Can we predict the risk factors for switching due to ineffectiveness in the first year of therapy with bDMARD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

INTRODUCTION: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have improved the clinical course and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients failed to respond or have an insufficient response to bDMARD early in the course of the treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of RA patients who need to switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment and to identify specific baseline features as possible predictors of switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted with patients with RA that started their first bDMARD. Demographic data, disease characteristics, disease activity data scores, laboratory parameters and treatment at baseline were collected. The proportion of patients who failed to respond and who switched to another bDMARD in the first year of treatment was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 437 (364 females, 83.3%) patients with RA were included. The majority of these patients started an anti-TNF-α agent (n=315, 72.1%). Forty-eight (11.0%) patients failed to respond to the bDMARD in the first year of treatment. There were significantly more current or former smokers (p=0.030), with a history of depression (p=0.003) and positive for RF at baseline (p=0.014) in the switch group. In the multivariate analysis, anti-TNF-α agents use (OR 8.3, 95% CI 2.4-28.8, p=0.001), tobacco exposure (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8, p=0.02) and history of depression (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.7) seem to predict the need to switch in the first year of treatment due to ineffectiveness. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our study, tobacco exposure and depression appear to be modifiable risk factors associated with early switching due to ineffectiveness. Addressing these factors in daily clinical practice is crucial to enhance the overall response to therapy and improve the well-being of patients.

Can microvascular damage predict disease severity in patients with systemic sclerosis?

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, microvascular damage and cellular and humoral immunity abnormalities. Microvascular damage can be easily detected through nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with SSc and a NVC performed within the first 6 months after diagnosis was conducted. Visceral involvement in the first 3 years of the disease and NVC findings were collected. The severity of microvascular damage was classified into four categories, according to the worsening of the NVC patterns. The severity of organ involvement was assessed by the disease severity scale of Medsger for each organ and as a global measure of disease severity, the simple summation was used. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with SSc were included. A moderate correlation was found between the severity of microvascular damage and the global measure of disease severity (r=0.55, p<0.001), the severity of peripheral vascular involvement (r=0.43, p<0.001) and the severity of skin involvement (r=0.34, p=0.001). The presence of a late scleroderma pattern in NVC were predictive in univariate analysis of digital ulcers (OR 6.03, 95% CI 1.52-23.86, p=0.01), muscular involvement (OR 13.09, 95% CI 1.09-156.78, p=0.04), calcinosis (OR 27.22, 95% CI 5.56-133.33, p<0.001) and worse global disease severity score (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.17-2.38, p=0.005). Multivariate analysis adjusted for disease duration and gender confirmed late pattern as an independent predictor of calcinosis (OR 42.89, 95% CI 5.53-332.85, p<0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In this study, the worsening of NVC pattern in SSc was associated with the overall disease severity, the severity of peripheral vascular involvement and extension of skin involvement. This study highlights the importance of NVC as a prognostic tool and a possible predictor of systemic visceral involvement.

Measurement properties of the Portuguese version of the rheumatoid arthritis patient-reported experience measure (CQRA-PREM): a cross-sectional single center study.

AIMS: to test the measurement properties of the Portuguese version of the Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-PREM) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This cross-sectional clinical field study recruited adult patients with RA during rheumatology appointments of a Portuguese rheumatology center. Patients completed the Portuguese version of CQRA-PREM, composed of 7 domains and 24 questions. Sociodemographic characteristics, symptoms/disease duration, current treatment, Pain-Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient Global Assessment (PGA)-VAS and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were also collected from the patient. Disease Activity Score for 28 joints with C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) was recorded by the rheumatologist. The assessment of CQRA-PREM measurement properties followed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients with RA were included. The domains in which patients showed better experience were the "Needs and preferences", followed by "Coordination and Communication". The domain "Information, education and self-care" was an identified area of improvement for providing patient-centered care. Ceiling effects were found in four domains of the CQRA-PREM. Internal consistency of all domains was considered good (α>0.7). Homogeneity was considered good for each question in all domains analyzed (0.30≤rp≤0.70). The divergent validity of the PREM was good, revealing that the domains were not correlated (Pain-VAS, HAQ, DAS28-CRP) or only weakly (PGA-VAS) correlated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The CQRA-PREM showed acceptable measurement properties and is a useful tool for evaluating quality of healthcare provided in daily practice, as perceived by RA patients in Portugal.

Comparing DAPSA, DAPSA28, and DAS28-CRP in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Initiating a First Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Across Nine European Countries.

