Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39365149

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the risk of anal cancer in sexual and gender minority populations (SGM), anal cancer screening remains infrequent and inconsistent in these populations. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with anal cancer screenings among sexual and gender minority populations (SGM) using the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. METHODS: Secondary analyses of two cross-sectional surveys from the 2020 (N=1125) and 2022 (N=630) "Pennsylvania LGBTQ Health Needs Assessment." Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify correlates of anal cytology screening. RESULTS: Average age was 37.7 (SD=13.3) and 39.7 (SD=13.6) in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Approximately 16-18% reported living with HIV. A minority of respondents reported past year screening (14.0% 2020 and 13.6% 2022). Enabling and need-based factors consistently associated with screening included STI treatment, living with HIV, PrEP use, and multiple sex partners. Robust factors associated with ever being screened were age and living with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Anal cytology screening is being done in Pennsylvania at a small but not insignificant rate. In accordance with existing guidelines, SGM living with HIV were most likely to be screened, but still at a low rate. Predictive factors associated with screening in this study can inform future interventions to implement guideline-specific anal cancer prevention. IMPACT: Factors that reflect consistent connection to healthcare are associated with increased rates of screening via anal cytology testing, indicating there are opportunities to implement anal cancer screening as part of a larger, more comprehensive SGM-focused care pathway.

2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(10)2024 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39460321

RESUMEN

Background/Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) types by HPV vaccination status and the feasibility of using HPV L1 serology to identify HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) who may be at risk for anal cancer. Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited HIV-negative MSM from a US metropolitan area. The prevalence of HR, quadrivalent, and nonavalent anorectal HPV DNA and HPV L1 serum antibodies was estimated. McNemar's chi-square and kappa statistics were used to determine significant differences in HPV detection between anorectal DNA swabs and HPV L1 serology. Results: Eighty-two men had adequate anorectal swabs and serology samples for analysis. Men who self-reported receipt of the HPV vaccine (35.6%) had detectable L1 HPV antibodies (93.1%) and a lower prevalence of active anal HPV infections (20.7%) compared to those who reported none. Conclusions: If confirmed in larger prospective studies, a combination of HPV vaccination status or HPV L1 serology and anorectal swabs for HR HPV types could identify HIV-negative MSM who do not need to undergo follow-up anal testing.

3.
Cancer Screen Prev ; 3(2): 125-129, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139552

RESUMEN

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancers associated with sexual contact are increasing, with high rates in men who have sex with men. HPV-related cancers have the advantage of being frequently detectable through oropharyngeal visual examination and having much higher survival rates than classic oropharyngeal cancers. It has been demonstrated that gay and bisexual men can take smartphone oropharyngeal "selfies" of sufficient quality for screening. However, there is an issue with the inability to move the tongue to allow a clear view of the palatine tonsils, where a majority of oropharyngeal cancer cases occur. We attempted to investigate the feasibility of using commercially available videoscopes to visualize the oropharynx. Fourteen healthy volunteers used a provided low-cost commercial endoscope to video their oropharynx. Participants used the videoscope connected to a laptop and could visualize the oropharynx on the screen. Attempts were observed, and the process was noted. A focus group of participants was carried out immediately afterwards to ascertain barriers and facilitators to using the videoscopes. All participants were able to use the videoscope and obtain videos of sufficient clarity to note major oropharyngeal landmarks. The palatine tonsils were initially difficult to visualize because the tongue could not be sufficiently controlled. Participants were given time to practice using visual cues to control the position of the tongue, which helped in obtaining good videos. Videoscopes can be used effectively with minimal instruction and provide a better view than still images, as they illuminate and magnify the site. Low-cost commercially available videoscopes may be an improvement over smartphone "selfies".

4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(4): 289-294, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430512

