Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Wildl Dis ; 58(3): 575-583, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35512299

RESUMEN

Free-ranging American black bears (Ursus americanus) often share habitat with humans and domestic animals, predisposing them to anthropogenic conflicts. Rehabilitation under professional care is a management option for orphaned, injured, and/or ill bears. Across several southeastern states, rescued bears are assessed and treated at the University of Tennessee and rehabilitated at Appalachian Bear Rescue (ABR). Records from 1996-2021 showed 337 bears (170 males, 166 females, 1 unknown) from nine states were admitted to ABR. Three bears were admitted twice, resulting in 340 admissions (42 neonates <3 mo old, 206 cubs 3-12 mo, 87 yearlings 1-2 yr, and 5 adults >2 yr). Bears presented as orphans (58%), malnourished (24%), injured or ill (12%), or confiscated/other (6%). Individuals were returned to the wild (85%); died or were euthanized (12%); or were placed into professional care (3%). Of released bears, 195 had complete medical records available for evaluation; 31% were healthy upon intake while the remaining were treated successfully for malnutrition and internal parasites (49%), orthopedic (9%) and soft tissue injuries (5%), or other diseases (5%). Causes of death determined during necropsies performed (n=30) were classified as trauma (50%), developmental (13%), undetermined (13%), malnutrition (13%), infectious or inflammatory (7%), and toxicosis (3%). Despite the lack of maternal care and high prevalence of malnutrition and trauma, most bears recovered to release with appropriate husbandry and medical care. This study provides a foundation for research to further improve care of rehabilitating black bears.


Asunto(s)
Desnutrición , Ursidae , Animales , Región de los Apalaches , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/veterinaria , Prevalencia , Tennessee/epidemiología , Ursidae/parasitología
2.
J Wildl Dis ; 54(3): 503-510, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616881

RESUMEN

Wildlife anesthetic protocols must offer rapid inductions and recoveries, be physiologically safe, and be minimally regulated. With this in mind, we evaluated differences in induction and recovery times and physiological parameters in 33 American black bears ( Ursus americanus) anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine (KX) or immobilized with a commercial drug combination of butorphanol, azaperone, and medetomidine (BAM). Dose was based on mass estimated from field observations. Bears were housed at Appalachian Bear Rescue, Townsend, Tennessee, US, or free-ranging within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (Tennessee and North Carolina, US) and chemically immobilized for management purposes. From 11 April to 29 June 2016, we immobilized bears with injection via pole syringe or disposable dart projected from an air-powered dart rifle. Once immobilized, we measured each bear's temperature, respiration (breaths/min), heart rate (beats/min), hemoglobin oxygen saturation (via pulse oximetry), arterial blood gases, and mass (kg). We found no differences in the induction parameters, partial pressures of CO2, and rectal temperatures. The BAM-treated bears had lower heart and respiratory rates that led to lower hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels (from blood gas analysis, SaO2). The SaO2 after treatment with BAM (91.1±0.8%) was lower than with KX (93.4±0.9%). After handling, we reversed KX-treated bears with a x̄=0.2±0.02 mg/kg yohimbine and BAM-treated bears with x̄=1.5±0.1 mg/kg atipamezole and 0.8±0.1 mg/kg naltrexone. We found no differences in the recovery times to increased respiration and to the bear assuming a head-up position. The BAM-treated bears stood and recovered quicker than did KX-treated animals. Based on our observations, BAM appears to offer safe, predictable immobilizations with fewer drawbacks and faster recovery times than KX-treated bears.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Anestésicos Disociativos/farmacología , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Inmovilización/veterinaria , Ursidae , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Disociativos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Azaperona/administración & dosificación , Azaperona/farmacología , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/farmacología , Masculino , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Medetomidina/farmacología , Xilazina/administración & dosificación , Xilazina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA