The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme.

AIM: Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion. METHOD: Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2. CONCLUSION: The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.

Developing a phantom for simulating robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision using 3D printing and medical imaging.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision is an advanced procedure mainly because of the great variability in anatomy. Phantoms can be used for simulation-based training and assessment of competency when learning new surgical procedures. However, no phantoms for robotic complete mesocolic excision have previously been described. This study aimed to develop an anatomically true-to-life phantom, which can be used for training with a robotic system situated in the clinical setting and can be used for the assessment of surgical competency. METHODS: Established pathology and surgical assessment tools for complete mesocolic excision and specimens were used for the phantom development. Each assessment item was translated into an engineering development task and evaluated for relevance. Anatomical realism was obtained by extracting relevant organs from preoperative patient scans and 3D printing casting moulds for each organ. Each element of the phantom was evaluated by two experienced complete mesocolic excision surgeons without influencing each other's answers and their feedback was used in an iterative process of prototype development and testing. RESULTS: It was possible to integrate 35 out of 48 procedure-specific items from the surgical assessment tool and all elements from the pathological evaluation tool. By adding fluorophores to the mesocolic tissue, we developed an easy way to assess the integrity of the mesocolon using ultraviolet light. The phantom was built using silicone, is easy to store, and can be used in robotic systems designated for patient procedures as it does not contain animal-derived parts. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed phantom could be used for training and competency assessment for robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision surgery in a simulated setting.

The effects of troponin screening among patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery is associated with a high short-term mortality rate. This might be partly attributed to myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) defined by elevated postoperative troponin levels. The myocardial injury is often asymptomatic; thus, troponin screening seems to be the best diagnostic method. We aimed to assess whether implementing troponin screening with subsequent individualised interventions as standard care is associated with reduced mortality after AHA surgery. We also explored the treatment implications in the screening period. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 558 patients undergoing surgery from February 2018 to March 2021 was included. The patients undergoing surgery before March 2019 served as the historical control group, while the screening group consisted of patients undergoing surgery from March 1, 2019. Troponin I was to be measured 6-12 h postoperatively and in the morning of the succeeding 4 days. Patients with myocardial injury were assessed, and treatment was individualised after multiple disciplinary consultations. The primary outcome was the unadjusted 30-day mortality rates. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust for selection bias. RESULTS: We included 558 patients: 382 in the screening group and 176 in the historical control group. In the screening group, 15 patients (3.9%) died before the first blood sampling, and in 31 patients (8.1%), troponin screening was omitted, leaving only 336 patients screened. Myocardial injury was diagnosed in 81 patients (24.1%) of the 336 patients. Of these, 59 (72.8%) had a cardiac consultation. No interventions or alterations in relation to myocardial injury were done in 67 patients (82.7%). The 30-day mortality was 13.8% (95% CI 8.7%-18.9%) in the control group and 11.1% (95% CI 8.0%-14.3%) in the screening group. The absolute risk difference was -2.7% (95% CI -8.7%-3.3%; p = .38), which was unchanged after adjustment. The difference remained unchanged after 90 days and 1 year. CONCLUSION: The implementation of postoperative troponin screening was not associated with reduced mortality after AHA surgery. Research on the prevention and treatment of MINS is warranted before the implementation of standard troponin screening.

Association between troponin I levels and mortality among patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery-A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is associated with 30-day mortality in heterogeneous surgical populations but is barely described after acute high-risk abdominal surgery. The impact of dynamic changes has not previously been investigated. The objectives were to determine the incidence of MINS in this population, the association between mortality and MINS, and whether plasma troponin I (TnI) dynamics have any impact on mortality. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 341 patients undergoing acute high-risk gastrointestinal surgery was conducted. Plasma TnI was measured at the first four postoperative days. MINS was defined as any increased TnI level >59 ng/L. TnI dynamic required either two succeeding measurements of TnI >59 ng/L with a >20% increase/fall or one measurement of TnI >59 ng/L with a succeeding measurement of TnI <59 ng/L with a >50% decrease. Adjusted mortality rates were calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses. RESULTS: The incidence of MINS was 23.8% and dynamic TnI changes occurred in 15.6% of the patients. The unadjusted 30-day and 1-year mortality were 19.8% and 35.9% in patients with MINS, compared with 2.7% and 11.6%, respectively, in patients without MINS (p < 0.001). After adjusting, the differences remained significant. There was no difference in mortality between patients with or without dynamic changes in TnI level. CONCLUSION: MINS occurred frequently and was associated with increased mortality. TnI monitoring might help identify patients with increased risk of mortality and improve care. Research on preventive measures and treatments is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND AGENCY: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05933837, retrospective registered.

