The Effect of Prone Positioning After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prone positioning has become a standard therapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome to improve oxygenation and decrease mortality. However, little is known about prone positioning in lung transplant recipients. This large, singe-center analysis investigated whether prone positioning improves gas exchange after lung transplantation. METHODS: Clinical data of 583 patients were analyzed. Prone position was considered in case of impaired gas exchange Pao2/fraction of oxygen in inhaled air (<250), signs of edema after lung transplantation, and/or evidence of reperfusion injury. Patients with hemodynamic instability or active bleeding were not proned. Impact of prone positioning (n = 165) on gas exchange, early outcome and survival were determined and compared with patients in supine positioning (n = 418). RESULTS: Patients in prone position were younger, more likely to have interstitial lung disease, and had a higher lung allocation score. Patients were proned for a median of 19 hours (interquartile range,15-26) hours). They had significantly lower Pao2/fraction of oxygen in inhaled air (227 ± 96 vs 303 ± 127 mm Hg, P = .004), and lower lung compliance (24.8 ± 9.1 mL/mbar vs 29.8 ± 9.7 mL/mbar, P < .001) immediately after lung transplantation. Both values significantly improved after prone positioning for 24 hours (Pao2/fraction of oxygen ratio: 331 ± 91 mm Hg; lung compliance: 31.7 ± 20.2 mL/mbar). Survival at 90 days was similar between the 2 groups (93% vs 96%, P = .105). CONCLUSIONS: Prone positioning led to a significant improvement in lung compliance and oxygenation after lung transplantation. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the benefit of prone positioning in lung transplantation.

Case Report: Recurrence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The main causes of early respiratory failure after lung transplantation include primary graft dysfunction (PGD), acute rejection, and infection. This report describes a case of unclear early respiratory failure after bilateral lung transplantation for extensive COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We reviewed the patient file to investigate the course of the functional decline and evaluate reasons for early graft failure. Analyzed data included crossmatching results, biopsy results, HLA antibodies testing, bronchoalveolar lavages, respiratory parameters, and medications. RESULTS: After an initial excellent early postoperative course, the patient developed progressive respiratory failure, making re-implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support necessary. An extensive diagnostic workup revealed no signs of infection or rejection. Because the patient showed no signs of improvement with any treatment, lung-protective ventilation with the intermittent prone position was initiated. The patient's respiratory situation and bilateral opacities slowly improved over the next few weeks, and ECMO support was eventually discontinued. CONCLUSION: With no evidence of PGD, rejection, or infection, recurrent ARDS caused by a systemic immunologic process was seen as the only plausible cause for the patient's respiratory failure after lung transplantation. The fact that ARDS can develop extrapulmonarily, without direct viral or bacterial damage, makes us conclude that the preceding systemic activation and recruitment of immune cells by the primarily injured lung could potentially lead to the recurrence of ARDS even if the injured organ is removed.

A European Multi-Center Analysis of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Therapy for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is used by few lung transplant centers to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Although reported results suggest a beneficial effect on CLAD progression, evidence is limited to single center experiences. The aim of this study is to analyze outcomes of ECP in a large multicenter European cohort. The primary endpoint was patient survival after initiation of ECP. This study included 631 patients, 87% suffered from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and 13% had restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). Long-term stabilization was achieved in 42%, improvement in 9%, and no response in 26%. Within the first 12 months of therapy, 23% of patients died. Patients' survival after initiation of ECP at 5 years was 56% in stable, 70% in responders, and 35% in non-responders (p = 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, both stabilization (HR: 0.48, CI: 0.27-0.86, p = 0.013) and response (HR: 0.11, CI: 0.04-0.35, p < 0.001) to ECP were associated with survival. Absolute FEV1 at baseline was also protective (HR: 0.09, CI: 0.01-0.94, p = 0.046). RAS phenotype was the only risk factor for mortality (HR: 2.11, 1.16-3.83, p = 0.006). This study provides long-term outcomes of ECP use in CLAD patients in the largest published cohort to date. Two-thirds of the cohort had a sustained response to ECP with excellent long-term results.

Prioritizing direct heart procurement in organ donors after circulatory death does not jeopardize lung transplant outcomes.

