[Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after elective transcatheter interventions: experience of a high-volume center]. / Fattibilità e sicurezza della dimissione in giornata per procedure elettive di cardiologia interventistica in un centro ad alto volume.

BACKGROUND: Safety of same-day discharge (SSD) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has been demonstrated in several studies. However, SDD is rarely adopted in Italy, with a potential waste of resources and decrease of patient satisfaction. METHODS: In 2019 we implemented a strategy of SDD for all elective coronary procedures admitted to our Radial Unit. Patients were excluded from SDD in case of contraindications for radial access, known contrast allergy, known left main disease based on previous angiogram or coronary computed tomography scan, chronic total occlusions considered as target of revascularization. We assessed the feasibility and safety of this approach in consecutive patients treated at Humanitas Research Center. RESULTS: Out of 366 patients who were admitted electively to our Radial Unit, 152 (41.5%) underwent only diagnostic coronary angiography, while 214 underwent PCI. As expected, radial access was used in the vast majority of cases (361; 98.6%). Patients were mostly discharged in the same day (268; 73%), both after diagnostic (96.7%) and interventional (56.5%) procedures. Patients that were hospitalized at least for one night were older, had a higher cardiovascular risk profile and had a more complex coronary anatomy (left main or proximal left anterior descending artery disease, bifurcations, total occlusions). There were no significant differences between patients discharged and those who were admitted overnight with regards to 7- and 30-day hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: SSD is safe and feasible in the majority of patients after elective coronary procedures (both diagnostic angiography and PCI), and is not associated with increased hospital readmission at 7 and 30 days. On the basis of the current study, a wider SDD program will be implemented in 2020.

Early detection of elevated cardiac biomarkers to optimise risk stratification in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Risk stratification is crucial to optimise treatment strategies in patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the impact on mortality of an early assessment of cardiac biomarkers in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital (Rozzano-Milan, Lombardy, Italy) is a tertiary centre that has been converted to the management of COVID-19. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 were entered in a dedicated database for cohort observational analyses. Outcomes were stratified according to elevated levels (ie, above the upper level of normal) of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or both measured within 24 hours after hospital admission. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 397 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included up to 1 April 2020. At the time of hospital admission, 208 patients (52.4%) had normal values for cardiac biomarkers, 90 (22.7%) had elevated both hs-TnI and BNP, 59 (14.9%) had elevated only BNP and 40 (10.1%) had elevated only hs-TnI. The rate of mortality was higher in patients with elevated hs-TnI (22.5%, OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.72 to 11.04), BNP (33.9%, OR 7.37, 95% CI 3.53 to 16.75) or both (55.6%, OR 18.75, 95% CI 9.32 to 37.71) as compared with those without elevated cardiac biomarkers (6.25%). A multivariate analysis identified concomitant elevation of both hs-TnI and BNP as a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 9.93). CONCLUSIONS: An early detection of elevated hs-TnI and BNP predicts mortality in patients with COVID-19. Cardiac biomarkers should be systematically assessed in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission in order to optimise risk stratification.

Transitory effusive-constrictive pericarditis.

Pericardial effusion of various sizes is a quite common clinical finding, while its progression to effusive-constrictive pericarditis occurs in about 1.4-14% of cases. Although available evidence on prevalence and prognosis of this rare pericardial syndrome is poor, apparently a considerable proportion of patients conservatively managed has a spontaneous resolution after several weeks. A 61-year-old female presented to our emergency department reporting fatigue, effort dyspnea and abdominal swelling. The echocardiography showed large pericardial effusion with initial hemodynamic impact, so she underwent a pericardiocentesis with drainage of 800-850cm3 of exudative fluid, on which diagnostic investigations were undertaken: possible viral and bacterial infections, medical conditions, iatrogenic causes, neoplastic and connective tissue diseases were all excluded. Despite empirical therapy with NSAIDs and colchicine, after about one week she had a recurrence of pericardial effusion and progressive development of constriction. Echocardiography performed after a few weeks of anti-inflammatory therapy showed resolution of constriction and PE, with clinical improvement. If progression of pericardial syndromes to a constrictive form is rarely described in literature, cases of transitory effusive-constrictive phase are even more uncommon, mainly reported during the evolution of pericardial effusion. According to the available data, risk of progression to a constrictive form is very low in case of idiopathic pericardial effusion. We report a case of large idiopathic subacute pericardial effusion, treated with pericardiocentesis and then evolved into an effusive-constrictive pericarditis. A prolonged anti-inflammatory treatment leads to complete resolution of pericardial syndrome without necessity of pericardiectomy.

Is the left ventricular lateral wall the best lead implantation site for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Short-term hemodynamic studies consistently report greater effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients stimulated from a LV lateral coronary sinus tributary (CST) compared to a septal site. The aim of the study was to compare the long-term efficacy of CRT when performed from different LV stimulation sites. From October 1999 to April 2002, 158 patients (mean age 65 years, mean LVEF 0.29, mean QRS width 174 ms) underwent successful CRT, from the anterior (A) CST in 21 patients, the anterolateral (AL) CST in 37 patients, the lateral (L) CST in 57 patients, the posterolateral (PL) CST in 40 patients, and the middle cardiac vein (MCV) CST in 3 patients. NYHA functional class, 6-minute walk test, and echocardiographic measurements were examined at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Comparisons were made among all pacing sites or between lateral and septal sites by grouping AL + L + PL CST as lateral site (134 patients, 85%) and A + MC CST as septal site (24 patients, 15%). In patients stimulated from lateral sites, LVEF increased from 0.30 to 0.39 (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 323 to 458 m (P < 0.0001), and the proportion of NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 82% to 10% (P < 0.0001). In patients stimulated from septal sites, LVEF increased from 0.28 to 0.41 (P < 0.0001), 6-minute walk test from 314 to 494 m (P < 0.0001), and the proportion of NYHA Class III-IV patients decreased from 75% to 23% (P < 0.0001). A significant improvement in cardiac function and increase in exercise capacity were observed over time regardless of the LV stimulation sites, either considered singly or grouped as lateral versus septal sites.