OBJECTIVE: Because 66/68 joint counts are not always performed in routine care, we aimed to determine which of the modified 28-joint disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA28) or 28-joint disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) should be preferred for monitoring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when the original DAPSA (66/68 joints) is not available. METHODS: Prospectively collected real-world data of European bionaive patients with PsA initiating a first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor were pooled. Remission and response status were evaluated at 6 months by remission (DAPSA ≤ 4, DAPSA28 ≤ 4, and DAS28-CRP < 2.6), response (75% improvement for DAPSA and DAPSA28), and combined EULAR good/moderate responses for DAS28-CRP. Logistic regression analyses on multiple imputed data were used to identify baseline predictors. RESULTS: Remission and response cohorts included 3,159 and 1,866 patients, respectively. The 6-month proportions achieving remission/response were DAPSA (27%/44%), DAPSA28 (28%/44%), and DAS28-CRP (59%/80%). Of 14 possible baseline predictors, 11 predicted both DAPSA and DAPSA28 remission (8 of which also predicted their response, indicated by "*"): longer disease duration*, male sex*, and higher CRP* were positive, whereas older age*, higher body mass index*, patient fatigue*, and global, physician global, health assessment questionnaire score*, and tender and swollen* joint counts were negative predictors. Eight and five of these predicted DAS28-CRP remission and response, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with PsA, DAPSA28 should be preferred over DAS28-CRP as a substitute for DAPSA when 66/68 joint counts are not available because of the large overlap in remission and response status and in predictors between DAPSA and DAPSA28.

Molecular Profiling of Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients Reveals an Association between Innate and Adaptive Cell Populations and Therapeutic Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors.

This study aims at identifying molecular biomarkers differentiating responders and non-responders to treatment with Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Whole blood mRNA and plasma proteins were measured in a cohort of biologic-naïve axSpA patients (n = 35), pre and post (14 weeks) TNFi treatment with adalimumab. Differential expression analysis was used to identify the most enriched pathways and in predictive models to distinguish responses to TNFi. A treatment-associated signature suggests a reduction in inflammatory activity. We found transcripts and proteins robustly differentially expressed between baseline and week 14 in responders. C-reactive protein (CRP) and Haptoglobin (HP) proteins showed strong and early decrease in the plasma of axSpA patients, while a cluster of apolipoproteins (APOD, APOA2, APOA1) showed increased expression at week 14. Responders to TNFi treatment present higher levels of markers of innate immunity at baseline, and lower levels of adaptive immunity markers, particularly B-cells. A logistic regression model incorporating ASDAS-CRP, gender, and AFF3, the top differentially expressed gene at baseline, enabled an accurate prediction of response to adalimumab in our cohort (AUC = 0.97). In conclusion, innate and adaptive immune cell type composition at baseline may be a major contributor to response to adalimumab in axSpA patients. A model including clinical and gene expression variables should also be considered.

Patient-reported outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients treated with secukinumab for 24 months in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating secukinumab, we aimed to assess and compare the proportion of patients achieving 6-, 12- and 24-month patient-reported outcomes (PRO) remission and the 24-month retention rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with axSpA or PsA from 16 European registries, who initiated secukinumab in routine care were included. PRO remission rates were defined as pain, fatigue, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) ≤2 (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤0.5, for both axSpA and PsA, and were calculated as crude values and adjusted for drug adherence (LUNDEX). Comparisons of axSpA and PsA remission rates were performed using logistic regression analyses (unadjusted and adjusted for multiple confounders). Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess and compare secukinumab retention rates. RESULTS: We included 3087 axSpA and 3246 PsA patients initiating secukinumab. Crude pain, fatigue, PGA and HAQ remission rates were higher in axSpA than in PsA patients, whereas LUNDEX-adjusted remission rates were similar. No differences were found between the patient groups after adjustment for confounders. The 24-month retention rates were similar in axSpA vs. PsA in fully adjusted analyses (HR [95 %CI] = 0.92 [0.84-1.02]). CONCLUSION: In this large European real-world study of axSpA and PsA patients treated with secukinumab, we demonstrate for the first time a comparable effectiveness in PRO remission and treatment retention rates between these two conditions when adjusted for confounders.

Neutrophile to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios predict clinical response to bDMARD in naïve spondylarthritis patients.

Objective: We aim to study association between neutrophile to lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte (PLR) ratios and disease activity, and their value to predict bDMARD response. Methods: A set of spondylarthritis (SpA) patients under bDMARD registered in the Reuma.pt registry was studied. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratorial variables were assessed on bDMARD initiation, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months (M) thereafter. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimation equations models assessed associations with disease activity. The NLR and PLR predictive value was assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: A total of 170 patients were included. Most were male (54.7%), with a predominantly axial phenotype (84.7%). Significant associations were observed between NLR [B=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.38; 1.74)] and PLR [(B=1.16, 95% CI = (1.09; 1.24)] with ASDAS-CRP (p < 0.001). Both baseline ratios predicted ∆ ASDAS-CRP ≥ 1.1 at 6 months [OR = 2.20, 95% CI = (1.21, 4.00) for NLR; OR = 1.02, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.04) for PLR, p < 0.01)]. PLR was a significant predictor of ∆ ASDAS-CRP ≥ 1.1 in all timepoints [OR (12 M) = 1.02, 95% CI = (1.00, 1.03), p < 0.05; OR (18M) = 1.02, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.03), p < 0.001; OR (24M) = 1.01, 95% CI = (1.01, 1.02), p < 0.01]. Conclusion: NLR and PLR were associated with disease activity during the follow up of these patients. They seem to be significant predictors of therapeutic response to bDMARD in naïve SpA patients.