Background: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has become a standard in liver, kidney, and lung transplantation (LTx). Based on recent innovations in ex vivo heart preservation, heart transplant centers have started to accept cDCD heart allografts. Because the heart has very limited tolerance to warm ischemia, changes to the cDCD organ procurement procedures are needed. These changes entail delayed ventilation and prolonged warm ischemia for the lungs. Whether this negatively impacts lung allograft function is unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cDCD lungs transplanted between 2012 and February 2022 at the Medical University of Vienna was performed. The heart + lung group consisted of cases in which the heart was procured by a cardiac team for subsequent normothermic ex vivo perfusion. A control group (lung group) was formed by cases where only the lungs were explanted. In heart + lung group cases, the heart procurement team placed cannulas after circulatory death and a hands-off time, collected donor blood for ex vivo perfusion, and performed rapid organ perfusion with Custodiol solution, after which the heart was explanted. Up to this point, the lung procurement team did not interfere. No concurrent lung ventilation or pulmonary artery perfusion was performed. After the cardiac procurement team left the table, ventilation was initiated, and lung perfusion was performed directly through both stumps of the pulmonary arteries using 2 large-bore Foley catheters. This study analyzed procedural explant times, postoperative outcomes, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and early survival after LTx. Results: A total of 56 cDCD lungs were transplanted during the study period. In 7 cases (12.5%), the heart was also procured (heart + lung group); in 49 cases (87.5%), only the lungs were explanted (lung group). Basic donor parameters were comparable in the 2 groups. The median times from circulatory arrest to lung perfusion (24 minutes vs 13.5 minutes; P = .002) and from skin incision to lung perfusion (14 minutes vs 5 minutes; P = .005) were significantly longer for the heart + lung procedures. However, this did not affect post-transplantation PGD grade at 0 hours (P = .851), 24 hours (P = .856), 48 hours (P = .929), and 72 hours (P = .874). At 72 hours after transplantation, none of the lungs in the heart + lung group but 1 lung (2.2%) in lung group was in PGD 3. The median duration of mechanical ventilation (50 hours vs 41 hours; P = .801), length of ICU stay (8 days vs 6 days; P = .951), and total length of hospital stay (27 days vs 25 days; P = .814) were also comparable in the 2 groups. In-hospital mortality occurred in only 1 patient of the lung group (2.2%). Conclusions: Although prioritized cDCD heart explantation is associated with delayed ventilation and significantly longer warm ischemic time to the lungs, post-LTx outcomes within the first year are unchanged. Prioritizing heart perfusion and explantation in the setting of cDCD procurement can be considered acceptable.

Duration of extracorporeal life support bridging delineates differences in the outcome between awake and sedated bridge-to-transplant patients.

OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, patients on bridge-to-transplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were kept sedated and intubated. However, awake bridging strategies have evolved during recent years. This study aims to elaborate differences in physical activity and postoperative outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx), depending on bridging strategy and duration. METHODS: Bridged patients receiving LTx between March 2013 and April 2021 were analysed. Awake bridging was defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of ≥-1 until 24 h before transplantation. Patients were grouped in awake and sedated cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients (35 awake, 53 sedated bridging) were included. After LTx, mobilization to standing position was achieved earlier in awake bridged patients (7 vs 15 days, P < 0.001). Postoperative ventilation time (247 vs 88 h, P = 0.005) and intensive care unit stay (30 vs 16 days, P = 0.004) were longer in the sedated cohort. Awake patients with bridging duration >6 days showed shorter postoperative ventilation time (108 vs 383 h, P = 0.003), less intensive care unit days (23 vs 36, P = 0.003) and earlier mobilization to standing position (9 vs 17 days, P < 0.001). In contrast, postoperative ventilation time and days in intensive care unit in patients with bridge-to-transplant duration ≤6 days were comparable between cohorts. Mobilization to standing position was achieved faster in the awake (≤6 days) bridged cohort (5 vs 9 days, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complex management of bridged patients, excellent survival rates after LTx can be achieved. Especially in patients with more than 1 week on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, awake bridging concepts are associated with significantly faster recovery.

