Clinicopathologic features of non-small cell lung cancer in India and correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status.

INTRODUCTION: We performed retrospective analysis of 106 patients with lung cancer for which formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues was available. Their epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and treatment outcomes are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during Jan 2008 to Dec 2010 were included. EGFR sequencing was performed with ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer. RESULTS: Forty-two (39.6%) patients had mutation in one of the four exons characterized. Patients whose EGFR mutational status was not available at presentation before the start of treatment were started on chemotherapy, n = 46 (43.39%). If EGFR mutational analysis was available and mutations were present, the patients were started on either upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), n = 15 (14.15%) or if on chemotherapy arm were allowed to finish six cycles and then start with maintenance TKIs, n = 26 (24.52%). The median progression free survival for patients with and without mutations was 11 months (95% CI,7-14) and 9 months (95% CI,7-10) respectively. A median PFS of 14 months (95%CI, 12-16) was seen in the mutation-positive group that received both chemotherapy followed by switch maintenance with TKIs versus 8 months (95%CI, 7-8 months) in the group that received only TKI. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of EGFR mutations in this population of NSCLC patients was 39.6% with exon 19 mutation being the most common. The observed benefit of addition of chemotherapy over TKI in EGFR mutation-positive group raises the question, can we offer the therapy of chemotherapy-TKI combination to EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer patients as shown in the present study.

Clinical research on ayurvedic therapeutics: myths, realities and challenges.

Globally there is an increasing interest in alternative routes to health such as ayurveda. There is a need to conduct globally acceptable clinical research in ayurvedic therapeutics (AT). Some of the issues in investigating AT in randomised clinical trials (CT) are: selection of appropriate AT, non-drug and/or drug AT, identification of objective outcomes, devising adequate placebo/positive controls, difficulties of blinding, guarding against bias, duration of trials, number of patients, dose optimisation, etc. There is also a need to establish reasonable safety of this therapy in CT. If AT has to complete with new chemical entities and biotechnology products, clinical research and development of AT should be focussed on unmet medical needs utilising principles and practices of modern CT approaches.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative safety, and efficacy trial of oral co-artemether versus oral chloroquine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in adults in India.

In India, treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria is becoming increasingly difficult due to resistance to chloroquine, thus there is a need for new antimalarial drugs. CGP 56697 (co-artemether), a new drug, is a combination of artemether and lumefantrine in a single oral formulation (one tablet = 20 mg of artemether plus 120 mg of lumefantrine). In a double-blind study, 179 patients with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to receive either CGP (n = 89) given as a short course of 4 x 4 tablets over a 48-hr period or chloroquine (n = 90) given as four tablets (one tablet = 150 mg of chloroquine base) initially, followed by two tablets each at 6-8, 24, and 48 hr. Due to a death in the chloroquine group and a decrease in the chloroquine cure rate to < 50% (based on the blinded overall cure rate at that time), recruitment was terminated prematurely. CGP 56697 showed a superior 28-day cure rate (95.4% versus 19.7%; P < 0.001), time to parasite clearance (median = 36 versus 60 hr; P < 0.001), and resolution of fever (median = 18 versus 27 hr; P = 0.0456). This drug provides a safe, effective, and rapid therapy for the treatment of acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

Comparative bioavailability study of clonazepam after oral administration of two tablet formulations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioavailability of clonazepam from two brands of 2 mg tablet formulations--Epitril and reference brand. METHODS: A two-way randomised cross-over bioavailability study was carried out in 12 healthy male volunteers. Coded plasma samples were analysed for levels of clonazepam by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. RESULTS: The mean Cmax, Tmax t1/2 beta and AUC (0-48) for Epitril were: 16.31 +/- 3.07 ng/mL, 1.63 +/- 0.48 h, 46.97 +/- 12.26 h and 207.70 +/- 57.07 ng/ml.h; for reference brand were 19.75 +/- 5.95 ng/mL, 1.42 +/- 0.29 h, 46.88 +/- 11.29 h and 215.70 +/- 50.89 ng/ml.h respectively. These were comparable and the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Based on above pharmacokinetic parameters, Epitril was bioequivalent to reference brand.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis-challenges of recognition and management.