Cutaneous sensory block area of the ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: an observational study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) can be applied using different approaches, resulting in varying cutaneous analgesic distributions. This study aimed to assess the cutaneous sensory block area (CSBA) after ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) using the subcostal approach. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received a subcostal US-TAP with 20 mL 2.5 mg/mL ropivacaine bilaterally. Measurements were performed 150 min after block application. The CSBA was mapped using cold sensation and a sterile marker, photodocumented, and transferred to a transparency. The area of the CSBA was calculated from the transparencies. RESULTS: The median CSBA of the subcostal US-TAP was 174 cm2 (IQR 119-219 cm2; range 52-398 cm2). In all patients, the CSBA had a periumbilical distribution. In 42 of the 60 (70%) unilateral blocks, the CSBA had both an epigastric and infraumbilical component; in 12 of the 60 (20%) unilateral blocks, it covered only the epigastrium; and in 4 of the 60 (7%) unilateral blocks, it had only an infraumbilical distribution. No CSBA was found in 2 of the 60 (3%) unilateral blocks. In none of the patients did the CSBA cover the abdominal wall lateral to a vertical line through the anterior superior iliac spine. CONCLUSION: The subcostal US-TAP results in a heterogeneous non-dermatomal CSBA with varying size and distribution across the medial abdominal wall.

Validation of the German classification system for quality assessment of right-sided colon cancer specimens.

AIM: The German classification system of the completeness of mesocolic excision aims to assess the quality of right-sided colonic cancer surgery by review of photographs. We aimed to validate the reliability of the classification in a clinical context. METHOD: The study was based on a cohort of patients undergoing resection for right-sided colon cancer in two university hospitals served by the same group of pathologists. Prospectively collected photographs of the specimens were assessed twice by six colorectal surgeons to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater accuracy of the German classification and a modification assessing extended right-sided resections. RESULTS: Specimens from 613 resections for right-sided colon cancer were reviewed. Twenty-one specimens were found to be non-assessable, leaving 436 right hemicolectomies, 139 extended right hemicolectomies and 17 right-sided subtotal colectomies. Intra-rater reliability was 0.57-0.74 and weighted kappa coefficients 0.58-0.74, without differences between subgroups. The percentage of agreement between all six participants was 20.3% for all specimens, 21.1% for right hemicolectomy specimens and 18.1% for extended hemicolectomy and right-sided subtotal colectomy specimens. For the right hemicolectomy specimens, the model-based kappa coefficient for agreement was 0.27 (95% CI 0.24-0.30) and for association 0.45 (95% CI 0.41-0.49). CONCLUSION: The German classification of right hemicolectomy specimens showed low intra-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement and association. The use of this classification for scientific purposes appeared not to be reliable.

Association between plane of mesocolic dissection and recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a cohort study.

AIM: Dissection in the mesocolic plane is considered by some medical professionals to be crucial in complete mesocolic excision. We aimed to assess whether intramesocolic plane dissection is associated with a risk of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer. METHOD: This is a single-centre study based on prospectively registered data on patients undergoing resection for Union for International Cancer Control Stage I-III right-sided colon adenocarcinoma during the period 2010-2017. Patients were stratified in an intramesocolic plane group or a mesocolic plane group based on a prospective assessment of fresh specimens by a pathologist. Primary outcome was the 4.2 year risk of recurrence after inverse probability treatment weighting and competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Of 383 patients, 4 (1%) were excluded as the specimen was assessed as muscularis propria plane, 347 (91.6%) specimens were deemed as mesocolic and 32 (8.4%) as intramesocolic. The 4.2 year cumulative incidence of recurrence after inverse probability treatment weighting was 9.1% (95% CI 6.0%-12.1%) in the mesocolic group compared with 14.0% (3.6%-24.5%) in the intramesocolic group with an absolute risk difference in favour of mesocolic plane dissection of 4.9% (-5.7 to 15.6, p = 0.37). No difference was observed in the risk of local recurrence, death before recurrence or overall survival after 4.2 years between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Mesocolic plane dissection can be achieved in more than 90% of patients. The classification seems to be a guide for good surgical practice and not to be used for research purposes.

Long-term outcome after Bascom's pit-pick procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: A cohort study.

