Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Exp Dermatol ; 32(7): 1096-1107, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37148203

RESUMEN

Keloid scars are hypertrophic and proliferating pathological scars extending beyond the initial lesion and without tendency to regression. Usually, keloids are considered and treated as a single entity but clinical observations suggest heterogeneity in keloid morphologies with distinction of superficial/extensive and nodular entities. Within a keloid, heterogeneity could also be detected between superficial and deep dermis or centre and periphery. Focusing on fibroblasts as main actors of keloid formation, we aimed at evaluating intra- and inter-keloid fibroblast heterogeneity by analysing their gene expression and functional capacities (proliferation, migration, traction forces), in order to improve our understanding of keloid pathogenesis. Fibroblasts were obtained from centre, periphery, papillary and reticular dermis from extensive or nodular keloids and were compared to control fibroblasts from healthy skin. Transcriptional profiling of fibroblasts identified a total of 834 differentially expressed genes between nodular and extensive keloids. Quantification of ECM-associated gene expression by RT-qPCR brought evidence that central reticular fibroblasts of nodular keloids are the population which synthesize higher levels of mature collagens, TGFß, HIF1α and αSMA as compared to control skin, suggesting that this central deep region is the nucleus of ECM production with a centrifuge extension in keloids. Although no significant variations were found for basal proliferation, migration of peripheral fibroblasts from extensive keloids was higher than that of central ones and from nodular cells. Moreover, these peripheral fibroblasts from extensive keloids exhibited higher traction forces than central cells, control fibroblasts and nodular ones. Altogether, studying fibroblast features demonstrate keloid heterogeneity, leading to a better understanding of keloid pathophysiology and treatment adaptation.


Asunto(s)
Queloide , Humanos , Queloide/metabolismo , Piel/metabolismo , Dermis/metabolismo , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Colágeno/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 48(14): 2183-91, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22464347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Seven genetic biomarkers previously associated with melanoma were analysed in a meta-analysis conducted in three South European populations: five red hair colour (RHC) MC1R alleles, one SLC45A2 variant (p.Phe374Leu) and one thermosensitive TYR variant (p.Arg402Gln). The study included 1639 melanoma patients and 1342 control subjects. RESULTS: The estimated odds ratio (OR) associated with carrying at least one MC1R RHC variant was 2.18 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.86-2.55; p-value=1.02×10(-21)), with an additive effect for carrying two RHC variants (OR: 5.02, 95% CI: 2.88-8.94, p-value=3.91×10(-8)). The SLC45A2 variant, p.Phe374Leu, was significantly and strongly protective for melanoma in the three South European populations studied, with an overall OR value of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.33-0.50; p-value=3.50×10(-17)). The association with melanoma of the TYR variant p.Arg402Gln was also statistically significant (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.11-2.04; p-value=0.0089). Adjustment for all clinical potential confounders showed that melanoma risks attributable to MC1R and SLC45A2 variants strongly persisted (OR: 2.01 95% CI: 1.49-2.72 and OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80, respectively), while the association of TYR p.Arg402Gln was no longer significant. In addition, stratification of clinical melanoma risk factors showed that the risk of melanoma was strong in those individuals who did not have clinical risk factors. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results show without ambiguity that in South European populations, MC1R RHC and SCL45A2 p.Phe374Leu variants are strong melanoma risk predictors, notably in those individuals who would not be identified as high risk based on their phenotypes or exposures alone. The use of these biomarkers in clinical practice could be promising and warrants further discussion.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/genética , Melanoma/genética , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/genética , Monofenol Monooxigenasa/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Receptor de Melanocortina Tipo 1/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Población Blanca/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Frecuencia de los Genes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Color del Cabello/genética , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Melanoma/etnología , Melanoma/fisiopatología , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Fenotipo , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etnología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/fisiopatología , Pigmentación de la Piel/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA