RECIP 1.0 Predicts Progression-Free Survival After [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 is an evidence-based framework to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of interim PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 with short-term outcome after radiopharmaceutical treatment. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy at 3 academic centers and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at 12 wk. Pairs of PSMA PET/CT images were assessed by 5 readers for visual RECIP 1.0. The primary outcome was the association of RECIP with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 124 of 287 screened patients met the inclusion criteria, with 0 (0%), 29 (23%), 54 (44%), and 41 (33%) of those 124 patients having complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease (PD) by visual RECIP 1.0, respectively. Patients with visual RECIP PD had a significantly shorter PSA-PFS than those with RECIP stable disease or with RECIP partial response (2.6 vs. 6.4 vs. 8.4 mo; P < 0.001). The median PSA-PFS among patients with RECIP PD versus those with non-RECIP PD was 2.6 versus 7.2 mo (hazard ratio, 13.0; 95% CI, 7.0-24.1; P < 0.001). Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 after 2 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is prognostic for PSA-PFS. PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 may be used in earlier stages of prostate cancer to evaluate drug efficacy and to predict progression-free survival.

Differences and Common Ground in 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Practice Patterns: International Survey of 95 Theranostic Centers.

177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy effectively treats metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients requiring treatment, and consequently the number of theranostic centers, are expected to increase significantly after Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval. This requires standardization or harmonization among theranostic centers. The aim of this study was to assess operational differences and similarities among 177Lu-PSMA treatment centers. Methods: A questionnaire comprising 62 items, designed by a core team of 5 physicians and externally reviewed by international experts, was developed. Study participants were asked to provide answers about their center, patient selection, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical assessment before and after 177Lu-PSMA treatments, laboratory values, treatment discontinuation, posttreatment imaging, and general information. An invitation e-mail to participate in the study was sent in June 2022. Duplicates were removed to allow for only one valid response per center. Results: Ninety-five of 211 (45%) contacted centers completed the questionnaire. Most participating centers were in Europe (51%), followed by America (22%) and Asia (22%). During the 12 mo before this study, a total of 5,906 patients received 177Lu-PSMA therapy at the 95 participating centers. Most of these patients were treated in Europe (2,840/5,906; 48%), followed by Asia (1,313/5,906; 22%) and Oceania (1,225/5,906; 21%). PSMA PET eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA was determined most frequently using 68Ga-PSMA-11 (77%). Additional pretherapy imaging included 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT, renal scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy at 41 (49%), 27 (32%), 25 (30%), and 13 (15%), respectively, of the 84 centers for clinical standard of care, compassionate care, or local research protocols and 11 (26%), 25 (60%), 9 (21%), and 28 (67%), respectively, of the 42 centers for industry-sponsored trials. PSMA PET eligibility criteria included subjective qualitative assessment of PSMA positivity at 33% of centers, VISION criteria at 23%, and TheraP criteria at 13%. The mean standard injected activity per cycle was 7.3 GBq (range, 5.5-11.1 GBq). Sixty-two (65%) centers applied standardized response assessment criteria, and PSMA PET Progression Criteria were the most applied (37%). Conclusion: Results from this international survey revealed interinstitutional differences in several aspects of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy, including patient selection, administered activity, and the response assessment strategy. Standardization or harmonization of protocols and dedicated training are desirable in anticipation of increasing numbers of patients and theranostic centers.

