Society of Robotic Surgery review: recommendations regarding the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures METHODS: Surgical society statements regarding the risk of COVID transmission during MIS procedures were reviewed. In addition, the available literature on COVID-19 and other viral transmission in CO2 pneumoperitoneum, as well as the presence of virus in the plume created by electrocautery during MIS was reviewed. The society recommendations were compared to the available literature on the topic to create our review and recommendations to mitigate COVID-19 transmission. RESULTS: The recommendations promulgated by various surgical societies evolved over time as more information became available on COVID-19 transmission. Review of the available literature on the presence of COVID-19 in CO2 pneumoperitoneum was inconclusive. There is no clear evidence of the presence of COVID-19 in plume created by electrocautery. Technologies to reduce CO2 pneumoperitoneum release into the operating room as well as filter viral particles are available and should reduce the exposure risk to operating room personnel. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence of COVID-19 virus in the CO2 used during MIS procedures or in the plume created by electrocautery. Until the presence or absence of COVID-19 viral particles has been clearly established, measures to mitigate CO2 and surgical cautery plume release into the operating room should be performed. Further study on the presence of COVID-19 in MIS pneumoperitoneum and cautery plume is needed.

Tobacco use, immunosuppressive, chronic pain, and psychiatric conditions are prevalent in women with symptomatic mesh complications undergoing mesh removal surgery.

Purpose: To identify demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with symptomatic pelvic floor mesh complications who underwent mesh removal at our academic medical center. The secondary goal was to determine patient-reported outcomes after mesh removal. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients from 2011-2016 undergoing removal of mesh graft for treatment of symptomatic mesh-related complications. Patient demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, and mesh factors were evaluated. Outcomes after explant were determined by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement and a Likert satisfaction scale. Results: One hundred fifty-six symptomatic patients underwent complete or partial pelvic floor mesh removal during the study period. Mid-urethral slings comprised 86% of explanted mesh grafts. Mesh exposure or erosion was identified in 72% of patients. Eighty-one percent of patients presented with pain, and 35% reported pain in the absence of exposure or erosion. Pre-operative comorbidities included psychiatric disease (54.5%), chronic pain (34.0%), irritable bowel syndrome (20.5%) and fibromyalgia (9.6%). Forty-three percent of patients reported current or past tobacco use. At mean follow-up of 14 months, 68% of responding patients reported improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement after surgery. Conclusions: This research identified tobacco use, and psychiatric, immunosuppressive, and chronic pain conditions as prevalent in this cohort of patients undergoing mesh removal. Surgical removal can improve presenting symptoms, including for patients with pain in the absence of other indications.

Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: evolving techniques and expanding considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) continues to gain popularity in the setting of nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses. Although the recent introduction of technological advancements has allowed for expanded roles for RAPN, the optimal techniques and approaches to the procedure remain controversial. RECENT FINDINGS: Of recent interest has been the role of warm ischemia time and its impact on postoperative renal function. Available studies suggest that although warm ischemia time remains an independent and modifiable risk factor for postoperative renal function, the role for 'zero ischemia' RAPN is still unclear. Recent studies on complex and/or larger tumors have demonstrated the feasibility of the procedure with comparable short-term outcomes to the open approach. Although these results should currently be considered experimental, they do shed light on the growing role for RAPN. Surgeon comfort and tumor location remain important factors when determining a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. Available research demonstrates shorter operative times, length of stay and potentially lower costs to the retroperitoneal approach. SUMMARY: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy remains an evolving procedure. Although recent literature suggests the feasibility of new and novel techniques, variable approaches and expanded indications, prospective, long-term follow-up data are needed before a consensus can be reached.