Abusive head trauma: The body of the iceberg - A population-based survey on prevalence and perpetrators.

BACKGROUND: Research on abusive head trauma (AHT) is usually research on clinically identified cases, while population-based studies, having the potential to identify cases of shaking that did not end with hospital admission, are missing to date. OBJECTIVE: Thus, we aimed to assess the prevalence of AHT and associated risk factors in a representative sample of the German population. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study in Germany from July to October 2021. Using different sampling steps including a random route procedure, a probability sample of the German population was generated. The final sample consisted of 2503 persons (50.2 % female, mean age: 49.5 years). METHODS: Participants were asked about sociodemographic information in a face-to-face interview and whether they had been ever responsible for the care of an infant and whether they had ever performed potential harmful methods including shaking to calm it, intimate partner violence (IPV) and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 1.4 % of women (N = 18) and 1.1 % of men (N = 13) reported to have at least once shaken an infant to calm it. Ever having used a potential harmful parenting method in calming an infant was reported by 4.9 % of women (N = 61) and 3.1 % (N = 39) of men. No gender differences were seen. A low income, living with someone under 16 in the household and victimization and perpetration of IPV and ACEs are associated with increased risks of shaking and other potential harmful methods to calm an infant. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that despite better knowledge on the dangers of shaking, the percentage of women that shake infants might be higher than previously thought. Also, intimate partner violence and ACEs are key risk factor for shaking and harmful parenting behaviors in general. This has important implications for future prevention programs.

Survey on Reporting of Child Abuse by Pediatricians: Intrapersonal Inconsistencies Influence Reporting Behavior More than Legislation.

Background: Internationally, various laws govern reporting of child abuse to child protection services by medical professionals. Whether mandatory reporting laws are in place or not, medical professionals need internal thresholds for suspicion of abuse to even consider a report ("reasonable suspicion" in US law, "gewichtige Anhaltspunkte" in German law). Objective: To compare internal thresholds for suspicion of abuse among US and German pediatricians, i.e., from two countries with and without mandatory reporting laws. Participants and Setting: In Germany, 1581 pediatricians participated in a nationwide survey among child health professionals. In the US, a survey was mailed to all Pennsylvania pediatricians, and 1249 participated. Methods: Both samples were asked how high in their rank order of differential diagnoses child abuse would have to be when confronted with a child's injuries to qualify for reasonable suspicion/gewichtige Anhaltspunkte (differential diagnosis scale, DDS). In a second step, both had to mark a 10-point likelihood scale (0-100%) corresponding to reasonable suspicion/gewichtige Anhaltspunkte (estimated probability scale, EPS). Results: While for almost two-thirds of German pediatricians (62.4%), child abuse had to be among the top three differential diagnoses for gewichtige Anhaltspunkte, over half of the US respondents (48.1%) had a lower threshold for reasonable suspicion. On the estimated probability scale, over 65% in both samples indicated that the probability of abuse had to exceed 50% for reasonable suspicion/gewichtige Anhaltspunkte. There was great variability between the two countries. Conclusions: There are similar uncertainties in assessing cases of suspected child abuse in different legal systems. There is a need for debates on thresholds among medical professionals in both countries.

Child Abuse and Neglect and the Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Families: A Series of Cases Consulted at the German Medical Child Protection Hotline.

Increased stress and decreased resources during a lockdown and social distancing can augment the risk for child abuse and neglect during the COVID-19 pandemic.Health practitioners should continue to be prepared for potentially rising numbers of cases of child abuse and neglect.Child protection services and mental health care should be considered essential and be available for adults and children at all times.

[Reporting "Reasonable Suspicion" of Child Abuse - A Survey among Physicians and Psychotherapists in Germany]. / "Gewichtige Anhaltspunkte" bei Verdacht auf Kindesmisshandlung ­ eine Befragung in Deutschland tätiger Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that health care professionals are uncertain about the legal framework when suspicion of child abuse or neglect is raised. This could result in inconsistent handling of such cases, putting children at risk in further danger. The present study was intended to provide an empirical basis for examining the knowledge of the legal framework among health care professionals. METHODS: A survey of child and youth physicians, child surgeons, child and adolescent psychiatrists as well as psychotherapists working in Germany was carried out to obtain information on the general conditions. RESULTS: In all occupational groups, a majority of respondents feel insecure about the application of the legal framework on particular cases. Only a minority can correctly reflect the legal regulations of the Federal Child Protection Act ("Bundeskinderschutzgesetz"). Experience with child abuse cases doubled the odds to correctly understanding legal frameworks. Having attended training courses showed no impact. CONCLUSION: There is little knowledge of the legal framework in child protection. There is a need to improve training and provide low-threshold counselling services, especially for professionals with little experience in child protection cases.

Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: With regular contacts to the general child population, healthcare professionals could play an important role in the detection of child maltreatment. However, a majority of child maltreatment cases go unnoticed by the healthcare system. Child protection legislations usually offer terms like "reasonable suspicion" to corner a threshold that warrants reporting to child protection services (CPS) is defined as. The indistinct legal terminology leads to marked differences in the interpretation of this threshold. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the understanding of reasonable suspicion and subsequent handling of cases in the German context. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 2485 physicians and psychotherapists working with children and adolescents. Field access was gained by German professional associations. Via case vignettes, predictors of thresholds for reporting were assessed. RESULTS: The probability of a report to CPS increased positively with the degree of suspicion for maltreatment. However, even if participants were certain that child maltreatment occurred, 20% did not chose to report to CPS. Training in child protection lowered the professionals' threshold for reasonable suspicion; experience with child protection cases and good knowledge of the legal framework increased the likelihood to report an alleged situation of child maltreatment to CPS. CONCLUSION: Our data show that a significant proportion of health care professionals are uncertain about estimating reasonable suspicion and on how to proceed when there are strong indications for child maltreatment Therefore, data point towards the relevance of training in child protection among healthcare professionals in order to improve detection and adequate handling of cases of child maltreatment.

Lifespan risks of growing up in a family with mental illness or substance abuse.

Growing up in a family with one member being affected by mental health problems or substance abuse is an adverse childhood experience which can lead to socioeconomic and health-related impairments in later life. Furthermore, the risk of child maltreatment is increased in affected families, which often adds to the individual risk factors. However, the interdependence between the particular risk factors is not well understood. To examine the correlation between mental health problems or substance abuse and child maltreatment within families and long term consequences for affected children, a cross sectional population representative survey in Germany (N = 2,531) has been conducted. The risk of child maltreatment was 5 to 5.6 times higher if mental illness and 4.9 to 6.9 times higher if substance abuse of a family member was reported. Furthermore, the risk of health problems, including obesity, decreased life satisfaction, lower income, low educational achievement, unemployment and living without a partner was increased if participants grew up in a family affected by mental health problems or substance abuse. All associations were mediated significantly by child maltreatment. These results point towards an urgent need for greater awareness for child protection issues in families affected by mental health problems or substance abuse.

[Improving child protection in healthcare: peer counseling, education, and research using the example of abusive head trauma]. / Kinderschutz im Gesundheitswesen verbessern: Fachberatung, Weiterbildung und Forschung am Beispiel des misshandlungsbedingten Kopftraumas.

Too often, diagnosis of maltreatment is missed by healthcare professionals - thus denying children in danger from necessary protection. Insufficient knowledge and insecurities towards professional confidentiality and how to approach child protection services may be the reasons for the failure to protect children effectively.In this article, we present how a comprehensive concept by the competence center of child protection in medicine of the state of Baden-Wurttemberg consisting of peer counseling, peer education, and research can add to the prevention of maltreatment. One component is peer counseling through a telephone helpline that is accessible 24/7, the medical child protection hotline. The requests to the helpline are analyzed and add to the generation of tailored content for the education of doctors, psychotherapists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals. As an example, we present the online course "Child protection in medicine - a basic course for all health professionals" (so far available only in German). One common issue when the child protection hotline is called for counseling is abusive head trauma. Research shows that sometimes a diagnosis of abusive head trauma might be missed. This condition is most prevalent in children under the age of 2 and represents one of the most severe forms of physical abuse with high mortality.Inquiries to the medical child protection hotline are constantly increasing, but making the service known nationwide to all healthcare professionals still poses a challenge. The online course is widely used and being constantly improved. The comprehensive concept of peer counseling, education, and research is an important contribution to the improvement of the prevention of child maltreatment.

Awareness of abusive head trauma in a German population-based sample: implications for prevention.

