Diagnostic Accuracy of a Mobile AI-Based Symptom Checker and a Web-Based Self-Referral Tool in Rheumatology: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) is often delayed due to unspecific symptoms and a shortage of rheumatologists. Digital diagnostic decision support systems (DDSSs) have the potential to expedite diagnosis and help patients navigate the health care system more efficiently. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile artificial intelligence (AI)-based symptom checker (Ada) and a web-based self-referral tool (Rheport) regarding IRDs. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients newly presenting to 3 rheumatology centers. Participants were randomly assigned to complete a symptom assessment using either Ada or Rheport. The primary outcome was the correct identification of IRDs by the DDSSs, defined as the presence of any IRD in the list of suggested diagnoses by Ada or achieving a prespecified threshold score with Rheport. The gold standard was the diagnosis made by rheumatologists. RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included, among whom 214 (35.7%) were diagnosed with an IRD. Most frequent IRD was rheumatoid arthritis with 69 (11.5%) patients. Rheport's disease suggestion and Ada's top 1 (D1) and top 5 (D5) disease suggestions demonstrated overall diagnostic accuracies of 52%, 63%, and 58%, respectively, for IRDs. Rheport showed a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 47% for IRDs. Ada's D1 and D5 disease suggestions showed a sensitivity of 52% and 66%, respectively, and a specificity of 68% and 54%, respectively, concerning IRDs. Ada's diagnostic accuracy regarding individual diagnoses was heterogenous, and Ada performed considerably better in identifying rheumatoid arthritis in comparison to other diagnoses (D1: 42%; D5: 64%). The Cohen κ statistic of Rheport for agreement on any rheumatic disease diagnosis with Ada D1 was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08-0.18) and with Ada D5 was 0.08 (95% CI 0.00-0.16), indicating poor agreement for the presence of any rheumatic disease between the 2 DDSSs. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest comparative DDSS trial with actual use of DDSSs by patients. The diagnostic accuracies of both DDSSs for IRDs were not promising in this high-prevalence patient population. DDSSs may lead to a misuse of scarce health care resources. Our results underscore the need for stringent regulation and drastic improvements to ensure the safety and efficacy of DDSSs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Trials DRKS00017642; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017642.

[CAR T-cell therapy in rheumatology-What we know so far?] / CAR-T-Zell-Therapie in der Rheumatologie ­ Was wissen wir bisher?

Autoreactive B­cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, such systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An efficient depletion of B­cells therefore plays a special role in autoimmune diseases, especially in cases with a severe course of the disease. Treatment with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T­cells, which was originally developed for the treatment of B­cell lymphomas and leukemias, provides the possibility to deplete B­cells even in deep tissues. The initial results from case series with this procedure for SLE, myositis and systemic sclerosis were very positive. This review article gives an overview of the course, mechanism of action, results so far and the research agenda of CAR T­cell therapy in autoimmune diseases.

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab for the prevention of COVID-19 in vaccine-refractory patients with autoimmune diseases: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of passive immunization with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab/cilgavimab on humoral responses and on COVID-19 outcomes in vaccine-refractory patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) at high risk of severe COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed on a cohort of high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID patients treated with a single dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (150 mg/150 mg). COVID-19 outcomes as well as serum and salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG were assessed at baseline and for at least 6 months. Results were compared with an untreated high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID population. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) of COVID-19 compared with the general population were calculated for both groups. RESULTS: 38 high-risk IMID patients received tixagevimab/cilgavimab and were compared with 114 untreated high-risk IMID controls. Serum anti-Spike IgG increased to 6.6 OD (SD: ±0.8) at day one and remained positive up to month 6 (6.3 ± 1.4 OD). Salivary anti-Spike IgG peaked at month 2 (1.6 ± 1.1 OD)) and decreased from month 3 (0.8 ± 0.3 OD)). No severe or extended infection was observed in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group. Compared with the general population, the SIR of COVID-19 in treated patients was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.24-1.58) despite the increased risk profile. The SIR of the control group was 1.51 (1.07-2.02), corresponding to a significantly increased incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Passive immunization with tixagevimab/cilgavimab is safe and effective in inducing anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity and potentially in preventing COVID-19 in high-risk vaccine-refractory IMID patients. These data provide a proof of concept for the use of monoclonal antibodies as a preventative strategy against SARS-CoV-2 in vulnerable populations.

