in 24 fractions.

Avoiding Toxicity With Lung Radiation Therapy: An IASLC Perspective.

Toxicity concerns from thoracic radiation therapy in the treatment of lung cancers have changed substantially over the past few decades. Survival in the treatment of lung cancer has markedly improved and the introduction of advanced radiation and imaging techniques to treatment planning and delivery has made reducing toxicity possible. Phase 3 dose-escalation trials have revealed that excess dose to critical organs within the thorax can negatively impact overall survival. We summarize the existing literature on the known toxicities of thoracic radiation therapy, summarize the technological advances that have made toxicity reduction possible, and provide an overview of emerging technologies and biomarkers that are being evaluated to assess future toxicity reductions.

Bronchial Stenosis in Central Pulmonary Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung tumors has an excellent local control due to the high delivered dose. Proximity of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) to the high dose area may result in pulmonary toxicity. Bronchial stenosis is an adverse event that can occur after high dose to the PBT. Literature on the risk of developing bronchial stenosis is limited. We therefore evaluated the risk of bronchial stenosis for tumors central to the PBT and correlated the dose to the bronchi. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a planning tumor volume (PTV) ≤2 cm from PBT receiving SBRT (8 × 7.5 Gy) between 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Main bronchi and lobar bronchi were manually delineated. Follow-up computed tomography scans were analyzed for bronchial stenosis and atelectasis. Bronchial stenosis was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAEv4). Patient, tumor, dosimetric factors and survival were evaluated between patients with and without stenosis using uni- and multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were analyzed with a median age of 70 years and World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≤1 in 92.2%. Median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR], 19.6-45.4) and median overall survival 48 months (IQR 21.5-59.3). In 15 patients (29.4%) bronchial stenosis was observed on follow-up computed tomography scan. Grade 1 stenosis was seen in 21.6% (n = 11), grade 2 in 7.8% (n = 4). No grade ≥3 stenosis was observed. Median time to stenosis was 9.6 months (IQR 4.4-19.2). Patients who developed stenosis had significantly larger gross tumor volume with a median of 19 cm3(IQR 7.7-63.2) versus 5.2 cm3 (IQR 1.7-11.3, P <.01). Prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for stenosis were age (P = .03; odds ratio [OR] 1.1), baseline dyspnea (P = .02 OR 7.7), and the mean lobar bronchus dose (P = .01; OR 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade (≤2) lobar bronchial stenosis is a complication in approximately one-third of patients after SBRT for lung tumors with a PTV ≤2 cm from PBT. Prognostic risk factors were age, baseline dyspnea and mean dose on a lobar bronchus.

The overall survival impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients has become more controversial. Since the publication of the systematic review by Aupérin et al. in 1999, no randomized controlled trials regarding PCI in LS-SCLC have been completed. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effect of PCI on overall survival (OS) in patients with LS-SCLC. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane library. Only studies that reported an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), indicating the effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS (adjusted for confounders) in patients with LS-SCLC were included for critical appraisal and meta-analysis. A pooled aHR estimate was calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Pooling of 28 retrospective studies including a total of 18,575 patients demonstrated a significant beneficial effect of PCI versus no PCI on OS with a pooled aHR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69). Substantial heterogeneity of reported aHRs among studies was observed (I2 = 65.9%). Subgroup analyses revealed that this heterogeneity could partly be explained by study sample size. The pooled aHR among 7 versus 21 studies with a sample size of > 300 versus ≤ 300 patients was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.64-0.97) versus 0.56 (95% CI: 0.46-0.69; p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates a significant beneficial effect of PCI on OS in patients with LS-SCLC. Larger studies reported a milder beneficial effect, possibly due to a decreased risk of model overfitting. Serious risk of selection and confounding bias were of concern due to the lack of prospective trials. These results support the role of PCI in standard clinical practice in patients with LS-SCLC while awaiting results of prospective trials on alternative strategies.