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to reduce the incidence of abusive head trauma (AHT), incidence rates remain high. One cause is that prevention programs mostly aim to educate mothers of newborns on AHT and infant crying. However, mothers commonly have already a high knowledge and constitute only a minority among identified AHT perpetrators. The hypothesis was that there are great differences in AHT awareness in different subgroups. To assess awareness of AHT, a population-based study was performed. METHODS: A population-based representative sample of the German population aged >14 years (N = 2510) was assessed in a cross-sectional observational survey. The sample was selected in a random route approach between November 2017 and February 2018. RESULTS: Overall knowledge of AHT was higher in women (67.9%) than in men (48.8%, p < 0.001). Female gender, having children, higher age, and level of education were predictors for the awareness of AHT. A majority of participants reported to have heard about AHT from the media. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of AHT differs significantly within the population. In groups at higher risk to perpetrate AHT, including men, young caregivers, and those with low educational level, awareness of AHT was low. These subgroups should be targeted by tailored education programs for prevention.

Child maltreatment is mediating long-term consequences of household dysfunction in a population representative sample.

BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) exhibit long-lasting consequences on later life and are considered as a major public health problem. ACEs can be divided into household dysfunctions, which affect the child indirectly, and direct maltreatment. As a high correlation between ACEs in general is known, we assessed the risk for child maltreatment associated with the occurrence of household dysfunctions. To provide a better understanding for the mechanisms leading to the deleterious sequelae of ACEs, we furthermore assessed whether the long-term consequences of household dysfunction are mediated by child maltreatment and thereby might be targeted by effective child protection programs. METHODS: A representative sample of the German population above the age of 14 (N = 2531) was assessed in a cross-sectional observational population-based survey. RESULTS: The data reveal that mental illness of a household member was associated with significantly increased risks for all child maltreatment subtypes (ORs 4.95-5.55), just as household substance abuse (ORs 5.32-6.98), violence against the mother (ORs 4.43-10.26), incarceration of a household member (ORs 6.11-14.93) and parental separation (OR 3.37-4.87). Child maltreatment partially mediated the association of household mental illness, substance abuse and parental separation with later depression, anxiety, life satisfaction and subjective general health status and completely mediated the associations of intimate partner violence (IPV) and incarceration of a household member with anxiety, depression and subjective health status in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs linked to household dysfunction are associated with an increased risk for all subtypes of child maltreatment. The assessed widespread consequences of household dysfunction are mediated by child maltreatment. This underlines the role of prevention of child maltreatment in families with household dysfunction and implies child protection as a priority in any interventions.

Do we get the message through? Difficulties in the prevention of abusive head trauma.

Many programs aim to prevent abusive head trauma throughout the USA, Europe, and in many other regions of the world. Most of these programs inform mothers shortly after delivery about the dangers of abusive head trauma. Effectiveness of these programs usually is measured by the increase of knowledge on abusive head trauma. Recent research showed, however that for effective primary prevention, a much broader approach might be necessary. But so far, there is no data that reports the knowledge on key messages on abusive head trauma in the general public as a baseline. We conducted a representative population-based survey on abusive head trauma knowledge in Germany. Whereas the dangers are generally well known, a majority might be ambivalent towards the recommendation to leave a crying infant alone for a few minutes when the caregiver becomes too stressed or frustrated. Furthermore, a majority prefers being informed on abusive head trauma before birth.Conclusion: Future preventive programs should focus on educating adolescents (potential baby sitters) and young adults when they do not yet have children of their own. What is known: • Most programs for primary prevention of abusive head trauma (AHT) focus on mothers shortly after delivery • There are no analyses so far of the quality of education programs in the general public, as educating mothers might not be sufficient to reduce incidence rates What is new: • Our study is the first population-based survey to measure the knowledge on AHT in a representative population sample and to provide the data base for targeted prevention programs. • The introduction of broader prevention programs might be necessary.

Abuse as a Cause of Childhood Fractures.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that physical abuse of children all too often escapes detection. Fractures are among the potential consequences of physical abuse but are also com- mon in childhood because of accidents. A question frequently addressed to the Medical Child Protection Hotline (Medizini- sche Kinderschutzhotline) is how fractures due to abuse can be distinguished from accidental fractures. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed and in the Cochrane Data- base, as well as on the authors' experience in a pediatric emergency department with ca. 29 000 consultations per year and in a child protection outpatient clinic with ca. 100 consultations per year. RESULTS: Fractures due to abuse are especially common among infants; their incidence is estimated at 56.8/100 000 among infants less than six months old and 39.8/100 000 among infants aged 6 to 11 months. In consideration of the age of the child, the type of fracture, the history, and other factors, a high probability of abuse can be suspected in many cases, so that further measures can be initiated. CONCLUSION: All physicians involved in the care of children (even if only occasionally) should be aware of the major indicators of likely physical abuse and of the available oppor- tunities for counseling and intervention. Failures to diagnose child abuse are associated with high rates of recurrence and mortality.