Aortic Healing Appears to Occur Rapidly after Successful Endovascular Sealing of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: The traumatic nature of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) would suggest that healing of the aorta would occur once the injured area is shielded from aortic pressure. This would be in contrast to degenerative aortic diseases which often continue to degenerate despite coverage. We hypothesize that after successful thoracic aortic endografting (TEVAR) that the aorta rapidly heals itself leaving minimal to no trace of the residual injury. METHODS: BTAI that were successfully covered with TEVAR from 2006 to 2019 were collected. Those with failed sealing or a lack of follow-up scans were excluded. Centerline aortic diameters were measured at healthy aorta 1 cm above (D1) and below the injury (D3) and at the widest point of injury (D2) on preoperative and initial postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Postoperative CTs were examined for residual signs of aortic injury including residual periaortic hematoma, persistent thrombosed pseudoaneurysm, or thickened aortic wall. Diameter changes in the healthy and injured aortic segments were compared pre and post TEVAR. Aortic diameter changes were analyzed with the Student's t-test. RESULTS: Twenty four patients were identified with sealed BTAI. The mean graft diameter was 24.2 ± 3.2 mm with oversizing of 10.74 ± 6.1 % at D1 and 19.52 ± 10.22 % at D3. Postoperative CTs occurred at 61.25 ± 123.6 days with one outlier at 602 days. Injured aortic segments (D2) had significantly larger diameters compared to D1 (28.94 ± 5.08 mm vs. 22.14 ± 3.08 mm, P < 0.001). After TEVAR, 23/24 (95.8%) had no residual radiographic evidence of aortic injury by 2 months. One patient had a persistent thrombosed pseudoaneurysm likely due to more than 50% disruption of the aortic wall. Post TEVAR, there was a significant diameter reduction at D2 by 13.8% (29.10 ± 5.27 mm vs. 24.8 ± 4.2 mm, P < 0.001) which was within 2.45% of the mean stent graft diameter. The healthy aorta dilated to accommodate the graft by 9% at D1 (21.9 ± 3.0 vs. 23.7 ± 2.5 mm, P < 0.001) and 17% at D3 (20.6 ± 3.4 mm vs. 23.6 ± 3.2 mm, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR promotes rapid aortic healing in BTAI with no evidence of residual aortic injury suggesting that a long-term seal is not necessary. The healthy aorta dilates to the stent graft size, as expected, whereas the injured aortic segment heals around the stent graft and assumes its diameter as well. Massive disruption of the aortic wall may preclude early healing.

Biomedical Perspectives of Acute and Chronic Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of COVID-19.

The incidence of infections from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiologic agent for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has dramatically escalated following the initial outbreak in China, in late 2019, resulting in a global pandemic with millions of deaths. Although the majority of infected patients survive, and the rapid advent and deployment of vaccines have afforded increased immunity against SARS-CoV-2, long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection have become increasingly recognized. These include, but are not limited to, chronic pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disorders, and proinflammatory-associated neurological dysfunction that may lead to psychological and neurocognitive impairment. A major component of cognitive dysfunction is operationally categorized as "brain fog" which comprises difficulty concentrating, forgetfulness, confusion, depression, and fatigue. Multiple parameters associated with long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been detailed in clinical studies. Empirically elucidated mechanisms associated with the neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 are by nature complex, but broad-based working models have focused on mitochondrial dysregulation, leading to systemic reductions of metabolic activity and cellular bioenergetics within the CNS structures. Multiple factors underlying the expression of brain fog may facilitate future pathogenic insults, leading to repetitive cycles of viral and bacterial propagation. Interestingly, diverse neurocognitive sequelae associated with COVID-19 are not dissimilar from those observed in other historical pandemics, thereby providing a broad and integrative perspective on potential common mechanisms of CNS dysfunction subsequent to viral infection. Poor mental health status may be reciprocally linked to compromised immune processes and enhanced susceptibility to infection by diverse pathogens. By extrapolation, we contend that COVID-19 may potentiate the severity of neurological/neurocognitive deficits in patients afflicted by well-studied neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Accordingly, the prevention, diagnosis, and management of sustained neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 are pivotal health care directives and provide a compelling rationale for careful monitoring of infected patients, as early mitigation efforts may reduce short- and long-term complications.

SAVE score with lactate modification predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest during VA-ECMO cannulation.

The survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation score and its lactate modification predict in-hospital mortality in patients based on pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation variables. Cardiac arrest history is a significant variable in these scores; however, patients with ongoing cardiac arrest during cannulation were excluded from these models. The goal of this study is to validate the survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation score with a lactate modification among patients with ongoing cardiac arrest. In our study, the survival after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation score predicted mortality in all patients, but did so with higher discrimination among ongoing cardiac arrest patients with a lactate modification.

Towards rapid intraoperative axial localization of spinal cord ischemia with epidural diffuse correlation monitoring.

Spinal cord ischemia leads to iatrogenic injury in multiple surgical fields, and the ability to immediately identify onset and anatomic origin of ischemia is critical to its management. Current clinical monitoring, however, does not directly measure spinal cord blood flow, resulting in poor sensitivity/specificity, delayed alerts, and delayed intervention. We have developed an epidural device employing diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) to monitor spinal cord ischemia continuously at multiple positions. We investigate the ability of this device to localize spinal cord ischemia in a porcine model and validate DCS versus Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF). Specifically, we demonstrate continuous (>0.1Hz) spatially resolved (3 locations) monitoring of spinal cord blood flow in a purely ischemic model with an epidural DCS probe. Changes in blood flow measured by DCS and LDF were highly correlated (r = 0.83). Spinal cord blood flow measured by DCS caudal to aortic occlusion decreased 62%. This monitor demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.91 for detection of a 25% decrease in flow. This technology may enable early identification and critically important localization of spinal cord ischemia.

Survival and Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest With VA-ECMO Rescue Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in patients with cardiac arrest is increasing. Utilization remains variable between centers using ECMO as a rescue therapy or early protocolized extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective evaluation of cardiac arrest with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and rescue ECMO support from 2011 through 2019. Study objectives included survival, non-neurologic, and neurologic outcomes; validation of the SAVE and modified SAVE (mSAVE) scores for survival and favorable neurologic outcome; and predictive factor identification in cardiac arrest with ECMO rescue therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included. In-hospital survival was 38.2% and median CPC score was 2. Survivors had lower BMI (27.9 ±â€Š4.2 kg/m2 vs. 32.3 ±â€Š7.5 kg/m2, P = 0.003), less obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) (26.5% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.035), shorter CPR duration (35.5 ±â€Š31.7 m vs. 58.0 ±â€Š49.5 m, P = 0.019), more tracheostomy (38.2% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.001), and less renal replacement therapy (RRT) (17.6% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.031). Patients with a favorable neurologic outcome had lower body weight (86.2 ±â€Š17.9 kg vs. 98.1 ±â€Š19.4 kg, P = 0.010), lower BMI (28.1 ±â€Š4.5 kg/m2 vs. 33.9 ±â€Š7.9 kg/m2, P < 0.001), and less obesity (29.7% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.026). mSAVE score predicted in-hospital survival (OR 1.11; 95%CI 1.03-1.19; P = 0.004) and favorable neurologic outcome (OR 1.11; 1.03-1.20; P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis for in-hospital survival included mSAVE, BMI, CPR-time, tracheostomy, and RRT (c-statistic: 0.864). Favorable neurologic outcome included mSAVE and BMI (c-statistic: 0.805). CONCLUSIONS: mSAVE, BMI, RRT, and tracheostomy are predictors of in-hospital survival and mSAVE and BMI are predictors of favorable neurologic outcome in cardiac arrest with ECMO rescue therapy.

Multicenter Study of Metastatic Lung Tumors Targeted by Interventional Cryoablation Evaluation (SOLSTICE).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and local recurrence-free survival in patients after cryoablation for treatment of pulmonary metastases. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study included 128 patients with 224 lung metastases treated with percutaneous cryoablation, with 12 and 24 months of follow-up. The patients were enrolled on the basis of the outlined key inclusion criteria, which include one to six metastases from extrapulmonary cancers with a maximal diameter of 3.5 cm. Time to progression of the index tumor(s), metastatic disease, and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Complications were captured for 30 days after the procedure, and changes in performance status and quality of life were also evaluated. RESULTS: Median size of metastases was 1.0 plus or minus 0.6 cm (0.2-4.5) with a median number of tumors of 1.0 plus or minus 1.2 cm (one to six). Local recurrence-free response (local tumor efficacy) of the treated tumor was 172 of 202 (85.1%) at 12 months and 139 of 180 (77.2%) at 24 months after the initial treatment. After a second cryoablation treatment for recurrent tumor, secondary local recurrence-free response (local tumor efficacy) was 184 of 202 (91.1%) at 12 months and 152 of 180 (84.4%) at 24 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 97.6% (95% confidence interval: 92.6-99.2) and 86.6% (95% confidence interval: 78.7-91.7), respectively. Rate of pneumothorax that required pleural catheter placement was 26% (44/169). There were eight grade 3 complication events in 169 procedures (4.7%) and one (0.6%) grade 4 event. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation is a safe and effective treatment for pulmonary metastases.