Presurgical 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence Risk Assessment: A Follow-up Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has been established as a front-line imaging modality. The increasing number of PSMA-PET scans performed in the primary staging setting might be associated with decreases in biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCR-FS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the added prognostic value of presurgical PSMA-PET for BCR-FS compared with the presurgical Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) and postsurgical CAPRA-Surgery (CAPRA-S) scores in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a follow-up study of the surgical cohort evaluated in the multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial (n = 277; NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Each 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET scan was read by three blinded independent readers. PSMA-PET prostate uptake (low vs high), PSMA-PET extraprostatic disease (N1/M1), and CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores were used to assess the risk of BCR. Patients were followed after RP by local investigators using electronic medical records. BCR was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level increasing to ≥0.2 ng/ml after RP or initiation of PCa-specific secondary treatment (>6 mo after surgery). Univariate and multivariable Cox models, and c-statistic index were performed to assess the prognostic value of PSMA-PET and for a comparison with the CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From December 2015 to December 2019, 277 patients underwent surgery after PSMA-PET. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 240/277 (87%) patients. The median follow-up after surgery was 32.4 (interquartile range 23.3-42.9) mo. Of 240 BCR events, 91 (38%) were observed. PSMA-PET N1/M1 was found in 41/240 (17%) patients. PSMA-PET prostate uptake, PSMA-PET N1/M1, and CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores were significant univariate predictors of BCR. The addition of PSMA-PET N1/M1 status to the presurgical CAPRA score improved the risk assessment for BCR significantly in comparison with the presurgical CAPRA score alone (c-statistic 0.70 [0.64-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.57-0.69]; p < 0.001). The C-index of the postsurgical model utilizing the postsurgical CAPRA-S score alone was not significantly different from the presurgical model combining the presurgical CAPRA score and PSMA-PET N1/M1 status (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical PSMA-PET was a strong prognostic biomarker improving BCR-FS risk assessment. Its implementation in the presurgical risk assessment with the CAPRA score improved the performance and reduced the difference with the reference standard (postsurgical CAPRA-S score). PATIENT SUMMARY: The use prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography improved the assessment of biochemical recurrence risk in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0) in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Background Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET/CT (RECIP 1.0) initially integrated software-based quantitative assessment of PSMA-positive total tumor volume (TTV). Clinical implementation of such software is not expected soon, limiting the use of RECIP in practice. Purpose To assess the agreement of RECIP determined using tumor segmentation software (quantitative RECIP) with RECIP determined by qualitative reads by nuclear medicine physicians (visual RECIP) for response evaluation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study at three academic centers included men who received lutetium 177 (177Lu) PSMA treatment between December 2014 and July 2019. PSMA PET/CT images at baseline and 12 weeks were assessed qualitatively by five readers for changes in TTV and for new lesions. Quantitative changes in TTV were also measured using tumor segmentation software. The status of new lesions was combined with qualitative changes in TTV to determine visual RECIP and with quantitative changes in TTV to determine quantitative RECIP. The primary outcomes were the agreement between visual and quantitative RECIP and the interreader reliability of visual RECIP according to the Fleiss κ. The secondary outcome was the association of visual RECIP with overall survival according to Cox regression. Results A total of 124 men (median age, 73 years [IQR, 67-76 years]) were included. Forty (32%) and 84 (68%) men had quantitative RECIP progressive disease (PD) and non-PD, respectively. Agreement between visual versus quantitative RECIP was excellent (κ = 0.89; 118 of 124 men [95%]). Agreement among readers in classifying visual RECIP PD versus non-PD was excellent (κ = 0.81; 103 of 124 men [83%]). RECIP PD was associated with significantly shorter overall survival compared with non-PD (hazard ratio, 2.6 [95% CI: 1.7, 3.8]; P < .001). Conclusion Qualitatively assessed RECIP demonstrated excellent agreement with quantitative RECIP and excellent interreader reliability and can be readily implemented in clinical practice for response evaluation in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing 177Lu-PSMA therapy. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Fibroblast Activation Protein Expression in Sarcomas.