AIM: Previous studies have shown favourable short-term results after Bascom's pit-pick procedure for simple pilonidal sinus disease. A minimum 5-year follow-up is considered the gold standard but only a few long-term studies have previously been reported. Here, we aimed to estimate the long-term risk of treatment failure, incomplete wound healing or recurrence, postoperative complications and patient reported outcome measures such as chronic pain and satisfaction with cosmetic appearance. METHODS: Medical records of patients registered in a local database after undergoing Bascom's pit-pick procedure were reviewed and follow-up data updated. The patients received an online survey including questions about demographics, lifestyle, complications, reintervention, pain, satisfaction with cosmetic appearance and supplemented with telephone interviews if no response was received. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients underwent Bascom's pit-pick procedure during the period August 2007 to March 2014. Median follow-up was 7.98 (0.66, 10.96) years. Twelve patients (8%) had reintervention due to incomplete wound healing. A total of 32 patients experienced a recurrence. In competing risk analyses, the 10-year cumulative recurrence rate was 27% (95% CI: 19%-35%) of patients with complete wound healing. Treatment success was 68%. Recurrence was associated with active smoking, HR of 5.30 (95% CI: 1.42-19.86; p = 0.01), and number of primary pits ≥3, HR of 5.11 (95% CI: 1.49-17.47; p = 0.01). More than 90% had no postoperative complications or chronic pain, and more than 70% reported a high satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance. CONCLUSION: Bascom's pit-pick seems to be adequate treatment for most patients with a simple pilonidal sinus.

Plane of mesocolic dissection as predictor of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid colon cancer: A cohort study.

AIM: To investigate whether intramesocolic plane dissection assessed on fresh specimens by the pathologist is a risk factor for recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid cancer when compared with mesocolic plane dissection. METHOD: Single-centre study based on prospectively registered data on patients undergoing resection for UICC stage I-III sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma during the period 2010-2017. The patients were stratified into either an intramesocolic plane group or a mesocolic plane group. Primary outcome was risk of recurrence after 4.2 years using inverse probability treatment weighting and competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Of a total of 332 patients, two were excluded as the specimen was assessed as muscularis propria plane, 237 (72%) specimens were deemed as mesocolic and 93 (28%) as intramesocolic. The 4.2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence after inverse probability treatment weighting was 14.9% (10.4-19.3) in the mesocolic group compared with 9.4% (3.7-15.0) in the intramesocolic group, thus the absolute risk difference between the mesocolic plane and intramesocolic plane was 5.5% (-12.5-1.6; p = 0.13) in favour of the intramesocolic group. CONCLUSION: Intramesocolic plane dissection was not a risk factor for recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for sigmoid cancer when compared with mesocolic plane dissection. No difference in risk of local recurrence, death before recurrence, and in overall survival after 4.2 years was observed between the two groups. With less than 1% of the specimens deemed as muscularis propria plane dissection, the classification appears unusable for the risk prediction of sigmoid colon cancer.

