RESUMEN
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) randomized for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). Introduction: For advanced CRLM, TSH or ALPPS may be needed for tumor freedom. The randomized, controlled, multicenter trial LIGRO showed an increased resection rate in patients who underwent ALPPS but no difference in morbidity or mortality. The 2-year survival analysis revealed better overall survival in the ALPPS group. Here, the long-term survival analysis from the LIGRO trial is reported. Methods: In the LIGRO trial, 100 patients were randomized to TSH or ALPPS, with the option of rescue ALPPS if insufficient growth was found after the initial step of TSH. Patients were enrolled between June 2014 and August 2016. Follow-up data for this study were collected between November 2022 and February 2023. Results: In total, 16 patients were alive at the end of the follow-up period. The estimated median follow-up time was 93 months. Estimated median overall survival times were 45 months in the ALPPS group and 27 months in the TSH group (P = 0.057), with 5-year survival rates of 31% and 20%, respectively. Positive prognostic factors were liver tumor-free status at the first follow-up and rectal primary tumor. Negative prognostic factors were extrahepatic disease and increasing CLRM size. Conclusion: Liver tumor-free status is a predictor of long-term survival, along with extrahepatic disease, large CRLM size, and rectal primary tumor. Survival did not significantly differ between patients treated with ALPPS or TSH.
RESUMEN
Objective: This is a preplanned, health economic evaluation from the LIGRO trial. One hundred patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and standardized future liver remnant <30% were randomized to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or two-staged hepatectomy (TSH). Summary Background Data: TSH, is an established method in advanced CRLM. ALPPS has emerged providing improved resection rate and survival. The health care costs and health outcomes, combining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), of ALPPS and TSH have not previously been evaluated and compared. Methods: Costs and QALYs were compared from treatment start up to 2 years. Costs are estimated from resource use, including all surgical interventions, length of stay after interventions, diagnostic procedures and chemotherapy, and applying Swedish unit costs. QALYs were estimated by combining survival and HRQoL data, the latter being assessed with EQ-5D 3L. Estimated costs and QALYs for each treatment strategy were combined into an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to assess the joint distribution of incremental costs and QALYs. Results: The mean cost difference between ALPPS and TSH was 12,662, [95% confidence interval (CI): -10,728-36,051; P = 0.283]. Corresponding mean difference in life years and QALYs was 0.1296 (95% CI: -0.12-0.38; P = 0.314) and 0.1285 (95% CI: -0.11-0.36; P = 0.28), respectively. The ICER was 93,186 and 92,414 for QALYs and life years as outcomes, respectively. Conclusions: Based on the 2-year data, the cost-effectiveness of ALPPS is uncertain. Further research, exploring cost and health outcomes beyond 2 years is needed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related deaths with few patients benefiting from biomarker-guided therapy. Mutation expression is essential for accurate interpretation of mutations as biomarkers, but surprisingly, little has been done to analyze somatic cancer mutations on the expression level. We report a large-scale analysis of allele-specific mutation expression. METHODS: Whole-exome and total RNA sequencing was performed on 137 samples from 121 microsatellite stable colorectal cancers, including multiregional samples of primary and metastatic tumors from 4 patients. Data were integrated with allele-specific resolution. Results were validated in an independent set of 241 colon cancers. Therapeutic associations were explored by pharmacogenomic profiling of 15 cell lines or patient-derived organoids. RESULTS: The median proportion of expressed mutations per tumor was 34%. Cancer-critical mutations had the highest expression frequency (gene-wise mean of 58%), independent of frequent allelic imbalance. Systematic deviation from the general pattern of expression levels according to allelic frequencies was detected, including preferential expression of mutated alleles dependent on the mutation type and target gene. Translational relevance was suggested by correlations of KRAS/NRAS or TP53 mutation expression levels with downstream oncogenic signatures (p < 0.03), overall survival among patients with stage II and III cancer (KRAS/NRAS: hazard ratio 6.1, p = 0.0070), and targeted drug sensitivity. The latter was demonstrated for EGFR and MDM2 inhibition in pre-clinical models. CONCLUSIONS: Only a subset of mutations in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers were expressed, and the "expressed mutation dose" may provide an opportunity for more fine-tuned biomarker interpretations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Mutación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Receptores ErbB , GTP Fosfohidrolasas , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-mdm2 , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Secuenciación del ExomaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gene expression-based subtyping has the potential to form a new paradigm for stratified treatment of colorectal cancer. However, current frameworks are based on the transcriptomic profiles of primary tumors, and metastatic heterogeneity is a challenge. Here we aimed to develop a de novo metastasis-oriented framework. METHODS: In total, 829 transcriptomic profiles from patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed, including primary tumors, liver metastases, and non-malignant liver samples. High-resolution microarray gene expression profiling was performed of 283 liver metastases from 171 patients treated by hepatic