Objectives: Fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) is highly expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in multiple epithelial cancers. The aim of this study was to characterize FAP expression in sarcomas to explore its potential utility as a diagnostic and therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker in sarcomas. Methods: Available tissue samples from patients with bone or soft tissue tumors were identified at the University of California, Los Angeles. FAP expression was evaluated via immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor samples (n = 63), adjacent normal tissues (n = 30), and positive controls (n = 2) using semiquantitative systems for intensity (0 = negative; 1 = weak; 2 = moderate; and 3 = strong) and density (none, <25%, 25-75%; >75%) in stromal and tumor/nonstromal cells and using a qualitative overall score (not detected, low, medium, and high). Additionally, RNA sequencing data in publicly available databases were utilized to compare FAP expression in samples (n = 10,626) from various cancer types and evaluate the association between FAP expression and overall survival (OS) in sarcoma (n = 168). Results: The majority of tumor samples had FAP IHC intensity scores ≥2 and density scores ≥25% for stromal cells (77.7%) and tumor cells (50.7%). All desmoid fibromatosis, myxofibrosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma samples had medium or high FAP overall scores. Sarcomas were among cancer types with the highest mean FAP expression by RNA sequencing. There was no significant difference in OS in patients with sarcoma with low versus high FAP expression. Conclusion: The majority of the sarcoma samples showed FAP expression by both stromal and tumor/nonstromal cells. Further investigation of FAP as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target in sarcomas is warranted.

FAPI PET Signal in Hibernoma Reflects FAP Expression in Tumor Vasculature Cells.

ABSTRACT: A 43-year-old man with a growing mass in the right groin, concerned for liposarcoma, underwent MRI and 68 Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-46 PET/CT before surgery. Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT demonstrated increased uptake (SUV max , 3.2) predominantly in the solid portion, where MRI showed gadolinium enhancement. The patient subsequently underwent surgery and was diagnosed with hibernoma. The immunohistochemistry of the tumor revealed the fibroblast activation protein expression in the fibrovascular network and myofibroblastic cells of the tumor. This case suggests that the FAPI uptake can be affected by the vascular cells, and thus, a careful interpretation of the FAPI PET signal may be needed.

PSMA PET Tumor-to-Salivary Gland Ratio to Predict Response to [177Lu]PSMA Radioligand Therapy: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy can improve the outcome of patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but patients do not respond uniformly. We hypothesized that using the salivary glands as a reference organ can enable selective patient stratification. We aimed to establish a PSMA PET tumor-to-salivary gland ratio (PSG score) to predict outcomes after [177Lu]PSMA. Methods: In total, 237 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with [177Lu]PSMA were included. A quantitative PSG (qPSG) score (SUVmean ratio of whole-body tumor to parotid glands) was semiautomatically calculated on baseline [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET images. Patients were divided into 3 groups: high (qPSG > 1.5), intermediate (qPSG = 0.5-1.5), and low (qPSG < 0.5) scores. Ten readers interpreted the 3-dimensional maximum-intensity-projection baseline [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET images and classified patients into 3 groups based on visual PSG (vPSG) score: high (most of the lesions showed higher uptake than the parotid glands) intermediate (neither low nor high), and low (most of the lesions showed lower uptake than the parotid glands). Outcome data included a more than 50% prostate-specific antigen decline, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 237 patients, the numbers in the high, intermediate, and low groups were 56 (23.6%), 163 (68.8%), and 18 (7.6%), respectively, for qPSG score and 106 (44.7%), 96 (40.5%), and 35 (14.8%), respectively, for vPSG score. The interreader reproducibility of the vPSG score was substantial (Fleiss weighted κ, 0.68). The more than 50% prostate-specific antigen decline was better in patients with a higher PSG score (high vs. intermediate vs. low, 69.6% vs. 38.7% vs. 16.7%, respectively, for qPSG [P < 0.001] and 63.2% vs 33.3% vs 16.1%, respectively, for vPSG [P < 0.001]). The median PSA progression-free survival of the high, intermediate, and low groups by qPSG score was 7.2, 4.0, and 1.9 mo (P < 0.001), respectively, by qPSG score and 6.7, 3.8, and 1.9 mo (P < 0.001), respectively, by vPSG score. The median OS of the high, intermediate, and low groups was 15.0, 11.2, and 13.9 mo (P = 0.017), respectively, by qPSG score and 14.3, 9.6, and 12.9 mo (P = 0.018), respectively, by vPSG score. Conclusion: The PSG score was prognostic for PSA response and OS after [177Lu]PSMA. The visual PSG score assessed on 3-dimensional maximum-intensity-projection PET images yielded substantial reproducibility and comparable prognostic value to the quantitative score.

