Distinct types of intramitochondrial protein aggregates protect mitochondria against proteotoxic stress.

Mitochondria consist of hundreds of proteins, most of which are inaccessible to the proteasomal quality control system of the cytosol. How cells stabilize the mitochondrial proteome during challenging conditions remains poorly understood. Here, we show that mitochondria form spatially defined protein aggregates as a stress-protecting mechanism. Two different types of intramitochondrial protein aggregates can be distinguished. The mitoribosomal protein Var1 (uS3m) undergoes a stress-induced transition from a soluble, chaperone-stabilized protein that is prevalent under benign conditions to an insoluble, aggregated form upon acute stress. The formation of Var1 bodies stabilizes mitochondrial proteostasis, presumably by sequestration of aggregation-prone proteins. The AAA chaperone Hsp78 is part of a second type of intramitochondrial aggregate that transiently sequesters proteins and promotes their folding or Pim1-mediated degradation. Thus, mitochondrial proteins actively control the formation of distinct types of intramitochondrial protein aggregates, which cooperate to stabilize the mitochondrial proteome during proteotoxic stress conditions.

Methods to Study the Biogenesis of Mitoribosomal Proteins in Yeast.

The biogenesis of mitoribosomes is an intricate process that relies on the coordinated synthesis of nuclear-encoded mitoribosomal proteins (MRPs) in the cytosol, their translocation across mitochondrial membranes, the transcription of rRNA molecules in the matrix as well as the assembly of the roughly 80 different constituents of the mitoribosome. Numerous chaperones, translocases, processing peptidases, and assembly factors of the cytosol and in mitochondria support this complex reaction. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae served as a powerful model organism to unravel the different steps by which MRPs are imported into mitochondria, fold into their native structures, and assemble into functional ribosomes.In this chapter, we provide established protocols to study these different processes experimentally. In particular, we describe methods to purify mitochondria from yeast cells, to import radiolabeled MRPs into isolated mitochondria, and to elucidate the assembly reaction of MRPs by immunoprecipitation. These protocols and the list of dos and don'ts will enable beginners and experienced scientists to study the import and assembly of MRPs.

Differential effects of familial Alzheimer's disease-causing mutations on amyloid precursor protein (APP) trafficking, proteolytic conversion, and synaptogenic activity.

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a key player in Alzheimer`s disease (AD) and the precursor of the Aß peptide, which is generated by consecutive cleavages of ß- and γ-secretases. Familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) describes a hereditary subgroup of AD that represents a low percentage of AD cases with an early onset of the disease. Different APP FAD mutations are thought to have qualitatively different effects on its proteolytic conversion. However, few studies have explored the pathogenic and putative physiological differences in more detail. Here, we compared different FAD mutations, located at the ß- (Swedish), α- (Flemish, Arctic, Iowa) or γ-secretase (Iberian) cleavage sites. We examined heterologous expression of APP WT and FAD mutants in non-neuronal cells and their impact on presynaptic differentiation in contacting axons of co-cultured neurons. To decipher the underlying molecular mechanism, we tested the subcellular localization, the endocytosis rate and the proteolytic processing in detail by immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Interestingly, we found that only the Iberian mutation showed altered synaptogenic function. Furthermore, the APP Iowa mutant shows significantly decreased α-secretase processing which is in line with our results that APP carrying the Iowa mutation was significantly increased in early endosomes. However, most interestingly, immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the amino acid substitutions of APP FAD mutants have a decisive impact on their processing reflected in altered Aß profiles. Importantly, N-terminally truncated Aß peptides starting at position 5 were detected preferentially for APP Flemish, Arctic, and Iowa mutants containing amino acid substitutions around the α-secretase cleavage site. The strongest change in the ratio of Aß40/Aß42 was observed for the Iberian mutation while APP Swedish showed a substantial increase in Aß1-17 peptides. Together, our data indicate that familial AD mutations located at the α-, ß-, and γ-secretase cleavage sites show considerable differences in the underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

Clingy genes: Why were genes for ribosomal proteins retained in many mitochondrial genomes?

Why mitochondria still retain their own genome is a puzzle given the enormous effort to maintain a mitochondrial translation machinery. Most mitochondrially encoded proteins are membrane-embedded subunits of the respiratory chain. Their hydrophobicity presumably impedes their import into mitochondria. However, many mitochondrial genomes also encode protein subunits of the mitochondrial ribosome. These proteins lack transmembrane domains and hydrophobicity cannot explain why their genes remained in mitochondria. In this review, we provide an overview about mitochondrially encoded subunits of mitochondrial ribosomes of fungi, plants and protists. Moreover, we discuss and evaluate different hypotheses which were put forward to explain why (ribosomal) proteins remained mitochondrially encoded. It seems likely that the synthesis of ribosomal proteins in the mitochondrial matrix is used to regulate the assembly of the mitochondrial ribosome within mitochondria and to avoid problems that mitochondrial proteins might pose for cytosolic proteostasis and for the assembly of cytosolic ribosomes.