Viz.ai Implementation of Stroke Augmented Intelligence and Communications Platform to Improve Indicators and Outcomes for a Comprehensive Stroke Center and Network.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Comprehensive stroke centers continually strive to narrow neurointerventional time metrics. Although process improvements have been put in place to streamline workflows, complex pathways, disparate imaging locations, and fragmented communications all highlight the need for continued improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Quality Improvement Initiative (VISIION) was implemented to assess our transition to the Viz.ai platform for immediate image review and centralized communication and their effect on key performance indicators in our comprehensive stroke center. We compared periods before and following deployment. Sequential patients having undergone stroke thrombectomy were included. Both direct arriving large-vessel occlusion and Brain Emergency Management Initiative telemedicine transfer large-vessel occlusion cases were assessed as were subgroups of OnHours and OffHours. Text messaging thread counts were compared between time periods to assess communications. Mann-Whitney U and Student t tests were used. RESULTS: Eighty-two neurointerventional cases were analyzed pre vs. post time periods: (DALVO-OnHours 7 versus 7, DALVO-OffHours 10 versus 5, BEMI-OnHours 13 versus 6, BEMI-OffHours 17 versus 17). DALVO-OffHours had a 39% door-to-groin reduction (157 versus 95 minutes, P = .009). DALVO-All showed a 32% reduction (127 versus 86 minutes, P = .006). BEMI-All improved 33% (42 versus 28 minutes, P = .036). Text messaging thread counts improved 30% (39 versus 27, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: There was an immediate improvement following Viz.ai implementation for both direct arriving and telemedicine transfer thrombectomy cases. In the greatest opportunity subset (direct arriving large-vessel occlusion-OffHours: direct arriving cases requiring team mobilization off-hours), we noted a 39% improvement. With Viz.ai, we noted that immediate access to images and streamlined communications improved door-to-groin time metrics for thrombectomy. These results have implications for future care processes and can be a model for centers striving to optimize workflow and improve thrombectomy timeliness.

Comparison of CBF Measured with Combined Velocity-Selective Arterial Spin-Labeling and Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling to Blood Flow Patterns Assessed by Conventional Angiography in Pediatric Moyamoya.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Imaging CBF is important for managing pediatric moyamoya. Traditional arterial spin-labeling MR imaging detects delayed transit thorough diseased arteries but is inaccurate for measuring perfusion because of these delays. Velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling is insensitive to transit delay and well-suited for imaging Moyamoya perfusion. This study assesses the accuracy of a combined velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling and traditional pulsed arterial spin-labeling CBF approach in pediatric moyamoya, with comparison to blood flow patterns on conventional angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two neurologically stable pediatric patients with moyamoya and 5 asymptomatic siblings without frank moyamoya were imaged with velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling, pulsed arterial spin-labeling, and DSA (patients). Qualitative comparison was performed, followed by a systematic comparison using ASPECTS-based scoring. Quantitative pulsed arterial spin-labeling CBF and velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling CBF for the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery territories were also compared. RESULTS: Qualitatively, velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling perfusion maps reflect the DSA parenchymal phase, regardless of postinjection timing. Conversely, pulsed arterial spin-labeling maps reflect the DSA appearance at postinjection times closer to the arterial spin-labeling postlabeling delay, regardless of vascular phase. ASPECTS comparison showed excellent agreement (88%, κ = 0.77, P < .001) between arterial spin-labeling and DSA, suggesting velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling and pulsed arterial spin-labeling capture key perfusion and transit delay information, respectively. CBF coefficient of variation, a marker of perfusion variability, was similar for velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling in patient regions of delayed-but-preserved perfusion compared to healthy asymptomatic sibling regions (coefficient of variation = 0.30 versus 0.26, respectively, Δcoefficient of variation = 0.04), but it was significantly different for pulsed arterial spin-labeling (coefficient of variation = 0.64 versus 0.34, Δcoefficient of variation = 0.30, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling offers a powerful approach to image perfusion in pediatric moyamoya due to transit delay insensitivity. Coupled with pulsed arterial spin-labeling for transit delay information, a volumetric MR imaging approach capturing key DSA information is introduced.

