Spanish Guidelines for Diagnosis, Management, Treatment, and Prevention of DRESS Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a complex multisystemic severe drug hypersensitivity reaction whose diagnosis and management are troublesome. DRESS syndrome requires management by various specialists. The correct identification of the culprit drug is essential to ensure safe future therapeutic options for the patient. There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on DRESS syndrome. Objective: To draft a review and guidelines on the clinical diagnosis, allergy work-up, management, treatment, and prevention of DRESS syndrome in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts from multiple disciplines. METHODS: These guidelines were drafted by a panel of allergy specialists from the Drug Allergy Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), together with other medical specialists involved in the management of DRESS syndrome and researchers from the PIELenRed consortium. A review was conducted of scientific papers on DRESS syndrome, and the expert panel evaluated the quality of the evidence of the literature and provided grades of recommendation. Whenever evidence was lacking, a consensus was reached among the experts. RESULTS: The first Spanish guidelines on DRESS syndrome are now being published. Important aspects have been addressed, including practical recommendations about clinical diagnosis, identification of the culprit drug through the Spanish pharmacovigilance system algorithm, and the allergy work-up. Recommendations are provided on management, treatment, and prevention. Algorithms for the management of DRESS in the acute and recovery phases have been drawn up. Expert consensus-based stepwise guidelines for the management and treatment of DRESS syndrome are provided.

Serum and blister-fluid elevation and decreased epidermal content of high-mobility group box 1 protein in drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.

BACKGROUND: High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a damage-associated molecular-pattern protein. Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are serious, immune-mediated skin-blistering conditions. OBJECTIVES: To determine serum and/or blister-fluid total HMGB1 levels in SJS/TEN cohorts, and HMGB1 expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) SJS/TEN skin vs. healthy and maculopapular exanthema (MPE) skin. Methods Serum HMGB1 was quantified in Malawian nevirapine-induced hypersensitivity, Taiwanese SJS/TEN and Spanish SJS/TEN cohorts. FFPE skin (healthy skin, MPE, SJS/TEN) was stained and assessed for HMGB1 expression. RESULTS: Serum total HMGB1 was not significantly elevated in patients with nevirapine-induced SJS/TEN (3·98 ± 2·17 ng mL-1 ), MPE (3·92 ± 2·75 ng mL-1 ) or drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (4·73 ± 3·00 ng mL-1 ) vs. tolerant controls (2·97 ± 3·00 ng mL-1 ). HMGB1 was significantly elevated in Taiwanese patients with SJS/TEN, highest during the acute phase (32·6 ± 26·6 ng mL-1 ) vs. the maximal (19·7 ± 23·2 ng mL-1 ; P = 0·007) and recovery (24·6 ± 25·3 ng mL-1 ; P = 0·027) phases. In blister fluid from Spanish patients with SJS/TEN, HMGB1 (486·8 ± 687·9 ng mL-1 ) was significantly higher than in serum (8·8 ± 7·6 ng mL-1 ; P <0·001). Preblistered SJS/TEN skin showed decreased epidermal nuclear HMGB1 expression in upper epidermis vs. healthy or MPE skin but retained basal/suprabasal expression. CONCLUSIONS: Epidermal HMGB1 expression was decreased in SJS/TEN skin. Retained basal/suprabasal epidermal HMGB1 expression may exacerbate localized injury in SJS/TEN.

Sensitivity and specificity of the lymphocyte transformation test in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms causality assessment.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe delayed hypersensitivity reaction. The determination of drug causality is complex. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has been reported positive in more than 50% of DRESS cases. Nevertheless, the sensitivity and specificity of LTT specifically in DRESS have not yet been established. Rechallenge with the culprit drug is contraindicated and cannot be used as gold standard for sensitivity and specificity determination. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of LTT in a clinically defined series of patients with DRESS. METHODS: Some 41 patients diagnosed with DRESS were included in the study. The results of the algorithm of the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System were used as the standard for a correct diagnosis of drug causality. A standard LTT was performed with involved drugs in acute or recovery samples. A stimulation index (SI) ≥2 in at least one concentration except for beta-lactams (SI ≥3) and contrast media (SI ≥4) was considered positive. Contingency tables and ROC curves were used for analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of LTT in the recovery phase of DRESS were 73% and 82%, respectively, whereas in the acute phase, they were only 40% and 30%, respectively. Comparison of skin tests and LTT confirmed a higher sensitivity and specificity of LTT in DRESS. LTT showed high sensitivity (S) and specificity (Sp) for anticonvulsants (S 100%, Sp 100%; P = .008), anti-TB drugs (S 87.5%, Sp 100%; P = .004), and beta-lactams (S 73%, Sp 100%; P = .001). ROC curves revealed that the best criteria for LTT positivity for all drugs are SI ≥2 in at least one concentration, increasing overall sensitivity to 80%, and for beta-lactams from 73% to 92%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LTT is a good diagnostic tool for drug causality in DRESS, mainly when performed in the recovery phase.