Immune Response after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Lung Transplant Recipients: A 6-Month Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective cohort study analyzed the immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs) compared to healthy controls (HCs) at a 6-month follow-up. METHODS: After the first two doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were measured in LuTRs (n = 57) and sex- and age-matched HCs (n = 57). Antibody kinetics during a 6-month follow-up and the effect of a third vaccine dose were evaluated. Humoral responses were assessed using the Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay. In 16 LuTRs, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were quantified using IFN-γ ELISpot assays. RESULTS: Seroconversion rates were 94% and 100% after the first and second vaccine dose, respectively, in HCs, while only 19% and 56% of LuTRs developed antibodies. Furthermore, 22 of 24 LuTRs who received the third vaccine dose showed seroconversion (five of seven primary non-responders and 17 of 17 primary responders). A T cell response against SARS-CoV-2-spike S1 and/or S2 was detected in 100% (16/16) of HCs and 50% (8/16) of LuTRs. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that LuTRs have reduced humoral and cellular immune responses after two doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination when compared to HCs. A third dose may be of substantial benefit.

A Dual-Lumen Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation Technique Using a Mobile X-Ray Device.

PURPOSE: Dual-lumen extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation is considered technically challenging and harbors the risk of potential life-threatening complications during cannulation. Dual-lumen cannula insertion is performed under either ultrasound or fluoroscopy guidance. Both techniques have significant disadvantages, such as examiner dependence or the necessity for transportation of the patient from the intensive care unit to the operating room. DESCRIPTION: Digital, mobile x-ray devices provide a novel, examiner-independent imaging modality for bedside dual-lumen ECMO cannulation. EVALUATION: From November 2019 to November 2021, 23 dual-lumen cannulations were performed in 20 patients at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna. Twelve of 23 (52.2%) were inserted in the intensive care unit using a mobile x-ray device. The remaining patients (47.8%) were cannulated in the operating room with conventional fluoroscopy guidance. In none of the procedures did cardiovascular injuries occur. Insertion site bleeding was the most common ECMO-related complication (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-lumen cannulation using sequential x-rays can be performed safely. Especially for infectious patients or patients who require an awake ECMO, this technique overcomes disadvantages of established imaging modalities.

Mechanisms of Action of Extracorporeal Photopheresis in the Control of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS): Involvement of Circulating miRNAs.

Clinical evidence suggests an improvement or stabilization of lung function in a fraction of patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) treated by extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP); however, few studies have explored the epigenetic and molecular regulation of this therapy. The aim of present study was to evaluate whether a specific set of miRNAs were significantly regulated by ECP. Total RNA was isolated from serum of patients with established BOS grade 1-2 prior to the start and after 6 months of ECP treatment. We observed a significant downregulation of circulating hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR-146a-5p and hsa-miR-31-5p in BOS patients at the start of ECP when compared to healthy subjects. In responders, increased miR-155-5p and decreased miR-23b-3p expression levels at 6 months were found. SMAD4 mRNA was found to be a common target of these two miRNAs in prediction pathways analysis, and a significant downregulation was found at 6 months in PBMCs of a subgroup of ECP-treated patients. According to previous evidence, the upregulation of miR-155 might be correlated with a pro-tolerogenic modulation of the immune system. Our analysis also suggests that SMAD4 might be a possible target for miR-155-5p. Further longitudinal studies are needed to address the possible role of miR-155 and its downstream targets.

Completion Pneumonectomy for Second Primary/Primary Lung Cancer and Local Recurrence Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Completion pneumonectomy (CP) for second primary/primary lung cancer (SPLC) and local recurrence lung cancer (LRLC) is still controversial. Although several case series on such a practice exist, the oncological benefit is under debate. The purpose of this study was to review available literatures on CP for SPLC and LRLC and evaluate postoperative and long-term outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were reviewed for eligible studies in January 2021. Studies were included if they indicated outcomes of patients with lung cancer undergoing CP. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included operative morbidity and 30-day mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis based on a binomial distribution was used to create pooled estimates. RESULTS: Thirty-two eligible studies including 1157 patients were identified. These studies were uniformly retrospective reports. Pooled estimates for 3-year and 5-year OS were 50.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%-66.5%) and 38.9% (95% CI, 32.2%-46.1%) in SPLC patients. When the SPLC was a stage I tumor, pooled 5-year OS was favorable with 60.7% (95% CI, 43.2%-75.9%). In LRLC, pooled 3-year and 5-year OS were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.1%-59.4%) and 33.8% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.5%), respectively. Pooled morbidity and 30-day mortality was reported in 38.2% (95% CI, 32.0%-44.9%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-12.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CP for SPLC and LRLC is a challenging procedure with significant perioperative morbimortality. However, published evidence indicates good long-term survival for selected patients. Further studies are needed to identify patient subgroups which benefit most from CP.

