Being a technician during COVID-19: a qualitative cross-sectional survey on the experiences of clinical neurophysiology technicians.

BACKGROUND: During the Sars-CoV-2 virus pandemic, Italy faced an unrivaled health emergency. Its impact has been significant on the hospital system and personnel. Clinical neurophysiology technicians played a central role (but less visibly so compared to other healthcare workers) in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aims to explore the experiences of clinical neurophysiology technicians during the pandemic and contribute to the debate on the well-being of healthcare workers on the front line. METHODS: We implemented a cross-sectional survey across Italy. It contained questions that were open-ended for participants to develop their answers and acquire a fuller perspective. The responses were analyzed according to the framework method. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one responses were valid, and the following themes were generated: technicians' experiences in their relationship with patients, technicians' relationship with their workgroup and directors, and technicians' relationship with the context outside of their work. The first theme included sub-themes: fear of infection, empathy, difficulty, a sense of obligation and responsibility, anger, and sadness. The second theme contained selfishness/solidarity in the workgroup, lack of protection/collaboration from superiors, stress, and distrust. The last theme included fear, stress/tiredness, serenity, sadness, and anger. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to building a humanized perspective for personnel management, bringing attention to the technical work of healthcare professionals in an emergency and the emotional and relational dimensions. These are the starting points to define proper, contextually adequate support.

Short-term effects of expiration under positive pressure in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild acidosis requiring non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and the efficacy of expiration under positive pressure (PEP mask) as a chest physiotherapy in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) requiring non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). DESIGN: A prospective, randomised, controlled study. SETTING: A respiratory intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-seven patients with large amounts of bronchial secretions on clinical examination due to exacerbation of COPD and mild acidosis were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (13 patients) received PEP mask plus assisted coughing. The controls (group B, 14 patients) received assisted coughing alone. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was to compare total sputum wet weight and to assess the feasibility of the PEP mask. Secondary outcomes were: (a) the time required for weaning patients from NIPPV, (b) treatment failure expressed as mortality within 2 months after discharge from the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) or the need for endotracheal intubation (ETI). RESULTS: The amount of sputum production at the end of physiotherapy was significantly ( p<0.01) higher in group A (9.6+/-3.9 g) compared with group B (4.7+/-2.5 g). The total length of weaning time was significantly lower in group A (4.9+/-0.8 days) versus group B (7.0+/-0.7 days), p<0.01. Mortality and ETI were not significantly different in the two groups of patients (0 versus 1 and 0 versus 1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Expiration under positive pressure was effective in acutely removing secretions in patients with exacerbation of COPD and mild acidosis requiring NIPPV. In conclusion, we suggest that this chest physiotherapy technique represents a useful therapeutic option for such patients and it should often be performed in addition to NIPPV.