Two cases of overlap severe cutaneous adverse reactions to benznidazole treatment for asymptomatic Chagas disease in a nonendemic country.

Chagas disease is a parasitosis endemic to South America. It is normally treated with benznidazole as first choice, which has been associated with numerous cutaneous reactions. However, very few benznidazole-associated severe cutaneous adverse reactions have been reported to date. The rise of Chagas disease in nonendemic countries represents a growing public health challenge. We report two patients who met the criteria for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis according to the RegiSCAR scoring systems. They were thus deemed overlapping cases, with a lymphocyte transformation test positive for benznidazole. Both required intensive care unit admission and both survived. Considering the rising application of this drug for trypanosomiasis in immigrant populations, clinicians should be aware of this newly reported, potentially life-threatening risk.

Severe delayed skin reactions related to drugs in the paediatric age group: A review of the subject by way of three cases (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and DRESS).

Severe delayed drug-induced skin reactions in children are not common but potentially serious. This article describes aspects concerning the etiology, pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of these processes; it presents three paediatric cases, namely STS (Steven Johnson Syndrome), TEN (toxic epidermal necrolysis), probably related to amoxicillin/clavulanate and ibuprofen and DRESS (a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) secondary to phenytoin; and in relation to them, the diagnosis and the treatment of these processes are discussed and reviewed. The AGEP (acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis) is also reviewed. The aetiological diagnosis of severe non-immediate reactions is difficult, and the value of current allergological testing is not well defined in these cases. Diagnosis is based on clinical history, the empirical risk of drugs to trigger SJS/TEN or DRESS, and the in vivo and in vitro testing of the suspect drug. Skin biopsy confirms that the clinical diagnosis and delayed hypersensitivity tests, especially the patch test and the lymphoblastic transformation test (LTT), may be important to confirm the aetiological diagnosis, in our cases emphasising the latter. These diseases can be life threatening (especially DRESS and TEN) and/or have a high rate of major complications or sequelae (SJS/TEN). The three cases described progressed well without sequelae. All were treated with corticosteroids, which is the most currently accepted treatment although the effect has not been clearly demonstrated.

Vemurafenib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis: possible cross-reactivity with other sulfonamide compounds.

Vemurafenib is a newly licensed target-directed medication. It has been proven to improve the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma and the BRAF(V600E) mutation; however, adverse cutaneous reactions are frequent. Few cases of life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) induced by vemurafenib have been reported. Dabrafenib, another selective BRAF inhibitor, has been licensed recently as an alternative drug with the same indications. From a molecular point of view, both vemurafenib and dabrafenib contain a sulfonamide group; cross-reactivity to sulfonamide compounds has been reported in allergic patients. We report on a patient with vemurafenib-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In vitro analysis of lymphocyte reactivity to vemurafenib showed positive results, confirming drug causality. In addition, lymphocytes from the patient reacted to dabrafenib and to the antibiotic sulfonamide drug sulfamethoxazole. Moreover, lymphocytes from two patients with cutaneous adverse reactions to sulfamethoxazole also reacted to vemurafenib and dabrafenib in vitro. These data strongly suggest that there might be clinical cross-reactivity between BRAF inhibitors and sulfonamides in some patients. Thus, precautions should be taken to avoid sulfonamide drugs as much as possible in patients showing serious hypersensitivity reactions to vemurafenib and vice versa.

HLA-A*31:01 and different types of carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: an international study and meta-analysis.