Lungs from polytrauma donors with significant chest trauma can be safely used for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The use of organs from polytrauma donors for lung transplantation is controversial in the literature. For many centers, the radiologic manifestation of lung contusions is a clear reason to reject an organ offer. This results in the loss of potentially viable organs for the donor pool. METHODS: We analyzed 1152 donor lungs procured by our transplant center between January 2010 and June 2018. These included 118 lungs with a history of polytrauma involving the chest. Sixteen polytrauma donor lungs were rejected after procurement. A total of 102 lungs were transplanted, divided into 2 groups: the polytrauma contusion group (n = 44), comprising polytrauma donors with radiologic signs of lung contusion at the time of offer, and the polytrauma clear group (n = 58), comprising polytrauma donors without lung contusion. Nontrauma donor lungs transplanted during the study period were assigned to a polytrauma control group (n = 650). Short- and long-term outcomes of the 3 groups were compared. RESULTS: Basic demographic data and preoperative factors were similar in the 3 groups. Rates of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours did not differ among the 3 groups (0.0% vs 3.4% vs 3.9%; P = .409). The duration of ventilation was similar the 3 groups: 45 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 28-94 hours), 37 hours (IQR, 22-71 hours), and 42 hours (IQR, 22-96 hours), respectively (P = .674). Long-term graft survival was not impaired in the trauma groups compared with controls. One-year survival rates were 84.1% for the polytrauma contusion group, 93.1% for the polytrauma clear group, and 83.1% for the no polytrauma group. Five-year graft survival in the 3 groups was 74.7%, 87.2%, and 70.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation using organs from polytrauma donors is associated with similar short- and long-term results as transplantation from nontrauma donors. The presence or absence of radiologic signs of lung contusion at the time of offer has no impact on primary graft function and long-term survival.

Early implementation of renal replacement therapy after lung transplantation does not impair long-term kidney function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, cardiac function can be impaired in the early postoperative phase after lung transplantation because the chronically untrained left ventricle is prone to fail. Thus, restrictive fluid management is pivotal to unload the left heart. In our institution, continuous renal replacement therapy is implemented liberally whenever a patient cannot be balanced negatively. It remains unclear whether such strategy impairs long-term kidney function. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2018. The impact of postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy on long-term outcomes was investigated using a linear mixed model and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 87 idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension lung transplant recipients were included in this analysis. In 38 patients (43%), continuous renal replacement therapy was started in the early postoperative period for a median of 16 days (10-22). In this group, urine production significantly decreased and patients began to acquire a positive fluid balance; however, homeostatic functions of the kidney were still preserved at the time of continuous renal replacement therapy initiation. All patients were successfully weaned from continuous renal replacement therapy and fully recovered their kidney function at the time of hospital discharge. No difference in kidney function was found between continuous renal replacement therapy and noncontinuous renal replacement therapy in patients within 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Early implementation of continuous renal replacement therapy for perioperative volume management does not impair long-term kidney function in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension lung transplant recipients. Our data suggest that such a strategy leads to excellent long-term outcomes.

Extracorporeal life support as a bridge to pulmonary retransplantation: prognostic factors for survival in a multicentre cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary retransplant (ReTx) is considered a controversial procedure. Despite literature reporting outcomes following ReTx, limited data exist in recipients bridged to their ReTx on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). The goal of this study was to investigate the outcomes of recipients bridged to a first-time ReTx by ECLS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre cohort analysis from 10 centres in Europe, Asia and North America. The primary outcome was overall survival. Risk factors were analysed using Cox regression models. RESULTS: ECLS as a bridge to a first-time ReTx was performed in 50 recipients (ECLS-ReTx). During the study period, 210 recipients underwent a first-time ReTx without bridging on ECLS (regular-ReTx) and 4959 recipients had a primary pulmonary transplant (index-Tx). The overall 1-year (55%) and 5-year (29%) survival was significantly worse for the ECLS-ReTx group.Compared to the index-Tx group, the mortality risk was significantly higher after ECLS-ReTx [hazard ratio 2.76 (95% confidence interval 1.94-3.91); P < 0.001] and regular-ReTx [hazard ratio 1.65 (95% confidence interval 1.36-2); P < 0.001].In multivariable analysis, recipient age ≥35 years, time interval <1 year from index-Tx, primary graft dysfunction as transplant indication, venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Zurich donor score ≥4 points were significant risk factors for mortality in ECLS-ReTx recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients for ECLS-ReTx should be carefully selected. Risk factors, such as recipient age, intertransplant interval, primary graft dysfunction as transplant indication and type of ECLS should be kept in mind before bridging these patients on ECLS to ReTx.

