Perioperative analgesia after intrathecal fentanyl and morphine or morphine alone for cesarean section: A randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Intrathecal morphine is used in the postoperative management of pain after caesarean section (CS), but might not be optimal for intraoperative analgesia. We hypothesized that intrathecal fentanyl could supplement intraoperative analgesia when added to a local anesthetic and morphine without affecting management of postoperative pain. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study included 60 parturients scheduled for elective CS. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with either morphine 100 µg (M group), or fentanyl 25 µg and morphine 100 µg (FM group). The frequency of intraoperative pain and pethidine consumption in the 24 hours postoperatively was recorded. RESULTS: Fewer patients in the FM group required additional intraoperative analgesia (P < .01, relative risk 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-1.04). The FM group was noninferior to the M group for 24-hour opioid consumption (95% CI -10.0 mg to 45.7 mg, which was below the prespecified boundary of 50 mg). Pethidine consumption in postoperative hours 1 to 12 was significantly higher in the FM group (P = .02). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were more common in the FM group (P = .01). Visual analog scale scores, effective analgesia, Apgar scores, and rates of pruritus and respiratory depression were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal combination of fentanyl and morphine may provide better perioperative analgesia than morphine alone in CS and could be useful when the time from anesthesia to skin incision is short. However, an increase in PONV and possible acute spinal opioid tolerance after addition of intrathecal fentanyl warrants further investigation using lower doses of fentanyl.

Analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl during the period of highest analgesic demand after cesarean section: A randomized controlled study.

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgical procedures in female patients. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl during the period of greatest postoperative analgesic demand after CS. This period was defined by detailed analysis of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) usage.This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized trial included 60 parturients who were scheduled for elective CS. Participants received spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine supplemented with normal saline (control group) or with fentanyl 25 µg (fentanyl group). To evaluate primary endpoints, we measured total pethidine consumption over the period of greatest PCA pethidine requirement. For verification of secondary endpoints, we recorded intravenous PCA requirement in other time windows, duration of effective analgesia, pain scores assessed by visual analog scale, opioid side effects, hemodynamic changes, neonatal Apgar scores, and intraoperative pain.Detailed analysis of hour-by-hour PCA opioid requirements showed that the greatest demand for analgesics among patients in the control group occurred during the first 12 hours after surgery. Patients in the fentanyl group had significantly reduced opioid consumption compared with the controls during this period and had a prolonged duration of effective analgesia. The groups were similar in visual analog scale, incidence of analgesia-related side effects (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, oversedation, and respiratory depression), and neonatal Apgar scores. Mild respiratory depression occurred in 1 patient in each group. Fewer patients experienced intraoperative pain in the fentanyl group (3% vs 23%; relative risk 6.8, 95% confidence interval 0.9-51.6).The requirement for postoperative analgesics is greatest during the first 12 hours after induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing CS. The addition of intrathecal fentanyl to spinal anesthesia is effective for intraoperative analgesia and decreases opioid consumption during the period of the highest analgesic demand after CS, without an increase in maternal or neonatal side effects. We recommend using intrathecal fentanyl for CS in medical centers not using morphine or other opioids intrathecally at present.

Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus plexus block. Part 1--basic sonoanatomy.

Axillary brachial plexus block is one of the most popular and widely used approaches for brachial plexus blocks. Its main advantages are its versatility and high safety. Brachial block facilitates analgesia for the distal arm, elbow, forearm and hand. Numerous upper limb procedures, particularly orthopedic ones, can be carried out under axillary block. Axillary block is well suited for the ultrasound-guided technique. Because the brachial plexus in the axillary region is located superficially, the nerves, block needle, and local anesthetic spread are all relatively easy to visualize. A high-frequency linear probe can be used during block procedure, so the quality and resolution of the ultrasound images are excellent. An important feature of the axillary approach is its high level of safety. In the axillary area, there are no anatomical structures other than vessels, to which damage during block placement could pose a risk for the patient. For this reason, axillary block is one of the techniques that are recommended for learning ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. This paper summarizes anatomical fundamentals and provides basic sonoanatomic knowledge that is essential for successful ultrasound-guided axillary block.

Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus plexus block. Part 2 - technical issues.

Axillary brachial plexus block is one of the most frequently employed peripheral blocks. The popularity of axillary block stems from its success as a safe and relatively easy technique with numerous applications. The technique of axillary block has evolved. It was modified after the development of precise nerve localization modalities. Currently, ultrasound is the most important localization technique for regional anaesthesia. Ultrasound-guided axillary block encompasses a spectrum of techniques. The selection of a specific technique can be adjusted to an operator's individual level of skill and proficiency. Axillary block under US-guidance can be performed using a traditional perivascular method and by placing a selective blockade of individual nerves that supply the surgical area. Regardless of the selected method, it enables the incorporation of individual patient anatomical variation in an anaesthesia plan. This paper discusses the technical details and efficacy issues of US-guided axillary brachial plexus block techniques.

The substantial impact of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia on the clinical practice of peripheral nerve blocks.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided (US-guided) regional anaesthesia has gained worldwide popularity in recent years owing to the benefits the method offers to patients. The 1st Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care of Warsaw Medical University was one of the first centres in Poland to employ US-guided peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) on a routine basis. The technique was incorporated into the institution's clinical practice from 2007. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess changes in the clinical practice of US-guided versus non US-guided PNBs over six years of experience with the technique. METHODS: Retrospective analysis assessing the prevalence of PNB methods, local anaesthetic (LA) injection techniques (i.e. single injection vs. multiple), LA volumes used, success rates and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: This study included 4,066 PNBs performed between January 2006 and June 2012. The results showed systematic growth in the prevalence of US-guided blocks in the total number of PNBs, from 8.6% in 2007 up to 53.3% in 2012. The mean LA volume used in PNB was significantly lower in US-guided blocks compared to traditional PNB techniques (respectively, 21.83 mL vs. 31.41 mL, P < 0.05) without a decrease in the success rate (respectively, 76% vs. 74%, P > 0.05). A shift in the prevailing block technique from single injection to multiple injections was observed, regardless of the nerve location technique employed (from 29% up to 84% of PNBs performed using multiple injection technique). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound optimizes the technique of peripheral blocks and the amount of local anaesthetic used. Ultrasonography does not affect the safety of peripheral blocks.

[Comparative study of postoperative analgesia after intrathecal administration of bupivacaine with fentanyl or morphine for elective Caesarean section]. / Analiza porównawcza podpajeczynówkowego zastosowania fentanylu lub morfiny w terapii bólu po operacji ciecia cesarskiego.

BACKGROUND: Various opioids have been recommended for spinal anaesthesia during Caesarean section. The aim of this prospective randomized, double-blind study was to compare the quality of postoperative analgesia and adverse effects after intrathecal administration of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) combined with either morphine or fentanyl. METHODS: Sixty parturients were randomly allocated to receive intrathecally, 7.5-15 mg of HB with either 25 microg fentanyl (group F), or 100 microg morphine (group M). All women received 100 mg ketoprofen at 2 and 14 h after surgery, and 1.0 g paracetamol at 2, 8, 14 and 20 h after surgery. Additionally, meperidine was offered as a rescue analgesic via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). During the first 24 h after surgery, pain intensity was evaluated using a VAS score, meperidine consumption was noted, and possible side effects were assessed. RESULTS: Mean PCA meperidine consumption was 47 mg and 130 mg, for groups M and F, respectively. Intrathecal morphine significantly prolonged the time to first PCA use, when compared to fentanyl. The mean VAS score was lower in group M. Pruritus was more frequently observed in group M. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both intrathecal morphine and fentanyl significantly reduced the intensity of postoperative pain. Morphine increased the duration of postoperative analgesia and reduced the demand for rescue meperidine.