Prognostic value of cerebrospinal fluid tumor cell count in leptomeningeal disease from solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Treatment decisions for leptomeningeal disease (LMD) rely on patient risk stratification, since clinicians lack objective prognostic tools. The introduction of rare cell capture technology for identification of cerebrospinal fluid tumor cells (CSF-TCs), such as CNSide assay, improved the sensitivity of LMD diagnosis, but prognostic value is unknown. This study assesses the prognostic value of CSF-TC density in patients with LMD from solid tumors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated LMD from a single institution who had CNSide assay testing for CSF-TCs from 2020 to 2023. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were conducted with Cox proportional-hazards modeling. Maximally-selected rank statistics were used to determine an optimal cutpoint for CSF-TC density and survival. RESULTS: Of 31 patients, 29 had CSF-TCs detected on CNSide. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) CSF-TC density was 67.8 (4.7-639) TCs/mL. CSF cytology was positive in 16 of 29 patients with positive CNSide (CNSide diagnostic sensitivity = 93.5%, negative predictive value = 85.7%). Median (IQR) survival from time of CSF-TC detection was 176 (89-481) days. On univariable and multivariable analysis, CSF-TC density was significantly associated with survival. An optimal cutpoint for dichotomizing survival by CSF-TC density was 19.34 TCs/mL. The time-dependent sensitivity and specificity for survival using this stratification were 76% and 67% at 6 months and 65% and 67% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CSF-TC density may carry prognostic value in patients with LMD from solid tumors. Integrating CSF-TC density into LMD patient risk-stratification may help guide treatment decisions.

Little patients, big impacts: a narrative review of palliative and emergent radiotherapy for pediatric cancers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliative and emergent settings for pediatric cancers is an under-utilized resource. Our objective was to provide an evidence-based review of the data to increase awareness of the benefit for this population along with providing guidance on pediatric specific treatment considerations for palliative care physicians, pediatric oncologists, and radiation oncologists. METHODS: A narrative review was performed querying PubMed, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and supplemented with review articles, survey studies, current and recent clinical trials. When limited data existed, well-designed retrospective and prospective studies in the adult setting were evaluated and expert opinion was provided from pediatric oncologists. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Pediatric specific treatment considerations include the use of anesthesia, impact of treatment on the developing child, and logistical challenges of RT. Treatment modality and dose selection are driven by histology and symptomatic site of pain, where we discuss detailed recommendations for hematologic, central nervous system, and solid tumors. For palliative RT, an underlying principle of searching for the lowest effective dose to balance response rate with minimal acute and late treatment related morbidity and logistical hardships is of paramount importance when caring for a pediatric patient. Lastly, we outline how to effectively communicate this option to patients and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative RT can be of valuable benefit in most settings for patients with pediatric cancer. There is an unmet need for prospective data to inform on dose-fractionation along with patient and caregiver reported outcomes.

Craniospinal irradiation for CNS leukemia: rates of response and durability of CNS control.

PURPOSE: Management of CNS involvement in leukemia may include craniospinal irradiation (CSI), though data on CSI efficacy are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed leukemia patients who underwent CSI at our institution between 2009 and 2021 for CNS involvement. CNS local recurrence (CNS-LR), any recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), CNS PFS, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS: Of thirty-nine eligible patients treated with CSI, most were male (59%) and treated as young adults (median 31 years). The median dose was 18 Gy to the brain and 12 Gy to the spine. Twenty-five (64%) patients received CSI immediately prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, of which 21 (84%) underwent total body irradiation conditioning (median 12 Gy). Among 15 patients with CSF-positive disease immediately prior to CSI, all 14 assessed patients had pathologic clearance of blasts (CNS-response rate 100%) at a median of 23 days from CSI start. With a median follow-up of 48 months among survivors, 2-year PFS and OS were 32% (95% CI 18-48%) and 43% (95% CI 27-58%), respectively. Only 5 CNS relapses were noted (2-year CNS-LR 14% (95% CI 5-28%)), which occurred either concurrently or after a systemic relapse. Only systemic relapse after CSI was associated with higher risk of CNS-LR on univariate analysis. No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was seen during CSI. CONCLUSION: CSI is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for patients with CNS leukemia. Control of systemic disease after CSI may be important for CNS local control. CNS recurrence may reflect reseeding from the systemic space.

Emergent radiotherapy for brain and leptomeningeal metastases: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: As novel systemic therapies allow patients to live longer with cancer, the risk of developing central nervous system (CNS) metastases increases and providers will more frequently encounter emergent presentation of brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Management of these metastases requires appropriate work-up and well-coordinated multidisciplinary care. We set out to perform a review of emergent radiotherapy (RT) for CNS metastases, specifically focusing on BM and LM. METHODS: We review the appropriate pathways for workup and initial management of BM and LM, while reviewing the literature supporting emergent treatment of these entities with surgery, systemic anti-cancer therapy, and RT. To inform this narrative review, literature searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted, with preference given to articles employing modern RT techniques, when applicable. Due to the paucity of high-quality evidence for management of BM and LM in the emergent setting, discussion was supplemented by the authors' expert commentary. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: This work highlights the importance of surgical evaluation, particularly for patients presenting with significant mass effect, hemorrhagic metastases, or increased intracranial pressure. We review the rare situations where emergent initiation of systemic anti-cancer therapy is indicated. When defining the role of RT, we review factors guiding selection of appropriate modality, treatment volume, and dose-fractionation. Generally, 2D- or 3D-conformal treatment techniques prescribed as 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions, should be employed in the emergent setting. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BM and LM present from a diverse array of clinical situations, requiring well-coordinated multidisciplinary management, and there is a paucity of high-quality evidence guiding such management decisions. This narrative review aims to more thoroughly prepare providers for the challenging situation of emergent management of BM and LM.

(Potential) Mishaps of High-Dose-Rate Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy.

Considering how commonly vaginal cuff brachytherapy is used, there is relatively little literature regarding the potential, albeit low, risk for complications. We present 3 potentially serious mishaps involving cylinder misplacement, dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue irradiation due to unique anatomy. Three patients with potentially serious treatment errors were encountered in the authors' usual clinical practice. Each patient's records were reviewed for this report. For patient 1, computed tomography (CT) simulation revealed grossly inadequate cylinder insertion, which was most obvious on the sagittal view. For patient 2, CT simulation revealed that the cylinder extended beyond the perforated vaginal cuff and was surrounded by bowel. For patient 3, CT images were used only to verify cylinder depth. A standard library plan based on cylinder diameter and active length was used. In retrospect, the images revealed an unusually thin rectovaginal septum, with the lateral and posterior vaginal wall thickness estimated to be <2 mm. This patient's fractional normal tissue doses were calculated for this report, revealing a rectal maximum dose (per fraction) of 10.8 Gy, maximum dose that 2 cc of the organ receives of 7.4 Gy, and volume of the organ that receives the prescription dose or higher of 2.8 cc. All doses were far in excess of those anticipated for a minimal 0.5-cm vaginal wall depth. Vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy is a high-volume, routine procedure. Even in experienced hands, however, it carries a risk of improper cylinder placement, cuff dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue dose, all of which could seriously affect outcomes. These potential mishaps would be better appreciated and avoided with more extensive use of CT-based quality assurance measures.