Skin adverse drug reactions (ADRs) generally present as transient erythematous macular/papular rashes. However these can many a times be the initial presentation of serious muco-cutaneous ADRs such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The incidence of SJS varies from 1.2 to 6 per million patient-years and that of TEN to be 0.4 to 1.2 per million patient-years. The pathophysiological mechanism of SJS and TEN have not been fully elucidated. The aetiological factors of SJS and TEN are diverse; drugs being the cause in more than 80% cases of TEN and about 40-50% cases of SJS. Mucous membranes are affected in nearly all cases. The extent of epidermal sloughing may vary and forms a basis for the classification of an individual case as SJS or TEN. Prognosis of SJS is better than that of TEN; mortality rates being about 5% and 30%-40% respectively. Specific therapy for these conditions is yet not available. The use of systemic corticosteroids has been controversial. Early diagnoses can prevent/reduce the morbidity of such serious ADRs. This article provides a brief review of the clinical presentation and management of SJS and TEN.

Comparative bioequivalence study of rifampicin and isoniazid combinations in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioavailability of rifampicin (RMP) in three brands of combination formulations of anti-tuberculosis drugs. DESIGN: A three-way double-blind, cross-over bioavailability study of RMP and isoniazid (INH), consisting of a comparison of a two-drug combination of tablets of RMP and INH each separately (reference brand R) and a tablet of RMP + INH (brand N), and a capsule of RMP + INH (brand L) was carried out in 12 healthy male volunteers. Coded plasma samples were analysed for levels of RMP as well as INH and acetylisoniazid (ACINH) by two high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. RESULTS: The mean values of RMP in brand N (Cmax 6.49+/-0.52 microg/mL, Tmax 2.33+/-0.18 h, AUC(0-24h) 39.83+/-3.44 microg/mL.h) were comparable with those obtained with brand R (Cmax 5.22+/-0.59 microg/mL, Tmax 2.50+/-0.12 h, AUC(0-24h) 33.33+/-3.47 microg/mL.h). The mean values of RMP in brand L (Cmax 3.05+/-0.52 microg/ mL, Tmax 3.79+/-0.57 h and AUC(0-24h) 21.78+/-3.67 microg/ mL.h) were significantly different from those in brand R. Nevertheless, all of the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for INH and ACINH in all three brands were comparable. CONCLUSION: Using brand R as a comparison, brand N was bioequivalent and brand L was not bioequivalent.

Comparison of absorption rate and bioavailability of two brands of carbamazepine.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioavailability of carbamazepine from two brands of carbamazepine--Tegretol 200 and Zen-200. METHODS: A two-way randomised cross-over bioavailability of carbamazepine was carried out in twelve healthy male volunteers. Coded plasma samples were analysed for levels of carbamazepine by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Tegretol 200 and Zen-200 were tested for in-vitro dissolution profiles. RESULTS: The mean Cmax, Tmax and t1/2a for Tegretol 200 were: 2.17 +/- 0.42 mcg/mL, 11.67 +/- 6.37 h and 2.72 +/- 1.87 h; for Zen-200 were 3.10 +/- 0.05 mcg/mL, 3.50 +/- 2.11 h and 0.76 +/- 0.76 h respectively. These values were statistically significant. However AUC (0-96 h) value of 150.16 +/- 27.13 mcg/ml.h after Zen-200 was not statistically significant as compared to 128.68 +/- 20.22 mcg/ml.h after Tegretol 200. The in-vitro dissolution profiles of the two formulations were dissimilar. The fluctuations in CBZ levels after Tegretol 200 was significantly less as compared to Zen-200. The absorption profile as judged by parameter 'A' was 50.44 +/- 10.95 for Tegretol 200 and 42.49 +/- 18.89 for Zen-200. CONCLUSION: Based on parameter 'A' and other pharmacokinetic parameters, the marketed generic carbamazepine product, Zen-200 is not bioequivalent to Tegretol 200.

