Hospital stays and costs of telemedical monitoring versus standard follow-up for diabetic foot ulcer: an open-label randomised controlled study.

Background: Two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have previously shown that telemedical monitoring of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) reduces the number of visits to the outpatient clinic, without losing treatment efficacy or increasing costs. Here we present the results of an open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to investigate whether telemonitoring, provided by an expert nurse (with extensive experience in DFU and trained in remote monitoring), reduces the hospital stay and the associated costs for a patient with DFU (TELEPIED trial). Methods: Eligible patients (n = 180) were randomly allocated to: (i) a control group, in which they received standard care, and (ii) an intervention group, in which they received asynchronous telemedicine follow-up by the expert nurse. The primary outcome was the cumulative hospital days over 12 months. The main secondary outcomes were (i) direct healthcare costs (estimated in a collective perspective), (ii) wound healing and (iii) amputation rates. ITT (intention-to-treat) population was analysed. Findings: In the ITT population, cumulative hospital days were significantly higher in the control group (13.4 days [95% CI 9.0-17.8]) than in the intervention group (7.1 days [2.8-11.5]) (p = 0.0458, ANCOVA model). Cumulative direct costs over 12 months were 7185 € (95% CI 5144-9226) in the control group and 3471 € (95% CI 1430-5512) in the intervention group (p = 0.0120). The percentage of wounds healed and amputation rate were not significantly different between groups. Similar results were found with the PP population. Interpretation: The implementation of a telemedical intervention with an expert nurse could lead to a length of hospitalization and direct costs that were two times lower compared to conventional follow-up. This lower medical and economic burden was obtained without losing effectiveness on the rate of healing, nor increasing the amputation rate. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings. Funding: This study was designed, funded and conducted by CERITD (Study and Research Centre for Intensification of Diabetes Treatment, Evry, France), Genopole GIP, 20 rue Henri Desbruères, 91030 EVRY Cedex and Laboratoires URGO, 15 Avenue d'Iéna, 75116 Paris Cedex, France. The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsor. The corresponding author (DD) certify that authors were not precluded from accessing data in the study, and they accept responsibility to submit for publication.

Intact Fish Skin Graft vs. Standard of Care in Patients with Neuroischaemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers (KereFish Study): An International, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Trial Study Design and Rationale.

BACKGROUND: Cell and/or tissue-based wound care products have slowly advanced in the treatment of non-healing ulcers, however, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these devices in the management of severe diabetic foot ulcers. METHOD: This study (KereFish) is part of a multi-national, multi-centre, randomised, controlled clinical investigation (Odin) with patients suffering from deep diabetic wounds, allowing peripheral artery disease as evaluated by an ankle brachial index equal or higher than 0.6. The study has parallel treatment groups: Group 1 treatment with Kerecis® Omega3 Wound™ versus Group 2 treatment with standard of care. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that a larger number of severe diabetic ulcers and amputation wounds, including those with moderate arterial disease, will heal in 16 weeks when treated with Kerecis® Omega3 Wound™ than with standard of care. CONCLUSION: This study has received the ethics committee approval of each participating country. Inclusion of participants began in March 2020 and ended in July 2022. The first results will be presented in March 2023. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as Identifier: NCT04537520.

Télépied Study: A Single-Centre Trial in Diabetic Subjects Comparing Total Duration of Hospitalization Over a 1-Year Period Required for Complete Healing of a Foot Ulcer Using Telemedicine Management and a Referral Nurse Versus the Standard Care Pathway.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the total number of days in hospital required for healing of a de novo diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) is lower in patients followed up using a telemedicine platform (Télépied Follow-Up group [Group 2]) than in patients followed up using standard care (Standard Follow-Up control group [Group 1]). Patients are assigned to either Group 1 or Group 2 depending on whether their first inclusion visit is during an even or odd week. Patients included in Group 1 are to be followed at spaced intervals during day hospital visits by the investigator assisted by a specialized referral nurse as part of the regular follow-up procedure (dressing changes + ulcer monitoring). Between visits, an independent nurse (IN) provides local care on a daily basis. Patients included in Group 2 have their DFU treated by a referral nurse trained at the diabetic foot unit of the investigating centre, and they are also followed up by an IN under the supervision of a referral nurse. In Group 2, monitoring of lesions is performed weekly by the referral nurse using photos of the DFU with planimetry taken by the IN and sent to the referral nurse via telemedicine software. The referral nurse can, in turn, provide guidance to the IN on the care to be provided and/or decide that a further hospital visit is needed. Both treatment groups are to be followed for 12 months or until complete healing of the ulcer. RESULTS: Recruitment for the study began in March 2017 and ended in May 2019, with the final study visit scheduled for May 2020. CONCLUSION: The aim of the Télépied study is to assess the impact of ambulatory foot ulcer management in diabetics over a 1-year period by a non-specialized IN working under the supervision of a referral nurse via telemedicine follow-up versus standard follow-up by an IN alone. The primary endpoint is the total duration of hospitalization required until full healing of the ulcer.