Non-oncologic incidental uptake on FAPI PET/CT imaging.

Fibroblast-activation protein (FAP) is a serine protease classified in the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) family. FAP is predominantly expressed in activated fibroblasts such as the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAP expression in CAFs is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in solid cancers. Recently, radiolabeled FAP inhibitors (FAPI) has been developed, which enables positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of FAP. FAPI PET/CT can provide a higher tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) than 18F-fludeoxyglucose PET/CT in various cancers, and thus has attracted substantial attention. As studies on FAPI PET grow in number and size, incidental findings related to non-oncologic conditions have been increasingly reported. FAPI PET uptake has been reported in various conditions such as benign tumors, fibrotic, granulomatosis, scarring/wound, degenerative diseases, and inflammatory diseases.The knowledge of physiological and non-oncologic causes of FAPI uptake is indispensable for accurate FAPI PET/CT interpretation and can help appropriate management of incidental findings on FAPI PET/CT in patients referred for cancer staging indications. In this review article, we describe for each organ system (Brain, Oral mucosa, Salivary Glands, Thyroid, Lung, Myocardium, Breast, Esophagus, Stomach, Intestine, Liver, Gallbladder, Pancreas, Spleen, Kidney, , Uterus, Bone marrow, Joints, Muscle, Vessels, Lymph nodes), the patterns of physiological FAPI uptake and the main causes of non-oncological uptake reported from the literature with FAPI-02, FAPI-04 and FAPI-46. We also illustrate some examples from our institutional database at UCLA.

Metal implants on abdominal CT: does split-filter dual-energy CT provide additional value over iterative metal artifact reduction?

PURPOSE: To assess image quality and metal artifact reduction in split-filter dual-energy CT (sfDECT) of the abdomen with hip or spinal implants using virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR). METHODS: 102 portal-venous abdominal sfDECTs of patients with hip (n = 71) or spinal implants (n = 31) were included in this study. Images were reconstructed as 120kVp-equivalent images (Mixed) and VMI (40-190 keV), with and without iMAR. Quantitative artifact and image noise was measured using 12 different ROIs. Subjective image quality was rated by two readers using a five-point Likert-scale in six categories, including overall image quality and vascular contrast. RESULTS: Lowest quantitative artifact in both hip and spinal implants was measured in VMI190keV-iMAR. However, it was not significantly lower than in MixediMAR (for all ROIs, p = 1.00), which were rated best for overall image quality (hip: 1.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00], spine: 3.00 [IQR:2.00-3.00]). VMI50keV-iMAR was rated best for vascular contrast (hip: 1.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00], spine: 2.00 [IQR: 1.00-2.00]), which was significantly better than Mixed (both, p < 0.001). VMI50keV-iMAR provided superior overall image quality compared to Mixed for hip (1.00 vs 2.00, p < 0.001) and similar diagnostic image quality for spinal implants (2.00 vs 2.00, p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: For abdominal sfDECT with hip or spinal implants MixediMAR images should be used. High keV VMI do not further improve image quality. IMAR allows the use of low keV images (VMI50keV) to improve vascular contrast, compared to Mixed images.

Measuring response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer using PSMA PET/CT: comparison of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 criteria.