HLA-A*31:01 was reported to be associated with carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR), including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). We conducted an international study using consensus diagnosis criteria to enroll a total of 93 patients with CBZ-SCAR from Europe or Asia. We found that HLA-A*31:01 showed a significant association with CBZ-DRESS in Europeans (P<0.001; odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI))=57.6 (11.0-340)), and the strong association was also found in Chinese (P<0.001; OR (95% CI)=23.0 (4.2-125)). However, HLA-A*31:01 had no association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in neither Chinese nor Europeans. By comparison, HLA-B*15:02 showed a strong association with CBZ-SJS/TEN in Chinese (P<0.001, OR (95% CI)=58.1 (17.6-192)). A meta-analysis of this and other published studies confirmed that in all populations, HLA-A*31:01 had an extremely strong association with CBZ-DRESS (P<0.001, a pooled OR (95% CI)=13.2 (8.4-20.8)), but a much weaker association with CBZ-SJS/TEN (P=0.01, OR (95% CI)=3.94 (1.4-11.5)). Our data revealed that HLA-A*31:01 is a specific predictor for CBZ-DRESS but not for CBZ-SJS/TEN. More studies are needed to investigate the genetic determinant of CBZ-SJS/TEN in Europeans. Considering the potential clinical utility, the cost-effectiveness of the combined HLA-A*31:01 and HLA-B*15:02 genetic test to prevent CBZ-SCAR in Chinese needs further investigation.

Piperacillin-induced DRESS: distinguishing features observed in a clinical and allergy study of 8 patients.

BACKGROUND: DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome is characterized by fever, rash, eosinophilia, and multiorgan failure. Previous reports have described differences in clinical and laboratory findings of DRESS syndrome depending on the inducing drug. Piperacillin has been reported as the drug responsible for this syndrome in 3 patients. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and describe the clinical, laboratory, and allergy study findings of piperacillin-induced DRESS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with DRESS associated with piperacillin-tazobactam (Pip/Taz) according to the Kardaun diagnostic score criteria. Assessment of causality was established using the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System and the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). The allergy study included skin and epicutaneous tests. RESULTS: Eight patients were diagnosed with DRESS due to Pip/Taz (3 probable and 5 definite cases). Skin rash was observed in all cases and facial edema in 50%; the mean latency period was 18 days. Fever was present in 7 patients. Liver and kidney injuries were detected in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients had eosinophilia and a full recovery. The LTT to Pip/Taz was strongly positive in all patients, with a stimulation index of over 6. Three of 3 patients had a positive intradermal test to Pip/Taz, and 1 of 4 had a positive patch test. All patients had a negative LTT to carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: We have reported on the first case series of piperacillin-induced DRESS. A latency period of 18 days, skin rash, eosinophilia, fever, liver injury, and good prognosis were the most common features. The allergy study, and the LTT in particular, was highly useful for identifying Pip/Taz as the culprit drug and piperacillin as the responsible active ingredient.

Expression of α-defensin 1-3 in T cells from severe cutaneous drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions.

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic T cells seem to be the main effector cells in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). However, recent data support a role of the innate immune system in the etiopathology of drug-induced cutaneous reactions. In this study, we analyzed the expression of α-defensins 1-3 in mononuclear cells from patients with SJS/TEN, drug-induced maculopapular exanthema (MPE), and healthy donors. METHODS: DEFA1A3 gene expression was analyzed by quantitative and end-point RT-PCR. Intracellular flow cytometry, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry were carried out to verify α-defensin 1-3 protein expression in mononuclear cells from peripheral blood and skin infiltrates. α-Defensin 1-3 concentration was evaluated in plasma and blister fluid samples by ELISA. RESULTS: We herein describe DEFA1A3 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with drug-induced cutaneous diseases. Gene expression analysis unveiled transcription in CD4 and CD8 peripheral blood T cells. Protein expression was confirmed by intracellular flow cytometry in mononuclear cells from the patients, including monocytes, NK cells, and T cells from peripheral blood and blister fluid. Further analysis of protein content by flow cytometry revealed higher protein levels in CD56(+) CD3(+) lymphocytes from patients with SJS/TEN when compared to MPE and healthy donors. Immunohistological analysis was used to confirm expression in dermal infiltrates. α-Defensin levels were estimated by ELISA to be 3- to 175-fold higher in blister fluid when compared to simultaneously drawn plasma samples. CONCLUSION: Upregulation of innate immune molecules such as α-defensins 1-3 in T cells from patients with SJS/TEN may be involved in the etiopathology of these life-threatening diseases induced by medications.

