Seasonal tourism's impact on wastewater composition: Evaluating the potential of alternating activated adsorption in primary treatment.

Primary treatment processes have gained attention in recent research and development due to their potential for redirecting carbon towards anaerobic digestion, which can subsequently be used for the production of biomethane. The alternating activated adsorption (AAA) process is implemented on full-scale at several wastewater treatment plants across Europe. However, there is a lack of full-scale studies of advanced carbon capture technology implementations in literature. This study demonstrates the ability of a full-scale AAA process to remove and redirect carbon in a region heavily influenced by tourism. Periods in high and off-season were compared to study the impact of tourism on the composition of the wastewater and the AAA-process. The wastewater characteristics of the high season differed significantly from the low season. During the high season, the PE increased by 37 %, total suspended solids went up by 75 % and chemical oxygen demand increased by 58 %, compared to the low season. Additionally, 80 % of the low volatile lipophilic substances (LVLS) measured were attributed to the impact of tourism. A mass-balance of primary treatment for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and LVLS was conducted for both trial periods. The primary treatment was able to eliminate 56 % of the COD and 62 % of the LVLS in the non-tourist season and 53 % of the COD and 54 % of the LVLS in the tourist season. The increased wastewater load was effectively managed in the AAA-process. Key process parameters like sludge settling characteristics, hydraulic retention time and total suspended solids removal rates remained stable during the high season in winter.

Dissolved organic material changes during combined treatment of a mixture of landfill leachate and anaerobic digestate using deammonification and chemical coagulation.

The current study investigates the combined treatment of wastewater of anaerobic digestate and landfill leachate, using deammonification and coagulation/flocculation processes. The deammonification section studies the performance of a full-scale deammonification plant in nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, monitored over 2 years. For further COD reduction from the deammonification effluent (DE) to meet the environmental regulatory standards, coagulation/flocculation using three different Al-based coagulants was used to treat the DE. Results revealed that the deammonification plant showed 80% average ammonium removal from the mixed feed over the study period. Additionally, 30% of the feed COD was removed in the deammonification plant. COD analysis after treatment using coagulants revealed that the polyaluminum chloride modified with Fe had the best performance in reducing COD to meet the environmental standards. Excitation-emission matrix-parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) of the dissolved organic material (DOM) samples indicated that fluorescents were the compounds mostly affected by the coagulant types. DOM analysis using 2D correlation Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the applied coagulants showed minor differences in removing different functional groups, despite having different COD reduction performance. Wastewater elemental analysis indicated elevated metal concentrations in low pH conditions (<6) due to re-stabilization of the flocs using coagulants.

Assessing the performance of a waste management system towards a circular economy in the Global South: The case of Marrakech (Morocco).

Waste management is essential for the safety and wellbeing of any society; it also helps to tackle global problems, such as climate change and resource scarcity. To support the evolution of waste management systems (WMSs) towards a circular economy (CE), assessment methods are applied. This paper shows, using the case of Marrakech (Morocco), how a novel holistic approach called WMS development stage concept (WMS-DSC) is applied to assess WMSs and determine measures promoting a CE. The approach enables a simplified derivation of measures that are useful to municipal decision makers and consists of five stages; stage 1 is equal to a WMS lacking essential WM elements and stage 5 describes a functioning CE. The approach was specifically designed to be transferable to other Global South cities through the categorization into these universal stages. The results from the WMS-DSC show that components related to energy recovery and waste recycling are classified in stage 1. For the latter, a slight development towards stage 2 can be assumed due to the planned activities in Marrakech. The components "collection and transport" and "prevention and reuse" are mainly in stage 2. Nevertheless, the components "governance", "sector and market" and "waste disposal" are assigned to stages 2 and 3 with a stronger trend towards stage 4. The results show that in Marrakech and Morocco, CE is still in its infancy, and with this current state, it is hard to achieve. However, 33 measures were determined to improve the WMS of Marrakech and promote a CE.

Decentralised system for demand-oriented collection of food waste - Assessment of biomethane potential, pathogen development and microbial community structure.