Endovascular Repair of the Ascending Aorta for an Anastomotic Saphenous Vein Graft Aneurysm.

The ascending aorta is the final segment of the aorta to be explored with endovascular stent grafts. With a patient population of increasingly advanced age and disease, there are situations where traditional open repair for ascending aneurysms or dissections may be prohibitive. However, the ascending aorta has multiple hostile characteristics that make endovascular treatment challenging. There is also a lack of approved specialized devices in the United States for this aortic territory. We demonstrate the feasibility of adapting an abdominal aortic graft to the ascending aorta for the treatment of a saphenous vein graft aneurysm with a discussion of the technical considerations for the operation.

Endovascular Thoracic Aortic Repair for Catheter Associated Aortic Injury During Thoracostomy Tube Placement.

BACKGROUND: Aortic injuries during non-aortic related procedures are rare but potentially catastrophic. Endovascular aortic repair has been described as a viable option in similar circumstances. However, most reports involve aortic injury from orthopaedic hardware after spine surgery or trocar injury during abdominal surgery. REPORT: This is a report of a thoracic aortic injury during thoracostomy tube placement and summary of the management paradigm. The patient was treated with a thoracic stent graft and was seen at four-month follow up, with imaging showing the endograft in stable position. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stenting can increase the treatment scope for management of emergent thoracic aortic pathology.

Will That Pulmonary Nodule Become Cancerous? A Risk Prediction Model for Incident Lung Cancer.

This prospective investigation derived a prediction model for identifying risk of incident lung cancer among patients with visible lung nodules identified on computed tomography (CT). Among 2,924 eligible patients referred for evaluation of a pulmonary nodule to the Stony Brook Lung Cancer Evaluation Center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2015, 171 developed incident lung cancer during the observation period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model time until disease onset. The sample was randomly divided into discovery (n = 1,469) and replication (n = 1,455) samples. In the replication sample, concordance was computed to indicate predictive accuracy and risk scores were calculated using the linear predictions. Youden index was used to identify high-risk versus low-risk patients and cumulative lung cancer incidence was examined for high-risk and low-risk groups. Multivariable analyses identified a combination of clinical and radiologic predictors for incident lung cancer including ln-age, ln-pack-years smoking, a history of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and several radiologic markers including spiculation, ground glass opacity, and nodule size. The final model reliably detected patients who developed lung cancer in the replication sample (C = 0.86, sensitivity/specificity = 0.73/0.81). Cumulative incidence of lung cancer was elevated in high-risk versus low-risk groups [HR = 14.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.17-25.18]. Quantification of reliable risk scores has high clinical utility, enabling physicians to better stratify treatment protocols to manage patient care. The final model is among the first tools developed to predict incident lung cancer in patients presenting with a concerning pulmonary nodule.

Exercise Capacity in Unilateral Diaphragm Paralysis: The Effect of Obesity.

PURPOSE: Healthy patients with unilateral diaphragm paralysis (UDP) are often asymptomatic; those with UDP and comorbidities that increase work of breathing are often dyspneic. We report the effect of obesity on exercise capacity in UDP patients. METHODS: All obese and nonobese patients with UDP undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during a 32-month period in the exercise laboratory of an academic hospital were compared to a retrospectively identified cohort of obese and nonobese controls without UDP, matched for key features. CPET used a modified Bruce treadmill protocol with breath-to-breath expired gas analysis. O2 uptake, minute ventilation, exercise time, and work rate were recorded at peak exercise. Static pulmonary functions were measured. Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Stratified linear regression was used to quantify the effect of UDP and obesity on CPET variables. RESULTS: Twenty-two UDP patients and 46 controls were studied. The BMI of obese and nonobese patients was 33.0±4.2 and 25.8±2.4 kg/m2, respectively. UDP subjects with obesity, compared to controls with neither condition, showed significantly reduced peak O2 uptake normalized to actual body weight (1.57±0.64 versus 2.01±0.88 L/min), shorter exercise time (5.7±2.0 versus 8.5±2.9 minutes), and lower peak ventilation. This was not observed in UDP alone or obesity alone. Peak work rate trended lower in the combined UDP-obesity group. CONCLUSION: Neither UDP nor obesity alone significantly reduced exercise capacity. Superimposed UDP and obesity interact to create a ventilatory limitation to exercise, with reduced peak-VO2, exercise time, and work rate.

