Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning classification for head and neck tumors.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that a mathematical technique called recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), when applied to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Head and Neck Cancer database, created rules that formed subgroups ("classes") having unique outcomes. We sought to learn if the application of RPA-derived rules to a new head and neck database would create classes that were similarly associated with outcome and thereby validate this technique. METHODS: The rules derived from recursive partitioning analysis of the previous database were used to subgroup an independent, new head and neck cancer database (RTOG 85-27), created as part of a phase III trial of the hypoxic-cell radiosensitizer, Etanidazole. The resulting classes were compared with each other and with the classes formed from the previous database. RESULTS: The rules derived by RPA from our previous database correctly grouped the tumors in the new database into unique classes of similar outcome. RPA could successfully use either survival or local-regional control of disease as the measure of outcome. As judged by comparison of the 95% confidence intervals, the outcome of the classes in the new database is essentially indistinguishable from the outcome of the classes in the previous database. CONCLUSION: RPA-derived rules provide a reliable method to assort head and neck tumors into unique classes that are predictive of outcome. These rules can be successfully applied to new databases that were not used in the creation of the rules and thereby validate the methodology.

The influence of beam energy on the outcome of postoperative radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients: secondary analysis of RTOG 85-03.

PURPOSE: To determine whether any difference in toxicity or efficacy occurs when head and neck cancer patients are treated postoperatively with (60)C0, 4 MV, or 6 MV photon beam. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a secondary analysis of the Intergroup Study 0034. Three hundred ninety-two patients were evaluable for comparison between treatment with (60)C0, 4 MV, or 6 MV photon beam. All patients had advanced but operable squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Patients were randomized following surgical resection to receive treatment with either postoperative irradiation alone, or postoperative irradiation plus three cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Patients were categorized as having either "low risk" or "high risk" treatment volumes based on whether the surgical margin was 5 mm or less, presence of extra capsular nodal extension, and/or carcinoma in situ at the surgical margins. Low-risk volumes received 50-54 Gy, and high-risk volumes were given 60 Gy. Patients were compared in regards to acute and late radiotherapy toxicities as well as overall survival and loco-regional control according to the beam energy used. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-seven, 140, and 95 patients were treated by (60)C0, 4 MV, and 6 MV, respectively. No differences were seen in acute or late toxicity among treatment groups. Locoregional control was achieved in 75%, 79%, and 80% of patients treated with (60)C0, 4 MV, or 6 MV (p = 0.61). Patients treated with 6 MV had a higher incidence of ipsilateral neck failure as first event (13%) than patients treated by (60)C0 and 4 MV (9%). This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: No differences in outcome, acute, or late toxicity were discernible in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with (60)C0, 4 MV, or 6 MV. This result should be interpreted with caution as increased incidence, albeit nonsignificant, of ipsilateral neck recurrence was observed in patients treated with 6 MV and the power of the study to detect a statistically significant difference is small.

Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS: Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P =.11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P =.23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P =.027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P =. 0031). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.

Outcomes of patients receiving radiation for carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the 1988-1989 patterns of care study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) indicate that postoperative radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) is superior to postoperative radiation alone (RT) or surgery alone. Whether preoperative treatment is superior to postoperative treatment is controversial. This Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveyed patients with RC treated with radiation during the years 1988-1989 to determine the national practice standards and outcomes and to compare these results with those of clinical trials. METHODS: A national survey of 73 institutions was conducted using 2-stage cluster sampling, and specific information on 406 patients with RC who received radiation at 69 facilities was collected. Follow-up information on 215 patients was subsequently collected by mail survey. There were no significant differences between the known prognostic indicators or treatment-related variables for patients for whom follow-up was available compared with the variables for patients for whom follow-up was not available. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 8.44 years with a median of 4 years. One hundred fifty-four patients (71%) received postoperative treatment, either RT (37%) or CRT (34%); and 40 (18%) received preoperative treatment, either RT (15%) or CRT (3%). Ninety-six patients (45%) received chemotherapy, and for 86% of those patients chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiation. RESULTS: Survival was stage-dependent (85% Stage I, 69% Stage II, and 54% Stage III at 5 years, P = 0.04). Survival was also substage-dependent, and patients with C(1) cancer had significantly higher 5-year survival than those with C(2)/C(3) cancer (89% vs. 48%, P = 0.008). Local failure was similar for Stage II and Stage III patients (10% vs. 11% at 5 years, respectively). In multivariate analyses, only stage and use of chemotherapy were significant to survival (Stage III vs. Stage I and II, relative risk [RR] = 2.52, and chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy, RR = 0.46). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was seen with postoperative CRT than with postoperative RT (69% vs. 50%, P = 0. 011). Preoperative radiation resulted in a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than postoperative radiation (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0006), but not compared with postoperative CRT. Survival and local failure did not differ according to radiation therapy interruption or the interval between surgery and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Stage is an important prognostic indicator for survival, and among patients with Stage III malignancies survival in the substage C(1) is significantly higher than in the substages C(2) and C(3). As has been demonstrated in randomized trials, adjuvant postoperative CRT is superior to postoperative RT for patients with RC in this national study. These nationwide results of adjuvant treatment are comparable to those reported in randomized trials. The use of CRT was the only treatment-related factor that resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of death.