Outcomes with alemtuzumab induction therapy in lung transplantation: a comprehensive large-scale single-center analysis.

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD52, increasingly used as induction therapy after transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by a low-dose maintenance immunosuppression in a large single-center cohort of lung transplant recipients. All patients, who received alemtuzumab induction followed by a low-dose maintenance immunosuppression were included in the analysis. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. 721 lung transplant recipients, transplanted between January 2008 and June 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Freedom from higher-grade ACR at 1, 5, and 10 years was 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. Thirty-nine patients (5%) developed clinical AMR. Twenty-one percent of patients developed high-grade CKD. A total of 1488 infections were recorded. Sixteen percent were diagnosed within the first 3 months. Sixty-two patients (9%) developed a malignancy during follow-up. Freedom from CLAD at 1, 5, and 10 years was 94%, 72%, and 53%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 71%, and 61%, respectively. Alemtuzumab induction combined with a low-dose tacrolimus protocol is safe and associated with low rates of acute and chronic rejection, as well as an excellent long-term survival.

Bilateral lung transplantation during pregnancy after ECMO for influenza-A caused ARDS.

Pregnant women with influenza-A have an increased risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used as salvage therapy, with lung transplantation as a therapeutic option. However, successful bilateral lung transplantation during pregnancy has never been reported before. We herein report the case of a 34-year-old primipara, who was diagnosed with ARDS caused by influenza-A-induced pneumonia at early gestation. After considering all possible therapeutic options and being fully dependent on VV-ECMO support, she underwent bilateral lung transplantation. The transplantation with intraoperative central VA-ECMO support was successfully performed with good recovery after an initial primary graft dysfunction. The pregnancy was prolonged until 29+5  gestational weeks. The newborn exhibited growth retardation and was initially stabilized, but later died due to severe, hypoxic respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension. In conclusion, lung transplantation is a possible salvage therapy for patients with severe lung failure following ARDS during pregnancy. However, it places the mother and unborn child at risk. A multi-professional approach is warranted to diagnose and treat complications at an early stage.

Cardiopulmonary response to high-altitude mountaineering in lung transplant recipients-The Jebel Toubkal experience.

OBJECTIVES: Only a small proportion of lung transplant recipients achieve a physical status comparable to healthy individuals in the long term. It is reasonable to hypothesize that the necessary cardiopulmonary adaptation required for strenuous physical exercise may be impaired. Exposure to high altitude provides an optimal platform to study the physiological cardiopulmonary adaptation in lung transplant recipients under aerobic conditions. To gain a deeper understanding, 14 healthy lung transplant recipients and healthcare professionals climbed the highest peak in North Africa (Mount Jebel Toubkal; 4167 m) in September 2019. METHODS: Monitoring included daily assessment of vital signs, repeated transthoracic echocardiography, pulmonary function tests, and capillary blood sampling throughout the expedition. RESULTS: Eleven out of fourteen lung transplant recipients reached the summit. All recipients showed a stable lung function and vital parameters and physiological adaptation of blood gases. Similar results were found in healthy controls. Lung transplant recipients showed worse results in the 6-minute walk test at low and high altitude compared to controls (day 1: 662 m vs. 725 m, p < 0.001, day 5: 656 m vs. 700 m, p = 0.033) and a lack of contractile adaptation of right ventricular function with increasing altitude as measured by tricuspid plane systolic excursion on echocardiography (day 2: 22 mm vs. 24 mm, p = 0.202, day 5: 23 mm vs. 26 mm, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Strenuous exercise in healthy lung transplant recipients is safe. However, the poorer cardiopulmonary performance in the 6-minute walk test and the lack of right ventricular cardiac adaptation may indicate underlying autonomic dysregulation.