A Feasibility Study of Extracting Tissue Textures From a Previous Full-Dose CT Database as Prior Knowledge for Bayesian Reconstruction of Current Low-Dose CT Images.

Markov random field (MRF) has been widely used to incorporate a priori knowledge as penalty or regularizer to preserve edge sharpness while smoothing the region enclosed by the edge for pieces-wise smooth image reconstruction. In our earlier study, we proposed a type of MRF reconstruction method for low-dose CT (LdCT) scans using tissue-specific textures extracted from the same patient's previous full-dose CT (FdCT) scans as prior knowledge. It showed advantages in clinical applications. This paper aims to remove the constraint of using previous data of the same patient. We investigated the feasibility of extracting the tissue-specific MRF textures from an FdCT database to reconstruct a LdCT image of another patient. This feasibility study was carried out by experiments designed as follows. We constructed a tissue-specific MRF-texture database from 3990 FdCT scan slices of 133 patients who were scheduled for lung nodule biopsy. Each patient had one FdCT scan (120 kVp/100 mAs) and one LdCT scan (120 kVp/20 mAs) prior to biopsy procedure. When reconstructing the LdCT image of one patient among the 133 patients, we ranked the closeness of the MRF-textures from the other 132 patients saved in the database and used them as the a prior knowledge. Then, we evaluated the reconstructed image quality using Haralick texture measures. For any patient within our database, we found more than eighteen patients' FdCT MRF texures can be used without noticeably changing the Haralick texture measures on the lung nodules (to be biopsied). These experimental outcomes indicate it is promising that a sizable FdCT texture database could be used to enhance Bayesian reconstructions of any incoming LdCT scans.

Survival Outcomes Among Lung Cancer Patients Treated Using a Multidisciplinary Team Approach.

BACKGROUND: Evidence favoring a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in the treatment of lung cancer is scarce, especially in the United States. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate survival outcomes of lung cancer patients treated with an MDT compared with a traditional care model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Stony Brook Cancer Center Registry was used to identify all lung cancer cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2016. We compared survival outcomes among 1956 lung cancer patients participating in our institution's Lung Cancer Evaluation Center's (LCEC) MDT program and 2315 lung cancer patients receiving traditional care. Log-ranks tests were used to evaluate differences in the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival outcomes between the 2 groups. To address inherent biases, Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the effects on survival outcomes and adjust for possible confounders. Propensity matching was also performed to account for the effects of selection bias. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates in the propensity-matched sample were one third greater among LCEC patients compared with those receiving a traditional care approach (33.6% vs. 23.0%; P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariable propensity-matched analyses, the LCEC model demonstrated a significant beneficial effect on 5-year survival outcomes compared with the standard treatment model (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.77). CONCLUSION: The results of the present investigation suggest an improved survival benefit from usage of an MDT model versus a traditional care model in the treatment of lung cancer. Despite the use of sophisticated statistical methods to mitigate bias in a nonrandomized study, additional research is needed to determine the extent to which an MDT approach for lung cancer influences patient outcomes.

Single- Versus Multicenter Surgeons' Risk-Adjusted Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedural Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, 460+ hospital mergers have occurred in the United States, rerouting historical coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) referral patterns. The goals of this study were: (1) to compare risk-adjusted CABG outcomes between single-center versus multicenter surgeons; and (2) for multicenter surgeons, to evaluate the risk-adjusted outcomes between their home (primary) versus satellite (secondary) hospitals. METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, nonemergent, first-time CABG procedures (n = 543,403) performed in the US between 2011 and 2014 were extracted across 1,120 centers and for 2,676 surgeons. Surgeons were classified as multicenter if they performed operations at two separate hospitals for ≥ 2 consecutive quarters; their home hospital was identified as their highest volume center. Observed-to-expected outcome ratios were reported using approved multivariable risk models for 30-day operative mortality and major morbidity. RESULTS: Of 2,676 cardiac surgeons, 668 (25.0%) operated at multiple centers. The observed-to-expected mortality ratios were 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.12) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.00) for multi- and single-center surgeons (p < 0.001). For multicenter surgeons, the observed-to-expected mortality ratios were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27) versus 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.07), p < 0.001, for their satellite versus home facilities, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single-center surgeons performing CABG had lower risk-adjusted outcome rates compared with multicenter surgeons, who performed better at their home versus satellite hospitals. To improve future quality of care, surgeons, health care networks, and health policy makers should now more closely scrutinize their single versus multicenter performance.

