[Glucocorticoide therapy in premature infants: French practices in 2006]. / Corticothérapie postnatale chez le prématuré : étude des pratiques des centres français de néonatologie en 2006.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In 1999, 80% of French neonatal centers used corticosteroids, mainly betamethasone (BMT), to prevent or treat bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) [Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlson A, et al. Variations in practice and outcomes in the canadian NICU Network 1996-1997. Pediatrics 2000;106:1070-9]. As many data suggested a low risk-benefit ratio, an updated assessment of this use was necessary [Desnoulez L, Empana J, Anceschi M, et al. Prise en charge de l'immaturité pulmonaire en néonatologie : enquête sur les pratiques européennes. Arch Pediatr 2005;12:4-9; Halliday HL, Ehrenkranz RA, Doyle LW. Early postnatal (less than 96h) corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD001146; Yeh TF, Lin YJ, Lin HC, et al. Outcomes at school age after postnatal dexamethasone therapy for lung disease of prematurity. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1304-13; Lin YJ, LKin CH, Wu JM, et al. The effects of early postnatal dexamethasone therapy on pulmonary outcome in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a 2-year follow-up study. Acta Paediatr 2005;94:310-16]. METHODS: Questionnaires addressing the use of and indications for corticosteroids were sent to all French neonatal centers. RESULTS: The study was conducted over 5 months (July to November 2006). Of 202 questionnaires sent out, 186 (92%) were completed. Of these 186 centers, 147 (79%) had a standard protocol for corticosteroid use, covering systemic and inhaled steroids (76 units), only systemic steroid therapy (30 units) and only inhaled steroids (41 units). Systemic corticosteroids were used in 106 centers for hemodynamic purposes in 42 cases (40%), prevention of BPD in 1 case (1%), early treatment of BPD (day 4 to day 21) in 23 cases (22%) and late treatment of BPD (after day 21) in 74 cases (70%). Hemisuccinate hydrocortisone (HSHC) was the only corticoid used for hemodynamic failure. The steroid used for early treatment of BPD was BMT (21 out of 23). The duration of treatment was less than 4 days in 10 centers (43%). The steroid most often used for late treatment was BMT (67 out of 74). The duration of treatment was less than 4 days in 29 centers, between 4 and 8 days in 22 centers, and longer than 8 days in 26 centers. Among 117 centers administering corticosteroids by inhalation, 74% used budesonide. Use of corticosteroids was higher in teaching hospitals (86%) than in others (49%), likely due to the immaturity of the neonates hospitalized in these centers. CONCLUSION: We showed a still frequent use of corticosteroids in preterm infants in France but only after the fourth day of life to treat BPD and not as a prevention therapy. We also found a marginal use of DXM in accordance with both short-term and long-term adverse side effects, suggesting an unbalanced risk-benefit ratio even though it has a beneficial effect on respiratory status. Our findings indicate the need for national recommendations and trials to assess oral BMT treatment in premature neonates with BPD.

[DRESS syndrome, a drug reaction which remains bad known from paediatricians]. / Le DRESS syndrome, une réaction d'hypersensibilité aux médicaments, qui reste mal connue des pédiatres.

The DRESS syndrome (Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) is a drug hypersensitivity reaction poorly known by paediatricians. It occurs within 1 to 8 weeks of treatment. Clinical features associate in variable patterns, fever, rash, lymphadenopathies, arthritis and potentially life-threatening damage (hepatitis, nephritis, pneumonitis), hyperleucocytosis and eosinophilia. This condition must be early recognized in order to immediately stop suspect drugs. A 6.5 year old girl had a febrile rash, hyperleucocytosis, lymph nodes and cytolitic hepatitis probably due to phenobarbital. Diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was performed only 13 days after the beginning of the eruption. Evolution was favorable but characterized by the recurrence of the febrile eruption with pleuritis. DRESS syndrome is a well described disease that occurs during treatment with a number drugs, particularly anti-epileptic drugs. Steroid therapy and immunoglobulins are proposed for treatment but have not been evaluated.