Imaging brain oxygenation with MRI using blood oxygenation approaches: methods, validation, and clinical applications.

SUMMARY: In many pathophysiologic situations, including brain neoplasms, neurodegenerative disease, and chronic and acute ischemia, an imbalance exists between oxygen tissue consumption and delivery. Furthermore, oxygenation changes following a stress challenge, such as with carbogen gas or acetazolamide, can yield information about cerebrovascular reactivity. The unique sensitivity of the BOLD effect to the presence of deoxyhemoglobin has led to its widespread use in the field of cognitive neurosciences. However, the high spatial and temporal resolution afforded by BOLD imaging does not need to be limited to the study of healthy brains. While the complex relationship between the MR imaging signal and tissue oxygenation hinders a direct approach, many different methods have been developed during the past decade to obtain specific oxygenation measurements. These include qBOLD, phase- and susceptibility-based imaging, and intravascular T2-based approaches. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the theoretic basis of these methods as well as their application to measure oxygenation in both healthy subjects and those with disease.

QUantitative Imaging of eXtraction of oxygen and TIssue consumption (QUIXOTIC) using venular-targeted velocity-selective spin labeling.

While oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)) are fundamental parameters of brain health and function, a robust MRI-based mapping of OEF and CMRO(2) amenable to functional MRI (fMRI) has not been established. To address this issue, a novel method called QUantitative Imaging of eXtraction of Oxygen and TIssue Consumption, or QUIXOTIC, is introduced. The key innovation in QUIXOTIC is the use of velocity-selective spin labeling to isolate MR signal exclusively from postcapillary venular blood on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Measuring the T(2) of this venular-targeted blood allows calibration to venular oxygen saturation (Y(v)) via theoretical and experimental T(2) versus blood oxygen saturation relationships. Y(v) is converted to OEF, and baseline CMRO(2) is subsequently estimated from OEF and additional cerebral blood flow and hematocrit measurements. Theory behind the QUIXOTIC technique is presented, and implications of cutoff velocity (V(CUTOFF)) and outflow time parameters are discussed. Cortical gray matter values obtained with QUIXOTIC in 10 healthy volunteers are Y(v) = 0.73 ± 0.02, OEF = 0.26 ± 0.02, and CMRO(2) = 125 ± 15 µmol/100 g min. Results are compared to global measures obtained with the T(2) relaxation under spin tagging (TRUST) technique. The preliminary data presented suggest that QUIXOTIC will be useful for mapping Y(v), OEF, and CMRO(2), in both clinical and functional MRI settings.

Quantification of regional pulmonary blood flow using ASL-FAIRER.

Pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques have been theoretically and experimentally validated for cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification. In this study ASL-FAIRER was used to measure regional pulmonary blood flow (rPBF) in seven healthy subjects. Two general ASL strategies were investigated: 1) a single-subtraction approach using one tag-control pair acquisition at an inversion time (TI) matched to the RR-interval, and 2) a multiple-subtraction approach using tag-control pairs acquired at various TIs. The mean rPBF averaged 1.70 +/- 0.38 ml/min/ml when measured with the multiple-subtraction approach, and was approximately 2% less when measured with the single-subtraction method (1.66 +/- 0.24 ml/min/ml). Assuming an average lung density of 0.33 g/ml, this translates into a regional perfusion of approximately 5.5 ml/g/min, which is comparable to other measures of pulmonary perfusion. As with other ASL applications, a key problem with quantitative interpretation of the results is the physical gap between the tagging region and imaged slice. Because of the high pulsatility of PBF, ASL acquisition and data analysis differ significantly between the lung and the brain. The advantages and drawbacks of the single- vs. multiple-subtraction approaches are considered within a theoretical framework tailored to PBF.