Rigid versus soft catheter for less invasive surfactant administration: A crossover randomized controlled manikin trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared surfactant administration with a rigid versus soft catheter in a manikin simulating an extremely preterm infant. METHODS: Randomized controlled crossover (AB/BA) trial. Fifty tertiary hospital consultants and pediatric residents. The primary outcome was the time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes were the success of the first attempt, the number of attempts, and the participant's opinion. RESULTS: Median time of device positioning was 19 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 15-25) with rigid catheter and 40 s (IQR: 28-66) with soft catheter (p < 0.0001). Success at first attempt was 92% with rigid catheter and 74% with soft catheter (p = 0.01). Median number of attempts was 1 (IQR: 1-1) with rigid catheter and 1 (IQR: 1-2) with soft catheter (p = 0.009). Participants found the rigid catheter easier to use (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a preterm manikin model, using a rigid catheter for less invasive surfactant administration was quicker and easier to use than a soft catheter.

Marked versus unmarked tip catheter for less invasive surfactant administration: A crossover randomised controlled manikin trial.

AIM: Less invasive surfactant administration is becoming increasingly popular, but health-care providers may experience some difficulties in achieving the correct positioning of the catheter in the trachea. We compared catheters with marked versus unmarked tips in terms of correct depth positioning in the trachea, total time, number of attempts and participant's opinion on using the device in a manikin model. METHODS: A randomised controlled crossover trial of surfactant administration with less invasive surfactant administration catheters with marked versus unmarked tip in a preterm infant manikin. Fifty tertiary hospital consultants and paediatric residents with previous experience in surfactant administration participated. The primary outcome measure was the positioning of the device at the correct depth in the trachea. The secondary outcome measures were the total time and the number of attempts for positioning the device in the trachea, and participant's opinion on using the device. RESULTS: Correct depth in the trachea was achieved by 38 (76%) and 28 (56%) participants using the catheters with marked and unmarked tip, respectively (P = 0.04). Median time of device positioning (P = 0.08) and number of attempts (P = 0.13) were not statistically different between the two catheters. Participants found the catheter with the marked tip easier to use (P = 0.007), especially concerning the insertion in the trachea (P = 0.04) and the positioning at the correct depth (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In a preterm manikin model, the marked tip catheter offered a higher chance of achieving the correct depth of the device in the trachea and was favoured by the participants.

Audiotaping communication of the diagnosis of childhood leukemia: parents' evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how parents viewed the authors' practice of audiotaping the initial communication of the leukemia diagnosis and of the complete program of care, including the prognosis. METHODS: From January 1997 through December 1998, at the end of the formal communication interview, parents were asked to evaluate the audiotaping by filling out a questionnaire concerning the procedure. RESULTS: Sixty-three parents of children with leukemia participated. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' use of audiotapes was strongly supported by the parents as a supplementary intervention and has become a routine procedure.