PURPOSE: To compare the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, the adapted Prostate Cancer Working Group Criteria 3 (aPCWG3), the adapted Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (aPERCIST), the PSMA PET Progression (PPP), and the Response Evaluation Criteria In PSMA-Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 for response evaluation using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. METHODS: A total of 124 patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study. All patients received 177Lu-PSMA and underwent PSMA-PET/CT scans at baseline (bPET) and at 12 weeks (iPET). Imaging responses according to RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 were interpreted by consensus among three blinded readers. Changes in total tumor burden were obtained using the semi-automatic qPSMA software. The response according to each criterion was classified to progressive disease (PD) vs no-PD. Primary outcome measure was the prognostic value (by Cox regression analysis) for overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome measure was the inter-reader reliability (by Cohen's κ coefficient). RESULTS: A total of 43 (35%) of patients had non-measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1. Sixteen (13%), 66 (52%), 72 (58%), 69 (56%), and 39 (32%) of 124 patients had PD according to RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST, PPP, and RECIP, respectively. PD vs no-PD had significantly higher risk of death according to aPCWG3 (HR = 2.37; 95%CI, 1.62-3.48; p < 0.001), aPERCIST (HR = 2.48; 95%CI, 1.68-3.66; p < 0.001), PPP (HR = 2.72; 95%CI, 1.85-4.01; p < 0.001), RECIP 1.0 (HR = 4.33; 95%CI, 2.80-6.70; p < 0.001), but not according to RECIST 1.1 (HR = 1.29; 95%CI, 0.73-2.27; p = 0.38). The κ index of RECIST 1.1, aPCWG3, aPERCIST 1.0, PPP, and RECIP 1.0 for identifying PD vs no-PD were 0.50 (95%CI, 0.32-0.76), 0.72 (95%CI, 0.63-0.82), 0.68 (95%CI, 0.63-0.73), 0.73 (95%CI, 0.63-0.83), and 0.83 (95%CI, 0.77-0.88), respectively. CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET-specific criteria for early response evaluation in men with mCRPC treated with 177Lu-PSMA achieved higher prognostic values and inter-reader reliabilities in comparison to conventional CT assessment or to criteria adapted to PSMA-PET from other imaging modalities. RECIP 1.0 identified the fewest patients with PD and achieved the highest risk of death for PD vs. no-PD, suggesting that other classification methods tend to overcall progression. Prospective validation of our findings on an independent patient cohort is warranted.

Novel Framework for Treatment Response Evaluation Using PSMA PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (RECIP 1.0): An International Multicenter Study.

Our objective was to develop version 1.0 of a novel framework for response evaluation criteria in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT (RECIP) and a composite response classification that combines responses by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements and by RECIP 1.0 (PSA + RECIP). Methods: This was an international multicenter, retrospective study. One hundred twenty-four men with metastatic castration-specific prostate cancer (mCRPC) who underwent 177Lu-PSMA therapy and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at an interim time point of 12 wk were included. Pairs of baseline interim PET/CT scans were interpreted by consensus among 3 masked readers for appearance of new lesions. Tumor lesions were segmented, and total PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-VOL) was obtained. Appearance of new lesions and changes in PSMA-VOL were combined to develop RECIP 1.0, which included classifications of complete response (RECIP-CR: absence of any PSMA-ligand uptake on interim PET/CT), partial response (RECIP-PR: decline ≥ 30% in PSMA-VOL and no appearance of new lesions), progressive disease (RECIP-PD: increase ≥ 20% in PSMA-VOL and appearance of new lesions), and stable disease (RECIP-SD: any condition but RECIP-PR or RECIP-PD). Changes in PSA levels at 12 wk by Prostate Cancer Working Group Criteria 3 were recorded. PSA + RECIP results were defined as response (PSA decline ≥ 50% or RECIP-PR/CR) or progression (PSA increase ≥ 25% or RECIP-PD). The study's primary outcome measure was the prognostic value of RECIP 1.0 for overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome measure was the prognostic accuracy (C-index) of PSA + RECIP versus PSA responses. Results: Patients with RECIP-PD (n = 39; 8.3 mo) had a shorter OS than patients with stable disease (RECIP-SD) (n = 47; 13.1 mo; P < 0.001) or RECIP-PR (n = 38; 21.7 mo; P < 0.001). In identifying responders and progressors, PSA + RECIP had C-indices superior to those of PSA only: 0.65 versus 0.62 (P = 0.028) and 0.66 versus 0.63 (P = 0.044), respectively. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 is prognostic for OS and can be used as a response biomarker to monitor early efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA in men with mCRPC. PSA + RECIP may be used as a novel composite endpoint in mCRPC clinical trial design.

