Portable flat-panel detector for low-dose imaging in a pediatric intensive care unit: comparison with an asymmetric film-screen system.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for low-dose imaging as compared with an asymmetric film-screen system in a pediatric intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 neonates underwent chest radiographs using a portable flat-panel detector (digital speed 800) and an asymmetric film-screen system (400 speed). Four readers evaluated the detection of 11 anatomic and 5 pathologic landmarks and 4 support devices. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated analysis of variance. The level of statistical significance was P = 0.05. RESULTS: The detection of 4 anatomic/4 pathologic landmarks and 2 support devices was significantly better using the flat-panel detector as compared with the asymmetric film-screen system (P < 0.05). Another 8 anatomic and one pathologic landmarks were detected equally well or slightly better with the flat-panel detector (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The portable flat-panel detector offers the potential of a 50% dose reduction with equal or significantly better detection of clinically important structures.

Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.

PURPOSE: To compare the exposure dose requirements and performance of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for pediatric use in the depiction of catheters, simulated pulmonary nodules, and simulated interstitial lung disease with those of storage phosphor radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Catheters and simulated nodules and subtle interstitial lung disease (miliary, reticular, linear, and ground-glass patterns) were superimposed over an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Images were obtained with different exposures corresponding to simulated speeds of 400 and 800 with a portable flat-panel detector and printed on hard copies. These images were compared with those from storage phosphor radiography at a simulated speed of 400, which is typically used in pediatric radiology. Four independent readers recorded 7200 observations per pattern (for a total of 600 statistically independent observations), and these observations were subjected to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Differences were considered significant at a P value of .05. RESULTS: Catheters over obscured chest areas, nodules 10 mm or smaller and larger than 10 mm over lucent lung, nodules 10 mm or smaller over obscured chest areas, and miliary and linear patterns over lucent lung showed higher areas under the ROC curve (A(z)) with the flat-panel detector at 400 and 800 digital speed compared with storage phosphor radiography. A(z) values for reticular and ground-glass patterns with the flat-panel detector were equal to or less than those with storage phosphor radiography. These differences, however, were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In the detection of catheters, nodules, and almost all interstitial lung disease, A(z) values were higher with the portable flat-panel detector than with storage phosphor radiography at equivalent and reduced speeds. These results suggest that the portable flat-panel detector could be used with reduced exposure dose in pediatric patients.

Low-voltage digital selenium radiography: detection of simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters--a phantom study.

PURPOSE: To compare three tube voltages in digital selenium radiography for the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated catheters, nodules, and ground-glass, linear, miliary, and reticular patterns were superimposed over an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Digital selenium radiography was performed with different tube voltages (70, 90, and 150 kVp). Hard-copy images were generated. Detection performance of five radiologists was compared by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis involving 54,000 observations. RESULTS: The detection of ground-glass, linear, miliary, and reticular patterns over lucent lung and of nodules equal to, smaller than, and larger than 10 mm increased when 70 kVp and/or 90 kVp was used. However, only the reticular pattern was significantly better detected at lower peak voltage (P <.05). Simulated catheters and nodules over the mediastinum showed smaller areas under the ROC curve at lower peak voltage. These results were not statistically significant (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of digital selenium radiography at lower peak voltage is at least as good as that at higher peak voltage for interstitial lung disease over lucent lung. Performance is equivalent for nodules and catheters over obscured chest regions at lower peak voltages compared with that at 150 kVp. Our results implicate that the use of high-voltage technique in digital selenium radiography should be reassessed.

Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a large area, cesium iodide amorphous silicon flat-panel detector (CsI/a-Si) at 3 tube voltages to detect simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters. METHODS: Simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters were superimposed over a chest phantom. Images were generated at 125 kVp, 90 kVp, and 70 kVp at the same surface dose and reduced effective dose equivalent for 90 kVp and 70 kVp and printed on hard copies. Fifty-four thousand observations were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC). RESULTS: Detectability of linear, miliary, reticular pattern, and nodules over lucent lung as well as of catheters and nodules over obscured chest areas increased at 90 and/or 70 kVp with higher Az values; however, only it was statistically significant for reticular pattern at 70 kVp and nodules at 90 kVp compared with 125 kVp (P < 0.05). The detection of ground-glass pattern was worse at lower kVp (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For most simulated patterns, differences in diagnostic performance at 70 kVp/90 kVp and 125 kVp were not significant, except for reticular pattern and nodules over lucent lung.

Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.

PURPOSE: To assess image quality and exposure dose requirements of a flat-panel detector system versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems for radiographic depiction of the lumbar spine in Cynomolgus monkeys as a pediatric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Cynomolgus monkeys underwent anteroposterior radiography of the lumbar spine. The size and weight of these monkeys are comparable to those of infants 3-4 months of age. Images were acquired with speed class 400 screen-film, flat-panel, and storage-phosphor systems with identical exposure dose. All other conditions were matched exactly. Additional images were acquired with the flat-panel and storage-phosphor systems at exposure doses equivalent to speed classes 800 and 1600. All images were obtained at 66 kVp without antiscatter grid. Images were assessed independently by three radiologists for visibility of 60 anatomic structures by using a five-point confidence scale. Scores were calculated for the seven combinations of imaging mode and exposure dose and were compared by using the Friedman test. RESULTS: Scores were 1.70 (speed class 400), 1.97 (speed class 800), and 2.27 (speed class 1600) for the flat-panel system; 2.50 (speed class 400) for the screen-film system; and 2.58 (speed class 400), 2.77 (speed class 800), and 3.13 (speed class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system. Scores for the flat-panel system at speed classes 400 and 800 were significantly lower (indicating better visibility) than those of the screen-film and storage-phosphor systems (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The flat-panel system is superior to screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in lumbar spine radiography in monkeys. With the flat-panel system, exposure dose can be reduced by 75% without loss in image quality.

Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

The purpose of this study was to compare a large-area, direct-readout, flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system, a storage-phosphor system, and a mammography screen-film system with regard to the detection of artificial bone erosions simulating rheumatoid disease, and to assess its diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose. Six hundred forty regions were defined in 160 metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint specimens from 20 monkey paws (4 regions per joint). Artificial bone erosions were created in 320 of these 640 regions. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to obtain absorption and scatter radiation conditions similar to those of a human hand. Imaging was performed using a flat-panel system, a speed class 200 screen-film system, a mammography screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system under exactly matched conditions. Different exposure doses equivalent to speed classes of S=100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-level confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for a total of 21,120 observations (1920 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated by the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. The ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.809 (S=200), 0.768 (S=400), 0.737 (S=800), 0.710 (S=1600), and 0.685 (S=3200) for the flat-panel system, 0.770 for the speed class 200 screen-film system, 0.781 (S=200), 0.739 (S=400), 0.724 (S=800), 0.680 (S=1600) for the storage-phosphor system, and 0.798 for the mammography screen-film system. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between different combinations of imaging modalities and exposure doses ( p<0.05). The diagnostic performance of the flat-panel detector system is superior to that of a screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system for the detection of erosive lesions at clinical exposure settings (S=200). Using the flat-panel system the exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain a diagnostic performance comparable to a speed class 200 screen-film system.

Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.

PURPOSE: To compare a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector with an asymmetric screen-film system for the depiction of simulated patterns of interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters, as well as for evaluation of dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ground-glass, linear, miliary, and reticular patterns; nodules; and catheters were superimposed over an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Hard copies were generated at different dose levels (speeds: 400, 800, and 1,600) with a flat-panel detector and were compared with copies generated with an asymmetric screen-film system (speed, 400). Detection performance of eight radiologists was compared with a receiver operating characteristic analysis of 19,200 observations per pattern. A difference was significant with a P value of.05. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the flat-panel detector and the asymmetric screen-film system at the same speed (P >.05) and between the flat-panel detector at a speed of 800 and the asymmetric screen-film system at a speed of 400 (P >.05). The visibility of linear, miliary, and reticular patterns over lucent lung and of nodules smaller than 10 mm and catheters over obscured chest regions on copies generated at a speed of 1,600 with the flat-panel detector decreased, compared with the visibility of these features on copies generated with the asymmetric screen-film system (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of the flat-panel detector is comparable to that of the asymmetric screen-film system for depiction of all simulated patterns of interstitial lung diseases, nodules, and catheters at the same speed and offers the potential of dose reduction to a speed of 800.

Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.

PURPOSE: To compare a large-area direct read-out flat-panel detector radiography system with screen-film and storage-phosphor systems with regard to detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures and to assess the diagnostic performance of the flat-panel system with decreasing exposure level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subtle fractures were created artificially in 100 of 200 porcine rib specimens. Specimens were enclosed in containers of water to generate absorption and scatter radiation conditions similar to those of a human chest wall. Imaging was performed with flat-panel, screen-film, and storage-phosphor systems with conditions that were exactly matched. Different exposure levels equivalent to speed classes (S) of 400, 800, 1,600, and 6,400 were used. All images were independently assessed for the presence of fracture by three radiologists with a five-level confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for a total of 4,200 observations (600 for each imaging system and exposure level). Diagnostic performance was estimated with area under the ROC curve (Az). Significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. RESULTS: ROC analysis yielded mean Az values for the flat-panel system of 0.879 (S = 400), 0.833 (S = 800), 0.765 (S = 1,600), and 0.576 (S = 6,400). Az values were 0.834 (S = 400) for the screen-film system and 0.789 (S = 400) and 0.729 (S = 800) for the storage-phosphor system. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences in diagnostic performance between various combinations of imaging system and exposure levels (P <.05). CONCLUSION: The flat-panel system is superior to the screen-film and storage-phosphor systems for detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures at clinical exposure settings (eg, S = 400). With the flat-panel system, radiation dose can be reduced by 50% to achieve diagnostic performance comparable to that of a speed class 400 screen-film system.

Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: The use of helical computed tomography is well established in the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, normal diameters and their changes during adult life according to this method are not available. We planned to set up normal diameters for the thoracic aorta of adults obtained by helical computed tomography. METHODS: Seventy adults, 17 to 89 years old, without any signs of cardiovascular disease were investigated with helical computed tomography. Aortic diameters were measured at seven predefined thoracic levels. RESULTS: Aortic diameters (mean +/- SD) were 2.98 +/- 0.46 cm at the aortic valve sinus, 3.09 +/- 0.41 cm at the ascending aorta, 2.94 +/- 0.42 cm proximal to the innominate artery, 2.77 +/- 0.37 cm at the proximal transverse arch, 2.61 +/- 0.41 cm at the distal transverse arch, 2.47 +/- 0.40 cm at the isthmus, and 2.43 +/- 0.35 cm at the diaphragm. Men had slightly longer diameters than did women. All diameters increased with age. There was no influence of weight, height, or body surface area. After normalization to the diameter at diaphragmatic level, no statistically significantly influential factor could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: This study delineates normal intrathoracic aortic diameters for helical computed tomography, including relationships with sex and age. Pathologic dimensions of the aorta should preferably be provided as percentiles or z scores.