Molecular biomarker identification for esophageal adenocarcinoma using endoscopic brushing and magnified endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a predisposing factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, the precise mechanism underlying this association remains unclear. The identification of biomarkers that are associated with an increased risk of BE progression to EAC would facilitate diagnosis and early treatment. Toward this goal, we aimed to identify biomarkers associated with BE and EAC in patients. METHODS: In conjunction with high-resolution magnified endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI), we obtained brushing samples from the long-segment BE (LSBE) or short-segment BE (SSBE) of patients with EAC or without EAC (control). To identify candidate biomarker genes, microarray analysis was performed for a training set of 28 American samples. To confirm the microarray results, expression levels of the 16 candidate biomarkers were evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis, using samples collected from an additional 53 American patients. In addition, we also performed a functional analysis for these genes using Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. RESULTS: Among the 16 genes identified as differentially expressed by microarray analysis, the GO analysis indicated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family associated with 'collagen metabolic process' and 'multicellular organismal macromolecule metabolic process' as the two top biological processes. Brushing samples of patients with EAC showed up-regulated expression of decay-accelerating factors (DAF and CD55) and topoisomerase type Iiα (TOP2A), and down-regulated expression of the sodium channel epithelial 1 beta subunit (SCNN1B). CONCLUSIONS: The up-regulation of CD55 and TOP2A, and the down-regulation of SCNN1B were common to the brushing samples and might serve as molecular biomarkers for identifying EAC in patients with SSBE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) (000004004).

Endoscopic Decompression of Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus in Pregnancy.

Sigmoid volvulus is a rare condition seen during pregnancy with high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. We report a case of a young 26-year-old woman, primipara, in her third trimester who presented with recurrent sigmoid volvulus at both 30 and 32 weeks of gestation. She underwent successful repetitive endoscopic decompression on both admissions with uneventful recovery. Endoscopic evaluation is safe in pregnancy and uncomplicated volvulus. It allows for diagnostic confirmation and assessment of complications; and it has successful outcomes in the presence of a multidisciplinary team.

Collagenous Gastritis: An Unusual Presentation With Tubular Shaped Stomach.

Collagenous gastritis is a rare histopathologic entity that causes marked subepithelial collagen deposition in the gastric mucosa. Clinical presentation is diverse, considering only less than 100 cases have been reported. However, we report a unique case of isolated collagenous gastritis in a 71-year-old female who presented with a 6-month history of dyspepsia and 27 kg weight loss. Her endoscopic findings revealed a tubular shaped stomach with diffuse gastric mucosal atrophy, findings that differ with previous case reports of a cobblestone pattern. Treatment remains unclear.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Disease to the Pancreas.

Introduction: Metastatic disease to the pancreas is a rare entity from all malignant pancreatic masses. Its diagnosis is very challenging, but with the introduction of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-fine needle aspiration (FNA), now there is a feasible way to make an accurate histopathological and definitive diagnosis. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of 11 patients with metastasis to the pancreas diagnosed with EUS-FNA in a tertiary referral center over a period of 3 years. We describe our institutional experience in diagnosing metastatic disease to the pancreas through EUS-FNA. Results: Between January 2015 and June 2018, 115 patients were diagnosed with pancreatic malignancy by EUS-FNA and only 11 (10%) with metastatic disease to the pancreas. Most common primary malignancy was renal cell carcinoma, followed by colon carcinoma, squamous/small cell carcinoma of the lung, and urothelial carcinoma. Five of 11 patients presented as a solitary pancreatic mass on initial imaging without any evidence of primary or metastatic disease elsewhere. Conclusions: In our experience, metastatic disease to the pancreas can represent up to 10% of solid pancreatic masses, which is lower compared to the reported incidence in previous literature. Our findings reveal that early identification and diagnosis help patient management and limit surgical morbidity and mortality.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: The wet suction technique.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become a fundamental tool in obtaining cytopathological diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. When sampling solid lesions of the pancreas, the endosonographer can use two suction techniques to enhance tissue acquisition; the dry and the wet suction techniques. The standard dry suction technique relies on applying negative pressure suction on the proximal end of the needle after the stylet is removed with a pre-vacuum syringe. The wet suction technique relies on pre-flushing the needle with saline to replace the column of air with fluid followed by aspiration the proximal end by using a prefilled syringe with saline. A new modified wet suction technique (hybrid suction technique) relies on preloading the needle with saline, but having continuous negative pressure with a pre-vacuum syringe to avoid manual intermittent suction. Tissue acquisition can be enhanced by applying fluid dynamic principles to the current aspiration techniques, such as the column of water used in the needle of the wet technique. In this review, we will focus on EUS-FNA using the wet suction technique for sampling of pancreatic solid lesions.

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the standard modality for diagnosing pancreatic masses. We compared the diagnostic yield of a new EUS-guided 22-gauge core needle biopsy to a standard 25-gauge FNA in sampling the same pancreatic lesions during the same EUS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The main outcomes of the study were the sample adequacy of each method to provide a final pathological diagnosis, and the concordance in diagnosis between core and FNA specimens. The secondary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of the findings for each needle and the incremental yield of using both needles compared with using each needle alone. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients with 61 solid pancreatic lesions were evaluated. The mean number of passes with FNA was 3.5 (ranges 1-8) and with core biopsy needle was 1.7 (ranges 1-5). The proportions of adequate samples were 50/61 (81.9%) for FNA and 45/61 (73.8%) for core biopsy (P = 0.37). The diagnostic yield was 46/61 (75.4%), 42/61 (68.9%) and 47/61 (77.1%) for FNA, core, and both, respectively. There was a substantial agreement of 87.5% (κ = 0.77; P < 0.001) in the findings of core and FNA specimens. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy for FNA and core biopsy were 68.1% and 59.6%, respectively (P = no significant [NS]). The specificity was 100% for both methods. The incremental increase in sensitivity and specificity by combining both methods are 1.5% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There are NS differences in the diagnostic yield between EUS-guided 22-gauge core biopsy and standard 25-gauge FNA for diagnosing pancreatic lesions, but core biopsy required fewer numbers of passes. There was NS incremental diagnostic yield when using both needles during the same procedure.

Diagnostic bedside EUS in the intensive care unit: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The knowledge of bedside diagnostic EUS in critically ill patients is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the indications, feasibility, safety, and clinical utility of diagnostic EUS in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients who had EUS done in the ICU within a 6-year period. INTERVENTION: Bedside EUS and EUS-guided FNA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: EUS indications, complications, and impact on management. RESULTS: A total of 64 EUS procedures were performed in 63 patients (38 men, 25 women; age range 27-78 years); 1 patient underwent 2 separate EUS procedures. EUS was performed while the patients were mechanically ventilated in 70% (45/64) of cases. Indications for EUS included jaundice (n = 24), mass of unknown etiology (n = 25), unexplained pancreatitis (n = 7), and staging of known cancer (n = 3). In 5 cases, EUS was used as an alternative to other imaging modalities because of morbid obesity (n = 3) or contraindication to intravenous contrast material (n = 2). Complications included reversible oxygen desaturation (n = 4), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 1), and transient hypotension (n = 1). Overall, EUS influenced management in 97% (62/64) of cases. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single-center study. CONCLUSION: ICU-based EUS can be performed with few intraprocedural complications and can be a valuable diagnostic modality in the ICU setting. It appears to be particularly useful for determining the etiology of jaundice, masses of unknown etiology, and pancreatitis. It may have particular value as a diagnostic technique on selected patients with unstaged cancer and when morbid obesity or the inability to use intravenous contrast material precludes the use of other imaging modalities in the critically ill patient.