Prevalence of anti-parvovirus B19 IgG and IgM and parvovirus B19 viremia in pregnant women in an urban area of Northern Italy.

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) infection in pregnancy is mostly asymptomatic, but can cause complications including abortion and fetal hydrops. Although its infection is ubiquitous, seroprevalence among pregnant women varies according to different geographical areas. Since seroprevalence data in Italy are limited, the prevalence of antibodies and DNA in pregnant women was evaluated retrospectively, correlating the clinical situation of mothers and newborns. One thousand eight hundred and ninety-three sequential sera were examined from pregnant women (60.8% in the first trimester, 16.6% in the second one, and 22.6% in the third one, respectively) for anti-B19V IgG and IgM (confirmed by immunoblot); 1402 (74.1%) were of Italian origin and 491 (25.9%) non-Italian women. Molecular tests were used to search for viral genome. One thousand three hundred and fifteen (69.5%) samples were IgG-positive, 21 (1.1%) IgM-positive, and 578 (30.5%) nonimmune. The difference in IgG seroprevalence between Italian (71.1%) and non-Italian women (64.8%) was statistically significant. Of the 21 IgM-positive women, 16 were confirmed positive also by immunoblot (prevalence: 0.8%), of which 11 were viraemic (prevalence: 0.6%; mean 1.3 × 104 geq/ml). Mothers were asymptomatic, and the newborns had no clinical signs of congenital infection. IgG seroprevalence in Italy is high, with differences between Italian women and non-Italian women from geographic areas with lower endemic levels of B19V. The consistent migratory flows in place could lead to an increase in the number of susceptible women. The prevalence of viremia is low, and has not been associated with evident fetal damage at birth.

Evaluation of the vitros hiv combo 4th generation test for the identification of HIV infections.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous detection of HIV 1 and 2 antibodies and HIV-1 p-24 antigen in the 4th generation tests is particularly effective for the identification of early acute HIV infections while maintaining accurate detection of long-established infections. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the new 4th generation VITROS HIV Combo test from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics by comparing its results with those obtained using a 3rd generation HIV 1/2 antibody test (VITROS Anti HIV 1 + 2 from Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics) and a 4th generation test (LIAISON XL HIV Ab/Ag, DiaSorin) currently used in the Microbiology Unit of Legnano Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: One thousand and three samples of the normal daily routine (Group 1) were analyzed simultaneously with the three systems. The concordant and discordant sample results were further tested using Western blot and HIV-RNA assay (Roche). One hundred samples (Group 2) of known HIV positive subjects (63 of subtype B, 37 subtype non-B, and 51 with positive viraemia) and 50 samples (Group 3) with indeterminate Western blot were also examined using the three systems. From Group 3, 24 samples were collected from patients diagnosed with acute infection. RESULTS: The overall agreement between the three systems was 99.4% (99.5% in group 1, 100% in group 2 and 96.6% in group 3) with a coefficient Fleiss Kappa of 0.9814. Notably, the VITROS HIV Combo test was positive in all known HIV positive samples of group 2 without any statistically significant difference in the values of the sample/cut off ratios between the B and non-B subtypes and between the positive and negative viraemia samples in established infections. The VITROS HIV Combo test was also positive in all samples of patients with acute infection in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: The VITROS HIV Combo test has shown comparable performance to the other two assays in use of 3rd and 4th generation tests and is able to correctly identify both acute and established HIV infections independently of viraemia and HIV subtype.

Threshold value of LIAISON XL anti-HCV screening assay predicting positive immunoblotting results.

Some international guidelines recommend evaluating the need to confirm positive anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody screening results by means of a more specific antibody or molecular biology test on the basis of a screening threshold value (such as the sample signal/cut-off ratio) that can predict the positivity of additional antibody testing in at least 95% of cases. The aim of this study was to determine the threshold value of the DiaSorin LIAISON XL chemiluminescence test. Two hundred and twenty-eight routine laboratory samples that were chemiluminescence positive for anti-HCV antibodies but had different signal/cut-off ratios were assayed using immunoblotting, which indicated that 155 (68.0%) were positive, 40 (17.5%) were negative, and 33 (14.5%) were indeterminate. When the samples were divided on the basis of their signal/cut-off ratios, 95.5% of the samples with a ratio of ≥3.5 were positive as against 74.1% of the positive or indeterminate samples with a ratio of <3.5. Statistical analysis using Youden's index and a receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the optimum cut-off value was 3.65. These findings indicate that, when using the LIAISON XL system for anti-HCV antibody screening, a signal/cut-off ratio of ≥3.65 makes further confirmatory tests unnecessary.

