Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single-Tooth with Scalloped Shape Implants and Digitalized Customized Restoration: A 5-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level.

PURPOSE: To evaluate, within a period of 5 years, the bone level in mesial, distal, palatal, and buccal areas around scalloped shape implants immediately placed and loaded with temporary crowns fixed on final prefabricated abutments, and also to evaluate the thickness of buccal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 18 implants were inserted and loaded immediately using computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing technology on 18 patients to replace single tooth in the esthetic part of the maxilla. The marginal bone level across the scalloped implant neck was measured mesially and distally using intraoral standardized radiographs after crown fixations and 1, 3, and 5 years later. Cone beam computed tomography para-axial cuts images were used to measure bone level buccally and palatally from the implant neck to the implant-to bone contact after 5 years of loading and to evaluate the thickness of the buccal bone at the implant neck and 4 mm apically, immediately after implant placement and 5 years later. RESULTS: All implants were assessed clinically and radiologically after 5 years. No implant failure was recorded, and the average marginal bone variation on mesial and distal sites was 0.114 ± 0.135 mm at crown cementation, 0.239 ± 0.158 mm 1 year later, 0.233 ± 0.182 mm 3 years later, and 0.180 ± 0.182 mm 5 years later. Our findings indicate that at T0, the average thickness of the buccal bone was 2.27 mm at implant neck M0 (ranging from 1.9 to 2.4) and 2.33 mm at 4 mm apically to the implant neck M1 (ranging from 1.9 mm to 2.9 mm). By T4, the mean had decreased to 1.94 mm at M0 (with a range of 1.7 mm to 2.3 mm) and 2.14 mm at M1 (with a range of 1.8 mm to 2.4 mm). After 5 years the mean changes at buccal and palatal bone for all implants were +0.187 ± 0.52 mm and +0.06 ± 0.38 mm respectively. Minor prosthetic problems were observed over the five years: incisal ceramic chipping occurred in two crowns, and two crowns were replaced for esthetic reasons after one year. No loosening of crowns or abutments was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Scalloped neck implants demonstrated a comparable behavior to regular neck implants with similar designs in an immediate implantation and temporization protocol over a five-year period.

Benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors of the maxillofacial bones: A report of 3 cases with 3 years follow-up.

Benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumors are lesions derived from the mesenchymal components of the tooth-forming apparatus and are consequently found within the jawbone. Benign fibro-osseous tumors are part of this category of lesions in which normal bone is substituted, initially by fibrous tissue and within time become infiltrated by osteoid and cementoid elements. They are asymptomatic, slow-growing lesions and remain undiagnosed until swelling of the face becomes prominent and they share similar radiological characteristics. Herein, we report three cases of ossifying fibroma, cemento-osseous fibroma and periapical cemento-osseous dysplasia and analyze all the correlating factors, clinical history, radiological and histological features, intraoperative appearance, and treatment with a 3-year follow-up period. Despite the advances in the identification of these pathologies, clinicians still face difficulties in their classification and the diagnosis due to overlap in both histological and radiographic findings. An accurate final diagnosis is essential for appropriate treatment and an informative prognosis.

Comparison of Bone Levels Around Immediately Loaded Single Implants Placed in Healed or Freshly Extracted Sites in the Esthetic Anterior Maxilla: A 10-Year Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively at 10 years the marginal bone levels around implants located in healed ridges or in extraction sockets and loaded immediately with provisional crowns fixed in prefabricated abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two implants were placed in 36 patients needing single tooth replacement. Implants were inserted either in healed ridges (group 1) or in extraction sockets (group 2) and loaded immediately with prefabricated abutments. Two implants were lost during the healing period from group 2. The bone level around the implant shoulder was calculated mesially and distally on each implant using intraoral radiographs after crown cementation and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years following loading. RESULTS: On the 10-year follow-up report, 36 implants were available for the clinical and radiologic evaluation. Besides the two implants lost during the osseointegration period, no implant loss was documented over the 5- to 10-year observation period. The average bone loss after implant and crown cementation was 0.266 ± 0.176 mm for 1 year, 0.194 ± 0.172 mm for 5 years, and 0.198 ± 0.165 mm for 10 years in healed ridges and 0.267 ± 0.161 mm for 1 year, 0.213 ± 0.185 mm for 5 years, and 0.287 ± 0.194 mm for 10 years in extraction sockets. Three crowns (in group 1) and one crown (in group 2) were replaced for esthetic reasons. CONCLUSION: The outcome of this study revealed that in both groups, the responses of marginal bone were similar. Immediate placement of the definitive prefabricated abutment in an immediate loading protocol appears to conserve marginal bone around the implant neck.