18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Biomarkers for Early and Late Evaluation of Response to First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-FDG PET/CT as an early and late interim imaging biomarker in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who undergo first-line systemic therapy. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label study (IRB12-000770). Patient receiving first-line chemotherapy were planned to undergo baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT, early interim 18F-FDG PET/CT, and late interim 18F-FDG PET/CT. Cutoffs for metabolic and radiographic tumor response assessment as selected and established by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis were applied (modified PERCIST/RECIST1.1). Patients were followed to collect data on further treatments and overall survival. Results: The study population consisted of 28 patients who underwent baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT. Twenty-three of these (82%) underwent early interim 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 21 (75%) underwent late interim 18F-FDG PET/CT. Twenty-three deaths occurred during a median follow-up period of 14 mo (maximum follow-up, 58.3 mo). The median overall survival was 36.2 mo (95% CI, 28 mo to not yet reached [NYR]) in early metabolic responders (6/23 [26%], P = 0.016) and 25.4 mo (95% CI, 19.6 mo-NYR) in early radiographic responders (7/23 [30%], P = 0.16). The median overall survival was 27.4 mo (95% CI, 21.4 mo-NYR) in late metabolic responders (10/21 [48%], P = 0.058) and 58.2 mo (95% CI, 21.4 mo-NYR) in late radiographic responders (7/21 [33%], P = 0.008). Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET may serve as an early interim imaging biomarker (at ∼4 wk) for evaluation of response to first-line chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Radiographic changes might be sufficient for response evaluation after the completion of first-line chemotherapy.

18F-FLT PET/CT as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-FLT PET/CT as an early prognostic imaging biomarker of long-term overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods: This was a 10-y follow-up of a previous single-center, single-arm prospective clinical trial. Patients underwent 18F-FLT PET/CT before treatment (PET1) and after NAT (PET2). Posttreatment pathology specimens were assessed for tumor necrosis or fibrosis and for Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 expression. Maximally selected cutoffs for PET and histopathologic factors were applied. Survival was calculated from the date of subject consent to the date of death or last follow-up. Results: The study population consisted of 26 patients who underwent PET1; 16 of the 26 with primary STS underwent PET2. Thirteen deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 104 mo. In the overall cohort, overall survival was longer in patients with a low than a high PET1 tumor SUVmax (dichotomized by an SUVmax of ≥8.5 vs. <8.5: not yet reached vs. 49.7 mo; P = 0.0064). DSS showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.096). In a subanalysis of primary STS, DSS was significantly longer in patients with a low PET1 tumor SUVmax (dichotomized by an SUVmax of ≥8 vs. <8; P = 0.034). There were no significant 18F-FLT PET response thresholds corresponding to DSS or overall survival after NAT at PET2. Conclusion:18F-FLT PET may serve as a prognostic baseline imaging biomarker for DSS in patients with primary STS.

Correlation of 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET Biodistribution with FAP Expression by Immunohistochemistry in Patients with Solid Cancers: Interim Analysis of a Prospective Translational Exploratory Study.