Drug-related problems and adverse drug events: negligence, litigation and prevention.

Since the inclusion of medical profession under Consumer Protection Act, Indian doctors are facing malpractice suits. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) is 3.4-3.7, of adverse drug events (ADEs) is 2.4-6.5 and of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is 6.7 per 100 hospital admissions. The complications of drug-related problems (DRPs) include therapeutic failure (TF) in 23% and new medical problems (NMPs) in 10% and could lead to serious permanent disability and death in majority (42%). The incidence of negligence in serious ADEs and death is 34% and 51%, respectively. Proportion of preventable ADEs is 28-50%. Errors occur most often in prescribing (39-56%) and result in malpractice claims in 13-25% of cases. Rational prescribing, improved therapeutic knowledge through re-training and effective use of computers in prescribing could prevent errors and reduce economic consequences for patients, doctors and hospitals.

Comparative bioavailability study of a conventional and two controlled release oral formulations of Tegretol (carbamazepine)--200 mg.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the bioquivalence of carbamazepine (CBZ) controlled release formulation A (Tegretol CR, local) vs formulation B (Tegretol CR, Basel) and confirm their controlled release characteristics by comparing with conventional formulation (Tegretol). METHODS: A three-way randomized cross-over bioavailability study was carried out using CBZ 200 mg tablets of conventional and two controlled release formulations in twelve healthy volunteers. Coded plasma samples were analysed for levels of CBZ by HPLC method. RESULTS: The mean Cmax, Tmax, t1/2 and AUC for formulation A were: 1.67 +/- 0.26 mcg/mL, 24 +/- 0 hr, 47.8 +/- 9.7 hr and 136.7 +/- 25.4 mcg/ml. h; for formulation B were 1.41 +/- 0.31 mcg/mL, 25 +/- 8 hr, 46.9 +/- 7.9 and 119 +/- 32.3 mcg/ml.h and for conventional formulation were 2.43 +/- 3.6 mcg/mL, 9.5 +/- 7.4 hr, 44.6 +/- 9.8 hr and 178.8 +/- 41.9 mcg/ml.h respectively. The fluctuation in plasma concentration within 24 h (peak:trough) were 11.7 +/- 8.14% with conventional formulation as compared to 0% and 1.2 +/- 3.98% with formulation A and B respectively. The mean Tmax for both the controlled release formulations was not statistically significant. On the basis of 90% confidence interval, mean AUC and Cmax values obtained after controlled release formulation A, though statistically significant (P < 0.05) lie well within the prescribed limits of 80-120% as compared to formulation B. Thus both the controlled release formulations were bioequivalent. In comparison to conventional formulation, both controlled release formulations gave lower Cmax, lower AUCs, higher Tmax values, less fluctuation in CBZ plasma concentrations, reduction in ratio of Cmax/AUC values, thus demonstrating controlled release characteristics of the formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above mentioned parameters both controlled release formulations are bioequivalent and demonstrate controlled release characteristics.

An open clinical trial of benazepril--a new ACE inhibitor in mild-moderate hypertension.

Benazepril hydrochloride, a new non-sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor (ACEI) was studied in a titrated dose of 10 mg-20 mg once a day for 6 weeks in 42 mild to moderate adult hypertensive patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) 95-114 mm Hg. The pre-drug SDBP(mean +/- SE) of 102.5 +/- 0.8 mm Hg showed a significant reduction to 87.5 +/- 0.93 mm Hg at the end of treatment. BP was controlled (SDBP < or = 90 mm Hg) in 34 (81%) patients and a drop of at least 10 mm Hg from the pre-treatment SDBP value was noted in 34 (81%) patients. Common adverse reaction was cough in 8(19%) patients. Clinically significant changes in laboratory evaluations were not seen in any patient. Study showed that benazepril in a dose range of 10 to 20 mg per day is an effective agent for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Clinical relevance of reduced bioavailability of rifampicin.