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC). The objective of this analysis was to create a psychometrically validated scale to measure perception of risk for HPV-OPC. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory and a confirmatory factor analysis to determine and confirm the latent factor structure. We used a path diagram to evaluate the relationship between the validated scale and perceived risk for HPV-OPC. The model was determined to be a good fit if it met all criteria: root mean square error of approximation ≤0.06, standardized root mean residual ≤0.08, Comparative Fit Index ≥0.90, and Tucker-Lewis Index ≥0.90. We report standardized estimates and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study recruited 1315 MSM. A majority (73.33%) of MSM had performed fellatio on ≥20 partners, 36.98% had rimmed ≥20 partners, and 5.31% had performed cunnilingus on ≥10 partners in their lifetime.Six sexual history survey items loaded onto 2 latent factors: sexual risk behaviors: class 1 and sexual risk behaviors: class 2. The final model statistics indicated good fit: root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, standardized root mean residual = 0.059, Comparative Fit Index = 0.996, and Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.993. Sexual risk behaviors: class 1 was associated with greater perceived risk for HPV-OPC (0.217; 95% confidence interval, 0.138-0.295). Age, HIV status, HPV vaccination status, and sexual risk behaviors: class 2 were not associated with perceived risk for HPV-OPC. CONCLUSION: Men who have sex with men assessed risk for HPV-OPC based on their lifetime number of cisgender male sexual partners, rimming partners, and fellatio partners but not other sexual behaviors. Men who have sex with men may be responsive to future HPV-OPC educational interventions and opportunities for screening.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Homosexualidad Masculina , Estudios Transversales , Psicometría , Conducta Sexual , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 155(1): 26-38.e1, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37988048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gay and bisexual men (GBM) are at increased risk of developing human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Vaccination may prevent OPC in GBM; however, vaccination rates are low. The authors explored the correlates associated with HPV vaccination intent for OPC prevention among GBM. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study in which they surveyed 1,700 adult GBM with a profile on 2 online dating sites. Eligibility criteria included self-identified GBM living in the United States, aged 18 through 45 years who had sex with a man in the past 5 years. Factors associated with participants' HPV vaccination status and intent to vaccinate were assessed via the online questionnaire using the Health Belief Model. RESULTS: Most of the 1,108 eligible GBM had not received 1 dose or more of the HPV vaccine (54.2%), were aged 27 through 37 years (52.3%), were White (58.3%), identified as cisgender men (93.4%), were gay (79.3%), were in a monogamous relationship (99.4%), and had a bachelor's degree (29.4%) or higher college education (26.1%). Among unvaccinated GBM, 25.3% reported intent to receive the vaccine. In the multivariable model, independent associations (P < .05) were found for the Health Belief Model constructs (perceived benefits and perceived barriers) with HPV vaccine intent, after adjusting for all other predictor variables in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of HPV vaccination for the prevention of OPC is associated with intent to vaccinate among GBM. Dental care providers can use this information to educate patients in this high-risk population on prevention of HPV-associated OPC. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can advocate for HPV vaccination uptake among GBM patients by means of discussing the benefits of vaccination in the prevention of HPV-associated OPC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Homosexualidad Masculina , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Vacunación , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/prevención & control , Virus del Papiloma Humano
6.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1233274, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37780435

RESUMEN

Objectives: This study aims to determine the potential uptake and quality of oropharyngeal "selfies" taken by gay/bisexual men as a screening approach for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Methods: From 1,699 gay/bisexual men in the US, surveyed about knowledge and attitudes to HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer, a random sample of 320 men were invited to take an oropharyngeal "selfie" by smartphone and send it to the study website: 113 (35.5%) did so. Images were rated for quality by three healthcare professional raters blinded to each other's rating, with an otolaryngologist as the gold standard. In the second wave, those whose images were rated as unacceptable were sent a short instructional video and asked to send another image. Of the 65 invited, 46 did so. An additional 15.2% sent acceptable images, and a total of 28.3% of the sample was acceptable. Results: A total of 1,121 men willing to participate in the future study who believed they could take a quality "oral selfie" were potentially eligible for this activity. A random sample of 320 participated: 153 participants started (47.8%) and 113 participants (35.3%) submitted an image. Responders were more likely to be younger, have higher knowledge scores on oropharyngeal HPV-related cancer, and have had HPV vaccination. There was high agreement between the three raters. Images of good/acceptable quality were 22.1%; oropharynx partially occluded images were 29.2%; oropharynx not visible images were 18.6%; images too dark were 21.2%; and images too small were 8.8%. From the second wave of requests with instructional videos, an additional 15.2% sent in quality images, with the remaining issues being partial occlusion of the tonsils by the tongue. Conclusion: One-third of the invited gay and bisexual men sent oropharyngeal selfie images to the study website and a total of 28.3% were of clinically acceptable quality. Following an instructional video on poorer-quality images, additional quality images were received. One barrier, i.e., partial occlusion of the oropharynx by the tongue remained. Quality oropharyngeal "selfies" are obtainable online.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Homosexualidad Masculina , Proyectos Piloto , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico
7.
Elife ; 122023 08 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594016

RESUMEN

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization named vaccine hesitancy as one of the top 10 threats to global health. The impact of hesitancy on the uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines was of particular concern, given the markedly lower uptake compared to other adolescent vaccines in some countries, notably the United States. With the recent approval of COVID-19 vaccines, coupled with the widespread use of social media, concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy have grown. However, the association between COVID-related vaccine hesitancy and cancer vaccines such as HPV is unclear. To examine the potential association, we performed two reviews using Ovid Medline and APA PsychInfo. Our aim was to answer two questions: (1) Is COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake associated with HPV or hepatitis B (HBV) vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake? and (2) Is exposure to COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on social media associated with HPV or HBV vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake? Our review identified few published empirical studies that addressed these questions. Our results highlight the urgent need for studies that can shift through the vast quantities of social media data to better understand the link between COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation and its impact on uptake of cancer vaccines.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra el Cáncer , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Adolescente , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Intención , Pandemias/prevención & control , Vacilación a la Vacunación
8.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1165107, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37151584