The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

BACKGROUND: For the first time, a Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted in 1992-1994 to determine the national practice standards in evaluating and treating patients with esophageal carcinoma and to determine the degree to which clinical trials have been incorporated into national practice. METHODS: A national survey of 61 institutions using 2-stage cluster sampling was conducted, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management of their disease. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Chi-square tests for significant differences between academic and nonacademic institutions for a particular variable were performed. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 66.7 years (range, 26-89 years); 76.5% were male and 23.5% were female. Karnofsky performance status was > or = 80 for 88.3% of patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 61.5% and adenocarcinoma in 36.8%. Fifteen percent were Clinical Stage (CS) I, 39.5% CS II, and 29.5% CS III. Evaluative procedures included endoscopy (>93%), computed tomography (CT) of the chest (86%), CT of the abdomen (75%), esophagography (68.5%), and endoscopic ultrasound (3.5%). Endoscopic ultrasound and CT of the chest were performed significantly more frequently at academic than nonacademic facilities (6.1% vs. 1.0% and 91.9% vs. 81.3%, respectively). Three-quarters of all patients received chemotherapy and RT and 62.5% received concurrent chemotherapy and RT as part of their treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy plus RT (54.0%), RT alone (20.3%), preoperative chemotherapy + RT (13.3%), postoperative chemotherapy + RT (7.7%), postoperative RT (3.5%), and preoperative RT (1.2%). The chemotherapeutic agents most frequently used were 5-fluorouracil (84%), cisplatin (64%), and mitomycin (9%); academic instututions used cisplatin significantly more often and mitomycin significantly less often than nonacademic institutions. Brachytherapy was used in 8.5% of cases. The median total dose of external beam radiation was 50.4 gray and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 gray. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the national benchmarks for the evaluation and treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma at radiation facilities in the U.S. It also indicates that the majority of patients given RT as a component of treatment for esophageal carcinoma receive chemoradiation rather than RT alone, as supported by clinical trials. Although some differences in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma were noted between academic and nonacademic facilities, there was no difference in the frequency of use of chemoradiation versus RT by facility type.

Anemia is associated with decreased survival and increased locoregional failure in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma: a secondary analysis of RTOG 85-27.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the strength of association between anemia and overall survival, locoregional failure, and late radiation therapy (RT) complications in a large prospective study of patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with conventional radiotherapy with or without a hypoxic cell sensitizer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1988 and September 1991, 521 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a randomized trial examining the addition of etanidazole (SR 2508) to conventional radiation therapy (RT) (66-74 Gy in 33-37 fractions, 5 days a week). Patients with hemoglobin (Hgb) levels measured and recorded prior to the second week of RT were included in this secondary analysis. Hemoglobin levels were stratified as normal (> or = 14.5 gm% for men, > or = 13 gm% for women) or anemic (< 14.5 gm% for men, < 13 gm% for women). Locoregional failure rates were calculated using the cumulative incidence approach. Overall survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Late RT toxicity was scored according to the RTOG morbidity scale. Differences in rates of overall survival, locoregional failure, and late complications were tested by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of 504 eligible patients, 451 had a Hgb level measured and recorded prior to the second week of RT. One hundred sixty-two patients (35.9%) were considered to have a normal Hgb level and 289 patients (64.1%) were considered to be anemic. The estimated survival rate is 35.7% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 21.7% in anemic patients (p = 0.0016). The estimated locoregional failure rate is 51.6% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 67.8% in anemic patients (p = 0.00028). The estimated rate of grade 3 or greater toxicity is 19.8% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 12.7% in anemic patients (p = 0.063). On multivariate analysis, several variables were found to be independent predictors of survival including: T stage, Karnofsky performance status, N stage, age, total radiation dose to the primary, and Hgb level. Independent predictors of locoregional control included T stage, Karnofsky performance status, N stage, radiation dose, and Hgb level. The only variables which predicted for the development of late RT complications were gender (p = 0.0109) and age (p = 0.0167). These findings were consistent regardless of whether Hgb level was considered a dichotomous or continuous variable. CONCLUSION: Low Hgb levels are associated with a statistically significant reduction in survival and an increase in locoregional failure in this large prospective study of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Hgb level should be considered as a stratification variable in subsequent studies of head and neck cancer. Strategies to increase Hgb prior to RT in patients with head and neck cancer may lead to improved survival and loco-regional control.