Risk of Local Recurrence After Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Post-Hoc Sensitivity Analysis of a Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: A causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer on the risk of recurrence has been shown, but it is still unclear whether this is caused solely by a risk reduction of local recurrence. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess to what extent complete mesocolic excision contributes to the risk of local recurrence. DESIGN: This study was a posthoc analyses of data from a population-based cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk analyses were used to estimate the possible causal effects of complete mesocolic excision. SETTING: Data were collected from the 4 public colorectal cancer centers in the Capital Region of Denmark. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colon resections for right-sided colon cancer without distant metastases during the period 2010-2013 were included. One center performed complete mesocolic excision and the remaining 3 centers performed conventional resections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of solely local recurrence 5.2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were solely distant recurrence and both local and distant recurrence diagnosed within 180 days. RESULTS: A total of 807 patients were included with 186 undergoing complete mesocolic excision and 621 conventional resections. The 5.2-year cumulative incidence of a solely local recurrence was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.5-6.1) after complete mesocolic excision compared with 7.0% (5.0-8.9) in the control group, and the absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision was 3.7% (2.5-7.1; p = 0.035). The absolute risk reduction on local and distant recurrence was 3.4% (1.3-5.6; p = 0.002) and on solely distant recurrence was 3.1% (0.0-6.2; p = 0.052). LIMITATIONS: The recurrence risk after conventional resection might be underestimated by the use of inappropriate modalities to diagnose local recurrence for some patients and the shorter duration in this group. CONCLUSION: This study shows a causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision on the risk of a solely local recurrence and of distant recurrence with or without local recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 .RIESGO DE RECURRENCIA LOCAL DESPUÉS DE LA ESCISIÓN MESOCÓLICA COMPLETA PARA EL CÁNCER DE COLON DEL LADO DERECHO: ANÁLISIS DE SENSIBILIDAD POST-HOC DE UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONALANTECEDENTES:Se ha demostrado un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa para el cáncer de colon del lado derecho sobre el riesgo de recurrencia, pero aún no está claro si esto se debe únicamente a una reducción del riesgo de recurrencia local.OBJETIVO:Evaluar en qué medida la escisión mesocólica completa se atribuye al riesgo de recurrencia local.DISEÑO:Análisis posthoc de datos de una cohorte poblacional. Se utilizaron análisis de probabilidad inversa de ponderación del tratamiento y de riesgo competitivo para estimar los posibles efectos causales de la escisión mesocólica completa.AJUSTE:Datos de los cuatro centros públicos de cáncer colorrectal en la Región Capital de Dinamarca.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones de colon electivas por cáncer de colon derecho sin metástasis a distancia durante el período 2010-2013. Un centro realizó escisión mesocólica completa, el resto resecciones convencionales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia acumulada de la recidiva local únicamente, 5,2 años después de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios fueron únicamente la recidiva a distancia y ambas,la recidiva local y a distancia diagnosticada dentro de los 180 días.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 807 pacientes, 186 sometidos a escisión mesocólica completa y 621 resecciones convencionales. La incidencia acumulada de 5,2 años de una recidiva únicamente local fue del 3,7% (IC del 95%: 0,5 a 6,1) después de la escisión mesocólica completa en comparación con el 7,0% (5,0 a 8,9) en el grupo de control, y la reducción del riesgo absoluto de la escisión mesocólica completa fue del 3,7% (2,5-7,1; p = 0,035). La reducción del riesgo absoluto de recidiva local y distante fue del 3,4% (1,3-5,6; p = 0,0019) y de recidiva únicamente a distancia 3,1% (0,0-6,2; p = 0,052).LIMITANTES:El riesgo de recurrencia después de la resección convencional podría subestimarse por el uso de modalidades inapropiadas para el diagnostico de la recurrencia local en algunos pacientes y la duración más corta en este grupo.CONCLUSIÓN:Este estudio muestra un efecto del tratamiento causal de la escisión mesocólica completa sobre el riesgo de una recidiva únicamente local y de recidiva a distancia con o sin recidiva local. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B832 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Optimal peripheral nerve block after minimally invasive colon surgery - a study protocol for a randomised trial.

Introduction Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are used for post-operative pain management, but their efficacy remains unclear. We aim to investigate the effect of two TAP block methods in minimally invasive colon surgery. Methods This will be a double-blind, randomised and controlled multicentre trial including 360 adults who are planned for elective minimally invasive colon surgery with curative intent for colon neoplasia. The participants are randomised to one of three arms: active ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) and placebo laparoscopic assisted TAP (L-TAP), placebo US-TAP and active L-TAP, or placebo US-TAP and placebo L-TAP. The primary outcome is morphine dose equivalents administered during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes are pain on the first post-operative day, length of stay, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery measured using the Quality of Recovery 15 questionnaire. Statistical analysis will determine any superiority of US-TAP and L-TAP versus placebo, and any non-inferiority of L-TAP compared with US-TAP. The latter will only be tested if superiority to placebo is shown. Primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed as intention-to-treat regarding superiority and as intention-to-treat and per protocol regarding non-inferiority. Conclusion This will be the first ever blinded multicentre trial comparing L-TAP, US-TAP and placebo in daily clinical practice. The study has the potential to determine the role of the TAP in minimally invasive colon surgery. Funding A and JC Tvergaards Fond, Helen Rudes Fond, Fru Olga Bryde Nielsens Fond, Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansen Fond, Medicine and Treatment Research Fund of the Danish Regions and a Research Grant from Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand Hospital. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04311099.

Recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: post hoc sensitivity analyses-early recurrence, surgery by specialist and dissection in the mesocolic plane.