resection, including multiregional and/or multi-metastatic samples from each of 47 patients. A single randomly selected liver metastasis sample from each patient was used for unsupervised subtype discovery by nonnegative matrix factorization, and a random forest prediction model was trained to classify multi-metastatic samples, as well as liver metastases from two independent series of 308 additional patients. RESULTS: Initial comparisons with non-malignant liver samples and primary colorectal tumors showed a highly variable degree of influence from the liver microenvironment in metastases, which contributed to inter-metastatic transcriptomic heterogeneity, but did not define subtype distinctions. The de novo liver metastasis subtype (LMS) framework recapitulated the main distinction between epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like tumors, with a strong immune and stromal component only in the latter. We also identified biologically distinct epithelial-like subtypes originating from different progenitor cell types. LMS1 metastases had several transcriptomic features of cancer aggressiveness, including secretory progenitor cell origin, oncogenic addictions, and microsatellite instability in a microsatellite stable background, as well as frequent RAS/TP53 co-mutations. The poor-prognostic association of LMS1 metastases was independent of mutation status, clinicopathological variables, and current subtyping frameworks (consensus molecular subtypes and colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes). LMS1 was also the least heterogeneous subtype in comparisons of multiple metastases per patient, and tumor heterogeneity did not confound the prognostic value of LMS1. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first large study of multi-metastatic gene expression profiling of colorectal cancer. The new metastasis-oriented subtyping framework showed potential for clinically relevant transcriptomic classification in the context of metastatic heterogeneity, and an LMS1 mini-classifier was constructed to facilitate prognostic stratification and further clinical testing.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Transcriptoma , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Heterogeneidad Genética , Humanos , Hígado/metabolismo , Masculino , Análisis por Micromatrices , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Pronóstico , Microambiente Tumoral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Gene expression-based subtypes of colorectal cancer have clinical relevance, but the representativeness of primary tumors and the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) for metastatic cancers is not well known. We investigated the metastatic heterogeneity of CMS. The best approach to subtype translation was delineated by comparisons of transcriptomic profiles from 317 primary tumors and 295 liver metastases, including multi-metastatic samples from 45 patients and 14 primary-metastasis sets. Associations were validated in an external data set (n = 618). Projection of metastases onto principal components of primary tumors showed that metastases were depleted of CMS1-immune/CMS3-metabolic signals, enriched for CMS4-mesenchymal/stromal signals, and heavily influenced by the microenvironment. The tailored CMS classifier (available in an updated version of the R package CMScaller) therefore implemented an approach to regress out the liver tissue background. The majority of classified metastases were either CMS2 or CMS4. Nonetheless, subtype switching and inter-metastatic CMS heterogeneity were frequent and increased with sampling intensity. Poor-prognostic value of CMS1/3 metastases was consistent in the context of intra-patient tumor heterogeneity.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncological outcome for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) randomized to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). BACKGROUND: TSH with portal vein occlusion is an established method for patients with CRLM and a low volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). ALPPS is a less established method. The oncological outcome of these methods has not been previously compared in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred patients with CRLM and standardized FLR (sFLR) <30% were included and randomized to resection by ALPPS or TSH, with the option of rescue ALPPS in the TSH group, if the criteria for volume increase was not met. The first radiological follow-up was performed approximately 4 weeks postoperatively and then after 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 months. At all the follow-ups, the remaining/recurrent tumor was noted. After the first follow-up, chemotherapy was administered, if indicated. RESULTS: The resection rate, according to the intention-to-treat principle, was 92% (44 patients) for patients randomized to ALPPS compared with 80% (39 patients) for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.091), including rescue ALPPS. At the first postoperative follow-up, 37 patients randomized to ALPPS were assessed as tumor free in the liver, and also 28 patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). The estimated median survival for patients randomized to ALPPS was 46 months compared with 26 months for patients randomized to TSH (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: ALPPS seems to improve survival in patients with CRLM and sFLR <30% compared with TSH.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Anciano , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Ligadura , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Vena Porta/cirugíaAsunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Hígado , Humanos , Vena Porta , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tirotropina , Carga TumoralAsunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , TirotropinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of RAS mutation status on the traditional clinical score (t-CS) to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND: The t-CS relies on the following factors: primary tumor nodal status, disease-free interval, number and size of CLM, and carcinoembryonic antigen level. We hypothesized that the addition of RAS mutation status could create a modified clinical score (m-CS) that would outperform the t-CS. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection of CLM from 2005 through 2013 and had RAS mutation status and t-CS factors available were included. Multivariate analysis was used to identify prognostic factors to include in the m-CS. Log-rank survival analyses were used to compare the t-CS and the m-CS. The m-CS was validated in an international multicenter cohort of 608 patients. RESULTS: A total of 564 patients were eligible for analysis. RAS mutation was detected in 205 (36.3%) of patients. On multivariate analysis, RAS mutation was associated with poor overall survival, as were positive primary tumor lymph node status and diameter of the largest liver metastasis >50âmm. Each factor was assigned 1 point to produce a m-CS. The m-CS accurately stratified patients by overall and recurrence-free survival in both the initial patient series and validation cohort, whereas the t-CS did not. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the t-CS by replacing disease-free interval, number of metastases, and CEA level with RAS mutation status produced an m-CS that outperformed the t-CS. The m-CS is therefore a simple validated tool that predicts survival after resection of CLM.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Mutación , Puntaje de Propensión , Proteínas ras/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Proteínas ras/metabolismoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Pacientes , Vena PortaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate if associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) could increase resection rates (RRs) compared with two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). BACKGROUND: Radical liver metastasis resection offers the only chance of a cure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) volume are traditionally treated with chemotherapy with portal vein embolization or ligation followed by hepatectomy (TSH). This treatment sometimes fails due to insufficient liver growth or tumor progression. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter RCT was conducted between June 2014 and August 2016. It included 97 patients with CRLM and a standardized FLR (sFLR) of less than 30%. Primary outcome-RRs were measured as the percentages of patients completing both stages of the treatment. Secondary outcomes were complications, radicality, and 90-day mortality measured from the final intervention. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, besides body mass index, did not differ between the groups. The RR was 92% [95% confidence interval (CI) 84%-100%] (44/48) in the ALPPS arm compared with 57% (95% CI 43%-72%) (28/49) in the TSH arm [rate ratio 8.25 (95% CI 2.6-26.6); P < 0.0001]. No differences in complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) [43% (19/44) vs 43% (12/28)] [1.01 (95% CI 0.4-2.6); P = 0.99], 90-day mortality [8.3% (4/48) vs 6.1% (3/49)] [1.39 [95% CI 0.3-6.6]; P = 0.68] or R0 RRs [77% (34/44) vs 57% (16/28)] [2.55 [95% CI 0.9-7.1]; P = 0.11)] were observed. Of the patients in the TSH arm that failed to reach an sFLR of 30%, 12 were successfully treated with ALPPS. CONCLUSION: ALPPS is superior to TSH in terms of RR, with comparable surgical margins, complications, and short-term mortality.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Márgenes de Escisión , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ligadura/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the survival impact of primary tumor nodal status (N0/N+) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), and to determine the value of circulating and disseminated tumor cells (CTCs/DTCs) in this setting. METHODS: In this prospective study of patients undergoing resection of CLM from 2008 to 2011, peripheral blood was analyzed for CTCs using the CellSearch System®, and bone marrow was sampled for DTC analyses just prior to hepatic resection. The presence of one or more tumor cells was scored as CTC/DTC-positive. Following resection of the primary tumor, the lymph nodes (LNs) were examined by routine histopathological examination. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in this study; 38 patients (27.1%) were negative at the primary colorectal LN examination (N0). CTCs were detected in 12.1% of all patients; 5.3% of patients in the N0 group and 14.7% of patients in the LN-positive (N+) group (p = 0.156), with the LN-positive group (N+) consisting of both N1 and N2 patients. There was a significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) when analysing the N0 group versus the N+ group (p = 0.007) and CTC-positive versus CTC-negative patients (p = 0.029). In multivariate analysis, CTC positivity was also significantly associated with impaired overall survival (OS) [p = 0.05], whereas DTC positivity was not associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of resectable CLM patients, 27% had primary N0 colorectal cancer. Assessment of CTC in addition to nodal status may contribute to improved classification of patients into high- and low-risk groups, which has the potential to guide and improve treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have been shown to have elevated levels of circulating prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) which promotes cancer progression and suppresses T cell immune responses. In this study we evaluated whether signaling responses in T lymphocytes obtained from peripheral blood of CRC patients were affected by the sustained exposure to increased levels of PGE2. The phosphorylation status of an extended panel of proteins involved in downstream signaling cascades in T cells was profiled at a single cell level both in naïve and antigen-experienced cells after triggering T cell-, prostaglandin- and interleukin-2 receptors. Peripheral T cells from patients with elevated PGE2 levels displayed aberrant T cell signaling responses downstream of the T cell receptor (assessed by reduced phosphorylation of CD3ζ and SLP76), and after triggering the IL-2 receptor (assessed by reduced phosphorylation of STAT5) when compared to T cells from CRC patients with lower levels of PGE2 and T cells from healthy blood donors. This signaling study of circulating T cells from CRC patients indicates that increased systemic PGE2 levels affect proximal T cell responses and confirms phospho-specific flow cytometry to be a valuable tool for revealing signaling signatures in immunological disorders.