Enormous amounts of food waste (FW) are produced worldwide, requiring efficient disposal strategies, both economically and ecologically. Anaerobic digestion to produce biomethane is among the most promising strategies, but requires proper solutions for storage and delivery of the waste material. Here, a decentralized system for demand-oriented FW storage and its practical usability was assessed. FW was stored under batch and fed-batch strategies at 5 °C, 20 °C and 30 °C for 28 days. The results showed that FW can be stored without cooling since bacterially produced lactic acid rapidly stabilized the material and inactivated pathogens. While FW storage worked well under all storage conditions and strategies, 16S analysis revealed a distinct microbiota, which was highly characteristic for each storage temperature. Moreover, FW storage had no negative impact on methane yield and stored FW contained readily degradable substances for demand-oriented biogas production.

Residual municipal solid waste as co-substrate at wastewater treatment plants: An assessment of methane yield, dewatering potential and microbial diversity.

Separately collected organic fraction of municipal solid waste, also known as biowaste, is typically used to fill the available capacity of digesters at wastewater treatment plants. However, this approach might impair the use of the ensuing digestate for fertilizer production due to the presence of sewage sludge, a contaminated substrate. Worldwide, unsorted municipal solid household waste, i.e. residual waste, is still typically disposed of in landfills or incinerated, despite its high content of biodegradables and recyclables. Once efficiently separated from residual waste by mechanical processes, the biodegradables might be appropriate to substitute biowaste at wastewater treatment plants. Thus, the biowaste would be available for fertilizer production and contribute to a reduction in the demand on non-renewable fertilizers. This study aimed at determining the technical feasibility of co-digesting the mechanically separated organic fraction of residual waste with sewage sludge. Further, key parameters for the implementation of co-digestion at wastewater treatment plants were determined, namely, degradation of the solids and organics, specific methane production, flocculant demand, and dewatered sludge production. The microbial community and diversity in both mono- and co-digestion was also investigated. Semi-continuous laboratory scale experiments showed that the co-substrate derived from the residual waste provided a stable anaerobic co-digestion process, producing 206 to 245 L of methane per kg of volatiles solids added to the digester. The dewaterability of the digestate increased by 4.8 percentage points when the co-substrate was added; however, there was also an increase in the flocculant demand. The specific dewatered sludge production was 955 kg per ton of total solids of co-substrate added to the digester. Amplicon sequencing analysis provided a detailed insight into the microbial communities, which were primarily affected by the addition of co-substrate. The microbiota was fully functional and no inhibition or problems in the anaerobic digestion process were observed after co-substrate addition.

The economic efficiency of the co-digestion at WWTPs: A full-scale study.

The methane and digestate production from biowaste (BW, 95% food waste and 5% garden waste based on fresh mass) and grease trap sludge (GTS) co-digestion at the Grossache-Nord WWTP (Austria) as a basis for a cost-benefit analysis was determined using two approaches: The first one was to determine the specific methane yields (SMY) and total solids (TS) removals (%) of the used substrates in biomethane potential (BMP) tests. In the second, the full-scale process data from a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system were analyzed. From these data, the SMY of the sewage sludge (SS) was calculated for a period without co-digestion and applied to the study period. Thus, it was possible to calculate the methane and digestate production from the co-substrates. Both approaches produced different co-substrate SMYs and TS degradation results. In the approach using the BMP, the SMY was 518 m3/t TSadded and the TS degradation was 77%. For the full-scale method, these values were found to be 620 m3/t TSadded and 66%, respectively. However, the cost-benefit analysis of both approaches indicated that electricity generation from co-digestion can cover the associated costs. The benefit to cost ratio was 1.14 and 1.08 for the BMP and full-scale approach, respectively. The application of the respective approach depends on the availability and quality of full-scale process SCADA data.

Determination of the dewatered digestate amounts and methane yields from the co-digestion of biowaste as a basis for a cost-benefit analysis.