Use of the lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome induced by ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam: two case reports.

Drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), is a life-threatening multiorgan systemic reaction characterized by rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, and leukocytosis with eosinophilia. Aromatic anticonvulsant drugs and allopurinol have been reported to be the most frequent eliciting agents. Our search of the literature revealed only 2 cases induced by piperacillin and 1 case by ceftriaxone.We present 2 cases of DRESS syndrome induced by the beta-lactam drugs ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam. An allergological workup including skin prick test, intradermal tests, patch tests, and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed. LTT was shown to be a useful technique in both cases to help to identify the drugs involved.

Differential gene expression in drug hypersensitivity reactions: induction of alarmins in severe bullous diseases.

BACKGROUND: Delayed hypersensitivity reactions to drugs can be life-threatening and constitute a growing problem in clinical practice. Although drug-specific T cells seem to be involved, the cellular and molecular bases of their aetiopathology are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: To study the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and the clinical heterogeneity of cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity reactions to drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We characterized the gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from patients during the acute phase of the reaction and upon resolution of clinical symptoms using a cDNA array technology. Low-density arrays were used to confirm differential expression of selected genes during the acute disease in patients and to compare gene expression in patients and exposed control donors by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Eighty-five genes were found to be differentially expressed during the acute phase of cutaneous drug-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Furthermore, 92 genes with distinct expression patterns in severe and benign diseases during the acute phase were identified. PBMCs from patients with severe bullous diseases showed a characteristic gene expression pattern with lower expression of genes encoding T cell-specific proteins and high expression of cell cycle-related genes and genes coding for inflammatory-related mediators among which several endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) or alarmins were found. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct gene expression profiles in PMBCs define benign and severe clinical entities. Overexpression of endogenous DAMPs in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis suggest that drugs can trigger the alarmin system in sensitized patients leading to life-threatening diseases.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis due to tetrazepam.

Tetrazepam is a benzodiazepine that is widely used in Spain as a muscle relaxant, with occasional cutaneous side effects. We report a patient who developed a generalized pruriginous cutaneous reaction compatible with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) due to tetrazepam. Patch tests with bromazepam, diazepam, and tetrazepam were negative at 48 and 72 hours; however, the tetrazepam patch showed a positive reaction at 10 days. Immunohistochemical studies revealed a mononuclear infiltrate composed of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Analysis of interleukin (IL) 8 expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed increased IL-8 mRNA levels in patch test-positive skin. Lymphoblast transformation test (LTT) was positive with tetrazepam but not with diazepam. Positive patch test and LTT suggested that tetrazepam-specific lymphocytes might be responsible for a T cell-mediated reaction. These results support previous data suggesting an important role for IL-8 and drug-specific T cells in the pathogenesis ofAGEP and imply that the reaction was specific to tetrazepam with no cross-reactivity to other benzodiazepines.

Up-regulation of CCL17, CCL22 and CCR4 in drug-induced maculopapular exanthema.

BACKGROUND: Maculopapular exanthema has been reported to be the most frequently drug-induced cutaneous reaction. Although T lymphocytes are involved in the pathomechanism of this disease, little is know about the recruitment of these cells to the skin. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to study the role of the chemokines TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 in the lymphocyte trafficking to affected skin in drug-induced exanthemas. METHODS: Real-time PCR was performed to quantify gene expression levels of CCL17, CCL22 and their receptor CCR4 in lesional skin biopsies and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients. CCL27 and CCL22 proteins were detected in the skin by immunochemistry. Protein expression of CCR4 was determined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Functional migration assays to CCL17 and CCL22 were assessed to compare the migratory responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients and healthy subjects. RESULTS: CCL17 and CCL22 were up-regulated in maculopapular exanthema-affected skin. CCR4 mRNA levels and protein expression were increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during the acute phase of the disease. The increased expression of the receptor was consistent with a higher response of peripheral blood lymphocytes to CCL17 and CCL22 compared with the migratory response in healthy donors. CONCLUSION: TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 might cooperate in attracting T lymphocytes to skin in drug-induced maculopapular exanthemas.