AIM: The aim was to investigate whether the previously reported causal treatment effect of complete mesocolic excision on the risk of recurrence was biased by inclusion of patients with potentially undiagnosed disseminated disease at the time of surgery, by non-specialist surgery, or caused by mesocolic plane dissection. METHOD: A population of 1069 patients, 813 undergoing conventional resection and 256 complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer during the period 2008-2013, was stepwise reduced in the following order by excluding patients with recurrence diagnosed within 6 months of the resection, having surgery performed by a non-specialist without supervision, and specimens assessed as not being mesocolic plane dissection. The primary outcome measure was risk of recurrence after 5.2 years using competing risk analyses. RESULTS: The absolute risk reduction of complete mesocolic excision was 6.0% (95% CI 1.8-10.2; P = 0.0049) after excluding patients with recurrence within 6 months of resection, 6.1% (95% CI 1.9-10.4; P = 0.0045) after excluding non-specialist surgery, and 7.5% (95% CI 2.9-12.0; P = 0.0013) after the exclusion of patients whose specimens were assessed as dissections not being performed in the mesocolic plane. CONCLUSION: The absolute risk reduction of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer in our previous study was not biased by potentially undiagnosed disseminated disease at the time of surgery or non-specialist surgery, and was not solely caused by dissection in the mesocolic plane. Central vascular dissection with central lymphadenectomy seems a major factor for better oncological results.

Accuracy of preoperative staging with multidetector computed tomography in colon cancer.

AIM: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the main preoperative decision-making tool in colon cancer treatment, thus the validation of daily clinical practice is warranted. The only published study validating the accuracy of MDCT in a national cohort was performed more than a decade ago. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with preoperatively assessed locally advanced cancer and the emergence of other personalized treatments we aimed to validate the accuracy of MDCT in a national cohort. METHOD: The study is based on the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database and included all Danish patients diagnosed with primary colon adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2018. The primary study outcome was the accuracy of MDCT in identifying patients with locally advanced disease. The secondary outcomes were the accuracy of predicting UICC Stage I based on predicting the tumour category (pT3-T4 versus pT1-T2) and lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: A total 3465 patients were included in the analyses regarding locally advanced colon cancer. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.61 (0.58-0.64) and 0.85 (0.83-0.86), respectively, for CT to predict locally advanced disease. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.63 (0.59-0.66) and 0.80 (0.78-0.81), respectively, for predicting UICC Stage I in 4496 patients. Thirty six per cent of the patients assessed as having locally advanced disease and 58% assessed as Stage I were misclassified by MDCT. CONCLUSION: The present standard in Denmark questions whether the implementation of personalized medicine such as neoadjuvant adjuvant chemotherapy and tailor-made resections based on MDCT is justified.

[Perianal abscess after anal intercourse should raise suspicion of rectal gonorrhoeae infection].

Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection is a sexually transmitted disease. Rectal gonorrhoea is often asymptomatic, the most common symptoms are anal pain, bleeding and purulent discharge. This case report describes a younger man, who experienced increasing anal pain and later fever after anal intercourse. N. gonorrhoeae infection was verified, before a clinical examination revealed a perianal abscess. During incision of the abscess an anal fistula was suspected, and six weeks after primary surgery and treatment with relevant antibiotics, transanal ultrasonography showed perianal scarring and no signs of anocutaneous fistula.

Long-term Functional Outcome After Right-Sided Complete Mesocolic Excision Compared With Conventional Colon Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Questionnaire Study.

BACKGROUND: Complete mesocolic excision improves the long-term outcome of colon cancer but might carry a risk of bowel dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether right-sided complete mesocolic excision is associated with an increased risk of long-term bowel dysfunction and reduced quality of life compared with conventional colon cancer resections. DESIGN: Data were extracted from a population-based study comparing complete mesocolic excision and conventional colon cancer resections and from a national questionnaire survey regarding functional outcome. SETTINGS: Elective right-sided colon resections for stage I to III colon adenocarcinoma were performed at 4 university colorectal centers between June 2008 and December 2014. PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty-two patients were eligible to receive the questionnaire in November 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the risk of diarrhea (Bristol stool scale score of 6-7), 4 or more bowel movements daily, and the impact of bowel function on quality of life. Secondary outcomes were other bowel symptoms, chronic pain, and quality of life measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (63.8%) and 324 (59.9%) patients undergoing complete mesocolic excision and conventional resections responded after a median of 3.99 (interquartile range, 2.11-5.32) and 4.11 (interquartile range, 3.01-5.53) years (p = 0.04). Complete mesocolic excision was not associated with increased risk of diarrhea (adjusted OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.57-1.95; p = 0.84), 4 or more bowel movements daily (adjusted OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.57-2.24; p = 0.68), or lower quality of life (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.49-1.40; p = 0.50). Complete mesocolic excision was associated nonsignificantly with nocturnal bowel movements, but not associated with chronic pain or other secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the retrospective design with unknown baseline symptoms. Responding patients were younger but without obvious selection bias. The outcome "diarrhea" seemed somehow sensitive to information bias. CONCLUSION: Right-sided complete mesocolic excision seems associated with neither bowel dysfunction nor impaired quality of life when compared with conventional surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A665.