Incidence and outcomes of pediatric patients with dual diagnosis of traumatic spinal cord injury and brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are diagnoses commonly encountered on the pediatric rehabilitation unit. However, there is limited evidence in the literature addressing the incidence of or rehabilitation outcomes in pediatric patients with a dual diagnosis of TBI and SCI. OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence and functional outcomes of the dual diagnosis population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation unit within an academic pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients admitted to a single inpatient rehabilitation unit with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI between 2006 and 2019. Fifty-four patient records were identified and 26 met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Presence of concomitant TBI in patients with diagnosed SCI. RESULTS: Seven of 26 patients were given a dual diagnosis of TBI and SCI during their initial rehabilitation hospitalization. After review of charts, authors identified 12 additional patients with suspected dual diagnoses based on injury characteristics and symptoms. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes across diagnosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of dual diagnosis among pediatric patients with traumatic SCI was initially found to be 27%; the retrospective review indicated that TBI may be underdiagnosed in this patient population, and the dual diagnosis incidence may be as high as 73%. All patients had improved functional outcomes during their rehabilitation stays regardless of presence or absence of TBI.

Functional Impairment in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship.

Care for pediatric cancer survivors must include scheduled, thorough evaluations of potential chronic and late effects resulting from multidimensional cancer treatments. Assessment of functional independence with activities and participation is critical in assuring that survivors can optimally access their environments and pursue educational, occupational, and leisure activities appropriate to their interests and capabilities. Owing to their expertise in both rehabilitation and habilitation, pediatric physiatrists are of great benefit in the care of survivors of pediatric cancer.

Acute Flaccid Myelitis: A Multidisciplinary Protocol to Optimize Diagnosis and Evaluation.

Acute flaccid myelitis is an emerging neurologic disease, first described in 2014 and predominantly affecting young children. Acute flaccid myelitis cases tend to spike every 2 years, in the late summer to fall, and the next peak is expected in 2020. The diagnosis of acute flaccid myelitis is often delayed, leading to suboptimal evaluation, including incomplete laboratory assessment. Acute and chronic morbidity are high, and a standardized, multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and treatment is essential to optimizing outcomes. In a review of acute flaccid myelitis patients treated in 2018 at our institution, we noted considerable variability in days to presentation, evaluation, and treatment. In response, the authors developed a protocol for the evaluation and management of pediatric patients suspected of having acute flaccid myelitis. The protocol was developed using local experience/case review, expert consensus, and the relevant literature. The protocol spans the spectrum of care, from initial evaluation in a primary care or emergency setting, to acute hospital management and evaluation and long-term inpatient and rehabilitation settings. The purpose of this report is both to share the findings from our 2018 case review and to disseminate our acute flaccid myelitis protocol. Our hope is that publication of our protocol will both inform the development of a standardized approach to acute flaccid myelitis and to encourage other centers to form a multidisciplinary acute flaccid myelitis team to provide expert care throughout the disease process, from presentation to recovery.

Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Attention Problems in Children After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine biopsychosocial factors associated with an increased risk of attention problems after a traumatic brain injury in children. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using data sources of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL up to August 30, 2020. Literature primarily examined pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury and attention problems. Risk factors for attention problems posttraumatic brain injury examined in all articles were identified and grouped into broad categories of biological, psychological, and social factors. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from 2009 were used in completing this review. RESULTS: Forty articles met inclusion criteria for this study. Overall findings were mixed but suggested that younger age at injury, presence of preinjury attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, poorer preinjury adaptive functioning, lower socioeconomic status, and poorer family functioning were associated with increased risk of developing attention problems posttraumatic brain injury. CONCLUSIONS: Development of attention problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury is complex and influenced by an array of biologic, environmental/social, injury-related, and host factors. Evidence is mixed, and further study is needed to better understand the relationships between these factors and how they influence attention after traumatic brain injury. Nonetheless, screening for attention problems in children with risk factors may allow for earlier identification and intervention, minimizing negative impacts of attention problems after traumatic brain injury in children. Limitations of this study included heterogeneity of studies and overall low to moderate methodological quality of studies included as measured by the modified Downs and Black checklist. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Describe the importance of recognizing and identifying attention problems after traumatic brain injury in children; (2) Identify risk factors for development of attention problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury; and (3) Recognize gaps in existing literature regarding predictors of attention problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Electrophrenic pacing and decannulation for high-level spinal cord injury: a case series.

BACKGROUND: In 1997, guidelines were developed for the management of high-level ventilator-dependent patients with spinal cord injury who had little or no ventilator-free breathing ability (VFBA). This article describes the three categories of patients, the decannulation criteria, and the successful decannulation of four patients with no VFBA and electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing, using these criteria. METHOD: Case series. CONCLUSION: Lack of VFBA in patients with high-level spinal cord injury does not mandate tracheostomy or electrophrenic/diaphragm pacing.