[Post licensure safety surveillance for Prevenar]. / Suivi de pharmacovigilance du vaccin Prevenar.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to detect as soon as possible a rare but severe or unexpected adverse effect (AE) of Prevenar vaccine. A pharmacovigilance survey was required by the French drug agency (Afssaps) to the regional pharmacovigilance centre of Tours (France). METHOD: Two approaches were used. One based upon systematic reports and the other upon spontaneous reports. Only severe and /or unexpected AEs were recorded. RESULTS: During the 19 months of intensive follow up, 24 AEs (8.7 [5-12.7]/100000 vaccinations) reported by 349 participating paediatricians have been analyzed. Prevenar was the only drug taken in 67% of children. AEs were severe (19 cases) or non severe but unexpected (5 cases). AEs were fever above 39 degrees C (10 cases), cutaneous manifestations (6 cases), neurologic manifestations (5 cases), diarrhoea-vomiting (2 cases), and purulent otitis media (1 case). During the 3.5 years of spontaneous reporting, 130 AEs (6 [5-7]/100000 vaccinations) have been reported and analyzed. AEs were severe (107 cases) or non severe but unexpected (23 cases). AEs were mainly: fever above 39 degrees C (17 cases), cutaneous (39 cases), neurologic (34 cases) and haematological (3 cases) manifestations and diarrhoea-vomiting (5 cases). In 3 children local AE limited the walk (5 cases). DISCUSSION: Our results are not far from north American data (VAERS) regarding incidence, kind of AEs and severity. Abnormal crying, members hypertonia and vascularitis not yet mentioned in Prevenar SPC need to be added. CONCLUSION: Regarding these new data, benefice-risk balance of Prevenar vaccine remains favourable for active immunisation against invasive infections due to pneumococcus in children.

[Pharmacovigilance of vaccines]. / Pharmacovigilance des vaccins.

Safety of vaccines must be excellent to make vaccine's strategy acceptable, since it usually has a deferred individual benefit but immediate adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacovigilance of vaccines after their marketing is crucial because, prior to its availability on the market, the size of clinical trials is insufficient to identify rare or deferred adverse effects. The Pharmacovigilance is based on "spontaneous reporting" of ADRs to the Pharmacovigilance Regional Centre (PVRC) which establishes a relationship between each drug taken by the patient and the ADRs occurrence (imputability). This method is crucial to generate alerts, but under-estimates the real frequency of ADRs (1 to 10% of severe ADRs are reported). Thus pharmacoepidemiology studies are necessary to confirm the alerts identified by spontaneous reporting. ADRs can be specific, related to the antigen of an attenuated alive virus vaccine (lymphocyte meningitis after anti-mumps vaccine) or non-specific, related to a component different from the antigen (aluminium hydroxide involved in the "macrophagic myofasciitis", allergic reactions to neomycin, latex, egg or gelatine). Importance of Pharmacovigilance of vaccines is illustrated. Data, especially case-control studies, about the relationship between multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccine are summarised. Data about the relationship between Crohn's disease or autism and MMR vaccine are analysed. As vaccines are used in healthy people, their safety must be excellent to be accepted. To monitor them after their marketing is the unique way to detect rare ADRs. This surveillance is made through reporting of ADRs to the PVRC. However, an active and intensive surveillance of ADRs as the one set up from the marketing of Prevenar should be systematic.

[Prescriptions and children]. / L'enfant et les médicaments: application à la prescription en pédiatrie.

Because of a lack in drug evaluation in children, they receive many off license drugs prescription, which means drugs prescribed in an indication, dosage, formulation or age different from the license terms. However, drug evaluation is crucial in paediatrics population because of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics modifications throughout organism development, which make usually wrong any extrapolation to children of data obtained in adults. Drug safety is generally better in infants except in newborns who are at a particularly high drug-related risk because of high frequency of off license drug use, many drugs association and drugs metabolism immaturity. The lack of evaluation in children, the fact that children are the unique target population of some drugs or the maturation phenomena explain some adverse effects more specific in children. The more the children are young, the more they are exposed to medication or drug utilization errors. Physician must take what the SPC, as found in the Vidal dictionary, mentions about children into account while prescribing. Drugs with a paediatric license must be preferred overall, however it should be kept in mind that a paediatric license means only that the drug is active in the indication of the license but it doesn't position it regarding other therapeutic alternatives. Off labeling prescription should be based on a supposed benefit, which had to be justified if a severe side effect occurred.

