Improved Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease for Restasis® Patients Following a Single Tearcare® Treatment: Phase 2 of the SAHARA Study.

Purpose: To evaluate dry eye disease (DED) signs and symptoms six months after a single treatment with Localized Heat Therapy (LHT) (TearCare, Sight Sciences) for patients previously treated for six months with cyclosporine (0.05%) ophthalmic emulsion (CsA) BID (Restasis, Allergan). Setting: Nineteen ophthalmic and optometric practices in 11 US states. Design: Multicenter, cross-over, six month extension to the SAHARA randomized, controlled trial (RCT). Included patients were those randomized to CsA in Phase 1 of the SAHARA RCT. Methods: This was the second phase of the SAHARA RCT in which, following the 6-month endpoint, all patients that had been randomized to CsA discontinued CsA and were treated with LHT and subsequently followed for an additional six months. Outcome measures at 12 months for CsA patients crossed over to LHT included TBUT, OSDI and MGSS. Results: One hundred and sixty-one patients (322 eyes) were analyzed. Mean (SD) baseline TBUT prior to CsA was 4.4 (1.2) seconds, 5.6 (2.6) at 6 months which improved to 6.6 (3.2) and 6.1 (2.8) seconds (both P < 0.001) at 9 and 12 months (3, 6 months post LHT). Mean (SD) OSDI was 50.0 (14.9) at baseline and 34.2 (21.5) after CsA. With LHT at 6 months, this improved to 30.0 (20.6) and 31.0 (19.5) at 9 and 12 months (P = 0.162 vs month 6, P < 0.0001 vs baseline). MGSS was 7.1 (3.2) at baseline, 13.3 (8.2) at the end of CsA treatment which improved to 17.4 (8.8) and 16.1 (9.0) at 9 and 12 months; both P <0.001. Conclusion: SAHARA showed 6-month superiority of LHT to CsA in clinical signs and non-inferiority in symptom scores. This extension shows that patients treated with CsA for 6 months can achieve meaningful additional improvement in signs and symptoms lasting for as long as 6 months following a single LHT treatment without the need for topical prescription therapy.

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare® and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA).

Purpose: We compare outcomes in eyes with dry eye disease (DED) treated with TearCare (TC) or topical cyclosporine 0.05% (RESTASIS; CsA). Setting: Nineteen ophthalmic and optometric practices in 11 US states. Design: Multicenter, randomized, assessor-masked, controlled IRB-approved trial. Eligible subjects: ≥22 years of age, dry eye symptoms within 3-6 months, Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) ≥1 to ≤7 s, Meibomian Gland Secretion Score (MGSS) ≤12, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) of 23-79. Randomized (1:1) to TC or CsA. TC subjects treated at baseline and month 5; CsA was twice daily for 6 months. Methods: Follow-up visits were scheduled for Day 1, Week 1, Months 1, 3, and 6 with primary inference at Month 6. Primary outcomes: TBUT and OSDI; secondary outcomes: MGSS, conjunctival and corneal staining, eye dryness score (EDS), symptoms assessment in dry eye (SANDE) score, and Schirmer tear score (STS). Safety assessments included adverse events, best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and slit-lamp findings. Results: Overall, 345 subjects, 172 TC and 173 CsA. TBUT improved at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001), with statistically greater improvement for TC versus CsA (p=0.0006). OSDI improved significantly at all time points in both groups (p<0.0001) with no significant differences between treatments. MGSS and other measures of meibomian gland function improved significantly more with TC eyes versus CsA; other secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in both groups with no difference between groups. Treatment-related adverse events were uncommon (10 total, 8 in the CsA group consistent with prior CsA studies); most (9/10) mild. Conclusion: TC provides statistically superior and sustained improvement in TBUT and multiple measures of meibomian gland secretion, and non-inferior improvement in OSDI, corneal and conjunctival staining, SANDE, EDS, and STS versus CsA. TC should be a preferred treatment for DED associated with MGD.

Dual-Polymer Drops, Contact Lens Comfort, and Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy.

PURPOSE: This study compared a new contact lens rewetting drop containing both carboxymethylcellulose and hyaluronic acid (CMC-HA) with a standard drop containing carboxymethylcellulose only (CMC). Symptoms of discomfort typical in lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) were assessed over a 3-month period in a diverse sample of contact lens wearers. METHODS: Adapted daily-wear contact lens subjects using hydrogel, silicone hydrogel, or rigid gas permeable lenses were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, 90-day study conducted at 15 clinical sites. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to CMC-HA (n = 244) or CMC alone (n = 121) with dosage at least four times per day, along with their habitual lens care system. At baseline and at days 7, 30, 60, and 90, subject-completed questionnaires, bulbar conjunctival staining, LWE, contact lens distance visual acuity (CLDVA), and standard safety measures were assessed. RESULTS: At day 90, CMC-HA performed significantly better than CMC in ocular symptoms including dryness throughout the day (p = 0.006), and burning/stinging throughout the day (p = 0.02) and at the end of the day (p < 0.001). CMC-HA also performed numerically better for dryness at the end of day (p = 0.06). LWE staining was improved in the CMC-HA group at day 90 whereas it increased slightly in the CMC alone group, with a significant between-group difference (p = 0.009). CMC-HA also demonstrated greater reduction in conjunctival staining compared with CMC alone at day 90 (p = 0.08). No differences in CLDVA, contact lens wear time, acceptability, and product use were observed, and safety outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of HA to a standard CMC rewetting drop improves clinical performance. In this comparison of rewetting drop efficacy in contact lens wearers, LWE was a useful clinical sign for differentiating clinical performance.

Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for moderate myopia and hyperopia.

BACKGROUND: As part of the United States Food and Drug Administration Phase III clinical trial, patients were implanted with the STAAR posterior chamber phakic intraocular contact lens (ICL). The trial is designed to test the safety and efficacy of this new lens for the treatment of moderate-to-high myopia and hyperopia. METHODS: Data were collected from 20 hyperopes--mean preoperative spherical equivalent, +5.55 D, and 65 myopes-mean preoperative spherical equivalent, -8.42 D, who were implanted with ICLs in our clinic, from November 1998 to March 2000. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 40% of the hyperopic eyes were 20/20 or better without correction and 80% of the eyes 20/40 or better without correction, with a mean spherical equivalent of +0.06 D. One hyperopic lens was explanted and no adverse events were reported. Postoperatively, 52.31% of the myopic eyes were 20/20 or better without correction and 92.3% of the eyes were 20/40 or better without correction, with a mean spherical equivalent of -0.31 D. No lenses were explanted and one was treated for angle closure. CONCLUSIONS: The STAAR Collamer ICL is a reasonably safe and effective procedure for the treatment of moderate-to-high refractive errors.