Prevalence and predictors of persistent sinus rhythm after elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence and predictors of persistent sinus rhythm in a recent cohort of unselected patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We enrolled all consecutive patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation between January 2017 and December 2018. We analysed baseline clinical and echocardiographic data as well as pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy. Primary endpoint was the maintenance of sinus rhythm at 12 months after electrical cardioversion. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients enrolled, 270 (90%) had successful electrical cardioversion and among them, 201 patients have 12-month follow-up data (mean age 70 ±â€Š10 years; 74% men). At 12 months, only 45.7% were in sinus rhythm. Patients without sinus rhythm compared with persistent sinus rhythm at 12 months had a lower baseline left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (49.1 ±â€Š16 vs. 59.7 ±â€Š9%, P = 0.02) and had more frequently a history of atrial fibrillation more than 12 months (55 vs. 34% P = 0.003). At the multivariate analysis, only the duration of the disease beyond 12 months (OR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.88, P = 0.032), LVEF (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = 0.012) and the presence of sinus rhythm at 1-month follow-up (OR 18.28, 95% CI: 3.3-100, P = 0.001) were associated with the probability of maintaining sinus rhythm at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective electrical cardioversion, only 45.7% were in sinus rhythm at 12 months. The presence of sinus rhythm at 1-month follow-up emerged as an independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm. This highlights that early re-evaluation of these patients appears useful for assessing longer term outcomes also from the perspective of a possible selective approach to ablation strategies.

Midline or long peripheral catheters in difficult venous access conditions? A comparative study in patients with acute cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND: Midline catheters (MCs) are commonly inserted in patients with difficult venous access (DVA) needing peripheral access. Recently, the alternative placement of ultrasound-guided long peripheral catheters (LPCs) has spread. However, no study has compared the reliability of the 2 devices. This study aims to compare the safety and reliability of MCs and LPCs in DVA patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 184 DVA patients. Polyurethane MCs and 2 lengths of polyethylene LPCs (8/10 cm and 18 cm) were compared. The independent effect of catheter type on uncomplicated catheter survival was determined through a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The relative incidences of overall catheter-related complications (CRCs) were 15.84 of 1,000, 10.64 of 1,000, and 6.27 of 1,000 catheter-days for 8/10 cm-LPCs, 18 cm-LPCs, and MCs, respectively. The relative incidences of catheter-related bloodstream infections were 0.72 of 1,000 for both length LPCs and 0.48 of 1,000 catheter-days for MCs. Compared to MCs, a significant increase in CRC risk for 8/10 cm LPCs (hazard ratio [HR] 5.328; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.118-13.404; P < 0.001) was found, along with a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk for 18 cm-LCPs (HR 2.489; 95% CI 0.961-6.448; P = 0.060). CONCLUSION: MCs allow for longer uncomplicated indwelling times than LPCs. The decision regarding which catheter to use should consider the planned duration of intravenous therapy, the patient's clinical condition, and the cost of the device.