Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 37(4): 231-238, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30929668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reflex testing of antibodies and viral load in the same sample for diagnosing hepatitis C virus infection speeds up access to treatment. However, how hepatitis C is diagnosed in Spanish hospitals is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the available resources and procedures for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in Spain. METHODS: Survey sent to public and private Spanish hospitals with teaching accreditation with at least 200 beds. RESULTS: Of the 160 hospitals that met the inclusion criteria, 90 centres (response rate 56.3%) completed the survey. Two hospitals (2.2%) have no diagnostic resources, 15 (16.7%) can only test for anti-hepatitis C virus(Ab), 9 (10.0%) for Ab and viral load, 47 (52.2%) for Ab, viral load and genotype, 2 (2.2%) for Ab, viral load and core antigen, and 15 (16.7%) can perform Ab, core antigen, viral load and genotype tests. When an Ab test is positive, 28 (31.1%) hospitals perform reflex testing. When an active infection is diagnosed, some communication strategy is used in 62 (68.9%) hospitals. Approximately 44.2% of the respondents believe that all determinations needed to reach a definitive diagnosis should be done on a single blood sample. CONCLUSION: Although 81% of Spanish hospitals have the resources to perform reflex hepatitis C virus infection testing, it is only done in 31%, and less than a half of respondents believe that the definitive diagnosis should be performed on a single sample.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , España , Virología/métodos
2.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(1): 10-16, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30561219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: implementing one-step strategies for hepatitis C diagnosis would help shorten the time to treatment access. Thus avoiding disease progression and complications, while facilitating hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. OBJECTIVE: to assess the validity and certainty of potential one-step strategies for the diagnosis of HCV infection and their associated cost and efficiency. METHODS: the study design is an economic appraisal of efficiency (cost/efficacy) using decision trees and deterministic sensitivity analysis. The analysis was performed from the payer perspective (Spanish National Health System), which exclusively considers the direct costs. Only the differential costs (diagnostic testing costs) were taken into account and the study was set in Spain. The efficacy of a diagnostic strategy was defined as the percentage of patients with an active HCV infection who received a positive diagnosis and the efficiency was defined as the cost per patient with a correctly diagnosed and active infection. RESULTS: the one-step strategies evaluated for the diagnosis of HCV had an acceptable validity and certainty due to the high sensitivity and specificity of the considered tests. The Ab-Ag strategy was the most efficient, followed by Ab-Ag-VL and Ab-VL. Ab-Ag was the most efficient due to the lower cost per patient tested, although the efficacy was lower than the Ab-VL efficacy. CONCLUSION: the study findings may help to establish more appropriate one-step diagnostic approaches whilst considering the efficacy and efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Hepacivirus/inmunología , Hepatitis C/economía , Hepatitis C/virología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/análisis , Antígenos de la Hepatitis C/análisis , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Carga Viral
3.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 34(7): 427-30, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25749416

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The National AIDS Plan and the Spanish AIDS study group (GESIDA) proposes "preferred regimens" (PR) of antiretroviral treatment (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients. In 2013, the recommended regimens were all triple therapy regimens. The Gardel Study assessed the efficacy of a dual therapy (DT) combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus lamivudine (3TC). Our objective is to evaluate the GESIDA PR and the DT regimen LPV/r+3TC cost/efficacy ratios. METHODS: Decision tree models were built. EFFICACY: probability of having viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48. ART regime cost: costs of ART, adverse effects, and drug resistance tests during the first 48 weeks. RESULTS: Cost/efficacy ratios varied between 5,817 and 13,930 euros per responder at 48 weeks, for the DT of LPV/r+3TC and tenofovir DF/emtricitabine+raltegravir, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the official Spanish prices of ART, the most efficient regimen was DT of LPV/r+3TC, followed by the triple therapy with non-nucleoside containing regimens.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/economía , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Lamivudine/economía , Lopinavir/economía , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/economía , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , España , Carga Viral
4.
Reumatol Clin ; 9(6): 353-8, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587550

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To: 1) describe the distribution of the public sector rheumatologists; 2) identify variables on which the workload in Rheumatology depends; and 3) build a predictive model on the need of rheumatologists for the next 10 years, in the Community of Madrid (CM). METHODOLOGY: The information was obtained through structured questionnaires sent to all services/units of Rheumatology of public hospitals in the CM. The population figures, current and forecasted, were obtained from the National Statistics Institute. A predictive model was built based on information about the current and foreseeable supply, current and foreseeable demand, and the assumptions and criteria used to match supply with demand. The underlying uncertainty in the model was assessed by sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the CM in 2011 there were 150 staff rheumatologists and 49 residents in 27 centers, which is equivalent to one rheumatologist for every 33,280 inhabitants in the general population, and one for every 4,996 inhabitants over 65 years. To keep the level of assistance of 2011 in 2021 in the general population, it would be necessary to train more residents or hire more rheumatologists in scenarios of demand higher than 15%. However, to keep the level of assistance in the population over 65 years of age it would be necessary to train more residents or hire more specialists even without increased demand. CONCLUSIONS: The model developed may be very useful for planning, with the CM policy makers, the needs of human resources in Rheumatology in the coming years.


Asunto(s)
Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Modelos Estadísticos , Reumatología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España , Salud Urbana , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...