Co-digestion is the simultaneous digestion of two or more substrates and a common practice at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The amounts of methane and digested sludge produced are key parameters for evaluating the economic efficiency of co-digestion. However, the share of dewatered digestate produced from co-substrates is not known. Synergistic effects in co-digestion, i.e. a better biodegradability compared to the mono-digestion of each substrate, might reduce the amounts of digested sludge and increase methane yields. However, these effects might also influence the calculation of methane and digestate quantities from co-substrates. The main objective of this work was to provide a basis for the cost-benefit analysis of biowaste (BW) co-digestion at WWTPs for this data. Therefore, continuous and batch experiments with sewage sludge (SS) and BW co-digestion were conducted and evaluated for methane and digestate production, and possible synergistic effects. BW co-digestion led to an additional production of 0.35 t total solids (TS) of dewatered sludge per ton TSadded in continuous and 0.23 t TS of dewatered sludge per ton of TSadded in batch experiments. The methane yield from BW was 441 L/kg TSadded in continuous experiments and 482 L/kg TSadded batch test. No synergistic effects were observed in both batch and continuous co-digestion experiments. Batch tests were found to be suitable for a rough estimation of the co-digestion economic efficiency key parameters. Continuous experiments are recommended to obtain more robust data. A cost-benefit analysis found that electricity production from co-digestion can generate savings of 88-170 €/t TSadded compared to grid purchase.

[Reduction of the waste produced by convenience food consumption-Opportunities and challenges of deposit return based re-use containers]. / Verringerung des Abfallaufkommens im Convenience-Food-Bereich ­ Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen pfandbasierter Mehrwegbehälter.

The market for convenience food and services, like food-delivery, takeaway, and pre-prepared meals is steadily growing. Many of these products are offered in single use packaging. Consequently, the waste produced by convenience food consumption is also growing. Information from literature and available data from companies provide are used to provide an overview of this waste. Even though plastics contribute a significant part to this waste, it is just a part of it. Additionally, the substitutes used instead of plastics nowadays are mostly designed for single-use application. In terms of resource sustainability, the avoidance of waste production should be imperative. With this respect re-use containers gain a growing interest and are discussed as a good future option for some convenience food sectors. Examples reveal that the annual waste production linked to takeaway food could be reduced by over 90% by implementation of re-use containers. Furthermore, they also reduce the cost of waste management, and create new job opportunities.However, besides opportunities there are challenges. The theoretical waste reduction potential is high, the one gained in practice, however, is rather low. This is due to customers and sales stuff alike. Furthermore, the infrastructure required for such systems to work smoothly is not available everywhere. Especially space for cleaning, drying and storage of the re-use containers is sparse, depending on the type of facility.Finally, questions concerning the material used for re-use containers remain unanswered yet. Especially the growing concerns about Plastic Micro- and Nanobeads remain to be a black box.

Mechanical separation of impurities in biowaste: Comparison of four different pretreatment systems.

Impurities in biowaste, such as plastics, glass, metals and inert material, negatively impact the operation of anaerobic digestion plants and compost quality, and have to be removed prior to the anaerobic digestion process. Different mechanical pretreatments are available for this purpose. However, data on the removal efficiencies of pretreatment systems for different types of biowaste and for different kinds of impurities are still scarce. This study aims to determine the efficiencies for impurity removal of four biowaste pretreatment plants (BTPs) at real scale - (1) drum-screen + shredder + piston press; (2) shredder + piston press + screw press; (3) separation-mill; and (4) pulper + drum-screen. BTP 1 treats mixed food and garden wastes, while BTP 2, 3 and 4 treat mostly food waste. The efficiency of the pretreatment systems was influenced by the type of pretreated biowaste. The recovery of organics by the press was more efficient when pretreating food waste (BTP 2, 93%) than for treating mixed food and garden wastes (BTP 1, 77%). BTP 3 presented the highest recovery of biogas (up to 98%), but also the highest transfer of inert particles to the substrate. On the contrary, BTP 4 was the most efficient for the removal of inert particles; however, this system also presented 18% loss of biogas potential.