Geographic Variations in Lung Cancer Lobectomy Outcomes: The General Thoracic Surgery Database.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer ranks as the top cancer killer in the United States. Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD), the geographic variability of lung cancer lobectomy for operative mortality and major morbidity were examined. METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2015, the GTSD lung cancer lobectomy records (excluding robotic procedures) were assigned to a US Census region using hospital location. Surgeons performing fewer than seven lung cancer lobectomies per year were categorized as "low volume." The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group criteria were used to classify patients as "high risk." Applying the published GTSD risk algorithms, regional unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were computed using univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression. Across geographic regions, patient risk factors and outcomes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2015, there were 39,078 lung cancer lobectomies that met study inclusion criteria (31.5% Northeast, 23.5% Midwest, 31.1% South, and 14.0% West). Fewer high-risk cases were seen in the West region (18.9% Northeast, 19.6% Midwest, 19.9% South, and 15.9% West; p < 0.001). Across geographic regions, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of low-volume surgeons (39.8% Northeast, 44.8% Midwest, 45.8% South, and 56.3% West; p = 0.0512). Adjusted odds ratios for operative mortality and major perioperative morbidity did not show statistically significant differences across regions (p = 0.761 and p = 0.600, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite geographic variations in the proportion of high-risk lobectomies, the risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity outcomes did not vary by region.

Perception of Chemical Venous Thromboprophylaxis for Oncologic Lung Resections among Thoracic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Controversies on chemical venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis in patients undergoing lung resection for malignancy exist. The available guidelines on VTE do not specifically address its prophylaxis in patients undergoing oncologic lung resections. The goal of this survey was to evaluate the perception of VTE prophylaxis among thoracic surgeons performing these operations. METHODS: A self-reported online survey was distributed to 267 active members of the General Thoracic Surgical Club between July and September 2015. The survey consisted of 22 questions related to the use of chemical venous thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing oncologic lung resection and their impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-six thoracic surgeons replied to the survey. The majority of these surgeons (57%) perform both open and thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer. All respondents stated that treatment modality and extent of surgical resection have no influence on their decision to use chemical VTE prophylaxis. Twenty-two (39%) respondents do not use chemical VTE prophylaxis prior to their oncologic lung resections, while the remaining 34 (61%) reported use of anticoagulants prior to them. None of the respondents prescribe extended 30-day VTE prophylaxis to these patients. Forty-nine (87%) respondents believe that chemical VTE prophylaxis is not related to major postoperative bleeding episodes. Forty-five (81%) respondents reported that none of their reoperations for bleeding were secondary to VTE prophylaxis or if it was, that isolated event could be successfully managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of thoracic surgeons surveyed believe that chemical VTE prophylaxis is safe and should be used regardless of the magnitude of oncologic lung resections whenever possible. Extended 30-day VTE prophylaxis is not yet used by the survey respondents.

Evaluating efficacy of current lung cancer screening guidelines.

Objective Current lung cancer screening criteria based primarily on outcomes from the National Lung Screening Trial may not adequately capture all subgroups of the population at risk. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in identifying known cases of lung cancer. Methods An investigation of the Stony Brook Cancer Center Lung Cancer Evaluation Center's database identified 1207 eligible, biopsy-proven lung cancer cases diagnosed between January 1996 and March 2016. Age at diagnosis, smoking history, and other known risk factors for lung cancer were used to determine the proportion of cases that would have met current United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network eligibility requirements for lung cancer screening. Results Of the 1046 ever smokers in the study, 40% did not meet the National Lung Screening Trial age requirements, 20% did not have a ≥30 pack year smoking history, and approximately one-third quit smoking >15 years before diagnosis, thus deeming them ineligible for screening. Applying the United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network eligibility criteria to the Stony Brook Cancer Center's Lung Cancer Evaluation Center cases, 49.2, 46.3, and 69.8%, respectively, would have met the current lung cancer screening guidelines. Conclusions The United States Preventive Services Task Force and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening captured less than 50% of lung cancer cases in this investigation. These findings highlight the need to reevaluate the efficacy of current guidelines and may have major public health implications.