[Insertion problems, removal problems, and contraception failures with Implanon]. / Implanon: difficultés d'insertion et de retrait, échecs contraceptifs.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the results of a national pharmacovigilance study on Implanon, a contraceptive implant containing 68 mg of etonogestrel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This survey concerns cases of pregnancies (contraception failures), of migrations and of insertion or removal problems with Implanon reported to French Regional Drug Pharmacovigilance Centres and to Organon SA between May 2001 and September 2002. RESULTS: In France, 39 unintended pregnancies were reported over 17 months. The pregnancies were in 77% of cases (N = 30) due to an insertion technique error (implant not found when pregnancy has been diagnosed). For 3 patients (7,6%), pregnancy was due to a failure of etonogestrel contraceptive effect, explained twice by its association with an enzymatic inductor drug. For 4 patients (10%), pregnancy was due to an untimely insertion (insertion after day 5 of menstrual cycle or woman already pregnant). For two patients, no information was available. The incidence of reported pregnancies in France is estimated at 0.359 / 10(3) implants [0.246-0.482], in accordance with a typical Pearl Index of 0.06 [0.04-0.08]. Twenty-eight suspected migrations (N = 11), problems or failures in removal of the implant (N = 11) and insertion difficulties (N = 6) were notified, corresponding to an incidence of 0.257/10(3) implants [0.162-0.363]. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Occurrence of pregnancy is possible with Implanon, due to errors in the insertion technique (device not really inserted) or to a non-respect of the SPC recommendations (drug-drug interaction or untimely insertion). Insertion problems can lead to localisation problems (implant not visible by X-ray) then needing further tests and even harmful practice (removal under general anaesthesia). That is why a real and strict training is highly recommended to physicians.

[Isotretinoin: compliance with recommendations in childbearing women]. / Isotrétinoïne: suivi de l'application des recommandations des prescriptions chez les femmes en âge de procréer.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this survey is to ascertain if the incidence of isotretinoin exposed pregnancies was reduced by the late recommendations of prescription and issue (AMM modification on 06/08/2001 and 25/09/2001). METHODS: All isotretinoin exposed pregnancies registered by the French Regional Drug Monitoring Centres, the Information Centre for Teratogenic Agents and Roche (Roaccutane), Pierre Fabre (Curacné Gé) and Expanscience (Procuta Gé) laboratories, from January 1st, 1999 to December 31st, 2002, were analysed. Enforcement of the strengthening of isotretinoin prescription recommendations was analysed on a sample of 68 prescriptions from 45 pharmacies throughout France. RESULTS: In 4 years, 103 isotretinoin exposed pregnancies (Roaccutane 97 p. 100, Curacné(R) Gé 3 p. 100) during teratogenic risk period, were registered. Pregnancy started less than one month after isotretinoin stopping (37 p. 100), during the treatment (43 p. 100), or was in progress when the treatment was initiated (20 p. 100). The reason of the 22 lacking contraception was known 12 times, i.e. an absence of prescription (6 times), a refusal to take a prescribed contraception (3 times) and a self-medication (3 times). Among the 71 pregnancies whose contraceptive status is known, 48 p. 100 could had been avoided if recommendations had been followed (pregnancies due to a premature stopping or an absence of contraception). The issue of pregnancies is a voluntary termination in 60 cases (87 p. 100). Malformations frequency is 25 p. 100. Incidence of isotretinoin exposed pregnancies remained stable, 0.26/1000 treated women (vs 0.34 after 2001's AMM modifications). Of 68 prescriptions studied, 23 (24 p. 100) carried all the legal warnings, which is close to the previous survey's results. Contraception was in accordance with the recommendations in 78 p. 100 of cases and women learned and applied information given in 38 p. 100 of cases. At last, only 6 patients (9 p. 100) have both a correctly written prescription, a contraception and a time between the pregnancy test date and prescription and issue dates, in accordance with the licence and have had a correct information and understood it. Regarding the previous survey, pregnancy test before treatment was more often prescribed (96 p. 100 vs 88 p. 100). On the other hand, less women knew the necessity to keep on taking contraception one month after isotretinoin stopping (82 p. 100 vs 93 p. 100). CONCLUSION: Despite 3 successive isotretinoin prescription and issue recommendations strengthening in childbearing women, pregnancies can't be totally avoided. Bad compliance concerns the prescription and/or an incomplete or not understood information by the patient who does not scrupulously apply the care and contraception agreement. However, this study does not allow to assess the proportion of issued prescriptions despite their non-accordance with the licence criteria. The National Commission of Pharmacovigilance did not like to limit isotretinoin prescription to dermatologists only. It estimates that the administrative authority must intensify information by dermatologists, general practitioners and pharmacists, about measures to take to avoid an exposure to isotretinoin during pregnancy.