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts confer treatment resistance and promote metastasis and immunosuppression. Because FAP is overexpressed in many cancers, radiolabeled molecules targeting FAP are studied for their use as pancancer theranostic agents. This study aimed to establish the spectrum of FAP expression across various cancers by immunohistochemistry and to explore whether 68Ga FAP inhibitor (FAPi)-46 PET biodistribution faithfully reflects FAP expression from resected cancer and non-cancer specimens. Methods: We conducted a FAP expression screening using immunohistochemistry on a pancancer human tissue microarray (141 patients, 14 different types of cancer) and an interim analysis of a prospective exploratory imaging trial in cancer patients. Volunteer patients underwent 1 whole-body 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT scan and, subsequently, surgical resection of their primary tumor or metastasis. 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET SUVmax and SUVmean was correlated with FAP immunohistochemistry score in cancer and tumor-adjacent non-cancer tissues for each patient. Results: FAP was expressed across all 14 cancer types on tissue microarray with variable intensity and frequency, ranging from 25% to 100% (mean, 76.6% ± 25.3%). Strong FAP expression was observed in 50%-100% of cancers of the bile duct, bladder, colon, esophagus, stomach, lung, oropharynx, ovary, and pancreas. Fifteen patients with various cancer types (colorectal [n = 4], head and neck [n = 3], pancreas [n = 2], breast [n = 2], stomach [n = 1], esophagus [n = 2], and uterus [n = 1]) underwent surgery after their 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT scan within a mean interval of 16.1 ± 14.4 d. 68Ga-FAPi-46 SUVs and immunohistochemistry scores were higher in cancer than in tumor-adjacent non-cancer tissue: mean SUVmax 7.7 versus 1.6 (P < 0.001), mean SUVmean 6.2 versus 1.0 (P < 0.001), and mean FAP immunohistochemistry score 2.8 versus 0.9 (P < 0.001). FAP immunohistochemistry scores strongly correlated with 68Ga-FAPi 46 SUVmax and SUVmean: r = 0.781 (95% CI, 0.376-0.936; P < 0.001) and r = 0.783 (95% CI, 0.379-0.936; P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: In this interim analysis of a prospective exploratory imaging trial, 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution across multiple cancers strongly correlated with FAP tissue expression. These findings support further exploration of FAPi PET as a pancancer imaging biomarker for FAP expression and as a stratification tool for FAP-targeted therapies.

Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia.

Acute bowel ischemia is a condition with high mortality and requires rapid intervention to avoid catastrophic outcomes. Swift and accurate imaging diagnosis is essential because clinical findings are commonly nonspecific. Conventional contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen has been the imaging modality of choice to evaluate suspected acute bowel ischemia. However, subtlety of image findings and lack of non-contrast or arterial phase images can make correct diagnosis challenging. Dual-energy CT provides valuable information toward assessing bowel ischemia. Dual-energy CT exploits the differential X-ray attenuation at two different photon energy levels to characterize the composition of tissues and reveal the presence or absence of faint intravenous iodinated contrast to improve reader confidence in detecting subtle bowel wall enhancement. With the same underlying technique, virtual non-contrast images can help to show non-enhancing hyperdense hemorrhage of the bowel wall in intravenous contrast-enhanced scans without the need to acquire actual non-contrast scans. Dual-energy CT derived low photon energy (keV) virtual monoenergetic images emphasize iodine contrast and provide CT angiography-like images from portal venous phase scans to better evaluate abdominal arterial patency. In Summary, dual-energy CT aids diagnosing acute bowel ischemia in multiple ways, including improving visualization of the bowel wall and mesenteric vasculature, revealing intramural hemorrhage in contrast enhanced scans, or possibly reducing intravenous contrast dose.

PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Sarcomas are rare tumors of mesenchymal origin and comprise only around 1% of adult cancers. The abundance of sarcoma histiotypes, with distinct imaging characteristics, biology, clinical behavior and treatment strategy, result in a complex disease presentation, requiring management by multidisciplinary specialized sarcoma centers. Oncologic and musculoskeletal radiology guidelines provide minimal guidance and only fragmentary information on the indications of 18F-FDG PET/CT in sarcoma. Therefore, knowledge of various phenotypes with preference for bone and lymph node metastases or higher incidence of local and distant recurrence is essential to select the appropriate diagnostic imaging tests and its interpretation. Benign and malignant soft tissue and bone tumors often share common radiographic and metabolic imaging characteristics. In addition, metastases of various histiotypes might exhibit a spectrum of atypical imaging appearances. Therefore, imaging specialists need to be aware of these variants and associated pitfalls of sarcoma imaging.