Bioavailability (BA) of rifampicin (RMP) is a critical factor in successful treatment of tuberculosis. The BA of RMP can be reduced by pharmaceutical factors, patient factors and drug interactions. Failure of treatment and development of drug resistance are potential consequences of reduction in BA and it is necessary to understand and control the factors influencing BA of RMP.

Endothelins and anti-endothelins.

Endothelins, endothelin-1 (ET1), endothelin-2 (ET2) and endothelin-3 (ET3), are the most potent vasoconstrictor peptides released by endothelial cells. ET production is stimulated by vasopressor hormones, platelet-derived factors, coagulation products and cytokines, whereas nitric oxide and prostacyclin reduce ET production. ET bind to ETA and ETB receptors and produce marked and sustained rise in blood pressure, intense vasoconstriction of coronary arteries and have positive inotropic and chronotropic effects on myocardium. Besides, they influence neuroendocrine, renal and smooth muscle functions. ET appears to function mostly as a paracrine or an autocrine hormone. ET may have a role in hypertension, atherosclerosis, heart failure, coronary artery disease, renal insufficiency, vascular hypertrophy, respiratory and cerebrovascular conditions. Several antagonists of ET acting at receptor level or influencing endothelin converting enzyme (ECE) are under investigation and have great potential as agents for use in the treatment of wide spectrum of disease entities and as biologic probes for understanding the actions of ET in human beings.

Picrorhiza kurroa (Kutaki) Royle ex Benth as a hepatoprotective agent--experimental & clinical studies.

Picrorhiza kurroa (Pk), a known hepatoprotective plant, was studied in experimental and clinical situtations. The standardization of active principles--Picroside 1 and 2 was done with High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Picroside 1 ranged from 2.72 to 2.88 mg/capsule and picroside 2 from 5.50 to 6.00 mg/capsule. In the galactosamine-induced liver injury in rats, Pk at a dose of 200 mg/kg p.o. showed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in liver lipid content, GOT and GPT. In a randomised, double-blind placebo controlled trial in patients diagnosed to have acute viral hepatitis (HBsAg negative), Pk root powder 375 mg three times a day was given for 2 weeks (n = 15) or a matching placebo (n = 18) was given. Difference in values of bilirubin, SGOT and SGPT was significant between placebo and Pk groups. The time in days required for total serum bilirubin to drop to average value of 2.5 mg% was 75.9 days in placebo as against 27.44 days in Pk group. The present study has shown a biological plausability of efficacy of Pk as supported by clinical trial in viral hepatitis, hepatoprotection in animal model and an approach for standardizing extracts based on picroside content.

Nifedipine, captopril, metoprolol and nifedipine with metoprolol in hypertensive crisis in non-intensive care setting.

In 102 cases of severe hypertension (DBP > or = 115 mm Hg), with or without acute complications, efficacy and safety of SL Nifedipine 10 mg (NIF), SL Captopril 25 mg (CAP), IV Metoprolol 15 mg (MET) and SL NIF + IV MET were studied in an inpatient trial. Maximum mean percent reduction in SBP was 13.3, 9.7, 15.7 and 19.9 and in DBP was 21.2, 13.9, 12.5 and 20.4 with NIF, CAP, MET and NIF + MET respectively. A safe DBP of < or = 110 mm Hg (Kaplan) was achieved in 90, 61, 72.2 and 95.2 percent of patients. A statistically significant fall in DBP was observed at 5 minutes with all regimens except CAP which was at 15 minutes. Mild side effects observed were palpitations and flushing (NIF n = 4), taste disturbances (CAP n = 3), heaviness of head (CAP n = 1) and giddiness (MET n = 2, NIF + MET n = 2). The trial data suggest that hypertensive crisis can be managed, without intensive care facility, with all four regimens; this implies significant cost containment.