Non-invasive metabolic profiling of inflammation in joints and entheses by multispectral optoacoustic tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the metabolic characteristics of arthritis and enthesitis using multispectral opto-acoustic tomography (MSOT), a technology using near-infrared multispectral laser to stimulate tissues and detect the emitted acoustic energy, enabling non-invasive quantification of tissue components in vivo based on differential absorbance at multiple wavelengths. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in patients with RA or PsA and healthy controls (HCs). Participants underwent clinical, ultrasonographic and MSOT examination of MCP and wrist joints as well as the entheses of the common extensor tendon at the lateral humeral epicondyles and of the patellar, quadriceps and Achilles tendon. MSOT-measured haemoglobin (Hb), oxygen saturation, collagen and lipid levels were quantified and scaled mean differences between affected and unaffected joints and entheses were calculated as defined by clinical examination or ultrasonography using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: We obtained 1535 MSOT and 982 ultrasonography scans from 87 participants (34 PsA, 17 RA, 36 HCs). Entheseal tenderness was not associated with significant metabolic changes, whereas enthesitis-related sonographic changes were associated with increased total Hb, oxygen saturation and collagen content. In contrast, the presence of arthritis-related clinical and sonographic findings showed increased Hb levels, reduced oxygen saturation and reduced collagen content. Synovial hypertrophy was associated with increased lipid content in the joints. CONCLUSION: MSOT allows determination of distinct metabolic differences between arthritis and enthesitis in a non-invasive setting in humans in vivo.

Diagnostic delay stages and pre-diagnostic treatment in patients with suspected rheumatic diseases before special care consultation: results of a multicenter-based study.

Early and effective discrimination (triage) of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) and other diseases (non-IRD) is essential for successful treatment and preventing damage. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic delays and pre-diagnosis treatment in patients newly presenting to rheumatology outpatient clinics. A total of 600 patients newly presenting to one university hospital and two non-academic centers were included. Time from onset of symptoms to rheumatology consultation "total delay" as well as medical treatment before consultation were recorded. Median time from symptom onset to rheumatologist appointment (total delay) was 30 weeks. Median time to online search, first physician appointment request and first physician appointment was 2, 4 and 5 weeks, respectively. Total delay was significantly shorter for IRD patients compared to non-IRD patients, 26 vs 35 weeks (p = 0.007). Only 17.7% of all patients and 22.9% of IRD patients had a delay of less than 12 weeks. Total delay was significantly lower in patients seen in non-academic centers compared to the university center, 20 vs 50 weeks (p < 0.0001). 32.2% of IRD patients received medical treatment that eased their symptoms prior to the rheumatology appointment. These findings highlight the persistent diagnostic delays in rheumatology; however, they also suggest that current triage strategies effectively lead to earlier appointments for IRD patients. Improvement of triage methods and pre-diagnosis treatment could decrease overall burden of disease in IRD patients.

Efficacy and drug persistence of baricitinib monotherapy is similar to combination therapy in patients with active RA: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib (BARI) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after failure of conventional synthetic and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cs/bDMARDs) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or as monotherapy. However, real-world data are scarce regarding efficacy and drug persistence for BARI monotherapy (BARI-mono) versus its combination with MTX (BARI-combo). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and drug persistence of BARImono compared with BARI-combo in routine clinical practice METHODS: Patients with RA who were switched to BARI were included in a prospective, monocentric cohort. Demographics, clinical outcomes, adverse events and medication were prospectively recorded every 3 months. Clinical efficacy was measured by DAS-28 ESR while drug persistence was measured as the time on drug. We estimated least-square mean DAS-28 scores over time using linear mixed effects models including time-group interactions. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate BARI survival and probability of remission over time. RESULTS: 139 patients (98 women; aged 58.4 (12.8) years; mean disease duration of 9.7 years) were included between 2017 and 2021. 46 patients received BARI-combo, 93 patients received BARI-mono. Mean DAS-28 ESR were not significantly but only numerically different between both groups at baseline and multiple timepoints over follow-up. DAS-28 ESR remission was attained at least once upto 48 weeks in 62% and 51% patients in BARI-combo versus BARI-mono group (log-rank p=0.64). Drug persistence was high (69 vs 67% at 48 weeks and 62% vs 56% at 96 weeks) and similar in BARI-combo-treated and BARI-mono-treated patients. b/ts DMARD naïve patients had lower mean DAS-28 scores over the follow-up and attained DAS-28 ESR remission earlier than patients with inadequate response to b/ts DMARDs (p=0.11). BARI was discontinued in 11/139 patients (7.9%) due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: In routine practice, BARI is effective as monotherapy in case of MTX intolerance with overall high drug persistence rates. No new safety signals were observed.