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/inmunología , Dinoprostona/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proliferación Celular , Células Cultivadas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Interleucina-2/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate clinical risk scores in patients underwent laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with 5 years follow-up or more, and assess 5- and 10-year actual survival in this group. METHODS: A total of 516 laparoscopic liver resections were performed in 406 patients with CLM between February 1998 and September 2015. A follow-up of 5 and 10 years could be assessed in 144 and 29 patients, respectively. The Fong score, pre- and postoperative Basingstoke Predictive Index (BPI), Nordlinger score, and Iwatsuki score were validated. RESULTS: Five- and ten-year cancer-related actual survival was 54% and 32%, respectively. The Fong score, pre- and postoperative BPI and the Nordlinger score divided patients into risk groups with significant difference in survival between the groups. However, predicted 5-year survival rates were lower than the actual 5-year survival (mean difference in 17%,13%, 20%, and 30%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Fong score, pre- and postoperative BPI and the Nordlinger score systems can be used to predict survival for laparoscopically operated patients in the era of multimodal-treatment after adjusting of survival rates. The actual five- and 10-year survival after laparoscopic resection of CLM is similar to results previously published for open liver resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:757-763. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hepatectomía/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multimodality treatment (MMT) improves survival for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The surgery-first (SF) strategy is the most universally accepted approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study of all cases of resectable PDAC from 2006 to 2012. Patients were planned for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with the Nordic 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen. Reasons for and rates of failure to complete AC, postoperative major complications (PMC), and overall survival (OS) were analysed. RESULTS: Of 203 patients, 85 (41.9%) completed AC, 41 (20.2%) failed to complete AC, and 77 (37.9%) never initiated AC. Primary reasons for not initiating or completing AC were early disease progression (34.7%), postoperative complications/poor performance status (32.2%), and age > 75 years (24.6%). Median OS in the whole cohort was 17.0 months, and 20.0 months in patients who initiated AC. Median OS in patients who completed AC was higher than in patients who did not (25.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p < 0.001). PMC (n = 41) were associated with decreased initiation rate (p < 0.001) and completion rate (p = 0.007) of AC, and decreased median OS (11.0 months vs. 19.0 months, p = 0.028). Among patients with R1 resection, PMC again were associated with worse median OS (8.0 months vs. 16.0 months, p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that completion of MMT and tumour grade (G1/G2) were related to mortality rate (p < 0.001). Mortality risk for patients who completed AC was reduced also when adjusting for competing risk (SHR 0.426, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MMT completion is strongly associated with reduced mortality risk in patients with resectable PDAC undergoing the SF approach. Early disease progression and PMC/poor performance status preclude MMT completion in more than one third of the patients. These reasons for failure to complete MMT underscore the need for strategies to improve patient selection and reduce surgical morbidity in patients with resectable PDAC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Naturally occurring regulatory T (T(R)) cells suppress autoreactive T cells whereas adaptive T(R) cells, induced in the periphery, play an important role in chronic viral diseases and cancer. Several studies indicate that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors prevent cancer development of colon adenomas and delay disease progression in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We have shown that adaptive T(R) cells express COX-2 and produce PGE(2) that suppress effector T cells in a manner that is reversed by COX-inhibitors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we demonstrate that CRC patients have elevated levels of PGE(2) in peripheral blood, and CRC tissue samples and draining lymph nodes display increased numbers of FOXP3+ T(R) cells. Depletion of T(R) cells from PBMC enhanced anti-tumor T-cell responses to peptides from carcinoembryonic antigen. Furthermore, the COX inhibitor indomethacin and the PKA type I antagonist Rp-8-Br-cAMPS significantly improved the anti-tumor immune activity. CONCLUSION: We suggest that adaptive T(R) cells contribute to an immunosuppressive microenvironment in CRC and inhibit effector T cells by a COX-2-PGE(2)-dependent mechanism and thereby facilitate tumor growth. Therapeutic strategies targeting T(R) cells and the PGE(2)-cAMP pathway may be interesting to pursue to enhance anti-tumor immune activity in CRC patients.