Comparison of two mechanical pre-treatment systems for impurities reduction of source-separated biowaste.

The treatment of source-separated biowaste is still a challenge due to its high proportion of impurities. Biowaste bins are intended exclusively for the collection of biodegradable matter, such as food, kitchen and garden waste. However, plastics, metals, glass and textiles are also found in biowaste bins. If not properly removed, these impurities cause problems to the treatment facility and depreciate the quality of the final product, when the biowaste is converted to compost. There is ongoing discussion whether the existing treatment systems are able to remove impurities, especially plastics, from biowaste thoroughly enough to ensure that the produced compost complies with state regulations. In this work, two wet mechanical pre-treatment systems were tested for their efficiency to remove impurities. The first system consisted of a screw mill, a star screen, and a food unpacking machine (process I). The second system consisted of a shredder, followed by a piston press with 12 mm pore size (process II). Both processes produced a dry output, which contained the concentrated impurities, and a wet output, which could be used as substrate for anaerobic digestion. Results showed that, although 99% of the incoming plastics were efficiently removed in process I, the impurities concentration was still too high to meet the legal standards of plastics concentration in the final product, according to the German Federal Compost Quality Association (Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V.). The removal efficiency of glass particles was low for both processes: at least 80% of the incoming particles were transferred to the wet output.

Methods to estimate the transfer of contaminants into recycling products - A case study from Austria.

Recycling of waste materials is desirable to reduce the consumption of limited primary resources, but also includes the risk of recycling unwanted, hazardous substances. In Austria, the legal framework demands secondary products must not present a higher risk than comparable products derived from primary resources. However, the act provides no definition on how to assess this risk potential. This paper describes the development of different quantitative and qualitative methods to estimate the transfer of contaminants in recycling processes. The quantitative methods comprise the comparison of concentrations of harmful substances in recycling products to corresponding primary products and to existing limit values. The developed evaluation matrix, which considers further aspects, allows for the assessment of the qualitative risk potential. The results show that, depending on the assessed waste fraction, particular contaminants can be critical. Their concentrations were higher than in comparable primary materials and did not comply with existing limit values. On the other hand, the results show that a long-term, well-established quality control system can assure compliance with the limit values. The results of the qualitative assessment obtained with the evaluation matrix support the results of the quantitative assessment. Therefore, the evaluation matrix can be suitable to quickly screen waste streams used for recycling to estimate their potential environmental and health risks. To prevent the transfer of contaminants into product cycles, improved data of relevant substances in secondary resources are necessary. In addition, regulations for material recycling are required to assure adequate quality control measures, including limit values.

Hydrocyclones for the separation of impurities in pretreated biowaste.

The aim of the mechanical pretreatment in case of anaerobic digestion of biowaste is to produce a substrate without impurities. To facilitate a failure free operation of the anaerobic digestion process even small impurities like stones or sand should be separated. As a result of an insufficient pretreatment or impurities separation, plant malfunctions, increased equipment wear or pipe clogging are reported. Apart from grit chambers or pulper systems, a hydrocyclone is a cost-efficient and space-saving option to remove impurities. The aim of this work was to investigate the efficiency of hydrocyclones for the separation of impurities. Two hydrocyclones at two different plants were investigated regarding their capability to separate the small inert impurities from pretreated source separated biowaste. In plant A, the hydrocyclone is part of the digester system. In plant B, the hydrocyclone is part of the biowaste pretreatment line (after milling and sieving the biowaste) before digestion. Separation rates of inert impurities such as stones, glass and sand were determined as well as the composition of the concentrated solids separated by the hydrocyclone. Due to the heterogeneity of the biowaste the impurity separation rates showed variations, therefore the following mean results were obtained in average: the investigated hydrocyclones of plant B, part of the biowaste treatment, separated more than 80% of the inert impurities in the waste stream before anaerobic digestion. These impurities had a size range of 0.5-4mm. The hydrocyclone integrated in the digester system of plant A showed separation rates up to 80% only in the size range of 2-4mm.