Intensity and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Concerns have been raised about the reduced immunogenicity of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and the higher risk of breakthrough infections. The objective of our study was to investigate the intensity and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, and to assess the effects of diagnosis, treatment, and adapted vaccination schedules. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was measured over time in a large prospective cohort of healthy controls and participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (attending or admitted to affiliated centres) between Dec 15, 2020, and Dec 1, 2021. Cohort participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and control participants with no diagnosis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, were eligible for this analysis. Demographic data and disease-specific data were collected using a questionnaire. Humoral response was compared across treatment and disease groups, and with respect to the receipt of additional vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 antibody response was measured by ELISA using optical density ratio units and modelled over time with age and sex adjustment using mixed-effects models. Using these models, marginal mean antibody titres and marginal risks of a poor response (optical density ratio <1·1) were calculated for each week starting from week 8 after the first vaccination to week 40. Findings: Among 5076 individuals registered, 2535 participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (mean age 55·0 [15·2] years; 1494 [58·9%] women and 1041 [41·1%] men) and 1198 healthy controls (mean age 40·7 [13·5] years; 554 [46·2%] women and 644 [53·8%] men) were included in this analysis. Mean antibody titres were higher in healthy controls compared with people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases at all timepoints, with a peak antibody response in healthy controls (mean optical density ratio 12·48; 95% CI 11·50-13·53) of more than twice that in participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (5·50; 5·23-5·77; mean difference 6·98; 5·92-8·04). A poor response to vaccination was observed in participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were taking B-cell inhibitors (peak mean difference from healthy controls 11·68; 10·07-13·29) and T-cell inhibitors (peakmean difference from healthy controls 10·43; 8·33-12·53). Mean differences in antibody responses between different immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were small. Participants with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were given a third vaccine dose had higher mean antibody titres than did healthy controls vaccinated with two vaccine doses at 40 weeks after the initial vaccination (mean difference 1·34; 0·01-2·69). Interpretation: People with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases show a lower and less durable SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response and are at risk of losing humoral immune protection. Adjusted vaccination schedules with earlier booster doses or more frequent re-doses, or both, could better protect people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, European Research Council, Innovative Medicine Initiative, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Else Kröner-Memorial Foundation.

Efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 revaccination in non-responders with immune-mediated inflammatory disease.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMIDs), who did not respond to two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, develop protective immunity, if a third vaccine dose is administered. METHODS: Patients with IMID who failed to seroconvert after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were subjected to a third vaccination with either mRNA or vector-based vaccines. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, neutralising activity and T cell responses were assessed at baseline and 3 weeks after revaccination and also evaluated seprarately in rituximab (RTX) and non-RTX exposed patients. RESULTS: 66 non-responders were recruited, 33 treated with RTX, and 33 non-exposed to RTX. Overall, 49.2% patients seroconverted and 50.0% developed neutralising antibody activity. Seroconversion (78.8% vs 18.2%) and neutralising activity (80.0% vs 21.9%) was higher in non-RTX than RTX-treated patients with IMID, respectively. Humoral vaccination responses were not different among patients showing positive (59.3%) or negative (49.7%) T cell responses at baseline. Patients remaining on mRNA-based vaccines showed similar vaccination responses compared with those switching to vector-based vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data strongly argue in favor of a third vaccination in patients with IMID lacking response to standard vaccination irrespective of their B cell status.

Impact of Cytokine Inhibitor Therapy on the Prevalence, Seroconversion Rate, and Longevity of the Humoral Immune Response Against SARS-CoV-2 in an Unvaccinated Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment on the prevalence, seroconversion rate, and longevity of the humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). METHODS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured in a prospective cohort of health care professional controls and non-health care controls and IMID patients receiving no treatment or receiving treatment with conventional or biologic DMARDs during the first and second COVID-19 waves. Regression models adjusting for age, sex, sampling time, and exposure risk behavior were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) of seropositivity. Seroconversion rates were assessed in participants with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibody response longevity was evaluated by reassessing participants who tested positive during the first wave. RESULTS: In this study, 4,508 participants (2,869 IMID patients and 1,639 controls) were analyzed. The unadjusted RR (0.44 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.31-0.62]) and adjusted RR (0.50 [95% CI 0.34-0.73]) for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were significantly lower in IMID patients treated with bDMARDs compared to non-health care controls (P < 0.001), primarily driven by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors, and IL-23 inhibitors. Adjusted RRs for untreated IMID patients (1.12 [95% CI 0.75-1.67]) and IMID patients receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs (0.70 [95% CI 0.45-1.08]) were not significantly different from non-health care controls. Lack of seroconversion in PCR-positive participants was more common among bDMARD-treated patients (38.7%) than in non-health care controls (16%). Overall, 44% of positive participants lost SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by follow-up, with higher rates in IMID patients treated with bDMARDs (RR 2.86 [95% CI 1.43-5.74]). CONCLUSION: IMID patients treated with bDMARDs have a lower prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, seroconvert less frequently after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and may exhibit a reduced longevity of their humoral immune response.

