[Correlation between spinous process deviation and lumbar disc herniation in young patients].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between spinous process deviation and lumbar disc herniation in young patients. METHODS: From March 2015 to January 2022, 30 treated young (under the age of 30) patients with lumbar disc herniation were included as the young group. In addition 30 middle-aged patients (quinquagenarian group) with lumbar disc herniation and 30 patients with non-degenerative spinal diseases (young non-degenerative group) were selected as control groups. The angle of the spinous process deviation was measured on CT and statistically analyzed by various groups. All the data were measured twice and the average value was taken and recorded. RESULTS: The average angle of spinous process deviation in the degenerative lumbar vertebra of young patients were (3.89±3.77) degrees, similar to the (3.72±2.98) degrees of quinquagenarian patients(P=0.851). The average angle of s spinous process deviation young non-degenerative group were (2.20±2.28) degrees, significantly less than young group(P=0.040). The spinous process deviation angle of the superior vertebral of the degenerative lumbar in the young group was (4.10±3.44) degrees, which similar to the (3.47±2.87) degrees in the quinquagenarian group (P=0.447). A total of 19 young patients had the opposite deviation direction of the spinous process of the degenerative lumbar vertebra and upper vertebra, while only 7 quinquagenarian patients had this condition(P=0.02). The type of lumbar disc herniation in young patients had no significant relationship with the direction of spinous process deflection of the degenerative or upper lumbar vertebra (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Spinous process deviation is a risk factor of young lumbar disc herniation patients. If the deviation directions of adjacent lumbar spinous processes are opposite, it will increase the incidence of lumbar disc herniation in young patients. There was no significant correlation between the type of disc herniation and the deviation direction of the spinous process of the degenerative or upper lumbar vertebra. People with such anatomical variation can strengthen the stability of spine and prevent lumbar disc herniation through reasonable exercise.

Positive Expression of Retinol-Binding Protein 4 Is Related to the Malignant Clinical Features Leading to Poor Prognosis of Glioblastoma.

Backgrounds: Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) is a monomeric-binding protein belonging to the lipocalin protein family, which has been reported to be dysregulated in several malignancies such as breast cancer and lung cancer. However, the expression and function of RBP4 in glioblastoma (GBM) are completely unknown. Materials and Methods: TCGA datasets were used for analyzing the mRNA level of RBP4 in GBM and its clinical relevance. A retrospective GBM cohort (n = 73) was enrolled from our hospital to test the protein expression profile of RBP4 in GBM tissues as well as its correlation with patients' prognoses. Two human GBM cell lines, LN229 and U251, were collected to conduct overexpression and knockdown experiments targeting RBP4. The tumor-related effects of RBP4 in GBM were finally evaluated by proliferation and invasion assays. Results: Both the higher mRNA level and protein level of RBP4 in GBM tissues were significantly correlated with poorer patients' overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified RBP4 as a novel independent prognostic predictor in GBM patients. Overexpression of RBP4 resulted in enhanced GBM proliferation capacity, which was consistent with clinical findings on the positive correlation between RBP4 level and tumor size. Meanwhile, overexpressing RBP4 promoted GBM cell migration and invasion, while silencing RBP4 led to the opposite results. Conclusions: RBP4 overexpression in tumor tissues is correlated with poorer prognosis of GBM patients, which functions by promoting GBM proliferation and invasion, thus, may serve as an invaluable predictive biomarker and therapeutic target.