Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nucl Med ; 58(7): 1058-1064, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28082437

RESUMEN

A fast-track pathway has been established in Denmark to investigate patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC), who are not eligible to enter an organ-specific cancer program. The prevalence of cancer in this cohort is approximately 20%. The optimal screening strategy in patients with NSSC remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate whether 18F-FDG PET/CT was superior to CT as an initial imaging modality in patients with NSSC. In a randomized prospective trial, the imaging modalities were compared with regard to diagnostic performance. Methods: Two hundred patients were randomized 1:1 to whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT or CT of the thorax and abdomen as the imaging modality. A tentative diagnosis was established after first-line imaging. The final referral diagnosis was adjudicated by the physician, when sufficient data were available. Results: One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for analysis because 3 patients withdrew consent before scanning. Thirty-nine (20%) patients were diagnosed with cancer, 10 (5%) with an infection, 15 (8%) with an autoimmune disease, and 76 (39%) with other diseases. In the remaining 57 patients (28%), no specific disease was found. 18F-FDG PET/CT had a higher specificity (96% vs. 85%; P = 0.028) and a higher accuracy (94% vs. 82%; P = 0.017) than CT. However, there were no statistically significant differences in sensitivity (83% vs. 70%) or negative predictive values (96% vs. 92%). No difference in days to final referral diagnosis according to randomization group could be shown (7.2 vs. 7.6 d). However, for the subgroups in which the imaging modality showed a suggestion of malignancy, there was a significant delay to final diagnosis in the CT group compared with the 18F-FDG PET/CT group (11.6 vs. 5.7 d; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Compared with CT, we found a higher diagnostic specificity and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting cancer in patients with NSSC. 18F-FDG PET/CT should therefore be considered as first-line imaging in this group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Prevalencia , Radiofármacos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Evaluación de Síntomas , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...