Accuracy, patient-perceived usability, and acceptance of two symptom checkers (Ada and Rheport) in rheumatology: interim results from a randomized controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis and treatment are essential in the effective management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Symptom checkers (SCs) promise to accelerate diagnosis, reduce misdiagnoses, and guide patients more effectively through the health care system. Although SCs are increasingly used, there exists little supporting evidence. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy, patient-perceived usability, and acceptance of two SCs: (1) Ada and (2) Rheport. METHODS: Patients newly presenting to a German secondary rheumatology outpatient clinic were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to complete Ada or Rheport and consecutively the respective other SCs in a prospective non-blinded controlled randomized crossover trial. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the SCs regarding the diagnosis of an IRD compared to the physicians' diagnosis as the gold standard. The secondary outcomes were patient-perceived usability, acceptance, and time to complete the SC. RESULTS: In this interim analysis, the first 164 patients who completed the study were analyzed. 32.9% (54/164) of the study subjects were diagnosed with an IRD. Rheport showed a sensitivity of 53.7% and a specificity of 51.8% for IRDs. Ada's top 1 (D1) and top 5 disease suggestions (D5) showed a sensitivity of 42.6% and 53.7% and a specificity of 63.6% and 54.5% concerning IRDs, respectively. The correct diagnosis of the IRD patients was within the Ada D1 and D5 suggestions in 16.7% (9/54) and 25.9% (14/54), respectively. The median System Usability Scale (SUS) score of Ada and Rheport was 75.0/100 and 77.5/100, respectively. The median completion time for both Ada and Rheport was 7.0 and 8.5 min, respectively. Sixty-four percent and 67.1% would recommend using Ada and Rheport to friends and other patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While SCs are well accepted among patients, their diagnostic accuracy is limited to date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS.de, DRKS00017642 . Registered on 23 July 2019.

Increased expression of olfactomedin-1 and myocilin in podocytes during puromycin aminonucleoside nephrosis.

BACKGROUND: The olfactomedin domain proteins Olfm-1 and myocilin are expressed in podocytes. Myocilin stimulates the formation of focal contacts and actin stress fibres in podocytes and other cell types, effects that are mediated through the Wnt signalling pathway. Here, we tested if the expression of both proteins is modified during puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN) nephrosis, which leads to structural changes in the actin cytoskeleton of podocytes. METHODS: Rats were treated with PAN, and the effectiveness of treatment was analysed by electron microscopy of podocytes and protein detection in the urine. The expression of Olfm-1 and myocilin was studied by immunohistochemistry, western blot analysis of glomerular proteins and real-time RT-PCR of glomerular proteins. In parallel experiments, the expression of Olfm-1 was studied in cultured podocytes treated with dexamethasone, TGF-ß, TNF-α and PAN. RESULTS: Between Days 5 and 22 after treatment, the amounts of the BMZ and BMY splice variants of Olfm-1 and their mRNA were markedly elevated in proteins and mRNA from isolated glomeruli. Immunohistochemistry showed that the expression of Olfm-1 was confined to podocytes. Essentially, comparable results were obtained for myocilin. The BMZ variant of Olfm-1 appeared to be secreted from podocytes and was found in high amounts in urine of treated animals. Treatment of cultured podocytes with dexamethasone and PAN caused an increase in Olfm-1 expression, while treatment with recombinant Olfm-1 increased the formation of actin stress fibres. CONCLUSIONS: Olfm-1 and myocilin are markedly induced in podocytes during PAN nephrosis and appear to be involved in the processes that govern the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton during podocyte repair.

Factor inhibiting HIF limits the expression of hypoxia-inducible genes in podocytes and distal tubular cells.

The two hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) are transcription factors that regulate the response to hypoxia. Recently, the factor inhibiting HIF (FIH1) was identified as a molecular oxygen-dependent dioxygenase that blunts the transcriptional activity of HIF and has also been implicated in HIF-dependent and -independent hypoxia responses. Interestingly, HIF accumulation in the kidney has been shown to confer renal protection and to also cause glomerular injury or enhance renal fibrosis. In order to better understand the regulation of hypoxia-inducible genes, we determined the expression of FIH1 in the kidney and its functional role in isolated renal cells. FIH1 was expressed only in distal tubules and in podocytes, thus showing a very distinct expression pattern, partially overlapping with sites of HIF-1α expression. In tubular cells, RNA silencing of FIH1 caused transcriptional activation of HIF target genes during hypoxia. In contrast, FIH1 silencing in podocytes enhanced transcription of hypoxia-inducible genes in an HIF-independent manner. Using the anti-Thy.1 rat model of glomerulonephritis, we found a gradual decrease of glomerular FIH1 expression during disease progression paralleled by an increase in hypoxia-inducible genes including CXCR4, a mediator of glomerular inflammation. Thus, FIH1 appears to be a suppressor of oxygen-dependent genes in the kidney, operating through HIF-dependent and -independent mechanisms.