Potential novel biomarkers for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and azithromycin responsive allograft dysfunction.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD), manifesting as Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) or Restrictive Allograft Syndrome (RAS), is the main reason for adverse long-term outcome after Lung Transplantation (LTX). Until now, no specific biomarkers exist to differentiate between CLAD phenotypes. Therefore, we sought to find suitable cytokines to distinguish between BOS, RAS and Azithromycin Responsive Allograft Dysfunction (ARAD); and reveal potential similarities or differences to end-stage fibrotic diseases. We observed significantly increased Lipocalin-2 serum concentrations in RAS compared to BOS patients. In addition, in RAS patients immunohistochemistry revealed Lipocalin-2 expression in bronchial epithelium and alveolar walls. Patients with ARAD showed significantly lower Activin-A serum concentrations compared to Stable-LTX and BOS patients. Further, increased serum concentrations of Lipocalin-2 and Activin-A were predictors of worse freedom-from-CLAD in Stable-LTX patients. These biomarkers serve as promising serum biomarkers for CLAD prediction and seem suitable for implementation in clinical practice.

Combined low-dose everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus after Alemtuzumab induction therapy: a randomized prospective trial in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of lung transplantation are severely affected by comorbidities and development of chronic rejection. Among the comorbidities, kidney insufficiency is one of the most frequent and it is mainly caused by the cumulative effect of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Currently, the most used immunosuppression protocols worldwide include induction therapy and a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppression, with one calcineurin inhibitor, one anti-proliferative drug, and steroids. Our center has pioneered the use of alemtuzumab as induction therapy, showing promising results in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. The use of alemtuzumab followed by a low-dose double drug maintenance immunosuppression, in fact, led to better kidney function along with excellent results in terms of acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and survival (Benazzo et al., PLoS One 14(1):e0210443, 2019). The hypothesis driving the proposed clinical trial is that de novo introduction of low-dose everolimus early after transplantation could further improve kidney function via a further reduction of tacrolimus. Based on evidences from kidney transplantation, moreover, alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by a low-dose everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus may have a permissive action on regulatory immune cells thus stimulating allograft acceptance. METHODS: A randomized prospective clinical trial has been set up to answer the research hypothesis. One hundred ten patients will be randomized in two groups. Treatment group will receive the new maintenance immunosuppression protocol based on low-dose tacrolimus and low-dose everolimus and the control group will receive our standard immunosuppression protocol. Both groups will receive alemtuzumab induction therapy. The primary endpoint of the study is to analyze the effect of the new low-dose immunosuppression protocol on kidney function in terms of eGFR change. The study will have a duration of 24 months from the time of randomization. Immunomodulatory status of the patients will be assessed with flow cytometry and gene expression analysis. DISCUSSION: For the first time in the field of lung transplantation, this trial proposes the combined use of significantly reduced tacrolimus and everolimus after alemtuzumab induction. The new protocol may have a twofold advantage: (1) further reduction of nephrotoxic tacrolimus and (2) permissive influence on regulatory cells development with further reduction of rejection episodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRACT Nr 2018-001680-24. Registered on 15 May 2018.

MiR-21 in Lung Transplant Recipients With Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Background: Micro-RNA-21 (miR-21) is a post-translational regulator involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Since EMT is thought to contribute to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), we aimed to characterize miR-21 expression and distinct EMT markers in CLAD. Methods: Expression of miR-21, vimentin, Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and SMAD 2/3 was investigated in explanted CLAD lungs of patients who underwent retransplantation. Circulating miR-21 was determined in collected serum samples of CLAD and matched stable recipients. Results: The frequency of miR-21 expression was higher in restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) than in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) specimens (86 vs 30%, p = 0.01); Vimentin, NICD and p-SMAD 2/3 were positive in 17 (100%), 12 (71%), and 7 (42%) BOS patients and in 7 (100%), 4 (57%) and 4 (57%) RAS cases, respectively. All four markers were negative in control tissue from donor lungs. RAS patients showed a significant increase in serum concentration of miR-21 over time as compared to stable recipients (p = 0.040). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study highlighting the role miR-21 in CLAD. Further studies are necessary to investigate the involvement of miR-21 in the pathogenesis of CLAD and its potential as a therapeutic target.