Impurities in pretreated biowaste for co-digestion: A determination approach.

Although the mechanical treatment of source separated organic waste typically includes processing steps to remove impurities like plastic bags, smaller particles like glass, stones or sand are often not sufficiently removed. These particles lead to plant malfunctions, increased equipment abrasion and accumulation in the digester. It is possible to remove these small impurities before or during the fermentation process but this requires additional equipment at the waste treatment facilities. For pretreated biowaste with fairly low concentrations of impurities and small particle sizes no appropriate method was found in literature to determine these particles. Therefore various approaches to develop an appropriate method were tested and finally one method was selected. Sample mass calculation showed that for the determination of impurities >2mm a sample mass of about 6kg is required to receive statistically sound result. Firstly an elutriation step is used to concentrate the impurities in a sinking fraction, still containing some organic material. The elutriated material is then dried. After drying the elutriated material, impurities can be fairly easily sorted manually. The elutriation process is applicable for the determination of impurities >1mm. Due to the difficult manual sorting of particles <2mm and the reduced sample mass required for the determination of particles <2mm, these particles are determined by a different procedure: A sample mass of about 1kg is dried and combusted in a muffle furnace. The remaining ashes are sieved from 2 to 0.06mm. Particles <0.06mm were not considered as impurities. The data regarding the impurities content and particle size distribution in food- and biowaste are required for assessing separation options as well as the behavior of stones or sand in the digester. This allows describing the quality of the pretreated biowaste. Furthermore the need to adopt or improve the existing pretreatment can be identified and the impact to the fermentation process (impurities accumulated in the digester, etc.) can be evaluated.

Waste Separation Press (WSP): a mechanical pretreatment option for organic waste from source separation.

An efficient biological treatment of source separated organic waste from household kitchens and gardens (biowaste) requires an adequate upfront mechanical preparation which possibly includes a hand sorting for the separation of contaminants. In this work untreated biowaste from households and gardens and the screen overflow >60mm of the same waste were mechanically treated by a Waste Separation Press (WSP). The WSP separates the waste into a wet fraction for biological treatment and a fraction of dry contaminants for incineration. The results show that it is possible to replace a hand sorting of contaminants, the milling and a screening of organic waste before the biological treatment by using the WSP. A special focus was put on the contaminants separation. The separation of plastic film from the untreated biowaste was 67% and the separation rate of glass was about 92%. About 90% of the organics were transferred to the fraction for further biological treatment. When treating the screen overflow >60mm with the WSP 86% of the plastic film and 88% of the glass were transferred to the contaminants fraction. 32% of the organic was transferred to the contaminants fraction and thereby lost for a further biological treatment. Additionally it was calculated that national standards for glass contaminants in compost can be met when using the WSP to mechanically treat the total biowaste. The loss of biogas by transferring biodegradable organics to the contaminants fraction was about 11% when preparing the untreated biowaste with the WSP.

The greenhouse gas and energy balance of different treatment concepts for bio-waste.

The greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy performance of bio-waste treatment plants been investigated for three characteristic bio-waste treatment concepts: composting; biological drying for the production of biomass fuel fractions; and anaerobic digestion. Compared with other studies about the environmental impacts of bio-waste management, this study focused on the direct comparison of the latest process concepts and state-of-the-art emission control measures. To enable a comparison, the mass balance and products were modelled for all process concepts assuming the same bio-waste amounts and properties. In addition, the value of compost as a soil improver was included in the evaluation, using straw as a reference system. This aspect has rarely been accounted for in other studies. The study is based on data from operational facilities combined with literature data. The results show that all three concepts contribute to a reduction of GHG emissions and show a positive balance for cumulated energy demand. However, in contrast to other studies, the advantage of anaerobic digestion compared with composting is smaller as a result of accounting for the soil improving properties of compost. Still, anaerobic digestion is the environmentally superior solution. The results are intended to inform decision makers about the relevant aspects of bio-waste treatment regarding the environmental impacts of different bio-waste management strategies.