Immediate placement and loading of maxillary single-tooth implants: a 3-year prospective study of marginal bone level.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate marginal bone level around single-tooth implants placed in anterior maxilla and immediately restored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty implants were placed in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women) that were selected for this study. Following atraumatic non-surgical extraction of tooth, all patients immediately received implants and the definitive prefabricated abutment was placed. Implant position was transferred to the scanning unit of the CAD/CAM system using prefabricated surgical guide. Temporary crowns were immediately fabricated and cemented. Eight weeks later final crowns were luted. Outcome assessment as implant survival and level of marginal bone radiographic evaluations were performed at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period after loading. RESULTS: All implants placed osseointegrated successfully after 3 years of functional loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.16 mm (SD, 0.167 mm), 0.275 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) and 0.265 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period respectively. Four out of the 20 implants showed no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Immediate loading technique using the final abutment directly eliminated the need for a second stage surgery and prevented interruption of soft and hard tissue at implant neck, which resulted in better soft tissue response and reduced marginal bone loss. Clinical significance: Immediately loaded implants, in fresh extraction sockets by insertion of a provisional restoration on the titanium abutment without any later manipulation, helped to protect the initially forming blood clot and presented a template for soft tissue contouring that resulted in significant reduction of marginal bone resorption and maintenance of soft tissue architecture.

Influence of surgical and prosthetic techniques on marginal bone loss around titanium implants. Part I: immediate loading in fresh extraction sockets.

PURPOSE: Delayed placement of implant abutments has been associated with peri-implant marginal bone loss; however, long-term results obtained by modifying surgical and prosthetic techniques after implant placement are still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal bone loss around titanium implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using two loading protocols after a 5-year follow-up period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 patients received 40 titanium implants (Astra Tech) intended for single-tooth replacement. Implants were immediately placed into fresh extraction sockets using either a one-stage (immediate loading by placing an interim prosthesis into functional occlusion) or a two-stage prosthetic loading protocol (insertion of abutments after 8 weeks of healing time). Marginal bone levels relative to the implant reference point were evaluated at four time intervals using intraoral radiographs: at time of implant placement, and 1, 3, and 5 years after implant placement. Measurements were obtained from mesial and distal surfaces of each implant (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One-stage immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets resulted in a significant reduction in marginal bone loss (p < 0.002) compared to the traditional two-stage technique. Whereas mesial surfaces remained stable for the 5-year observation period, significant marginal bone loss was observed on distal surfaces of implants after cementation of interim prostheses (p < 0.007) and after 12 months (p < 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets reduced marginal bone loss and did not compromise the success rate of the restorations.

A 5-year comparison of marginal bone level following immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets in the maxilla.

PURPOSE: The aim of present investigation was to evaluate marginal bone level after 5-year follow-up of implants placed in healed ridges and fresh extraction sockets in maxilla with immediate loading protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients in need of a single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla received 42 Astra Tech implants (Astra Tech Implant system™, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden). Implants were placed either in healed ridges (group I) or immediately into fresh extraction sockets (group II). Implants were restored and placed into functional loading immediately by using a prefabricated abutment. Marginal bone level relative to the implant reference point was recorded at implant placement, crown cementation, 12, 36, and 60 months following loading using intra-oral radiographs. Measurements were made on the mesial and distal sides of each implant. RESULTS: Overall, two implants were lost from the group II, before final crown cementation: they were excluded from the study. The mean change in marginal bone loss (MBL) after implant placement was 0.26 ± 0.161 mm for 1 year, and 0.26 ± 0.171 mm for 3 years, and 0.21 ± 0.185 mm for 5 years in extraction sockets and was 0.26 ± 0.176 mm for 1 year and 0.21 ± 0.175 mm for 3 years, and 0.19 ± 0.172 mm for 5 years in healed ridges group. Significant reduction of marginal bone was more pronounced in implants inserted in healed ridges (P < 0.041) compared to fresh surgical extraction sockets (P < 0.540). Significant MBL was observed on the mesial side of the implant after cementation of the provisional (P < 0.007) and after 12 months (P < 0.034) compared to the distal side which remained stable for 3 and 5 years observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, responses of local bone to immediately loaded implants placed either in extraction sockets or healed ridges were similar. Functional loading technique by using prefabricated abutment placed during the surgery time seems to maintain marginal bone around implant in both healed and fresh extraction sites.