RESUMEN

Introduction: Among US men, oropharyngeal cancer (cancer of the back of the mouth and throat) is the 8th most common cancer. If detected early, human papillomavirus (HPV)-16-associated oropharyngeal cancer has a high 5-year survival rate. Risk factors such as high numbers of oral sex partners, disparities in smoking and drinking, and low rates of HPV vaccination may put gay and bisexual men at even higher risk for oropharyngeal cancer. Methods: We recruited 21 healthcare providers in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota and Houston, Texas to participate in semi-structured interviews. Nurses, physician assistants, dental hygienists, and dentists were asked about their clinical experiences serving gay and bisexual men and opinions on potential interventions for the early detection of oropharyngeal cancer. Results: Providers typically did not tailor health screenings and examinations for gay and bisexual men. Participants lacked confidence in their ability to effectively implement routine screening for oropharyngeal cancer. The extent to which oropharyngeal cancer screening was incorporated into clinical practice varied by specialty, and practices necessary to detect it were scattered across clinical environments. HIV- and LGBTQ-focused healthcare providers were more aware of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in gay and bisexual men, and appeared readier to act and lead on this issue. Discussion: Further studies should (1) evaluate protocols for oropharyngeal cancer detection; (2) identify and assess the acceptability of screening in the community; and (3) study how to best close gaps in health services for gay and bisexual men which might contribute to low early detection rates of oropharyngeal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Homosexualidad Masculina , Bisexualidad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud
9.
Prev Med ; 170: 107494, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37001607

RESUMEN

This study aims to evaluate the association between smoking exposure and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cervical abnormalities among women living with HIV (WLWH). By conducting a systematic review of the current literature, we evaluated the association between current active smoking and/or exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and the risk of cervical HPV incidence, prevalence, and clearance, as well as high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (HGCIN) incidence, prevalence, progression, and regression among WLWH. We conducted the literature search in Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus following the PRISMA guidelines. We determined the risk of bias of included studies using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Studies with the same effect measure were combined for a pooled estimate. We identified 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis, with a limited number of studies evaluating each study question. Among WLWH, current active smoking is associated with an increased risk of new HPV infections (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.60), HPV prevalence (ORpooled = 1.55, 95% CI 1.26-1.91), HGCIN incidence (HR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0), and HGCIN prevalence (PR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.54-8.78). There was no significant association between current active smoking and HPV clearance. We did not identify any study that evaluated the association between SHS exposure and HPV-related cervical abnormalities among WLWH. Active smoking increases the risk of HPV infection and pre-cancer lesion development in WLWH. Considering smoking as an additional risk factor when designing tailored cervical cancer screening programs for WLWH is necessary in high smoking prevalence regions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Displasia del Cuello del Útero , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Prevalencia , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Papillomaviridae , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/patología
10.
Venereology (Basel) ; 2(4): 180-193, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38515606

RESUMEN

Oropharyngeal cancers (OPCa) caused by HPV have emerged as one of the leading causes of malignancies caused by HPV infection. They are also significantly more likely to occur in males and in people with a history of oral sex with multiple partners. Gay and bisexual men are disproportionately affected by HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers. We studied 1699 gay and bisexual men on 2 major dating sites in the US to assess their knowledge about HPV-related OPCa, attitudes toward screening for it, beliefs about oropharyngeal cancer screening based on the Health Belief Model, and attitudes toward possible screening approaches for OPCa. Knowledge on a 12-item scale was low, with a median of 5 items correct: 72% knew of the benefits of HPV vaccination. Significant predictors of needing OPCa screening included perception of risk for OPCa, seeing it as severe, having lower barriers, fewer reasons to avoid screening, higher knowledge, and being HPV vaccinated were significant predictors, explaining half the total variance. Most participants would accept routine, virtual/online doctor or dental appointments, and over half would accept an in-person screening. Nearly two-thirds stated that they would accept getting checked for OPCa if they could do self-screening at home, and half were prepared to use an online screening tool or app, where they could take an "oral selfie" and send it to a healthcare provider for examination. One-third stated that they would trust the results of a home screening completed by themselves and posted to a website equally as cancer screening completed online by a healthcare provider. Data indicate that despite low OPCA knowledge levels, the risk of HPV-associated OPCa was known. Being at personal risk and having knowledge of disease severity had 70% of the sample thinking about, or preparing to get, screening. Self-screening by a smartphone "oral selfie" transmitted to a screening website was acceptable to many gay and bisexual men, and online screening by a doctor or dentist was acceptable to most. OPCa screening in this population using electronic technology, together with the increasing incidence of HPV-associated OPCa in gay and bisexual men, brings together an opportunity to detect OPCa early.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...