Evaluation of LIAISON® XL system for HBsAg, and anti-HCV and anti-HIV/Ag p24.

The aim of this study was to compare the data obtained using the new LIAISON® XL chemiluminescence system to search for HBsAg, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV1-2/p24 Ag with those obtained using the VITROS system currently adopted by the Microbiology Unit of the Hospital of Legnano. Routine samples of patients who were referred by practitioners for the determination of HBsAg (1,000 samples) and/or anti-HCV (1,002 samples) and/or anti-HIV1-2 (995 samples) were simultaneously analyzed using both systems. The concordant positive and discordant samples were re-examined for confirmation by means of an HBsAg neutralization assay, anti-HCV immunoblot, or anti-HIV1-2 Western blot; HBV-DNA, or HCV-RNA or HIV-RNA was also sought in the discordant samples. Samples of patients known to be positive were tested (100 HBsAg positive, 100 anti-HCV positive, and 100 HIV 1-2 positive) as well throughout treatment, with viremia levels becoming undetectable after treatment. The HBsAg, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV1-2 concordance between the two systems in routine series was respectively 99.8%, 98.5% and 99.7%, and 100% for all markers in samples known positive. The various molecular biology and confirmatory tests of the discordant samples were all negative (except for one anti-HCV positive sample). Measure of Cohen's kappa coefficient for HBsAg, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV gave K values of respectively 0.992, 0.946, and 0.980. In conclusion, the performance of the LIAISON® XL system in the routine laboratory determination for all three markers was comparable with that of the VITROS system. J. Med. Virol. 89:489-496, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Prevalence of markers of hepatitis B virus infection or vaccination in HBsAg-negative subjects.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of mass vaccinations against hepatitis B virus (HBV) has significantly reduced the prevalence of HBsAg-positive subjects. At the same time, the prevalence of the other markers of infection has decreased, but there has been an increase in the percentage of subjects with markers of a successful vaccination. It has been suggested that increasing immigration from countries in which this virus is highly endemic is changing the epidemiology of HBV infection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the serological markers of HBV in Italian and non-Italian HBsAg-negative subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the years 2007-2008, 8,018 samples from HBsAg-negative subjects (7,521 Italians and 497 non-Italians) were received for detection of anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc. The findings in the 1,358 samples from candidate blood donors were compared with those obtained in 1991 and 1999. RESULTS: The rate of anti-HBc positivity was 18.3% in the Italian samples and 32.8% in the non-Italian samples; the corresponding percentages of anti-HBs/anti-HBc positive samples (indicating past infection), anti-HBs positive only samples (vaccination) and anti-HBc positive only were, 11.3% vs. 22.5%, 25.8% vs. 17.2%, and 6.9% vs. 9.9% in Italians and non-Italians, respectively. The differences were more marked when stratified by age. In relation to candidate blood donors, simultaneous positivity for anti-HBs and anti-HBc decreased from 11.0% in 1991 to 8.1% in 1999 and 3.9% in 2007-2008, whereas isolated anti-HBs positivity increased from 2.2% in 1991 to 21.4% in 1999 and 42.9% in 2007-2008. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of markers of past infection among Italians has decreased over time as a result of mass vaccination and is significantly lower than that observed in non-Italians. The increasing number of immigrants from countries in which HBV is highly endemic is changing the epidemiology of HBV infection in Italy.

Revision of the positive predictive value of IgM anti-Toxoplasma antibodies as an index of recent infection.

The severity of congenital Toxoplasma gondii infection underlines the need for a precise diagnosis of acute infection during pregnancy. The search for specific IgM has been widely used for this purpose, but their possible early disappearance or persistence over time limits their meaning. In order to estimate the positive predictive value of anti-Toxoplasma IgM testing, we made an epidemiological analysis of the presence of anti-Toxoplasma IgG and IgM using ELISA in 4786 subjects attending the Hospital of Legnano in 2004-2005: 1360 seen for a clinical check-up and 3426 pregnant women for serological screening. In relation to IgG avidity, the positive predictive value of IgM was 45.98% (95% CI: 35.51-56.45) as a whole: this increased to 83.87% (95% CI: 70.92-96.82) in the patients with a highly positive test for IgM, but decreased to 9.52% (95% CI: 0.00-22.07) in pregnant women with a weakly positive test for IgM. Our results indicate that a highly positive IgM value in patients can be a good index of recent infection, but its poor predictive value in pregnant women underlines the need for additional tests with a follow-up if necessary.