Radiation therapy for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care process survey.

PURPOSE: To determine the US national practice standards for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated in radiation oncology facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey of 57 institutions identified 507 eligible patients who received radiation therapy as a component of their treatment for rectal cancer. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling at each stage for each stratum was used and on-site surveys were performed. RESULTS: Of the 507 patients, 378 (75%) received postoperative therapy, 110 (22%) received preoperative therapy, 17 (2%) received both preoperative and postoperative therapy, and less than 0.5% received intraoperative radiation alone. To more accurately assess the utilization of modern radiation techniques as well as recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored, randomized, postoperative, adjuvant combined modality therapy rectal cancer trials into current practice, the analysis was limited to the 243 (48%) patients with tumor, node, and metastasis staging system classification T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease who underwent conventional surgery with negative margins. Although only 7% were treated on a clinical trial, 90% received chemotherapy for a median of 21 weeks. Most were treated with modern radiation treatment techniques. In contrast, techniques to identify and help exclude the small bowel from the radiation field were not routinely used. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that only 7% of patients with T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease were treated on a clinical trial, such trials appear to have resulted in a positive influence on the standard of practice within the oncology community. Although there are still some deficiencies, the majority of these patients received combined modality therapy and were treated with modern radiation therapy techniques.

The Multidimensional Scale of Sexuality.

Research on the assessment of sexual orientation has been limited, and what does exist is often conflicting and confusing. This is largely due to the lack of any agreed upon definition of bisexuality. The Multidimensional Scale of Sexuality (MSS) was developed to validate and to contrast six proposed categories of bisexuality, as well as categories related to heterosexuality, homosexuality, and asexuality. This instrument includes ratings of the behavioral and cognitive/affective components of sexuality. The MSS was completed by 148 subjects, the majority of whom were from identified homosexual and bisexual populations. Although subjects' self-descriptions on the MSS were consistent with their self-descriptions on the Kinsey Heterosexual-Homosexual Scale, the MSS provided a more varied description of sexual orientation. Subject's self-described sexual orientation on the MSS was more consistent with their cognitive/affective ratings than with their behavioral ratings. With the exception of self-described heterosexuals, the frequency of cognitive/affective sexuality was greater than that of behavioral sexuality.

Vigilance in vasectomies.

PIP: A case history is presented as a means of focusing on the psychosocial complications that frequently follow vasectomy. The physician is urged to evaluate the husband's avowed reasons for seeking the procedure as well as the wife's influence on the decision. In the case of Mr. T, the decision for the vasectomy was really the wife's. Unknowingly, he was carrying out his wife's unspoken wish. A major damaging emotional component of the surgical decision was Mr. T's anger. This stemmed from his failure to recognize, until years later, the influence of his wife on "his" decision. Even at the time of psychotherapy, the anger was blunted and released indirectly, taking the form of sexual disinterest, poor sexual performance, and a vasovasotomy. Men with personalities like Mr. T's present a challenge in the area of vasectomy screening. Although only age 26 and childless at the time, he appeared mature, unwavering in his views, and had the support and cooperation of his wife. Exaggeration of anticipated positives can operate against the best interests of a couple in the decision of a vasectomy, and the physician needs to explain that to the couple. Couples need to be informed that a vasectomy can intensify rather than resolve existing sexual and marital conflicts. The physician must be on the alert for the couple who unconsciously conspire to have the vasectomy for the wrong reasons. An in-depth interview of the couple would uncover a greater percentage of contraindications than if the husband were interviewed alone.^ieng