Evaluation of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining Compared with HPV Genotyping in Anal Cytology with Diagnosis of ASC-US for Detection of High-Grade Anal Intraepithelial Lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the main risk factor for anogenital cancer. The objective of this study was to compare p16/Ki-67 dual staining to HPV genotyping in anal cytology samples with an atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) for the identification of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). METHODS: Anal cytology samples with an ASC-US result (n = 111) were collected from patients of a university hospital (Lyon, France) from 2014 to 2015. Cases with remaining squamous cells (n = 82) were stained using p16/Ki-67 dual staining (CINtec-Plus kit) and analyzed for HPV screening (CLART2-PCR kit) using a composite endpoint of biopsy and cytology results on follow-up specimens. RESULTS: Detection of HSIL on follow-up specimens (5/22 biopsies; 1/29 cytology samples) was obtained in two out of six cases with p16/Ki-17 versus. five out of six with HPV genotyping alone. Sensitivity and specificity to detect HSIL for p16/Ki-67 was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI] [4; 77]) and 49% (95%CI [34; 64]) versus. 83% (95%CI [36; 99.6]) and 13% (95%CI [5; 27]) for HPV genotyping. CONCLUSION: Herein, HPV genotyping was more sensitive but less specific than p16/Ki-67 staining for the detection of subsequent HSIL in ASC-US anal cytology. A larger study is required to evaluate the combination of these biomarkers for triage.

Preliminary results of a prospective study of testicular sperm extraction in young versus adult patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter syndrome.

CONTEXT: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in adult patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY provides a sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of approximately 50%. Age is the only significant prognostic factor. Whether TESE should be performed in adolescent patients for sperm cryopreservation remains to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare SRR between young (15-23 y) and adult (> 23 y) patients with 47,XXY, and to determine whether previous androgenic treatment had a deleterious effect. DESIGN: We designed a prospective comparative study between two groups enrolled in parallel from September 2010 onward. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty one patients with nonmosaic 47,XXY karyotype and azoospermia were included. Twenty five patients from 15-22 years of age were assigned to the "Young" group, and 16 patients age 23 years or more, to the "Adult" group. INTERVENTION: A bilateral testicular open biopsy was performed by a single surgeon. The reproductive biologist who performed TESE was blind to the patient's age. Principal Outcome Measure: The main outcome measure was the SRR. The TESE procedure was considered positive if at least 20 sperm cells could be cryopreserved for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. RESULTS: SRR was 13/25 = 52% in the Young group and 10/16 = 62.5% in the Adult group, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .73). Ages were 24.3 ± 7.4 years in the 23 cases of positive TESE, and 23.7 ± 7.4 in the 18 cases of negative TESE, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .42). SRR was 9/17 = 52.9% for patients with and 14/24 = 59.1% for patients without previous testosterone (T) treatment, the difference being nonsignificant (P = .98). CONCLUSIONS: According to the present results, performing TESE at a younger age (15-23 y) in patients with azoospermic nonmosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter did not increase SRR relative to adult patients (25-39 y). Previous replacement treatment with moderate doses of T did not seem to be deleterious for the recovery of sperm cells by TESE.

Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients.

BACKGROUND: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is diagnosed in 4% to 10% of directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsies (DVABs) performed for microcalcifications. Since the underestimation rate varies from 7% to 36%, surgical excision is still recommended, although some authors have tried to identify a subset of patients who can be spared surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we analyzed a retrospective series of 300 patients with ADH on 11-gauge DVAB. The only 4 events that occurred (3%) in 135 of 184 patients (61%) who were followed may not be due to underestimation. Comparing the diagnoses on DVAB and surgical excisions for 116 patients (39%), we identified 3 subsets of patients: no underestimation (size <6 mm and complete removal), low rate of 4% (< or =2 foci ADH in microcalcifications either <6 mm with incomplete removal or > or =6 mm and <21 mm), and high rate of 36% to 38% (>2 foci ADH in microcalcifications either <6 mm with incomplete removal or > or =6 mm and <21 mm, lesion size > or =21 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that strict follow-up can be a safe option for the first 2 groups of patients, but that surgical excision is mandatory for patients from the third group.