Liver cancer risk after HCV cure in patients with advanced liver disease without non-characterized nodules.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recognition of non-characterized liver nodules (NCLN) prior to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in patients with HCV. The risk of HCC has not been defined in F3/F4 patients in whom NCLN have been ruled-out before starting DAAs and at sustained virological response (SVR). This study aimed to estimate HCC incidence in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective study including HCV-infected patients with F3/F4 fibrosis, without a history of HCC, and who achieved SVR after DAAs. Patients were only included if they had undergone ultrasound imaging that excluded the presence of HCC/NCLN within 30 days after SVR. All patients were evaluated every 6 months until developing primary liver cancer, death or withdrawal of informed consent. HCC incidence was expressed per 100 patient-years (/100PY). Adherence to screening program was calculated every 6 months for the first 48 months. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients (63/122, F3/F4) were included. Among those with cirrhosis, 92% were Child-Pugh A and 42.7% had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Albumin-bilirubin score was 1 in 84.9% and 2 in 15.1% of patients, respectively. The median clinical and radiologic follow-up was 52.4 months and 48 months, respectively. Ten patients developed HCC: HCC incidence was 1.46/100PY (95% CI 0.79-2.71) in the whole cohort, 2.24/100PY (95% CI 1.21-4.17) in F4 only and 3.63/100PY (95% CI 1.95-6.74) in patients with CSPH. No HCC was registered in patients with F3. Median time between SVR and HCC occurrence was 28.1 months; 12 non-primary liver cancers were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis without NCLN at SVR remain at risk of HCC development. The absence of HCC in patients with F3 reinforces their marginal cancer risk, but prospective studies are needed to exclude them from screening programs. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, without non-characterized liver nodules at sustained virologic response, remain at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma despite viral cure. However, the cancer risk after successful direct-acting antiviral treatment is marginal in patients with F3 fibrosis without non-characterized liver nodules. If confirmed in larger prospective studies, current screening recommendations may need to be revisited in this group of patients.

Thermal Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Cirrhosis: Safety and Efficacy in Non-Surgical Patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation as upfront treatment of intrahepatic colangiocarcinoma (ICC) in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all biopsy-confirmed ICC in cirrhotic patients treated in the authors' unit from 2001 to 2017. Baseline characteristics, ablation procedures, and complications were recorded, and time to recurrence (TTR) and OS were calculated. Twenty-seven patients were identified. Seventy percent had Child-Pugh A disease, and most had clinically significant portal hypertension. Median tumor size was 21 mm. Twenty-one cases were uninodular, and 10 were single ≤ 2 cm. RESULTS: Complete radiologic necrosis was achieved in 25 cases (92.6%). Median OS was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.6-46.5), and recurrence was detected in 21 cases (77.8%) with a TTR of 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.7-20.9). In those patients with single ≤ 2-cm ICC, the OS was 94.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-not reached). Differences in OS were statistically significant between patients with single ICC ≤ 2 cm and patients with single ICC > 2 cm (P = .04) and between patients with single ICC > 2 cm and patients with multinodular ICC (P = .02). Only 1 patient had a treatment-related complication. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for ICC in patients with cirrhosis who are not candidates for surgery. The OS is similar to that reported in surgical series, but the initial treatment success is hampered by a high rate of tumor recurrence. Encouraging long-term survival after thermal ablation is achieved in patients with single ≤ 2-cm ICC.

Prospective evaluation of gadoxetic acid magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in newly detected nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most of the published studies about the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (EOB-MR) for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have had a retrospective design. Thus, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EOB-MR for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm detected by screening ultrasound (US) in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Between July 2012 and October 2015, 62 consecutive asymptomatic Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients with newly US-detected solitary nodules between 1 and 2 cm were prospectively included in the study. Hepatic extracellular contrast-enhanced MR (ECCE-MR) followed by EOB-MR were obtained in less than 1-month interval. Two independent radiologists blindly reviewed the EOB-MR studies, and the diagnosis of HCC was assigned when the lesion showed arterial enhancement followed by portal venous phase washout and/or hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). The final HCC diagnosis was made by ECCE-MR according to the accepted non-invasive criteria, or by biopsy in lesions with atypical vascular profile. RESULTS: Final diagnoses were as follows: HCC (n = 41), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2), colorectal metastases (n = 1) and benign conditions (n = 18). The sensitivity and specificity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis were 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7-71.5) and 90.5% (95% CI: 69.6-98.8), respectively, while sensitivity of ECCE-MR was 63.4% (95% CI: 46.9-77.9). The low rate of hypointense HCCs in the HBP and suboptimal liver uptake of contrast agent justify the low sensitivity of EOB-MR for HCC diagnosis. CONCLUSION: EOB-MR does not surpass the diagnostic accuracy of ECCE-MR for non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in nodules ≤2 cm in cirrhotic patients.

Diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): current guidelines.

One of the key strategies to improve the prognosis of HCC, beside prevention, is to diagnose the tumor in early stages, when the patient is asymptomatic and the liver function is preserved, because in this clinical situation effective therapies with survival benefit can be applied. Imaging techniques are a key tool in the surveillance and diagnosis of HCC. Screening should be based in US every 6 months and non-invasive diagnostic criteria of HCC based on imaging findings on dynamic-MR and/or dynamic-CT have been validated and thus, accepted in clinical guidelines. The typical vascular pattern depicted by HCC on CT and or MRI consists on arterial enhancement, stronger than the surrounding liver (wash-in), and hypodensity or hyposignal intensity compared to the surrounding liver (wash-out) in the venous phase. This has a sensitivity of around 60% with a 96-100% specificity. Major improvements on liver imaging have been introduced in the latest years, adding functional information that can be quantified: the use of hepatobiliary contrast media for liver MRI, the inclusion of diffusion-weighted sequences in the standard protocols for liver MRI studies and new radiotracers for positron-emission tomography (PET). However, all them are still a matter of research prior to be incorporated in evidence based clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current knowledge about imaging techniques for the early diagnosis and staging of HCC, and it discusses the most relevant open questions.

Phase II randomised trial of autologous tumour lysate dendritic cell plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Autologous tumour lysate dendritic cell vaccine (ADC) has T-cell stimulatory capacity and, therefore, potential antitumour activity. We designed a phase II randomised trial of ADC + best supportive care (BSC) (experimental arm [EA]) compared with BSC (control arm [CA]), in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive mCRC, at least to two chemotherapy regimens and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2, were randomised to EA versus CA. Stratification criteria: ECOG PS (0-1 versus 2) and lactate dehydrogenase (ULN). EA was administered subcutaneously till progressive disease. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included (28 EA/24 CA). An interim analysis recommended early termination for futility. No objective radiological response was observed in EA. Median PFS in EA was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.2 months) versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-2.5 months) in CA (p = 0.628). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.4-7.9 months) in EA versus 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.3-7 months) in CA (p = 0.41). No ADC-related adverse events were reported. Immunization induces tumour-specific T-cell response in 21 of 25 (84%) patients. Responder patients have an OS of 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.4 months) versus 3.8 months (95% CI, 0.6-6.9 months) in non-responders; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our randomised clinical trial comparing ADC + BSC versus BSC in mCRC demonstrates that ADC generates a tumour-specific immune response but not benefit on PFS and OS. Our results do not support the use of ADC alone, in a phase III trial.

Lack of arterial hypervascularity at contrast-enhanced ultrasound should not define the priority for diagnostic work-up of nodules <2 cm.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current guidelines recommend diagnostic work-up for nodules >1cm detected during screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This implies that patients with benign conditions may undergo unnecessary evaluation and those with small nodules may be intervened too early, leading to overdiagnosis. Since increased arterial vascularization is the hallmark of malignancy, its detection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could become the signal to proceed with diagnosis confirmation. The aim was to assess if HCCs <2 cm without arterial hyperenhancement by baseline CEUS have a benign evolutionary profile, suggesting that diagnosis and invasive treatment could be delayed until detection of an overt malignant profile, associated with increased vascularization. METHODS: We prospectively included 168 cirrhotic patients with a newly detected solitary nodule of 5-20mm by screening ultrasonography. MRI, CEUS and fine needle biopsy (FNB) were performed and if no confident diagnosis was obtained, patients were closely followed to rule out HCC. Final diagnosis was: HCC (n = 119), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumour (n = 1) and benign lesions (n = 45). RESULTS: CEUS did not detect contrast hyperenhancement in the arterial phase in 55 cases (34%). Eighteen out of these 55 nodules were diagnosed as HCC. Non-CEUS hyperenhanced HCCs were more frequently well-differentiated than CEUS-hyperenhanced HCCs (p < 0.004). Fourteen patients were treated with ablation and 4 with resection. Ten (55.6%) patients experienced tumour recurrence after treatment, mostly distant, confirming their overt malignant profile. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of contrast hyperenhancement on CEUS during the arterial phase in nodules <2 cm in a cirrhotic liver does not predict a less malignant profile. Accordingly, priority for diagnostic work-up and treatment should not differ according to contrast profiles on CEUS.

Impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the study of hepatic artery hypoperfusion shortly after liver transplantation: contribution to the diagnosis of artery steal syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the absence of hepatic artery signal on Doppler ultrasound (DUS) in the immediate postoperative period after liver transplant. METHODS: This prospective study included 675 consecutive liver transplants. Patients without hepatic artery signal by DUS within 8 days post-transplant were studied with CEUS. If it remained undetectable, a thrombosis was suspected. In patent hepatic artery, a DUS was performed immediately after CEUS; if low resistance flow was detected, an arteriography was indicated. Patients with high resistance waveform underwent DUS+/CEUS follow-up. Arteriography was indicated when abnormal flow persisted for more than 5 days or liver dysfunction appeared. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were studied with CEUS. In 11 patients CEUS correctly diagnosed hepatic artery thrombosis. In two out of 23 non-occluded arteries, a low resistance flow lead to a diagnosis of stenosis/proximal thrombosis. Twenty-one patients had absence of diastolic flow, which normalized in the follow-up in 13 patients. In the remaining eight patients, splenic artery steal syndrome (ASS) was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS allows us to avoid invasive tests in the diagnostic work-up shortly after liver transplant. It identifies the hepatic artery thrombosis and points to a diagnosis of ASS. KEY POINTS: • CEUS is useful in the diagnostic work-up shortly after liver transplant • CEUS identifies the hepatic artery thrombosis with reliability • There is little information about DUS and CEUS findings in the ASS • DUS and CEUS offer functional information useful in the diagnosis of ASS.

Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 2 cm in cirrhosis. Diagnostic accuracy assessing fat, capsule and signal intensity at dynamic MRI.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of the incorporation of additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in those based on contrast enhancement pattern for the diagnosis of solitary nodules between 5 and 20mm, detected during surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Between November 2003 and January 2010, we prospectively included 159 cirrhotic patients with a newly detected solitary nodule between 5 and 20mm in diameter by screening ultrasonography (US). Hepatic MRI and fine-needle biopsy were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Final diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n=103), other malignant lesions (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma/metastases) (n=4), and benign lesions (n=52). The specific enhancement pattern (arterial enhancement followed by washout) yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 58.3% and 96.4%, respectively. Peritumoral capsule was present in 43 HCC and in 2 non-HCC lesions. Intralesional fat was detected in 24 nodules; 5 nodules were non-HCC. Finally, the presence of both capsule and fat was observed in 10 cases, all of them HCC (100% specificity), but all of them also displayed the specific enhancement pattern, thus adding no sensitivity or specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusive non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis should be based only on the contrast enhancement pattern, while other characteristics at MRI do not increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Prospective validation of an immunohistochemical panel (glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 and glutamine synthetase) in liver biopsies for diagnosis of very early hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional pathological analysis fails to achieve sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in small nodules. Immunohistochemical staining for glypican 3 (GPC3), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and glutamine synthetase (GS) has been suggested to allow a confident diagnosis but no prospective study has established the diagnostic accuracy of this approach. The aim of this study is to assess prospectively the diagnostic accuracy of a panel of markers (GPC3, HSP70, GS) for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis with a small (5-20 mm) nodule detected by ultrasound screening. METHODS: Sixty patients with cirrhosis with a single nodule 5-20 mm newly detected by ultrasound were included in the study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance and fine needle biopsy of the nodule (gold standard) were performed; the biopsy was repeated in case of diagnostic failures. Three consecutive sections of the first biopsy sample with meaningful material were stained with antibodies against GPC3, HSP70 and GS. RESULTS: Forty patients were diagnosed with HCC. The sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis were: GPC3 57.5% and 95%, HSP70 57.5% and 85%, GS 50% and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the different combinations were: GPC3+HSP70 40% and 100%; GPC3+GS 35% and 100%; HSP70+GS 35% and 100%; GPC3+HSP70+GS 25% and 100%. When at least two of the markers were positive (regardless of which), the sensitivity and specificity were 60% and 100%, respectively. Conventional pathological analysis yielded three false negative results, but the addition of this panel only correctly classified one of these cases as HCC. CONCLUSION: These data within a prospective study establish the clinical usefulness of this panel of markers for the diagnosis of early HCC. However, the panel only slightly increases the diagnostic accuracy in an expert setting.

Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis patients may display a vascular pattern similar to hepatocellular carcinoma on contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to describe the imaging features by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in cirrhosis patients. We registered the CEUS images of cirrhosis patients with histologically confirmed ICC. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to confirm the diagnosis and/or staging purposes. A total of 21 patients met all the criteria to be included in the study. The median nodule size was 32 mm. All nodules showed contrast enhancement at arterial phase; in 10 cases it was homogeneous and in 11 cases peripheral (rim-like). All nodules displayed washout during the venous phases; it appeared during the first 60 seconds in 10 nodules, between 60-120 seconds in five cases, and in six cases after 2 minutes. Ten nodules (five larger than 2 cm) displayed homogeneous contrast uptake followed by washout and they correspond to the specific pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria. However, none of these lesions displayed washout on MRI. CONCLUSION: CEUS should not be used as the sole imaging technique for conclusive hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and if the MRI does not display the diagnostic vascular pattern, a confirmatory biopsy is mandatory.

Percutaneous ethanol injection before liver transplantation in the hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The study evaluates the outcome of patients who performed orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) while on the waiting list, verifying the effectiveness of this treatment in producing tumor necrosis and avoiding dropout and identifying treatment-related complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 97 patients on the waiting list for LT at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona were examined. Sixty-two (56.3%) patients had been treated with PEI (group 1); 35 (31.8%) had not received any anti-tumor therapy before LT (group 2). RESULTS: Complete necrosis of the tumor was observed in 38/59 (64.3%) patients. The presence of additional nodules in the explant and the diameter of the main tumor of group 1 was significantly lower than in group 2 (p = 0.002). Dropout related to tumor progression occurred in 4.8% and 8.5%, and tumor recurrence in 5% and 6.2% for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Major complications were not evidenced after 421 PEI sessions and there was no tumor implant in the needle traject. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the percutaneous treatment of HCC with PEI is a safe and effective method before the LT.

Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable?

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of response to treatment is a key aspect in cancer therapy. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are used in most oncology trials, but those criteria evaluate only unidimensional tumor measurements and disregard the extent of necrosis, which is the target of all effective locoregional therapies. Therefore, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommended that assessment of tumor response should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden. The current report provides an assessment of the agreement/concordance between both RECIST and the EASL guidelines for the evaluation of response to therapy. METHODS: The authors evaluated a cohort of 55 patients within prospective studies, including 24 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and 31 patients who underwent percutaneous ablation (percutaneous ethanol injection [PEI]/radiofrequency [RF]). Triphasic helical computed tomography scans were performed at baseline, at 1 month, and at 3 months after procedure, and 2 independent radiologists evaluated tumor response. RESULTS: Evaluating response according to RECIST criteria, no patients achieved a complete response (CR), 21.8% of patients achieved a partial response (PR) (none in the PEI/RF group), 47.3% of patients had stable disease (SD), and 30.9% of patients had progressive disease (PD). When response was evaluated according to the EASL guidelines, 54.5% of patients achieved a CR, 27.3% of patients achieved a PR, 3.6% of patients had SD, and 14.5% had PD. The kappa coefficient was 0.193 (95% confidence interval, 0.0893-0.2967; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: RECIST missed all CRs and underestimated the extent of partial tumor response because of tissue necrosis, wrongly assessing the therapeutic efficacy of locoregional therapies. This evaluation should incorporate the reduction in viable tumor burden as recognized by nonenhanced areas on dynamic imaging studies.

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: the high accuracy of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of response to percutaneous treatment.

Image-guided tumor ablation has a major role in the therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma and the assessment of the efficacy of percutaneous ablation is crucial for the management of cirrhotic patients. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is extremely sensitive in detecting the intratumoral microvasculature in real time, with the same sensitivity in the detection of residual HCC as CT. CEUS has some advantages. It can be used before and during the ablative procedure as a guide for percutaneous needle placement. Moreover, CEUS can be performed almost immediately after ablation to determine whether the tumor has been completely ablated or needs additional treatment that can be performed in the same session, improving the cost-effectiveness of the treatment.

Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a blood-pool sonographic contrast agent in the late phase compared with the three vascular phases for differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 152 patients (105 with chronic liver disease), 152 solid focal liver lesions characterized either by fine-needle biopsy or by dynamic CT or MRI were studied. The final diagnoses were metastasis for 24, hepatocellular carcinoma for 75, focal nodular hyperplasia for 13, regenerating or dysplastic nodule for 14, hemangioma for 22, cholangiocarcinoma for two, and another focal liver lesion for two. Real-time sonography was performed after a bolus injection of 2.4 mL of SonoVue, using a low mechanical index (< 0.2). All lesions were evaluated in the arterial, portal, and late phases; classified as benign or malignant; and correlated with final diagnoses. RESULTS: For discrimination between malignant and benign focal liver lesions, evaluation of all vascular phases improved the sensitivity from 78.4% to 98% and the accuracy from 80.9% to 92.7%, compared with evaluation of the late phase alone. The increase in accuracy was higher in patients with chronic liver disease (16.3%) than in those without (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Evaluation of SonoVue enhancement in all three vascular phases is superior to evaluation of SonoVue enhancement in the late phase alone, especially in patients with chronic liver disease.

Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation.

The appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the vascular phase is described and evaluated as to whether the enhancement pattern correlates with the degree of cellular differentiation. One hundred four HCCs were prospectively evaluated with CEUS using coherent-contrast imaging (CCI) and SonoVue with a low mechanical index (<0.2). The enhancement of HCCs in the vascular phase was analyzed according to the degree of pathological differentiation obtained by fine-needle biopsy. In the arterial phase, all HCCs except for four well differentiated ones (96.2%) showed enhancement ( P<0.05). Histological differentiation of hypoechoic lesions in the early portal phase (7 HCCs; 16%) significantly differed from hyperechoic (1 HCC; 1%) or isoechoic lesions (87 HCCs; 83.6%) ( P<0.05), with a significant probability of a worse differentiation in hypoechoic lesions. Histological differentiation of isoechoic lesions in the late phase (30 HCCs; 28.8%) significantly differed from hypoechoic lesions (74 HCCs; 71.2%) ( P<0.05), with a significant probability of a better differentiation in isoechoic lesions. CEUS using CCI and SonoVue revealed enhancement in the arterial phase in >95% of HCCs, with a few well-differentiated cases not being diagnosed due to the absence of enhancement. Echogenicity in the portal and late phases correlated with cellular differentiation.

Effects of metformin or gemfibrozil on the lipodystrophy of HIV-infected patients receiving protease inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Hypertriglyceridaemia and insulin resistance are common in HIV-infected patients treated with protease inhibitors, particularly in those with lipodystrophy. Whether a therapeutic approach addressed to those metabolic abnormalities may have any impact on body fat is not clear. METHODS: Patients on stable antiretroviral therapy containing protease inhibitors, with abdominal obesity defined by increased waist-to-hip ratio, and plasma triglycerides >200 mg/dl, were randomized to receive blind medication consisting of metformin 850 mg, gemfibrozil 600 mg or placebo every 12 h for 1 year. Weight, height, waist and hip were measured, and fasting blood analyses, including at least CD4 cell count, plasma HIV-1 RNA, lactate, glucose, insulin, triglycerides, total, HDL and LDL cholesterol were performed at baseline and every 3 months. An oral glucose tolerance test, and assessments of total and regional fat by bioimpedance analysis and sonography, respectively, were also done at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-eight patients were randomized to placebo (n=36), gemfibrozil (n=37) or metformin (n=35). There was absolute loss of total and regional fat in the three arms without significant changes in the waist-to-hip ratio. However, the loss of fat in patients on gemfibrozil was significantly lower than in patients on placebo. No patient discontinued study drugs due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: In this population of HIV-infected patients, there was a loss of fat along time. The finding of relative preservation of fat associated with gemfibrozil therapy deserves further investigation in the search of potential effective therapies for lipodystrophy in HIV-infected subjects.

Significance of and contributing factors for a high resistive index on Doppler sonography of the hepatic artery immediately after surgery: prognostic implications for liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to investigate the contributing factors, clinical repercussions, and implications for prognosis of high-resistance flow at the hepatic artery detected on Doppler sonography during the period immediately after orthotopic liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the transplanted livers of 90 patients who had been examined on Doppler sonography within the first 3 days after grafting. Seventeen variables from organ donors, transplant recipients, graft characteristics, and surgical procedures were investigated. Early clinical evolution was also analyzed. Follow-up was performed for 5 years. RESULTS: Forty-one (45.6%) of the 90 patients showed a high resistive index at the hepatic artery during the first 72 hr after transplantation. Two factors showed a statistically significant effect on the occurrence of a high resistive index at the hepatic artery immediately after transplantation: an older liver donor (p = 0.008) and extended preservation time (p = 0.005). No relation with early graft function was detected. The incidence of bile duct complications, retransplantation, or death was not higher at follow-up in patients with high-resistance flow than in those with normal flow. CONCLUSION: High-resistance flow at the hepatic artery detected on Doppler sonography during the period immediately after transplantation is a frequent finding and is related to older donor age and prolonged period of ischemia. This finding has neither significant clinical repercussions nor prognosis implications for early and long-term follow-up.