Impact of mobilization regimen on multiday collection of peripheral blood CD34+ cells by large volume leukapheresis.

BACKGROUND: The collection yield of hematopoietic progenitors cell (HPC) by leukapheresis is critical for a successful transplantation, which often requires multiday collections to achieve the collection goal. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Collection procedures of 181 patients who underwent leukapheresis for more than 1 day were reviewed. Patients were separated into six groups based on the mobilization regimen: G-CSF on day 1 (D1) and day 2 (D2) (G-G); G-CSF on D1 and G-CSF and plerixafor on D2 (G-GP); G-CSF and plerixafor on day D1 and D2 (GP-GP); G-CSF and plerixafor on D1 and G-CSF on D2 (GP-G); chemotherapy and G-CSF on D1 and D2 (GC-GC); and chemotherapy, G-CSF, and plerixafor on D1 and D2 (GCP-GCP). Patient's pre-collection CD34 count (pre-CD34) on D1 and D2 were compared in the same individual and among groups. RESULTS: We found D2 pre-CD34 were significantly decreased in G-G, GP-G, and GP-GP groups and significantly increased in G-GP group (p < .001) using a repeated measures ANOVA analysis. D2 pre-CD34 remained at similar levels as D1 in GC-GC and GCP-GCP groups. A multiple regression analysis showed that the mobilization regimen was the only factor that significantly affected pre-CD34 D2/D1 ratio (p < .001). There was a significant difference in the pre-CD34 D2/D1 ratio (p < .001) among these six groups with the lowest in GP-G group (0.40 ± 0.45), and the highest in G-GP group (2.35 ± 0.36). DISCUSSION: Mobilization regimen has significant impact on pre-collection CD34 count. Apheresis facilities may change mobilizing drugs accordingly to achieve a specific HPC goal.

Red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease-indications and management: a review and consensus report by the therapeutic apheresis subsection of the AABB.

BACKGROUND: A prior practice survey revealed variations in the management of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and stressed the need for comprehensive guidelines. Here we discuss: 1) common indications for red blood cell exchange (RCE), 2) options for access, 3) how to prepare the red blood cells (RBCs) to be used for RCE, 4) target hemoglobin (Hb) and/or hematocrit (Hct) and HbS level, 5) RBC depletion/RCE, and 6) some complications that may ensue. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifteen physicians actively practicing apheresis from 14 institutions representing different areas within the United States discussed how they manage RCE for patients with SCD. RESULTS: Simple transfusion is recommended to treat symptomatic anemia with Hb level of less than 9 g/dL. RCE is indicated to prevent or treat complications arising from the presence of HbS. The most important goals are reduction of HbS while also preventing hyperviscosity. The usual goals are a target HbS level of not more than 30% and Hct level of less than 30%. CONCLUSION: Although a consensus as to protocol details may not be possible, there are areas of agreement in the management of these patients, for example, that it is optimal to avoid hyperviscosity and iron overload, that a target Hb S level in the range of 30% is generally desirable, and that RCE as an acute treatment for pain crisis in the absence of other acute or chronic conditions is ordinarily discouraged.

The management of anticoagulation in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange: A concise review.

We surveyed multiple apheresis centers represented by the authors for their clinical approach to the management of anticoagulation issues during therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). We present the results of their practices and a review of the pertinent literature. As plasma is removed during TPE, replacement with all or partial non-plasma-containing fluids (eg, 5% albumin) may lead to significant changes in hemostasis. These changes are amplified in patients who are receiving anticoagulation. We discuss various anticoagulants as well as the monitoring and adjustment of anticoagulation before, during, and after TPE. No single guideline can be applied, but rather, patients must be monitored individually, taking into account their often complex clinical conditions and medication profiles.

IL-12 enhances the antitumor actions of trastuzumab via NK cell IFN-γ production.

The antitumor effects of therapeutic mAbs may depend on immune effector cells that express FcRs for IgG. IL-12 is a cytokine that stimulates IFN-γ production from NK cells and T cells. We hypothesized that coadministration of IL-12 with a murine anti-HER2/neu mAb (4D5) would enhance the FcR-dependent immune mechanisms that contribute to its antitumor activity. Thrice-weekly therapy with IL-12 (1 µg) and 4D5 (1 mg/kg) significantly suppressed the growth of a murine colon adenocarcinoma that was engineered to express human HER2 (CT-26(HER2/neu)) in BALB/c mice compared with the result of therapy with IL-12, 4D5, or PBS alone. Combination therapy was associated with increased circulating levels of IFN-γ, monokine induced by IFN-γ, and RANTES. Experiments with IFN-γ-deficient mice demonstrated that this cytokine was necessary for the observed antitumor effects of therapy with IL-12 plus 4D5. Immune cell depletion experiments showed that NK cells (but not CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells) mediated the antitumor effects of this treatment combination. Therapy of HER2/neu-positive tumors with trastuzumab plus IL-12 induced tumor necrosis but did not affect tumor proliferation, apoptosis, vascularity, or lymphocyte infiltration. In vitro experiments with CT-26(HER2/neu) tumor cells revealed that IFN-γ induced an intracellular signal but did not inhibit cellular proliferation or induce apoptosis. Taken together, these data suggest that tumor regression in response to trastuzumab plus IL-12 is mediated through NK cell IFN-γ production and provide a rationale for the coadministration of NK cell-activating cytokines with therapeutic mAbs.